<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>http://wiki.icar.org/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Cvangemert</id>
	<title>ICAR Wiki - User contributions [en]</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://wiki.icar.org/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Cvangemert"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://wiki.icar.org/index.php/Special:Contributions/Cvangemert"/>
	<updated>2026-04-18T20:45:24Z</updated>
	<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.41.1</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>http://wiki.icar.org/index.php?title=Section_20:_Sniffer_SOP&amp;diff=4988</id>
		<title>Section 20: Sniffer SOP</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://wiki.icar.org/index.php?title=Section_20:_Sniffer_SOP&amp;diff=4988"/>
		<updated>2026-03-20T09:53:14Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Cvangemert: /* Analox */ added new website for HerdLab system&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;big&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;b&amp;gt;NOTE: This version of Section 20 has been approved by the working group&#039;s Chair.  Please be aware that further revisions may occur before final review and approval by the Board and ICAR members per the [[Approval of Page Process]].&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/b&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Introduction ==&lt;br /&gt;
Accurate measurement of methane emissions in ruminants is crucial to develop robust national or international greenhouse gas emission inventories and to evaluate mitigation strategies for their reduction. Over years many instruments and techniques have been developed and used for research purposes. Between all instruments and techniques available, Sniffer method has assumed significance. Sniffer has been developed to measure and collect data about methane (CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) and carbon dioxide (CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) emissions in the breath of ruminants during milking and/or feeding. The feed bin might be in an automatic milking system (AMS) or in an automatic feeding system (AFS). Before considering all features, advantages and disadvantages of the system, it is important to remember that they have been originally designed to detect dangerous gas leaks. Breath-sampling methods are non-invasive because, once installed, animals are unaware of the equipment and animals are in their normal environment. Animals follow their normal routine, which includes milking and feeding, so no training of animals, handling or change in diet are required. Equipment is relatively cheap and running costs are negligible. In Sniffer method, gases are continuously sampled into a sampling tube installed in the feed bin or through. The other end of the sampling tube is connected to an infrared CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration analyser. Data are collected every 1-5 seconds by the Sniffer.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Equipment description ==&lt;br /&gt;
On the market several suppliers of this product are available, but all systems share the same basic structure consisting of: gas meter, pressure inlet, flow meter, pressure outlet and a tube to suction with filter. It is essential to have a filter at level of the suction tube to avoid clogging of the cylinder with dust, saliva or feed. In the tube between the cylinder and the gas meter, whose diameter is 2-4 mm, one or more filters can be inserted which ensure the removal of impurities and debris from the animal’s breath. For the correct functioning of the system and for the collection of good quality data, the aspiration pump must work with an aspiration volume of 0.5-1.5 L/s. In more complex systems and to deal with particular needs (e.g., high environmental humidity) a dryer tube can also be inserted. Generally, Sniffer systems are provided of at least two gas meters: one for the methane (CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) and one for carbon dioxide (CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;); further gas meters could be available, e.g., oxygen (O&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;), nitrous oxide (N&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;O) and water (H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;O). Gas cards used to estimate CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentrations have different ranges, depending on which sensor is used and how it is calibrated. Generally for CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; it is best to have a range between 0-25.000ppm, sensors with a range of 0-20.000ppm or 50.000ppm are also functional. For CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;  a range of 0-2.000ppm or 0-5.000 ppm is generally used. Internet connection is guaranteed through a 5G modem or through a Wi-Fi router. Internet connection allows data storage or download. Connections problems can occur; therefore, a hard disk can be provided to ensure data still collected when connection is lost. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is important to install the Sniffer sampling tube in a position that is not so visible to the animal to avoid frequent damages. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One unit, when installed in the automated milking system (AMS), can measure as many animals as the capacity of the AMS, generally up to 130 animals per day. Sniffers can also be installed in concentrate feeders. This is not often done as it does not give you simultaneous milking records and because concentrate feeders are generally more open than the AMS. Which means there is more influence on the measurements by for example the wind. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If there are power cuts, the system restarts automatically when power is restored. Some systems have a battery included to operate the system during a power cut.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Overview of commercially available sniffers ==&lt;br /&gt;
Currently there are different devices on the market that can be used as a sniffer. This section gives an overview of the different sniffers. &lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Agscent.png|thumb|157x157px|Agscent Air]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Agscent ===&lt;br /&gt;
Agscent is a company based in Australia, you can find their website [https://agscent.com/ here.] They have developed the Agscent Air, current model: GHG 2100. This device uses a TDL (Tunable Diode Laser) sensor for CH4 and a NDIR (Non-Dispersive InfraRed) sensor for CO2. With a measurement range of 0-20.000ppm for CO2 and 0-40.000ppm for CH4. The datasheet for this device can be downloaded [https://agscent.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Agscent-GHG-2100-tech-flyer.pdf here] and you can find the device on the website [https://agscent.com/products/agscent-air/#air-ghg here]. Currently this device is used in Australia and the USA. They have also developed the agscent x optiweigh, which combines the sniffer sensor with a weighting station for in the pasture. The datasheet for this device can be downloaded [https://agscent.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Agscent-Optiweigh-flyer.pdf here] and you can find the device on their website [https://agscent.com/products/agscent-air/#air-optiweigh here]. Currently these combined devices are being used in Australia. Validations for the combined and standalone devices were conducted by multiple institutions, you can find a summary [[:File:Agscent Air GHG Validation Case Study 2025.pdf|here.]] Preliminary results of one of these validation studies was presented at the State of the Science summit in 2025. You can find the poster [[:File:ADSA 2025 NS ed.pdf|here]] and the abstract [[:File:Abstracts BOOK 2025 20250624-1249.pdf|here]], number 1155. A preliminary paper on a follow-up study can be found [[:File:Reyes et al. - Enteric methane (paper).pdf|here.]] The report for one of the other validations can be found [[:File:Report Agscent 4-2024 external.pdf|here.]] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Agscent Air falls into the middle price range for a sniffer, for more information please contact Daniela Carnovale ([Mailto:daniela@agscent.com daniela@agscent.com])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
During the [[Section 20: Activities|Denmark-The Netherlands project]] the Axetris methane sensor will be tested, this is the same methane sensor that the Agscent Air uses. It has been installed in the original Carltech v1 casing. Testing in the Air Quality lab has been completed for these devices and these sensors functioned as well as the other sensors tested. On-farm testing is still in progress. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Analox ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:PXL 20250722 143934376.jpg|thumb|343x343px|HerdLab system, for all gasses.]]&lt;br /&gt;
Analox is a company based in the UK, you can find their website [https://analoxgroup.com/ here.] They have developed the [https://analoxgroup.com/product/herdlab/ HerdLab system]. This device can measure 6 different gasses. The measurement range for CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is dependent on which variant of the sensor you choose, generally it will be 0-2.000 ppm, they also offer 0-1.000 ppm and 0-5.000 ppm. For CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; the range is also dependent on the variant of sensor you choose, generally it will be 0-20.000 ppm, they also offer 0-2.000, 0-5.000 and 0-50.000. This device can also measure oxygen (O&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;), hydrogen (H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;), ammonia (NH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) and nitric oxide (NO), if needed. It uses a combination of NDIR, paramagnetic and electrochemical sensors to analyze the concentrations. The datasheet for this device can be found [[:File:Herd Lab Brochure - Final Version.pdf|here]]. A short introductory presentation [[:File:Measuring Methane Emissions Introduction.pdf|here]] with associated video to be found [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2O9cDKg94W0 here.] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This system is originally developed to measure up to 6 bays in a herringbone system, at the same time. Thereby, HerdLab can be applied to multiple AMS systems at the same time and multiple bays in a rotary system too. Due to this possibility price range is more dynamic than for other devices included in the list. When using one system for one AMS the HerdLab falls into the medium price range for a sniffer. Price will change when you want to measure more gasses or more animals, for measuring in multiple AMS systems (at the same farm) or multiple bays the increase in costs would be low, as you already have the system in place. For more information please contact Adrian Howe ([Mailto:adrian.howe@analoxgroup.com adrian.howe@analoxgroup.com]).[[File:Arcoflex.jpg|thumb|151x151px|ASCH001]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Arcoflex ===&lt;br /&gt;
Arcoflex is a company based in Australia, you can find their website [https://www.arcoflex.com.au/ here.] They have developed a sniffer device different from the others currently on the market, as it is a passive device it does not require tubes to suck up the air. The sensor is directly placed in a feed bin above where the mouth from the cow will be. This sniffer is currently being used in Australia and New Zealand. Currently the version ASCH401 is available commercially, this device can only measure methane. Version ASCH402 will also include a CO2 sensor, this version is still under development. They have submitted a paper for review on device. You can download an earlier version of this paper [[Media:Enteric Methane Monitoring in Dairies.pdf|here]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The ASCH401 and ACH402 both fall into the lower price range for a sniffer, for more information please contact Geoff Schaller ([Mailto:geoff@arcoflex.com.au geoff@arcoflex.com.au])&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Carltech V2.jpg|thumb|181x181px|Carltech v2]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Carltech ===&lt;br /&gt;
Carltech is a company based in The Netherlands, you can find their website [https://carltech.nl/ here.]They have developed a a new version of the WD_WUR sniffer, which will be tested in the SOP sniffer project. This device can measure CO2 in the range 0-50.000ppm and CH4 in the range of 0-2.000ppm, optionally a O2 sensor can be included. Currently the older models are being used in The Netherlands. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The WD_WUR falls into the lower price range for a sniffer, for more information please contact Koen Böggemann ([Mailto:koen@carltech.nl koen@carltech.nl])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== C-lock ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Simplescan.jpg|thumb|163x163px|SimpleScan]]&lt;br /&gt;
C-lock is a company based in The USA, you can find their website [https://www.c-lockinc.com/ here.]Their development is mostly focused on the [[Greenfeed SOP|Greenfeed]], but they have also developed a sniffer, the SimpleScan. This sniffer uses the exact same sensors as their GreenFeed, TDL for CH4 with a range of 0-40.000ppm and NDIR for CO2 with a range of 0-20.000ppm. According to C-Lock their CH4 sensor is precise to about 1 ppm. This device can be outfitted with optional O&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; sensors. C-lock uses their own filtering algorithms and knowledge on finalized data for the final results. The datasheet for the SimpleScan can be downloaded [[Media:SimpleScan FactSheet.pdf|here.]]   &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The simple scan falls into the higher price range for a sniffer, for more information please contact Robert Whittington ([Mailto:rwhittington@c-lockinc.com rwhittington@c-lockinc.com])  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This product has been discontinued by the manufacturer.  &lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Gasera.png|thumb|181x181px|Gasera one pulse]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Gasera ===&lt;br /&gt;
Gasera is a company based in Finland, you can find their website [https://gasera.fi/ here.] They have developed multiple gas analysers, of which the Gasera one pulse can be used to measure CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. This device can be used for many different application as it can measure up to 9 gasses and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;O. Their sensor is based on combining the cantilever enhanced photoacoustic detection technology with a broad band IR source and narrow bandpass optical filters. It measures CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; in the range 0,3 – 30.000ppm and measures CH4 in the range 1-100.000ppm. Both ranges can be configured to achieve the detection performance required. The datasheet for this device can be found [[Media:Gasera brochure OnePulse.pdf|here]] and you can find the device on the website [https://gasera.fi/product/gasera-one-pulse/ here.]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
They have also developed the Gasera one GHG, this device can measure CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, NO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;O, but no CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;.&#039;&#039;&#039; This device is based on combining the cantilever enhanced photoacoustic detection technology with quantum cascade laser source operating at a Mid-IR fundamental spectral absorption line of CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and N&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;O. This combination provides very high sensitivity (ppb level) to reliably measure ambient background levels of greenhouse gases methane (CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) and nitrous oxide (N&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;O). It has a recommended recalibration period of 12 months. You can download the datasheet for this device [[Media:GASERA ONE GHG.pdf|here]] and find more information on the website [https://gasera.fi/product/gasera-one-ghg-greenhouse-gas-analyzer/ here].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Gasera one pulse falls into the higher price range for a sniffer, for more information please contact gasera [https://gasera.fi/company/distribution/ here].&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Gasmet.png|thumb|149x149px|GT5000]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Gasmet ===&lt;br /&gt;
Gasmet is a company based in Finland, you can find their website [https://www.gasmet.com/ here]. They have developed multiple gas analyzers for many different applications, the GT5000 can measure up to 50 gasses. It can measure both CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; up to 100.000ppm, the range can be adjusted to what is needed. This device uses a FTIR (Fourier Transformed InfraRed) sensor. The benefit of this sensor is that it can easily detect other or unknown gasses which you were not aware of and you can then add them to your detection. You can download the datasheet for this device [[Media:Gasmet GT5000 Terra Technical Data.pdf|here]] and find more information on the website [https://www.gasmet.com/products/category/portable-gas-analyzers/gt5000-terra/ here.]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The GT 5000 falls into the higher price range for a sniffer, for more information please contact Jockum Törnqvist ([Mailto:jockum.tornqvist@gasmet.fi jockum.tornqvist@gasmet.fi])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Edinburgh Sensors ===&lt;br /&gt;
Edinburgh Sensors is a company based in the UK, you can find their website [https://edinburghsensors.com/ here.] They develop sensors that can be used for measuring CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; in the breath of ruminants. They produce the boxed gascard and the guardian NG. These sensors can be used to build your own sniffer, by combining the sensors with, amongst others, a datalogger and waterproof casing. The measurement range is dependent on which type of gascard for CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; you include in the build. Currently the completely assembled Guardian sniffers are being used in Finland, Denmark and Spain. [[File:Guardian NEIKER.jpg|200px|thumb|Guardian build in Spain at [https://neiker.eus/en/ NEIKER]]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are companies that can build the complete sniffer from these sensors. One of these companies is DuoTec, you can find their website [https://duotec.dk/ here.] Contact person for inquiries for this company would be: Rasmus Bendsen ([Mailto:raw@duotec.dk raw@duotec.dk])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another company that can build a sniffer from these sensors is Bramtech, they build the sniffers that are currently used by Aarhus University. They currently have no plans to expand further into this business.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
During the [[Section 20: Activities|Denmark-The Netherlands project]] the Edinburgh methane sensor will be tested. It has been installed in the original Carltech v1 casing. Testing in the Air Quality lab has been completed for these devices and these sensors functioned as well as the other sensors tested. On-farm testing is still in progress. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Most often the Guardians are assembled in house by the research groups themselves.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In general this device, once completed falls in the lower price range for sniffers. You can contact Edinburgh Sensors [https://edinburghsensors.com/contact/ here.]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:MooLogger.jpg|thumb|175x175px|MooLogger]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Tecnosens  ===&lt;br /&gt;
Tecnosens is a company based in Italy, you can find their website [https://www.tecnosens.it/en here.] They have developed the MooLooger, currently there are two versions available, the MooLooger standard and the MooLogger advanced. The MooLogger has a measurement range of 0-5.000ppm for CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and 0-50.000ppm for CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and uses a NDIR sensor. Optionally this device can measure O&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; in the range of 0-25.000ppm. Currently the MooLogger is being used, on small or large scale, in Italy, Spain, Canada, USA, Switzerland and Uruguay. You can download the datasheet for this device [[Media:MooLogger Plus Oct 2024.pdf|here]] and find more information on the MooLogger on the website [https://www.tecnosens.it/en/Tecnosens-products/moologger here.] They have multiple instruction video&#039;s available on their [https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLR1KvTMU2thuf-xpkTuHM6fs_WRVtwoz6 youtube channel.] For this device a multiplexer is available to use one MooLogger and measure in multiple AMS.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The MooLooger falls in the lower price range for a sniffer, for more information please contact Greta Bonacina ([Mailto:gbonacina@tecnosens.it gbonacina@tecnosens.it]).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Nikira labs ===&lt;br /&gt;
Nikira labs is a company bases in the USA, you can find their website [https://www.nikiralabs.com/ here]. They have developed the CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;/CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;/H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;O analyser. This device has a measurements range of 100-20.000ppm for CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and 1-20.000ppm for CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and can optionally detect H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;O in the range of 500-20.000 ppm. The datasheet for this device can be downloaded from their website [https://www.nikiralabs.com/ch4-co2-h2o-analyzer here.]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;/CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;/H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;O analyser falls into the higher price range for a sniffer, for more information please contact Nikira Labs [https://www.nikiralabs.com/contact-9 here.]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== La Trobe Uni ===&lt;br /&gt;
The research institute, as a part of La Trobe university based in Australia, has developed a sniffer inhouse, you can find their website [https://www.latrobe.edu.au/ here.] They are still working on commercializing their sniffer device.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When commercialized they aim to have the sniffer fall into the lower price range, for more information please contact Aniruddha (Ani) Desai ([Mailto:A.Desai@latrobe.edu.au A.Desai@latrobe.edu.au]).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Comparison of technical details of commercially available sniffers ==&lt;br /&gt;
As part of the [[Section 20: Ongoing activities|DNK-NLD project]] Wageningen Livestock Research has collected technical information on all commercially available sniffers directly from the companies. An excel file showing these details for all the sniffers can be downloaded [[Media:Comparison technical details sniffers ICAR.xlsx|here]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Experimental protocols ==&lt;br /&gt;
No particular experimental protocols are applied. Once installed, the system runs continuously. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Change in diet are not required.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Training and adaptation period ==&lt;br /&gt;
Training, handling or adaptation period are not required.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Problems faced and upgrades ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Device waterproof ===&lt;br /&gt;
Sniffer devices are not always completely waterproof. Considering that there is electrical wiring inside and that in some cases the intervention of a technician is necessary, it is important to choose an IP65 box or to equip the Sniffer box with a waterproof coating.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Clogging problems ===&lt;br /&gt;
To avoid clogging of the pipes, ideally a venting hose is provided. This pipe is connected to the compressed air outlet pipe of the AMS. When the gate of the milking robot opens, allowing the animal to exit, compressed air is blown into the venting hose. This air flow in the direction of the cylinder helps to avoid clogging. Currently some sniffers have the option for a blow-back system.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Animals identification ===&lt;br /&gt;
Antenna for ID reader is not always successful. It is suggested to use AMS data identification and merge them later on.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Calibration procedure ===&lt;br /&gt;
In many cases problems of calibration drift can occur. It is necessary to standardize zero and span calibrating procedure.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Personell in charge of the trial ===&lt;br /&gt;
It is essential to have a good technician who monitors Sniffer&#039;s activities on daily basis and who also knows the AMS and AFS system. Among the activities that the technician must carry out: setting up, moving equipment, daily data monitoring and download, checking up on equipment at irregularities, fixing problems, downloading AMS data and ordering spare parts. If a good technician is not available, it is essential to have an alert system (sms, e-mail) of anomalies.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Filter replace ===&lt;br /&gt;
Filter obturations by dust or condensation can occur. It is possible to prevent these problems changing external filter every 15 days and change internal filter every 6 months. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Questions and answers ==&lt;br /&gt;
 &#039;&#039;&#039;Q1. What’s the cost of the system?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 A1. Very dependent on which system and producer, you can see an indication for pricing in the comparison excel file. If you want an exact quote, please contact the companies.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &#039;&#039;&#039;Q2. How many animals per Sniffer?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Depending on where the sniffer is installed, it can measure as many animals as can visit that location. If an AMS can milk 130 cows per day, then the sniffer can measure 130 cows per day.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &#039;&#039;&#039;Q3. How long does the experimental trial take?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 A1. For genetic evaluation purposes we plan to collect data for many years.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &#039;&#039;&#039;Q4. How do you identify animals in Sniffer?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 A1. We use AMS identification, easier and more accurate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 A2. We use AMS identification. It is possible to use also external RFID tag reader but it need validation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &#039;&#039;&#039;Q5. It is necessary to have gas cards with wide detection limit (0-10.000 CH4 and 0-50.000 CO2)?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 A1. Not necessary considering animals’ emission, so probably are cheaper than other gas cards with different detection limit.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Cvangemert</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://wiki.icar.org/index.php?title=Section_20:_Methane_measuring_methods&amp;diff=4981</id>
		<title>Section 20: Methane measuring methods</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://wiki.icar.org/index.php?title=Section_20:_Methane_measuring_methods&amp;diff=4981"/>
		<updated>2026-03-16T08:47:05Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Cvangemert: changed name to sniffers&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;big&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;b&amp;gt;NOTE: This version of Section 20 has been approved by the working group&#039;s Chair.  Please be aware that further revisions may occur before final review and approval by the Board and ICAR members per the [[Approval of Page Process]].&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/b&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Several factors influence the choice of measurement method such as cost, level of accuracy, precision, scope of application, and scale, which vary across disciplines (Cassandro et al., 2013&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Cassandro, M. 2013. Comparing local and cosmopolitan cattle breeds on added values for milk and cheese production and their predicted methane emissions. Animal Genetic Resources/Ressources génétiques animales/Recursos genéticos animales, available on CJO2013. doi:10.1017/S2078 63361200077X&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;; Hammond et al., 2016A&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Hammond, K.J., Crompton, L.A., Bannink, A., Dijkstra, J., Yáñez-Ruiz, D.R., O’Kiely, P., Kebreab, E., Eugenè, M.A., Yu, Z., Shingfield, K.J., Schwarm, A., Hristov, A.N., and Reynolds, C.K. 2016A. Review of current in vivo measurement techniques for quantifying enteric methane emission from ruminants. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 219:13–30. doi:10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2016.05.018.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;; Garnsworthy et al., 2019&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Garnsworthy, P.C. Difford, G.F. Bell, M.J. Bayat, A.R. Huhtanen, P. Kuhla, B. Lassen, J. Peiren, N. Pszczola, M; Sorg, D. Visker, M.H., and Yan, T. 2019 Comparison of Methods to Measure Methane for Use in Genetic Evaluation of Dairy Cattle. Animals 9:837, 12p.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;). For instance, genetic selection programs require CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; measurements on thousands of related individuals under the environmental conditions in which the animals are expected to perform (Falconer and Mackay, 1996&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Falconer, D., and Macka,y T. 1996. Introduction to quantitative genetics (4th edn). ISBN-13: 978-0582243026; ISBN-10: 0582243025&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;). This can be challenging because dairy cattle perform in a wide range of conditions (e.g. grazing vs indoor housing). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are a number of different measurement methods currently being employed, each with advantages and disadvantages in terms of the factors listed above. The currently accepted and widely used measurement methods are listed and described below. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The main features of methods for measuring CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; output by individual animals are summarised in Table 4. Values for each feature are based on experience of experts in METHAGENE WG2 who have used the methods. All values are relative, and somewhat subjective, because absolute values will depend on installation and implementation of each method at different research centres. It should be noted that the measuring methods can be divided in two major sections: methods that measure the concentration and flux of CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (e.g. the respiration chamber), and methods that measure the flux of CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; through the device (e.g. GreenFeed). This affects the useability of the methods for answering research questions – please see also the recommendations at the end of these guidelines.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Section 20: Respiration chamber|Respiration chamber]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Section 20: Portable Accumulation Chamber|Portable Accumulation Chambers]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Section 20: Wearables|Wearables]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Breath sampling during milk and feeding]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Section 20: Sniffer SOP|Sniffer SOP]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Section 20: Greenfeed SOP|Greenfeed SOP]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Section 20: Laser Methane Detector|Laser Methane Detector]]&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! colspan=&amp;quot;3&amp;quot; | &#039;&#039;Table 1.  Table one caption (in first row of the table).&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|- style=&amp;quot;background-color:#efefef;&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+&lt;br /&gt;
!Method&lt;br /&gt;
!Purchase cost&lt;br /&gt;
!Running costs&lt;br /&gt;
!Labour&lt;br /&gt;
!Repeatability&lt;br /&gt;
!Behaviour alteration&lt;br /&gt;
!Throughput&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Respiration chamber&lt;br /&gt;
|High&lt;br /&gt;
|High&lt;br /&gt;
|High&lt;br /&gt;
|High&lt;br /&gt;
|High&lt;br /&gt;
|Low&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|SF6 technique&lt;br /&gt;
|Medium&lt;br /&gt;
|High&lt;br /&gt;
|High&lt;br /&gt;
|Medium&lt;br /&gt;
|Medium&lt;br /&gt;
|Medium&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Sniffers&lt;br /&gt;
|Low&lt;br /&gt;
|Low&lt;br /&gt;
|Low&lt;br /&gt;
|Medium&lt;br /&gt;
|None&lt;br /&gt;
|High&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|GreenFeed&lt;br /&gt;
|Medium&lt;br /&gt;
|Medium&lt;br /&gt;
|Medium&lt;br /&gt;
|Medium&lt;br /&gt;
|Medium&lt;br /&gt;
|Medium&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Laser methane detector&lt;br /&gt;
|Low&lt;br /&gt;
|Low&lt;br /&gt;
|High&lt;br /&gt;
|Low&lt;br /&gt;
|Low-Medium&lt;br /&gt;
|Medium&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|ZELP Sense&lt;br /&gt;
|Low&lt;br /&gt;
|Low&lt;br /&gt;
|Medium&lt;br /&gt;
|Medium&lt;br /&gt;
|Low&lt;br /&gt;
|High&lt;br /&gt;
|}Table 4. Summary of the main features of methods for measuring CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; output by individual animals.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Cvangemert</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://wiki.icar.org/index.php?title=Section_20:_Methane_measuring_methods&amp;diff=4980</id>
		<title>Section 20: Methane measuring methods</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://wiki.icar.org/index.php?title=Section_20:_Methane_measuring_methods&amp;diff=4980"/>
		<updated>2026-03-16T08:45:50Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Cvangemert: Added ZELP sense to table&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;big&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;b&amp;gt;NOTE: This version of Section 20 has been approved by the working group&#039;s Chair.  Please be aware that further revisions may occur before final review and approval by the Board and ICAR members per the [[Approval of Page Process]].&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/b&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Several factors influence the choice of measurement method such as cost, level of accuracy, precision, scope of application, and scale, which vary across disciplines (Cassandro et al., 2013&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Cassandro, M. 2013. Comparing local and cosmopolitan cattle breeds on added values for milk and cheese production and their predicted methane emissions. Animal Genetic Resources/Ressources génétiques animales/Recursos genéticos animales, available on CJO2013. doi:10.1017/S2078 63361200077X&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;; Hammond et al., 2016A&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Hammond, K.J., Crompton, L.A., Bannink, A., Dijkstra, J., Yáñez-Ruiz, D.R., O’Kiely, P., Kebreab, E., Eugenè, M.A., Yu, Z., Shingfield, K.J., Schwarm, A., Hristov, A.N., and Reynolds, C.K. 2016A. Review of current in vivo measurement techniques for quantifying enteric methane emission from ruminants. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 219:13–30. doi:10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2016.05.018.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;; Garnsworthy et al., 2019&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Garnsworthy, P.C. Difford, G.F. Bell, M.J. Bayat, A.R. Huhtanen, P. Kuhla, B. Lassen, J. Peiren, N. Pszczola, M; Sorg, D. Visker, M.H., and Yan, T. 2019 Comparison of Methods to Measure Methane for Use in Genetic Evaluation of Dairy Cattle. Animals 9:837, 12p.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;). For instance, genetic selection programs require CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; measurements on thousands of related individuals under the environmental conditions in which the animals are expected to perform (Falconer and Mackay, 1996&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Falconer, D., and Macka,y T. 1996. Introduction to quantitative genetics (4th edn). ISBN-13: 978-0582243026; ISBN-10: 0582243025&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;). This can be challenging because dairy cattle perform in a wide range of conditions (e.g. grazing vs indoor housing). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are a number of different measurement methods currently being employed, each with advantages and disadvantages in terms of the factors listed above. The currently accepted and widely used measurement methods are listed and described below. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The main features of methods for measuring CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; output by individual animals are summarised in Table 4. Values for each feature are based on experience of experts in METHAGENE WG2 who have used the methods. All values are relative, and somewhat subjective, because absolute values will depend on installation and implementation of each method at different research centres. It should be noted that the measuring methods can be divided in two major sections: methods that measure the concentration and flux of CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (e.g. the respiration chamber), and methods that measure the flux of CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; through the device (e.g. GreenFeed). This affects the useability of the methods for answering research questions – please see also the recommendations at the end of these guidelines.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Section 20: Respiration chamber|Respiration chamber]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Section 20: Portable Accumulation Chamber|Portable Accumulation Chambers]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Section 20: Wearables|Wearables]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Breath sampling during milk and feeding]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Section 20: Sniffer SOP|Sniffer SOP]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Section 20: Greenfeed SOP|Greenfeed SOP]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Section 20: Laser Methane Detector|Laser Methane Detector]]&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! colspan=&amp;quot;3&amp;quot; | &#039;&#039;Table 1.  Table one caption (in first row of the table).&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|- style=&amp;quot;background-color:#efefef;&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+&lt;br /&gt;
!Method&lt;br /&gt;
!Purchase cost&lt;br /&gt;
!Running costs&lt;br /&gt;
!Labour&lt;br /&gt;
!Repeatability&lt;br /&gt;
!Behaviour alteration&lt;br /&gt;
!Throughput&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Respiration chamber&lt;br /&gt;
|High&lt;br /&gt;
|High&lt;br /&gt;
|High&lt;br /&gt;
|High&lt;br /&gt;
|High&lt;br /&gt;
|Low&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|SF6 technique&lt;br /&gt;
|Medium&lt;br /&gt;
|High&lt;br /&gt;
|High&lt;br /&gt;
|Medium&lt;br /&gt;
|Medium&lt;br /&gt;
|Medium&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Breath sampling during milking and feeding&lt;br /&gt;
|Low&lt;br /&gt;
|Low&lt;br /&gt;
|Low&lt;br /&gt;
|Medium&lt;br /&gt;
|None&lt;br /&gt;
|High&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|GreenFeed&lt;br /&gt;
|Medium&lt;br /&gt;
|Medium&lt;br /&gt;
|Medium&lt;br /&gt;
|Medium&lt;br /&gt;
|Medium&lt;br /&gt;
|Medium&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Laser methane detector&lt;br /&gt;
|Low&lt;br /&gt;
|Low&lt;br /&gt;
|High&lt;br /&gt;
|Low&lt;br /&gt;
|Low-Medium&lt;br /&gt;
|Medium&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Zelp sense&lt;br /&gt;
|Low&lt;br /&gt;
|Low&lt;br /&gt;
|Medium&lt;br /&gt;
|Medium&lt;br /&gt;
|Low&lt;br /&gt;
|High&lt;br /&gt;
|}Table 4. Summary of the main features of methods for measuring CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; output by individual animals.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Cvangemert</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://wiki.icar.org/index.php?title=Section_20:_Wearables&amp;diff=4979</id>
		<title>Section 20: Wearables</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://wiki.icar.org/index.php?title=Section_20:_Wearables&amp;diff=4979"/>
		<updated>2026-03-16T08:44:15Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Cvangemert: /* ZELP Sense */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;big&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;b&amp;gt;NOTE: This version of Section 20 has been approved by the working group&#039;s Chair.  Please be aware that further revisions may occur before final review and approval by the Board and ICAR members per the [[Approval of Page Process]].&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/b&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== SF6 ==&lt;br /&gt;
The SF6 technique samples breath over 24 hours, whereas other techniques use spot samples of breath over periods of minutes throughout the day, so diurnal variation has to be considered. The majority of CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (87-99%) is released by eructation (Blaxter and Joyce, 1963&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Blaxter, K.L., and Joyce, J.P. 1963. The accuracy and ease with which measurements of respiratory metabolism can be made with tracheostomized sheep. Br. J. Nutr. 17:523-537&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;; Murray et al., 1976&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Murray, R.M., Bryant, A.M., and Leng, R.A.. 1976. Rates of production of methane in the rumen and large intestine of sheep. Br. J. Nutr. 36:1-14.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;), which provides a clear signal for sample processing. Please note that the tracheostomy used in Murray et al. (1976)&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:0&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; may have resulted in a higher percentage, but in both publications, it is clear that the majority of the CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is released via eructation. The SF6 tracer gas technique was developed in an attempt to measure CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; emissions by animals without confinement in respiration chambers (Johnson et al., 1994&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Johnson, K., Huyler, M., Westberg, H., Lamb, B., and Zimmerman, P. 1994. Measurement of methane emissions from ruminant livestock using a sulfur hexafluoride tracer technique. Environ. Sci. Technol. 28:359-362.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;). Air is sampled near the animal’s nostrils through a tube attached to a halter and connected to an evacuated canister worn around the animal’s neck or on its back. A capillary tube or orifice plate is used to restrict airflow through the tube so that the canister is between 50 and 70% full in approximately 24 hours. A permeation tube containing SF6 is placed into the rumen of each animal. The pre-determined release rate of SF6 is multiplied by the ratio of CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; to SF6 concentrations in the canister to calculate CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; emission rate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Many research centres have used the SF6 technique with variations in design of sampling and collection equipment, permeation tubes, and gas analysis (Berndt et al., 2014&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Berndt, A., Boland, T.M., Deighton, M.H., Gere, J.I., Grainger, C., Hegarty, R.S., Iwaasa, A.D., Koolaard, J.P., Lassey, K.R., Luo D., Martin, R.J., Martin, C., Moate, P.J., Molano, G., Pinares-Patiño, C., Ribaux, B.E., Swainson, N.M., Waghorn, G.C., and Williams, S.R.O. 2014. Guidelines for use of sulphur hexafluoride (SF6) tracer technique to measure enteric methane emissions from ruminants. Pages 166. M. G. Lambert, ed. New Zealand Agricultural Greenhouse Gas Research Centre, New Zealand. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;). Reliable results depend on following standard protocols, with greatest variation coming from accuracy of determining SF6 release rate from permeation tubes and control of sampling rate. With capillary tubes, sampling rate decreases as pressure in the canister increases, whereas an orifice plate gives a steadier sampling rate over 24 hours (Deighton et al., 2014&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Deighton, M.H., Williams, S.R.O., Hannah, M.C., Eckard, R.J., Boland, T.M., Wales, W.J., and Moate, P.J. 2014. A modified sulphur hexafluoride tracer technique enables accurate determination of enteric methane emissions from ruminants. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 197:47-63.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;). A source of error that has not been evaluated is that animals might interact and share CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; emissions when the sampling tube of one animal is near the head of another animal. There is good agreement between CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; emissions measured by the SF6 technique and respiration chambers, although results from the SF6 technique are more variable (Grainger et al., 2007&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Grainger, C., Clarke, T., McGinn, S.M., Auldist, M.J., Beauchemin, K.A., Hannah, M.C., Waghorn, G.C., Clark, H., and Eckard, R J. 2007. Methane emissions from dairy cows measured using the sulfur hexafluoride (SF6) tracer and chamber techniques. J. Dairy Sci. 90:2755-2766.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;; Muñoz et al., 2012&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Muñoz, C., Yan, T., Wills, D.A., Murray, S., and Gordon, A.W. 2012. Comparison of the sulfur hexafluoride tracer and respiration chamber techniques for estimating methane emissions and correction for rectum methane output from dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 95:3139-3148.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Global Research Alliance (GRA) published new materials from the New Zealand Climate Smart Agriculture Initiative (CSA). This includes guidelines for the SF6 gas tracer technique, you can find those [https://globalresearchalliance.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/SF6-Tracer-Technique-Guidelines_April-2014.pdf here].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== ZELP Sense ==&lt;br /&gt;
[https://www.zelp.co/ ZELP] is a company based in the UK, which has developed a wearable device for cows called [https://www.zelp.co/zelp-sense/ ZELP Sense]. The device continuously measures methane (CH₄) and carbon dioxide (CO₂) emissions from individual cows, in real-world settings, together with estimated dry matter intake (DMI). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== System description ===&lt;br /&gt;
ZELP Sense consists of three key parts: a headpiece, nosepiece, and gas sensing unit. The headpiece, made from ventilated neoprene, correctly positions the nosepiece without restricting the cow&#039;s natural movements or behaviours. The gas sensing unit sits below the cow&#039;s neck. The full device is lightweight and quick and easy to fit to the animal. The headpiece and nosepiece come in multiple sizes to ensure an optimal fit for a wide range of cows.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The device samples ambient and eructed air from close to the cow&#039;s nostrils through the nosepiece. These samples are processed by the gas sensing unit, which contains sensors to track ventilation rate and measure gas concentrations. Data from the device is offloaded via a WiFi connection and processed by ZELP&#039;s Machine Learning models. The device has local data storage allowing it to be used in areas with intermittent connectivity.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Users receive CH₄ and CO₂ emissions data and estimated DMI via ZELP&#039;s mobile-optimized web-app, ZELP Insight. Users can choose, for each project, the data package that suits them best - from daily totals to more frequent readings every 6 hours. The data can be downloaded for further analysis.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Internal chamber trial (2024): ====&lt;br /&gt;
Three cows, each fitted with a ZELP Sense device, were tested in respiration chambers over a 3-week period, with two 3-day testing sessions, separated by a one-week break. The daily emission totals provided by ZELP Sense showed an average difference of less than 10% versus those provided by respiration chambers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For more details, you can download the latest version of ZELP’s White Paper [https://www.zelp.co/zelp-sense/ here]. These results have been shared at the British Society for Animal Science Conference 2025, EAAP’s AI4AS Conference 2025, and at the ASGGN &amp;amp; ICAR Feed &amp;amp; Gas Workshop held at the 9th International Greenhouse Gas &amp;amp; Animal Agriculture Conference 2025. The poster presentation is available [[:File:ZELP Sense - Chamber Comparison Poster.pdf|here]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== External chamber trials (2025): ====&lt;br /&gt;
Multiple third-party trials of ZELP Sense have now been completed at different research institutions and universities. The trials focused on comparing the methane and carbon dioxide measurements provided by ZELP Sense with those from respiration chambers. Analysis is underway and results are expected to be published in early 2026. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Commercial availability ===&lt;br /&gt;
ZELP Sense is available for pre-order now, with ZELP’s team allocating devices from their upcoming commercial production run on a first-come, first-serve basis. Delivery is expected in the second half of 2026. For more information, and to request a quote, please contact: [Mailto:sense@zelp.co sense@zelp.co].&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Cvangemert</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://wiki.icar.org/index.php?title=Section_20:_Methane_measuring_methods&amp;diff=4917</id>
		<title>Section 20: Methane measuring methods</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://wiki.icar.org/index.php?title=Section_20:_Methane_measuring_methods&amp;diff=4917"/>
		<updated>2026-02-18T07:46:17Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Cvangemert: Added section 20 to all methane measurement subsections and edited links&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;big&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;b&amp;gt;NOTE: This version of Section 20 has been approved by the working group&#039;s Chair.  Please be aware that further revisions may occur before final review and approval by the Board and ICAR members per the [[Approval of Page Process]].&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/b&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Several factors influence the choice of measurement method such as cost, level of accuracy, precision, scope of application, and scale, which vary across disciplines (Cassandro et al., 2013&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Cassandro, M. 2013. Comparing local and cosmopolitan cattle breeds on added values for milk and cheese production and their predicted methane emissions. Animal Genetic Resources/Ressources génétiques animales/Recursos genéticos animales, available on CJO2013. doi:10.1017/S2078 63361200077X&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;; Hammond et al., 2016A&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Hammond, K.J., Crompton, L.A., Bannink, A., Dijkstra, J., Yáñez-Ruiz, D.R., O’Kiely, P., Kebreab, E., Eugenè, M.A., Yu, Z., Shingfield, K.J., Schwarm, A., Hristov, A.N., and Reynolds, C.K. 2016A. Review of current in vivo measurement techniques for quantifying enteric methane emission from ruminants. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 219:13–30. doi:10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2016.05.018.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;; Garnsworthy et al., 2019&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Garnsworthy, P.C. Difford, G.F. Bell, M.J. Bayat, A.R. Huhtanen, P. Kuhla, B. Lassen, J. Peiren, N. Pszczola, M; Sorg, D. Visker, M.H., and Yan, T. 2019 Comparison of Methods to Measure Methane for Use in Genetic Evaluation of Dairy Cattle. Animals 9:837, 12p.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;). For instance, genetic selection programs require CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; measurements on thousands of related individuals under the environmental conditions in which the animals are expected to perform (Falconer and Mackay, 1996&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Falconer, D., and Macka,y T. 1996. Introduction to quantitative genetics (4th edn). ISBN-13: 978-0582243026; ISBN-10: 0582243025&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;). This can be challenging because dairy cattle perform in a wide range of conditions (e.g. grazing vs indoor housing). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are a number of different measurement methods currently being employed, each with advantages and disadvantages in terms of the factors listed above. The currently accepted and widely used measurement methods are listed and described below. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The main features of methods for measuring CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; output by individual animals are summarised in Table 4. Values for each feature are based on experience of experts in METHAGENE WG2 who have used the methods. All values are relative, and somewhat subjective, because absolute values will depend on installation and implementation of each method at different research centres. It should be noted that the measuring methods can be divided in two major sections: methods that measure the concentration and flux of CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (e.g. the respiration chamber), and methods that measure the flux of CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; through the device (e.g. GreenFeed). This affects the useability of the methods for answering research questions – please see also the recommendations at the end of these guidelines.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Section 20: Respiration chamber|Respiration chamber]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Section 20: Portable Accumulation Chamber|Portable Accumulation Chambers]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Section 20: Wearables|Wearables]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Breath sampling during milk and feeding]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Section 20: Sniffer SOP|Sniffer SOP]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Section 20: Greenfeed SOP|Greenfeed SOP]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Section 20: Laser Methane Detector|Laser Methane Detector]]&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! colspan=&amp;quot;3&amp;quot; | &#039;&#039;Table 1.  Table one caption (in first row of the table).&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|- style=&amp;quot;background-color:#efefef;&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+&lt;br /&gt;
!Method&lt;br /&gt;
!Purchase cost&lt;br /&gt;
!Running costs&lt;br /&gt;
!Labour&lt;br /&gt;
!Repeatability&lt;br /&gt;
!Behaviour alteration&lt;br /&gt;
!Throughput&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Respiration chamber&lt;br /&gt;
|High&lt;br /&gt;
|High&lt;br /&gt;
|High&lt;br /&gt;
|High&lt;br /&gt;
|High&lt;br /&gt;
|Low&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|SF6 technique&lt;br /&gt;
|Medium&lt;br /&gt;
|High&lt;br /&gt;
|High&lt;br /&gt;
|Medium&lt;br /&gt;
|Medium&lt;br /&gt;
|Medium&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Breath sampling during milking and feeding&lt;br /&gt;
|Low&lt;br /&gt;
|Low&lt;br /&gt;
|Low&lt;br /&gt;
|Medium&lt;br /&gt;
|None&lt;br /&gt;
|High&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|GreenFeed&lt;br /&gt;
|Medium&lt;br /&gt;
|Medium&lt;br /&gt;
|Medium&lt;br /&gt;
|Medium&lt;br /&gt;
|Medium&lt;br /&gt;
|Medium&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Laser methane detector&lt;br /&gt;
|Low&lt;br /&gt;
|Low&lt;br /&gt;
|High&lt;br /&gt;
|Low&lt;br /&gt;
|Low-Medium&lt;br /&gt;
|Medium&lt;br /&gt;
|}Table 4. Summary of the main features of methods for measuring CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; output by individual animals.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Cvangemert</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://wiki.icar.org/index.php?title=Wearables&amp;diff=4916</id>
		<title>Wearables</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://wiki.icar.org/index.php?title=Wearables&amp;diff=4916"/>
		<updated>2026-02-18T07:45:02Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Cvangemert: Cvangemert moved page Wearables to Section 20: Wearables&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;#REDIRECT [[Section 20: Wearables]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Cvangemert</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://wiki.icar.org/index.php?title=Section_20:_Wearables&amp;diff=4915</id>
		<title>Section 20: Wearables</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://wiki.icar.org/index.php?title=Section_20:_Wearables&amp;diff=4915"/>
		<updated>2026-02-18T07:45:02Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Cvangemert: Cvangemert moved page Wearables to Section 20: Wearables&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;big&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;b&amp;gt;NOTE: This version of Section 20 has been approved by the working group&#039;s Chair.  Please be aware that further revisions may occur before final review and approval by the Board and ICAR members per the [[Approval of Page Process]].&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/b&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== SF6 ==&lt;br /&gt;
The SF6 technique samples breath over 24 hours, whereas other techniques use spot samples of breath over periods of minutes throughout the day, so diurnal variation has to be considered. The majority of CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (87-99%) is released by eructation (Blaxter and Joyce, 1963&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Blaxter, K.L., and Joyce, J.P. 1963. The accuracy and ease with which measurements of respiratory metabolism can be made with tracheostomized sheep. Br. J. Nutr. 17:523-537&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;; Murray et al., 1976&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Murray, R.M., Bryant, A.M., and Leng, R.A.. 1976. Rates of production of methane in the rumen and large intestine of sheep. Br. J. Nutr. 36:1-14.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;), which provides a clear signal for sample processing. Please note that the tracheostomy used in Murray et al. (1976)&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:0&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; may have resulted in a higher percentage, but in both publications, it is clear that the majority of the CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is released via eructation. The SF6 tracer gas technique was developed in an attempt to measure CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; emissions by animals without confinement in respiration chambers (Johnson et al., 1994&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Johnson, K., Huyler, M., Westberg, H., Lamb, B., and Zimmerman, P. 1994. Measurement of methane emissions from ruminant livestock using a sulfur hexafluoride tracer technique. Environ. Sci. Technol. 28:359-362.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;). Air is sampled near the animal’s nostrils through a tube attached to a halter and connected to an evacuated canister worn around the animal’s neck or on its back. A capillary tube or orifice plate is used to restrict airflow through the tube so that the canister is between 50 and 70% full in approximately 24 hours. A permeation tube containing SF6 is placed into the rumen of each animal. The pre-determined release rate of SF6 is multiplied by the ratio of CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; to SF6 concentrations in the canister to calculate CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; emission rate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Many research centres have used the SF6 technique with variations in design of sampling and collection equipment, permeation tubes, and gas analysis (Berndt et al., 2014&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Berndt, A., Boland, T.M., Deighton, M.H., Gere, J.I., Grainger, C., Hegarty, R.S., Iwaasa, A.D., Koolaard, J.P., Lassey, K.R., Luo D., Martin, R.J., Martin, C., Moate, P.J., Molano, G., Pinares-Patiño, C., Ribaux, B.E., Swainson, N.M., Waghorn, G.C., and Williams, S.R.O. 2014. Guidelines for use of sulphur hexafluoride (SF6) tracer technique to measure enteric methane emissions from ruminants. Pages 166. M. G. Lambert, ed. New Zealand Agricultural Greenhouse Gas Research Centre, New Zealand. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;). Reliable results depend on following standard protocols, with greatest variation coming from accuracy of determining SF6 release rate from permeation tubes and control of sampling rate. With capillary tubes, sampling rate decreases as pressure in the canister increases, whereas an orifice plate gives a steadier sampling rate over 24 hours (Deighton et al., 2014&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Deighton, M.H., Williams, S.R.O., Hannah, M.C., Eckard, R.J., Boland, T.M., Wales, W.J., and Moate, P.J. 2014. A modified sulphur hexafluoride tracer technique enables accurate determination of enteric methane emissions from ruminants. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 197:47-63.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;). A source of error that has not been evaluated is that animals might interact and share CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; emissions when the sampling tube of one animal is near the head of another animal. There is good agreement between CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; emissions measured by the SF6 technique and respiration chambers, although results from the SF6 technique are more variable (Grainger et al., 2007&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Grainger, C., Clarke, T., McGinn, S.M., Auldist, M.J., Beauchemin, K.A., Hannah, M.C., Waghorn, G.C., Clark, H., and Eckard, R J. 2007. Methane emissions from dairy cows measured using the sulfur hexafluoride (SF6) tracer and chamber techniques. J. Dairy Sci. 90:2755-2766.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;; Muñoz et al., 2012&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Muñoz, C., Yan, T., Wills, D.A., Murray, S., and Gordon, A.W. 2012. Comparison of the sulfur hexafluoride tracer and respiration chamber techniques for estimating methane emissions and correction for rectum methane output from dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 95:3139-3148.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Global Research Alliance (GRA) published new materials from the New Zealand Climate Smart Agriculture Initiative (CSA). This includes guidelines for the SF6 gas tracer technique, you can find those [https://globalresearchalliance.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/SF6-Tracer-Technique-Guidelines_April-2014.pdf here].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== ZELP Sense ==&lt;br /&gt;
[https://www.zelp.co/ ZELP] is a company based in the UK, which has developed a wearable device for cows called [https://www.zelp.co/measurement/ ZELP Sense]. The device continuously measures methane (CH₄) and carbon dioxide (CO₂) emissions from individual cows, in real-world settings, together with estimated dry matter intake (DMI). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== System description ===&lt;br /&gt;
ZELP Sense consists of three key parts: a headpiece, nosepiece, and gas sensing unit. The headpiece, made from ventilated neoprene, correctly positions the nosepiece without restricting the cow&#039;s natural movements or behaviours. The gas sensing unit sits below the cow&#039;s neck. The full device is lightweight and quick and easy to fit to the animal. The headpiece and nosepiece come in multiple sizes to ensure an optimal fit for a wide range of cows.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The device samples ambient and eructed air from close to the cow&#039;s nostrils through the nosepiece. These samples are processed by the gas sensing unit, which contains sensors to track ventilation rate and measure gas concentrations. Data from the device is offloaded via a WiFi connection and processed by ZELP&#039;s Machine Learning models. The device has local data storage allowing it to be used in areas with intermittent connectivity.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Users receive daily CH₄ and CO₂ emission totals (g/day), hourly CH₄ and CO₂ emissions for every hour of data collected (g/hour), and estimated DMI (kg/day), via ZELP&#039;s mobile-optimized web-app. The data can be downloaded for further analysis.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Internal chamber trial (2024): ====&lt;br /&gt;
Three cows, each fitted with a ZELP Sense device, were tested in respiration chambers over a 3-week period, with two 3-day testing sessions, separated by a one-week break. The daily emission totals provided by ZELP Sense showed an average difference of less than 10% versus those provided by respiration chambers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For more details, you can download the latest version of ZELP’s White Paper [https://www.zelp.co/measurement/ here]. These results have been shared at the British Society for Animal Science Conference 2025, EAAP’s AI4AS Conference 2025, and at the ASGGN &amp;amp; ICAR Feed &amp;amp; Gas Workshop held at the 9th International Greenhouse Gas &amp;amp; Animal Agriculture Conference 2025. The poster presentation is available [[:File:ZELP Sense - Chamber Comparison Poster.pdf|here]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== External chamber trials (2025): ====&lt;br /&gt;
Multiple third-party trials of ZELP Sense have now been completed at different research institutions and universities. The trials focused on comparing the methane and carbon dioxide measurements provided by ZELP Sense with those from respiration chambers. Analysis is underway and results are expected to be published in early 2026. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Commercial availability ===&lt;br /&gt;
ZELP Sense is available for pre-order now, with ZELP’s team allocating devices from their upcoming commercial production run on a first-come, first-serve basis. Delivery is expected in the second half of 2026. For more information, and to request a quote, please contact: [Mailto:sense@zelp.co sense@zelp.co].&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Cvangemert</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://wiki.icar.org/index.php?title=Portable_Accumulation_Chamber&amp;diff=4914</id>
		<title>Portable Accumulation Chamber</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://wiki.icar.org/index.php?title=Portable_Accumulation_Chamber&amp;diff=4914"/>
		<updated>2026-02-18T07:44:38Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Cvangemert: Cvangemert moved page Portable Accumulation Chamber to Section 20: Portable Accumulation Chamber&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;#REDIRECT [[Section 20: Portable Accumulation Chamber]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Cvangemert</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://wiki.icar.org/index.php?title=Section_20:_Portable_Accumulation_Chamber&amp;diff=4913</id>
		<title>Section 20: Portable Accumulation Chamber</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://wiki.icar.org/index.php?title=Section_20:_Portable_Accumulation_Chamber&amp;diff=4913"/>
		<updated>2026-02-18T07:44:38Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Cvangemert: Cvangemert moved page Portable Accumulation Chamber to Section 20: Portable Accumulation Chamber&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;NOTE: This version of Section 20 has been approved by the working group&#039;s Chair. Please be aware that further revisions may occur before final review and approval by the Board and ICAR members per the [[Approval of Page Process]].&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Introduction ==&lt;br /&gt;
In Australia and New Zealand an alternative method was developed for the short-term measurement of Methane Production Rate (MPR) of sheep using Portable Accumulation Chambers (PAC) during 1 hour without leading discomfort to the animals. Similarly to RC, CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; emissions recorded in PAC include gases from flatulence in addition to eructed and expired CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, but only during 1 hour. For a detailed comparison of the PAC and respiration chamber methods see Jonker et al. (2018)&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Jonker, A., Hickey, S.M., Rowe, S.J., Janssen, P.H., Shackell, G., Elmes, S., Bain, W.E., Wing, J., Greer, G.J., Bryson, B., MacLean, S., Dodds, K.G., Pinares-Patiño, C.S., Young, E.A., Knowler, K. Pickering, N.K., and McEwan, J.C. 2018. Genetic parameters of methane emissions determined using portable accumulation chambers in lambs and ewes grazing pasture and genetic correlations with emissions determined in respiration chambers. J. Anim. Sci. 96:3031-3042. doi: 10.1093/jas/sky187.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. Currently PACs are mostly used for small ruminants, but there are trials underway for using larger cabins for large ruminants. In general the same protocols described here for small ruminants are also applied in the trials with large ruminants.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For information about other traits recorded in sheep and goats please visit section [[Section 21 – Meat, reproduction and maternal trait in sheep and goats|21]] and [[Section 23 – Wool Sheep Recording|23]], a new section on feed intake measurements is planned. Often the feed intake measurements are combined with the methane measurements using PACs.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Eagle 2 ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Eagle 2 with tube.png|right|frameless|282x282px]]&lt;br /&gt;
Eagle 2 Gas analyser [https://www.rkiinstruments.com/ RKI Instruments], this device is often used to measure the following from the PACs:&lt;br /&gt;
* CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (methane) concentration in ppm &#039;&#039;(ensure scale set to ppm by pushing the “range-shift&amp;quot; button until ppm comes up.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (carbon dioxide) concentration in %&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* O&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (oxygen) concentration in %&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Calibration ===&lt;br /&gt;
Before the Eagle 2 can be used it needs to be calibrated, this requires specific gasses:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Methane (CH4) Calibration Gas&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Methane Packaged in Steel Cylinders; Capacity: 103 Liters (3,6 Ft&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
40-004-(B) -(A) 100 ppm in Air 100ppm of Methane in Air &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
40-003-(B) -(A) 1.000 ppm in Air 1.000ppm of Methane in Air &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Specialty mix&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Calibration mix D cylinder (1.300 l), 5% CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, 16% O&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, 5.000ppm CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (or some other specified mix) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The eagle 2 needs PALL Life Sciences Versapor® -1200 Membrane 25MM 1,2μm 100/Pk, circular paper filters for probe. The RKI part number for the filter bowl is RKI 80-0211RK Water Trap (bowl type) with 1641 fittings with pleated paper filter. Particle filter RKI 33-1200RK. This can be washed and thoroughly dried for re-use if required until replacement is possible. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Daily start up ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Eagle 2 probe open.png|thumb|248x248px|Probe unscrewed; conical filter in the middle; membrane paper filter closest to base.]]&lt;br /&gt;
Before starting the Eagle check the filters within the probe. These are in the circular region of the probe. Check the conical filter is dry and clean by unscrewing the middle section. Change the circular membrane paper filter at the start of each day &amp;amp; as needed throughout the day. Membrane paper filter is seated at the base of the probe closest to the black rubber tubing.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Reassemble the probe making sure all parts are sitting correctly. Turn machine on to warm up, for at least 20 minutes to allow the Eagle 2 to return to 0ppm Methane, 20,9% O&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and 0% CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; before validations are carried out. If necessary, push demand zero by holding down the AIR demand button to zero the Eagle 2. This measurement is the “Fresh Air” measurement and should not be made within a building containing animals, rather it should be carried out in fresh air. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Eagle 2 is checked against standard gases of known mix concentrations at the beginning and end of each day of recordings, using the 100ppm and 1.000ppm Methane in air gas bottles. All readings are recorded daily. Screw the regulator into the desired gas bottle. Insert the probe into the tube that is on the end of the regulator and open fully the tap that is on the regulator, allow reading to settle and record measurements on worksheet. The readings should be close to (within 20% of):&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;Air&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;100ppm Methane mix&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;1.000ppm Methane mix&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;Methane (CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;)&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|0ppm&lt;br /&gt;
|100ppm&lt;br /&gt;
|1.000ppm&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;O&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|20,9%&lt;br /&gt;
|20,9%&lt;br /&gt;
|20,9%&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|0%&lt;br /&gt;
|0%&lt;br /&gt;
|0%&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
If the readings shift too far from these levels, try again or the Eagle 2 may require servicing, recalibration, or sensor replacement. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Using the specialty mix ===&lt;br /&gt;
Open gas security valve. Open the valve on top of the gas bottle and turn the valve on and allow a little amount of gas to pass through the hose that is attached to the gas bottle, insert the probe into the hose (making sure the eagle is reading CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = O, O&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;=20,9, &amp;amp; CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;= 0. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another way to carry this operation out is fill a 3 Litre Tedlar Bag with the specialty gas. Once filled (don’t over fill the plastic bag) turn off the valve &amp;amp; remove gas pipe, place the probe from the eagle onto Tedlar bag, open valve and allow the eagle to settle &amp;amp; record the reading. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Record final readings of gas concentrations, usually the readings are 5.000 ppm methane and approximately 16% O&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and 4,9% CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If these gas levels are not reached, remove probe, and allow meter to stand in fresh air for a few minutes, the display should show fresh air readings (20,9% O&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, 0% CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and 0ppm Methane) if not demand zero using the “Air – Yes” button and try to measure the specialty mix gas a second time. If the Eagle 2 continues to read unacceptable gas levels the Eagle 2 may need to be serviced, recalibrated or need a sensor replacement. This Eagle 2 should not be used to take measurements, a different Eagle2 analyser must be used. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After known gas checks are completed allow the machine to return to a 0 ppm Methane before turning it off, this can take up to 20mins. You may have to push the demand zero button (&amp;quot;Air- Yes&amp;quot; button)  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These same gas calibration checks are to be done at the end of the day just prior to shutting the Eagle down in the same order as detailed above in daily start up procedures. These calibration values are recorded and if outside given parameters the machines are checked or recalibrated. The calibration data is not used in the calculations because the recorded data is rescaled as the first step before use in genetic evaluations. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Protocols on experimental farms ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== [https://www.inia.es/en-en/aboutus/whoweare/Pages/Home.aspx INIA] - Uruguay - meat sheep ===&lt;br /&gt;
Below a protocol for using PACs to measure meat sheep from INIA in Uruguay.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The animal is placed in a sealed chamber (860-880 litres; for large animals/breeds, a larger chamber should be considered) for a known period of time, between 40 to 60 minutes, after at least three weeks of constant feeding in terms of quantity and type of feed. More than one measure (2 to 3) per animal is recommended, with a period no shorter than 7 days between measurements. The traits to evaluate would be the concentration of Oxygen, Carbon dioxide and Methane. On the measurement day with the animal placed into the chamber, CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, and O&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; are recorded using a portable multi-gas detector (in parallel with a background estimation) every ten or twenty minutes. Air temperature and pressure will be also registered for the calculation of methane emission at standardized conditions. Multi-gas detector calibration, bump tests and chambers leak tests should be performed routinely. Sealing of the chamber is mandatory to guarantee isolation, which is highly recommended. Transparent chambers can be used to reduce stress, accounting for animal welfare. Records of body weight will be necessary to estimate actual gas volume in the chamber and to estimate methane intensity. Also, dry matter intake on the measurement day and previous days will be required to assess methane yield. When possible, animals can be off feed from one hour before the estimate, if extra handling is necessary and records of eaten feed and hour of last meal are available, they can stay on feed until the estimate (Robinson et al., 2020&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Robinson DL, Dominik S, Donaldson AJ, Oddy VH. 2020. Repeatabilities, heritabilities and correlations of methane and feed intake of sheep in respiration and portable chambers. Animal Production Science 60, 880-892&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Data from each batch of methane measurements can be then transformed considering the body weight of the animal, the time between measures and start of measurement, the gas concentration inside and outside of the chamber, the temperature and atmospheric pressure, following the procedure described by Jonker et al. (2018)&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:0&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Protocols on commercial farms ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Norway - meat sheep ===&lt;br /&gt;
Below a protocol for using PACs from Norway for measuring meat sheep.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To use PAC on commercial farms, they are set in a truck. The truck is easier than a trailer to drive on icy roads, there is a possibility for heating, for cleaning and for carrying wastewater. 10 chambers are used, so that gases are measured in lots of 10 animals at a time. A hand-held Eagle2 instrument is used to capture accumulated 50 min gas emissions / consumption following a measurement protocol developed in New Zealand (Jonker et al., 2020).&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Jonker, A., Hickey, S.M., McEwan, J.C., and Waghorn G. (2020). Guidelines for estimating methane emissions from individual ruminants using: GreenFeed, &#039;sniffers&#039;, hand-held laser detector and portable accumulation chambers. Ministry for Primary Industries, Wellington, New Zealand. &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://www.mpi.govt.nz/resources-and-forms/publications/&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The sheep are placed in the PACs, the measurements last 50 minutes. Sheep are either fed fresh grass or grass silage and are required to be off feed for at least one and less than four hours prior to entering the chamber and are in addition weighed prior to measurement. Fifty-minute CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration is converted to CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; g/hr. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The computation of CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and O&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; are realised as follows: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; / CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; emission and O&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; consumption are measured in gram/hour.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Conversion from weight to litres:  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Litres CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;/hour = ppm CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;/hour * (1.146 - Weight * 1,01) / 1.000.000 &lt;br /&gt;
* Litres CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;/hour = ppm CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;/hour * (1.146 - Weight * 1,01) / 100 &lt;br /&gt;
* Litres O&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;/hour = ppm O&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;/hour * (1.146 - Weight * 1,01) / 100 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1,01 is the density of a sheep; 1.146 is the air volume (in litre) in the PAC.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Converting mBar to kPa:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* gram_CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;/hour = Litres CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;/hour * (0,1 * Air Pressure, mBar) * 16,043 / (8,3145 * (Temp in °C + 273,15)&lt;br /&gt;
* gram_CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;/hour = Litres CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;/hour * (0,1 * Air Pressure, mBar) * 44,01 / (8,3145 * ( Temp in °C + 273,15)&lt;br /&gt;
* gram_O&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;/hour = Litres O&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;/hour * (0,1 * Air_Pressure, mBar) * 31,998 / (8,3145 * (Temp in °C + 273,15)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
16,043 is the molar mass (g) of methane; 44,01 is the molar mass (g) of carbon dioxide; 31,998 is the molar mass (g) of oxygen; 8,3145 is the gas constant; 273,15 is to convert the temperature from °C to Kelvin.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== New Zealand - sheep ===&lt;br /&gt;
Below a protocol used in New Zealand for sheep.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The sheep will be placed in the PAC for approximately 50 minutes and gas emissions will be measured at three time points using an Eagle 2 gas analyser (RKI instruments). Animals are weighed on the day of measurement and are grazed on known pasture covers for three days prior to measurement to allow determination of estimated dry matter intakes. Animals are handled as quietly as possible and measured once, using a random method of allocation to lots of 12 by sire.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Lots&#039;&#039; are groups of animals allocated to be measured through the set of chambers at the same time, a lot consists of 12 animals. For example, if there were a total of 96 animals to be measured in one day eight separate lots of 12 animals per lot would be randomly allocated.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Allocations&#039;&#039; are completed using sire to allocate animals randomly to lots. Different allocations are carried out for each round of measurements ensuring animals are measured randomly across lots and days. e.g., a cohort of 156 animals would be split into 7 lots of 12 animals for the first day and 6 lots the following day.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Pre-Measurement ====&lt;br /&gt;
Animals to be measured through PAC are run as a single group along with their cohorts that will not be measured in PAC chambers. One week prior to measurement animals are drafted from the main group and run separately on pasture with desired feed levels. Three days prior to measurement all allocated animals are moved into a paddock of known area, pasture cover is above 2000kg/ha, paddock selection will depend on group size. On the day of measurement, an estimated pasture reading is obtained from the farmer and recorded. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===== Setting up the trailer =====&lt;br /&gt;
The chambers should be operated out of direct sunlight where possible to avoid heating up excessively while sheep are inside. If the chamber temperature gets above 30 °C let the animal out. The trailer should be as level as possible. &lt;br /&gt;
[[File:PAC chamber door open.png|thumb|191x191px|PAC chamber door opened]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Day of Measurements ====&lt;br /&gt;
On the first day of measurements, animals are brought into yards and drafted into lots. The animals being measured on the first day are weighed and weights recorded and drafted into lots of 12, with only the morning lots (lots 1 – 3/4) animals to be measured retained off feed, with the balance for the afternoon lots put back on feed until approximately one hour before the afternoon session of measurements is due to start. The animals to be measured on day 2 are returned to the paddock. Day 2 animals are removed from feed on the day of their measurements, and pasture cover is re-estimated after they exit.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Measurements ====&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:PAC gas tab open.png|thumb|243x243px|Gas valve opened]]&lt;br /&gt;
Immediately prior to starting measurements, the air temperature and pressure outside the chambers should be recorded. Animals are located close to the chambers (trailer) set up and pushed into the chamber when the door to the chamber is open. The animals enters the chambers; the door is fastened closed. Upon the animal entering the chamber check that the pressure gauge on top of the chamber changes to reflect that a seal has been obtained. The first reading is taken immediately after the animals enter by inserting the Eagle 2 probe into the gas valve on the top of the chamber and opening the valve. After 30 seconds the reading should have stabilized and is recorded using a data recording on the XR. The values should be: 0ppm CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;; 20,9% O; 0% CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2.&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Make sure the gas valve is closed before the probe is removed. The order of all animals and their IDs are recorded, and the “0” time measurements are taken for each animal in order of loading. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The methane value for these time measurements should be zero&#039;&#039;&#039;,&#039;&#039;&#039; if they are not zero it indicates that the chambers have not been suitably cleaned out between lots. If they are below this value, measurements can continue, but additional time should be allowed for the next cleaning period and a couple of chambers checked before any animals are loaded. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Animals are left undisturbed for 25 minutes from the first reading before a second measurement is taken. Ensure sufficient time is allowed for fresh air to enter the Eagle between measurements (3 – 4 minutes) when starting up the Eagle or leave the Eagle running. Make sure the Eagle is zero before starting second &amp;amp; third measurements.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The methane values for the second measurement should be at least 200ppm. If the measurement is between 100ppm and 200ppm, there may be an issue which should be checked and noted. To determine if the measurement was done correctly check the following things: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Check that the chambers are sealed properly, and confirm reading, noting on the XR that it was a true measurement.  &lt;br /&gt;
* Check the door is closed and water is still in the water traps.  &lt;br /&gt;
* Check Eagle 2 is working properly  &lt;br /&gt;
* Check the animals have been fed to the required levels if there is more than two in the lot at this level.      &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
25 minutes after the second reading, a third reading is taken. Unless the CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; was above 2,75% at the second reading, then the third reading would be at the 40-minute mark. If the second measurement is above 2% CO2, the animal should be monitored at the 35-minute mark. If levels are above 5%, release the animal. If more than 2 or 3 in a lot move to 35-minute rounds, see early release of animals below. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After the third reading 50 minutes from the start, the door is unfastened, and the animal is released from the chamber. Before releasing animals inform any people in the surrounding area that the animals are being released, and check that the pathway is clear for animals to return to the pens. The chamber is then washed down with the water blaster.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Early release of animals ====&lt;br /&gt;
Any animals that have a CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; reading greater than 2% at their second reading need to be monitored and have an extra measurement made 10 minutes afterwards. If CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; rises above 5% at any point during the measurement time, the animal is immediately released. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If an animal does not settle in the first 10 minutes, or their behaviour is affecting others, the animal is released early, and a note is made on the PAC chamber recording sheet. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If an animal is showing visible agitation (hyperventilation or panting in the chamber) a final measurement is made, and the animal is released. An increase in frequency above 50 breaths per minute can be considered as panting but be aware that the other animals may become stressed when left on their own. Instead of releasing the stressed animal, consider opening the door a bit. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If an animal is released early a note on reason must be made. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Measurements for each Lot ====&lt;br /&gt;
Sheep spend approximately 50 minutes in PAC, while gas measurements are being taken.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* LWt = Live weight recorded before PAC measurements&lt;br /&gt;
* Air temperature is recorded in degrees celcius&lt;br /&gt;
* Air pressure is recorded in hectopascals (hPA); Note 1hPa = 1mb&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Gas measurements are recorded at start, midpoint and for each individual recorded on XR. CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; in ppm and CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and O&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; in %. Calculate litres/day (l/d) for each time period (1 = start to midpoint; 2 = midpoint to end, 3 = start to end). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For time period 3:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; l/d = (End CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; – Start CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) / (End Time – Start Time) * (cVol - LWt * 1,01) / 1.000.000&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; l/d = (End CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; – Start CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) / (End Time – Start Time) * (cVol - LWt * 1,01) / 100&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* O&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; l/d = = (Start O&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; – End O&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) / (End Time – Start Time) * (cVol - LWt * 1,01) / 100     &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Vol = 827 litres for mark 1 chambers, 853 for mark 2 chambers, and 1.146 for Mark 3 chambers. The volume and mark number of the chambers are written on them. The type of chambers used should be recorded on the daily recording sheet. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Convert L/d to grams/d:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Similar to computing g/hour.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; g/d = CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; l/d * (Pressure(hPa) * 0,1) / (8,3145 * (Temperature(&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;0&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;C) + 273,15)) * 16,043&lt;br /&gt;
* CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; g/d = CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; l/d * (Pressure(hPa) * 0,1) / (8,3145 * (Temperature(&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;0&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;C) + 273,15)) * 44,01&lt;br /&gt;
* O&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; g/d = O&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; l/d * (Pressure(hPa) * 0,1) / (8,3145 * (Temperature(&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;0&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;C) + 273,15)) * 32&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
16,043 is the molar mass (g) of methane; 44,01 is the molar mass (g) of carbon dioxide; 31,998 is the molar mass (g) of oxygen; 8,3145 is the gas constant; 273,15 is to convert the temperature from °C to Kelvin.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Cleaning of the chambers ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Gas vent and hose inside chamber.png|left|thumb|209x209px|Drainage system and gas vent inside PAC]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:PAc waste gas extraction tab open.png|thumb|201x201px|Waste gas extraction system; tab opened]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Between groups ====&lt;br /&gt;
The chambers have a gas extraction vacuum fan that is used to remove all residual gases from each chamber. This has to be done prior to the entry of the next animal to be measured.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To operate the waste gas extraction fan, turn on the power once the final reading has been taken &amp;amp; open the door on the first chamber. Let the animal out of chamber, leave the door open and turn on red tap at top of chamber. Leave on for a minimum of 30 seconds and make sure tap is closed when loading the next lot. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In addition to removing the gases the chamber is also hosed out with a water blaster in preparation for the next animal. There is a drainage system at the rear of the chamber where water and waste drains from, plus any large amounts of waste are removed with a small spade. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== After completing the trials for the day ====&lt;br /&gt;
Wash down and clean all chambers, leave the gas taps open to prevent condensation collecting in the tap. Complete three gas validations as done at the beginning of the day and record results. All chambers are checked as being empty. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Trait definition for meat sheep ==&lt;br /&gt;
GHG emissions can be expressed as raw outputs, in grams per day, or in relation to feed intake or body weight. Different indicators have been proposed and used to express GHG emissions.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Ratio indicators:&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; or CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; yields express gas emissions in relation to dry matter intake: CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4yield&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; / DMI&lt;br /&gt;
* CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; or CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; intensities express gas emissions in relation to live weight: CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4intensity&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; / liveweight&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Residual CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;:&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Similarly to residual feed intake, residual methane emissions (RME) has been proposed as an indicator of methane emissions. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In meat sheep, residual methane can be obtained as the residual from the following equation: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Daily methane = µ + a * BW&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;0.75&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; + b * DMI + CG + RME (from Smith et al., 2021&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Smith et al., 2021. Effect of divergence in residual methane emissions on feed intake and efficiency, growth and carcass performance, and indices of rumen fermentation and methane emissions in finishing beef cattle. JAS Volume 99, Issue 11, November 2021, skab275  &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://doi.org/10.1093/jas/skab275&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
BW and DMI are body weight and dry matter intake, respectively, and have to be recorded over the same period as gas emissions. CG is the contemporary group. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Genetic evaluations ==&lt;br /&gt;
To decrease GHG emissions, selection programmes can use different models for the genetic analyses. The table below shows the models used by different analyses of GHG emissions criteria. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;List of fixed and random effects used to analyse GHG emissions criteria.&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|Trait name&lt;br /&gt;
|Species (DS, MS, DG)&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|Fixed effects&lt;br /&gt;
|Random effects&lt;br /&gt;
|Notes&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Gram CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; / CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; /O&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; per hour &lt;br /&gt;
|MS&lt;br /&gt;
|Flock,  age, lot (pen / trial), sex, birth type, dam age, live weight (fixed  regression), age at measurement (fixed regression) birthdate deviation from  average, rearing rank, age of dam &lt;br /&gt;
|Animal&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;Species are defined as Dairy Sheep (DS), Meat Sheep (MS) and Dairy Goat (DG). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Genetic parameters ===&lt;br /&gt;
Genetic parameters obtained from the previously described protocols and using models presented in the above table are given in the below table. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Genetic parameters for GHG emissions traits estimated in small ruminants.&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|Traits&lt;br /&gt;
|Species (DS, MS, DG)&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|Heritability&lt;br /&gt;
|Genetic standard deviation&lt;br /&gt;
|Coefficient of variation (%)&lt;br /&gt;
|Notes&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (gram per hour)&lt;br /&gt;
|MS (adult ewes)&lt;br /&gt;
|0,18&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|SMARTER, Jette Jakobsen, NSG (Jakobsen et al., 2022)&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:1&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Jakobsen J.H., Blichfelct T., Linneflaatten L.-B., Gloersen M.O., Wallin L.E., McEwan J.C. (2022). Methane emission has low genetic correlations to lamb growth traits in Norwegian White sheep. Proc. of WCGALP 12, Rotterdam, the Netherlands, 3-8 July 2022.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (gram per hour)&lt;br /&gt;
|MS (adult ewes)&lt;br /&gt;
|0,31&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|SMARTER, Jette Jakobsen, NSG (Jakobsen et al., 2022) &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:1&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (gram per day)&lt;br /&gt;
|MS (wool)&lt;br /&gt;
|0,23&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|Marques et al., 2022&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:2&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Marques C.B, De Barbieri I., Velazco J., Navajas E.A. and Ciappesoni G (2022). Genetic parameters for feed efficiency, gas emissions, oxygen consumption and wool traits in Australian Merino. Proc. of WCGALP 12, Rotterdam, the Netherlands, 3-8 July 2022.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (gram per day)&lt;br /&gt;
|MS (wool)&lt;br /&gt;
|0,27&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|Marques et al., 2022&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:2&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|O&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (gram per day)&lt;br /&gt;
|MS (wool)&lt;br /&gt;
|0,26&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|Marques et al., 2022&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:2&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; g/d&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|MS&lt;br /&gt;
|0,19 (0,05)&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|Jonker et al., 2018&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:0&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; g/d&lt;br /&gt;
|MS&lt;br /&gt;
|0,19 (0,05)&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|Jonker et al., 2018&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:0&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;  / (CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; + CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) (mol/mol) &lt;br /&gt;
|MS&lt;br /&gt;
|0,24 (0,05)&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|Jonker et al., 2018&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:0&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;Species are defined as Dairy Sheep (DS), Meat Sheep (MS) and Dairy Goat (DG). &amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Cvangemert</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://wiki.icar.org/index.php?title=Respiration_chamber&amp;diff=4912</id>
		<title>Respiration chamber</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://wiki.icar.org/index.php?title=Respiration_chamber&amp;diff=4912"/>
		<updated>2026-02-18T07:44:12Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Cvangemert: Cvangemert moved page Respiration chamber to Section 20: Respiration chamber&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;#REDIRECT [[Section 20: Respiration chamber]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Cvangemert</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://wiki.icar.org/index.php?title=Section_20:_Respiration_chamber&amp;diff=4911</id>
		<title>Section 20: Respiration chamber</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://wiki.icar.org/index.php?title=Section_20:_Respiration_chamber&amp;diff=4911"/>
		<updated>2026-02-18T07:44:12Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Cvangemert: Cvangemert moved page Respiration chamber to Section 20: Respiration chamber&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;big&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;b&amp;gt;NOTE: This version of Section 20 has been approved by the working group&#039;s Chair.  Please be aware that further revisions may occur before final review and approval by the Board and ICAR members per the [[Approval of Page Process]].&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/b&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Respiration chambers are calibrated to be accurate and precise, and are the gold standard for benchmarking new methods. Only respiration chambers measure total emissions from the animal via the oral, nasal and anal routes; all other methods ignore emissions via the anus and only measure CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; emitted in breath. Breath measurements are justified because 99% of CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is emitted from the mouth and nostrils, and only 1% via the anus (Murray et al., 1976&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Murray, R.M., Bryant, A.M., and Leng, R.A.. 1976. Rates of production of methane in the rumen and large intestine of sheep. Br. J. Nutr. 36:1-14.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A single animal (or occasionally more) is confined in a chamber for between 2 and 7 days. Concentration of CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (and other gases if required) is measured at the air inlet and outlet vents of the chamber. The difference between outlet and inlet concentrations is multiplied by airflow to indicate CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; emissions fluxes. In most installations, a single gas analyser is used to measure both inlet and outlet concentrations, often for two or more chambers. This involves switching the analyser between sampling points at set intervals, so concentrations are actually measured for only a fraction of the day. If the sampling points acquisition frequency is high it enables to draw the diurnal pattern of methane emission, comparable to the GreenFeed system. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Respiration chambers vary in construction materials, size of chamber, gas analysis equipment and airflow rate, all of which can influence results. Validation of 22 chambers at six UK research sites revealed an uncertainty of 25.7% between facilities, which was reduced to 2.1% when correction factors were applied to trace each facility to the international standard CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (Gardiner et al., 2015&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Gardiner, T.D., Coleman, M.D., Innocenti, F., Tompkins, J., Connor, A., Garnsworthy, P.C., Moorby, J.M., Reynolds, C.K., Waterhouse, A., and Wills, D. 2015. Determination of the absolute accuracy of UK chamber facilities used in measuring methane emissions from livestock. Measurement 66: 272-279.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;). The main sources of uncertainty were stability and measurement of airflow, which are crucial for measuring CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; emission rate. The authors concluded, however, that chambers were accurate for comparing animals measured at the same site. This is an added challenge to benchmarking alternative methods with respiration chambers if respiration chambers themselves have not been benchmarked with respiration chambers at other facilities. It should be noted that substantial errors can occur if appropriate calibration procedures are not followed (Gardiner et al., 2015&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:0&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For large-scale evaluation of CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; emissions by individual animals, respiration chambers are challenging with only a single study in growing Angus steers and heifers exceeding 1000 animals and finding CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; production to be moderately heritable h&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; = 0.27 ± 0.07 (Donoghue et al., 2016&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Donoghue, K.A., Bird-Gardiner, T., Arthur, P.F., Herd, R.M., and Hegarty, R.F. 2016. Genetic and phenotypic variance and covariance components for methane emission and postweaning traits in Angus cattle. J. Anim. Sci. 94:1438–1445. doi:10.2527/jas2015-0065.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;). Installation and running costs are high, as only one animal is normally measured at once. If we assume that the monitoring time is three days per animal, and chambers are run continuously, then maximum throughput would be approximately 100 animals per chamber per year. In practice, throughput is likely to be 30 to 50 animals per year. Cows are social animals and confinement in a chamber may ultimately influence their feeding behaviour resulting in less feed consumed and in a different meal pattern compared with farm conditions. Altered feeding pattern or level is not a problem for metabolic studies evaluating feeds but can be a problem when evaluating individual animals. Furthermore, the representativeness of respiration chambers to grazing systems has been called into question (Pinares-Patiño et al., 2013&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Pinares-Patiño C.S., Hickey, S.M., Young, E.A., Dodds, K.G., MacLean, S., Molano, G., Sandoval, E., Kjestrup, H., Harland, R., Pickering, N.K., and McEwan, J.C. 2013. Heritability estimates of methane emissions from sheep. Animal 7: 316–321.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;). However, promising developments have led to more animal friendly respiration chambers constructed from cheaper, transparent materials. These lower the cost and reduce the stress of confinement with minimal disruptions to accuracy, precision and no drop in feed intake of the cows (Hellwing et al., 2012&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Hellwing, A.L.F., Lund, P., Weisbjerg, M.R., Brask, M., and Hvelplund. T. 2012. Technical note: test of a low-cost and animal-friendly system for measuring methane emissions from dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 95:6077–85. doi:10.3168/jds.2012-5505.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Where an alternative method may be cheaper, less invasive, easier to implement, or have a wider scope of application, it is of value to assess the relative accuracy, precision and correlation with the gold standard to assess the relative worth of the alternative method (Barnhart et al., 2007&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Barnhart, H.X., Kosinski, A.S., and Haber, M.J. 2007. Assessing Individual Agreement. J. Biopharm. Stat. 17:697–719. doi:10.1080/10543400701329489.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;). All methods measure CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; with some level of error, so the ‘true value’ of an individual is not known. However, when the level of measurement error increases, so too does the imprecision. When comparing two methods where one or both methods has high imprecision a phenomenon known as ‘attenuation of errors’ occurs (Spearman, 1904&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Spearman, C. 1904. The Proof and Measurement of Association between Two Things. Am. J. Psychol. 15:72–101.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;). The increased measurement error biases the correlation between the two methods downwards and reduces the efficacy of detecting significant differences in accuracy (Adolph and Hardin, 2007&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Adolph, S.C., and Hardin, J.S. 2007. Estimating phenotypic correlations: Correcting for bias due to intraindividual variability. Funct. Ecol. 21:178–184. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2435.2006.01209.x.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;). Or in terms of linear regression terms, when the observed CV of an alternative method is higher than that of the gold standard method, the slope of regression between the methods is decreased and the intercept is biased upwards.&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+Table 3. Summary of the main features of methods for measuring CH4 output by individual animals.&lt;br /&gt;
!Method&lt;br /&gt;
!Purchase cost&lt;br /&gt;
!Running costs&lt;br /&gt;
!Labour&lt;br /&gt;
!Repeatability&lt;br /&gt;
!Behaviour alteration&lt;br /&gt;
!Throughput&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Respiration chamber&lt;br /&gt;
|High&lt;br /&gt;
|High&lt;br /&gt;
|High&lt;br /&gt;
|High&lt;br /&gt;
|High&lt;br /&gt;
|Low&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|SF6 technique&lt;br /&gt;
|Medium&lt;br /&gt;
|High&lt;br /&gt;
|High&lt;br /&gt;
|Medium&lt;br /&gt;
|Medium&lt;br /&gt;
|Medium&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Breath sampling during milking and feeding&lt;br /&gt;
|Low&lt;br /&gt;
|Low&lt;br /&gt;
|Low&lt;br /&gt;
|Medium&lt;br /&gt;
|None&lt;br /&gt;
|High&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|GreenFeed&lt;br /&gt;
|Medium&lt;br /&gt;
|Medium&lt;br /&gt;
|Medium&lt;br /&gt;
|Medium&lt;br /&gt;
|Medium&lt;br /&gt;
|Medium&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Laser methane detector&lt;br /&gt;
|Low&lt;br /&gt;
|Low&lt;br /&gt;
|High&lt;br /&gt;
|Low&lt;br /&gt;
|Low-Medium&lt;br /&gt;
|Medium&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Cvangemert</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://wiki.icar.org/index.php?title=Laser_Methane_Detector&amp;diff=4910</id>
		<title>Laser Methane Detector</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://wiki.icar.org/index.php?title=Laser_Methane_Detector&amp;diff=4910"/>
		<updated>2026-02-18T07:40:42Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Cvangemert: Cvangemert moved page Laser Methane Detector to Section 20: Laser Methane Detector&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;#REDIRECT [[Section 20: Laser Methane Detector]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Cvangemert</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://wiki.icar.org/index.php?title=Section_20:_Laser_Methane_Detector&amp;diff=4909</id>
		<title>Section 20: Laser Methane Detector</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://wiki.icar.org/index.php?title=Section_20:_Laser_Methane_Detector&amp;diff=4909"/>
		<updated>2026-02-18T07:40:42Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Cvangemert: Cvangemert moved page Laser Methane Detector to Section 20: Laser Methane Detector&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;big&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;b&amp;gt;NOTE: This version of Section 20 has been approved by the working group&#039;s Chair.  Please be aware that further revisions may occur before final review and approval by the Board and ICAR members per the [[Approval of Page Process]].&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/b&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The laser CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; detector (LMD) is a highly responsive, hand-held device that is pointed at an animal’s nostrils and measures CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; column density along the length of the laser beam (ppm.m). In the first implementation of LMD on a farm, measurements for each cow were taken over periods of 15 to 25 seconds between eructation events and could detect CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; emitted each time the animal breathed out (Chagunda et al., 2009&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Chagunda, M.G.G., Ross, D., and Robert,s D J. 2009. On the use of a laser methane detector in dairy cows. Comput. Electron. Agric. 68:157-160.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, Sorg et al., 2016&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Sorg, D., Mühlbach, S., Rosner, F., Kuhla, B., Derno, M., Meese, S., Schwarm, A., Kreuzer, M., and Swalve, H. 2016. The agreement between two next-generation laser methane detectors and respiration chamber facilities in recording methane concentrations in the spent air produced by dairy cows. Comp. Electr. Agric. 143:262-272. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, Sorg et al., 2017&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Sorg, D., Difford, G.F., Mühlbach, S., Kuhla, B., Swalve, H.H., Lassen, J., Strabel, T., and Pszczola, M. 2017. Comparison of a laser methane detector with the GreenFeed and two breath analysers for on-farm measurements of methane emissions from dairy cows. Comp. Elec. Agric. 153:285-294.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;). In a later study with sheep and beef cattle, monitoring periods of 2 to 4 minutes allowed authors to separate breathing cycles from eructation events (Ricci et al., 2014&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Ricci, P., Chagunda, M.G.G., Rooke, J., Houdijk, J.G.M., Duthie, C-A., Hyslop, J., Roehe, R., and Waterhouse, A. 2014. Evaluation of the laser methane detector to estimate methane emissions from ewes and steers. J. Anim. Sci. 92:5239-5250.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;). Typically, animals are restrained either manually or in head yokes at a feed fence for the required length of time. The operator has to stand at the same distance (1 to 3 m) from each animal every time and must be careful to keep the laser pointed at the animal’s nostrils throughout the measurement period.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Cvangemert</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://wiki.icar.org/index.php?title=Section_20:_Methane_measuring_methods&amp;diff=4908</id>
		<title>Section 20: Methane measuring methods</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://wiki.icar.org/index.php?title=Section_20:_Methane_measuring_methods&amp;diff=4908"/>
		<updated>2026-02-18T07:40:15Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Cvangemert: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;big&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;b&amp;gt;NOTE: This version of Section 20 has been approved by the working group&#039;s Chair.  Please be aware that further revisions may occur before final review and approval by the Board and ICAR members per the [[Approval of Page Process]].&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/b&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Several factors influence the choice of measurement method such as cost, level of accuracy, precision, scope of application, and scale, which vary across disciplines (Cassandro et al., 2013&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Cassandro, M. 2013. Comparing local and cosmopolitan cattle breeds on added values for milk and cheese production and their predicted methane emissions. Animal Genetic Resources/Ressources génétiques animales/Recursos genéticos animales, available on CJO2013. doi:10.1017/S2078 63361200077X&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;; Hammond et al., 2016A&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Hammond, K.J., Crompton, L.A., Bannink, A., Dijkstra, J., Yáñez-Ruiz, D.R., O’Kiely, P., Kebreab, E., Eugenè, M.A., Yu, Z., Shingfield, K.J., Schwarm, A., Hristov, A.N., and Reynolds, C.K. 2016A. Review of current in vivo measurement techniques for quantifying enteric methane emission from ruminants. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 219:13–30. doi:10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2016.05.018.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;; Garnsworthy et al., 2019&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Garnsworthy, P.C. Difford, G.F. Bell, M.J. Bayat, A.R. Huhtanen, P. Kuhla, B. Lassen, J. Peiren, N. Pszczola, M; Sorg, D. Visker, M.H., and Yan, T. 2019 Comparison of Methods to Measure Methane for Use in Genetic Evaluation of Dairy Cattle. Animals 9:837, 12p.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;). For instance, genetic selection programs require CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; measurements on thousands of related individuals under the environmental conditions in which the animals are expected to perform (Falconer and Mackay, 1996&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Falconer, D., and Macka,y T. 1996. Introduction to quantitative genetics (4th edn). ISBN-13: 978-0582243026; ISBN-10: 0582243025&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;). This can be challenging because dairy cattle perform in a wide range of conditions (e.g. grazing vs indoor housing). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are a number of different measurement methods currently being employed, each with advantages and disadvantages in terms of the factors listed above. The currently accepted and widely used measurement methods are listed and described below. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The main features of methods for measuring CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; output by individual animals are summarised in Table 4. Values for each feature are based on experience of experts in METHAGENE WG2 who have used the methods. All values are relative, and somewhat subjective, because absolute values will depend on installation and implementation of each method at different research centres. It should be noted that the measuring methods can be divided in two major sections: methods that measure the concentration and flux of CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (e.g. the respiration chamber), and methods that measure the flux of CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; through the device (e.g. GreenFeed). This affects the useability of the methods for answering research questions – please see also the recommendations at the end of these guidelines.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Respiration chamber]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Portable Accumulation Chamber|Portable Accumulation Chambers]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Wearables]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Breath sampling during milk and feeding]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Section 20: Sniffer SOP|Sniffer SOP]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Section 20: Greenfeed SOP|Greenfeed SOP]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Laser Methane Detector]]&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! colspan=&amp;quot;3&amp;quot; | &#039;&#039;Table 1.  Table one caption (in first row of the table).&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|- style=&amp;quot;background-color:#efefef;&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+&lt;br /&gt;
!Method&lt;br /&gt;
!Purchase cost&lt;br /&gt;
!Running costs&lt;br /&gt;
!Labour&lt;br /&gt;
!Repeatability&lt;br /&gt;
!Behaviour alteration&lt;br /&gt;
!Throughput&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Respiration chamber&lt;br /&gt;
|High&lt;br /&gt;
|High&lt;br /&gt;
|High&lt;br /&gt;
|High&lt;br /&gt;
|High&lt;br /&gt;
|Low&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|SF6 technique&lt;br /&gt;
|Medium&lt;br /&gt;
|High&lt;br /&gt;
|High&lt;br /&gt;
|Medium&lt;br /&gt;
|Medium&lt;br /&gt;
|Medium&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Breath sampling during milking and feeding&lt;br /&gt;
|Low&lt;br /&gt;
|Low&lt;br /&gt;
|Low&lt;br /&gt;
|Medium&lt;br /&gt;
|None&lt;br /&gt;
|High&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|GreenFeed&lt;br /&gt;
|Medium&lt;br /&gt;
|Medium&lt;br /&gt;
|Medium&lt;br /&gt;
|Medium&lt;br /&gt;
|Medium&lt;br /&gt;
|Medium&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Laser methane detector&lt;br /&gt;
|Low&lt;br /&gt;
|Low&lt;br /&gt;
|High&lt;br /&gt;
|Low&lt;br /&gt;
|Low-Medium&lt;br /&gt;
|Medium&lt;br /&gt;
|}Table 4. Summary of the main features of methods for measuring CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; output by individual animals.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Cvangemert</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://wiki.icar.org/index.php?title=Greenfeed_SOP&amp;diff=4907</id>
		<title>Greenfeed SOP</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://wiki.icar.org/index.php?title=Greenfeed_SOP&amp;diff=4907"/>
		<updated>2026-02-18T07:39:43Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Cvangemert: Cvangemert moved page Greenfeed SOP to Section 20: Greenfeed SOP&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;#REDIRECT [[Section 20: Greenfeed SOP]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Cvangemert</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://wiki.icar.org/index.php?title=Section_20:_Greenfeed_SOP&amp;diff=4906</id>
		<title>Section 20: Greenfeed SOP</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://wiki.icar.org/index.php?title=Section_20:_Greenfeed_SOP&amp;diff=4906"/>
		<updated>2026-02-18T07:39:43Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Cvangemert: Cvangemert moved page Greenfeed SOP to Section 20: Greenfeed SOP&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;big&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;b&amp;gt;NOTE: This version of Section 20 has been approved by the working group&#039;s Chair.  Please be aware that further revisions may occur before final review and approval by the Board and ICAR members per the [[Approval of Page Process]].&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/b&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Introduction ==&lt;br /&gt;
Enteric methane (CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) production and carbon dioxide (CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) production can be measured non-invasively using a GreenFeed emission monitoring system (C-lock Inc. Rapid City, SD, USA). GreenFeed is an adapted feeding station that continuously measures both CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration and the quantitative airflow in order to generate individual gaseous production. GreenFeed is equipped with a fan that pulls air from around the head of the cow with 30-40 L/s. The airflow is measured continuously by a hot-film anemometer that needs to be calibrated monthly. In the air collection pipe continuous subsamples are drawn to analyse the CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration by nondispersive infrared sensors, which are automatically calibrated on a daily basis. Additionally, head positioning is registered by an infrared sensor. This sensor only determines the distance of the cow to the sensor, not what part of the cow causes this distance, could be the nose but also the ear for example. Temperature and radiofrequency identification tags specific to each cow for individual recognition are recorded as well. All variables are logged at a 1 s interval. GreenFeed measures continuously, even if there are no animals present, to correct for background emissions in the barn. The periods within a visit where the head position of the animal is correct are used for measuring gaseous emissions. Quantitative concentrations in g/d were calculated at a 1 s interval, which were then averaged per visit (minimum of 2 min).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Most of the information on this page refers to the standard version of the GreenFeed, most often used for dairy and beef cattle. There are two other versions, which are discussed separately, for small ruminants and for animals with large horns.  GreenFeed can be used both in barn and on pasture. For pasture systems, the GreenFeed is mounted on a trailer and equipped with solar panels. There is also the option of a skid system, an enhanced version of the GreenFeed for heavy-duty application. The skid system consists of a protective housing around the GreenFeed and includes a build in retractable alleyway. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Global Research Alliance ([https://globalresearchalliance.org/ GRA]) published new materials from the New Zealand Climate Smart Agriculture Initiative ([https://www.climatesmartagriculture.org.nz/ CSA]). This includes a technical manual for the GreenFeed, find this page [https://globalresearchalliance.org/library/greenfeed-emission-monitor/ here]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Equipment description ==&lt;br /&gt;
The correct placement of the GreenFeed unit inside the barn is crucial. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Indoor, it is advisable to place it on solid, non-slatted floor, in a location with good ventilation. Irregular ventilation or background emissions from manure may negatively affect the estimates of methane and carbon dioxide emissions. Take into account that installation of the GreenFeed on low-emission floors can be more difficult and take longer. This is because there are fewer anker points available. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Outdoor, the GreenFeed have to be located in a solid place (not in the mud), with a good phone (internet) connection and a good sunlight (if equipped with solar panel). The GreenFeed unit and the grazing site have to be nearby. The grazing area should not be so large as it could impact the number of visits. It may be appropriate to install an electric fence to protect the GreenFeed unit from animals’ damage, but also to avoid animals to enter by side of the GreenFeed; this was not always undertaken and warrants further investigation. A plastic and waterproof cover can be installed on the unit and a weather station on its top. Together with the GreenFeed, the trailer can also be purchased from C-Lock. This trailer is suitable for short distance moving and it is essential for placement in pasture (i.e. the trailer contains a spot where the unit can be attached, since it has to be standing solid to prevent it from getting damaged by cows, where the gas cylinders can stand and contain power supply (solar panel or batteries). If it is necessary to move the GreenFeed unit for longer distances it is essential to have a more solid trailer available and should be compatible with the legal requirements for road vehicles in the respective country.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
All users agree that wooden side shieldings provided by C-Lock are not enough to contain the animal and to reduce the influence of other animals’ emissions. According to user experience to reduce influence of gaseous emissions from cows to the side, a good side shielding must be 0.80-0.90 m wide and adjustable, at least 2.5 m long, both indoor and outdoor. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some advanced users have created a “L-port gate” (Picture 1) that closes behind the animal, so it cannot be pushed out of the unit by other cows. Cows that use this “L-port gate” are calmer (once they are used to it).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
All users consider positive the ventilation noise of the GreenFeed fan. This ventilation noise is easily associated by the animals with the supply of feed, so the animals adapt more quickly.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As regards the feed to be used in GreenFeed, most users use a pellet feed with a diameter of less than 7 mm as suggested by C-Lock. Few users use feed blocks.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:L PortGate.png|center|thumb]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Picture 1. “L-port gate” on the GreenFeed alleyway of Wageningen Livestock Research at Research Facility De Marke.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Experimental protocols ==&lt;br /&gt;
The overall duration of the trial varies, from a minimum of 7 days up to a year, both indoor and outdoor, according to the purpose of the experimental trial. Feeding settings can vary dependent on the preferred feed gift and preferred number of measurements per day. There are two important principles that should be met: the time of a feeding period (and thus gaseous measurement) should be between 2 and 5 minutes (at least 2 minutes, preferably 3-4 minutes), and the number of visits per day should be between 2 and 8, and divided over the day. The number of cows that can visit multiplied by the number of visits per cow per day multiplied by the time per visit should never exceed 24 hours, but preferably not exceed 12 hours (which means occupation of the GreenFeed 50% of the time). In general, one GreenFeed is suitable to measure at maximum 40 to 50 cows and still get decent data. This also leaves the GreenFeed unoccupied for long enough to measure background concentrations, which are needed for calibration.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When more than 50 cows have tags that the GreenFeed can recognize, the system can be programmed to only drop feed for specifically selected cows. The other cows will lose interest and the cows you want to measure can use the GreenFeed enough to get useable data. The GreenFeed does not recognize all tags cows can wear, RFID tags with ISO number 11784/11785 are recognized. When measuring on a commercial farm not all farmers will have tags with the correct ISO number and you will have to attach new RFID tags to the collar of the cow.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The wide variability of the experimental protocol variables can be summarized as follows for cows:&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+&lt;br /&gt;
!&lt;br /&gt;
!INDOOR&lt;br /&gt;
!OUTDOOR&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|DROP DISPENSE INTERVAL&lt;br /&gt;
|10 - 60 seconds&lt;br /&gt;
|10 - 30 seconds&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|MIN. TIME BETWEEN FEEDING PERIODS&lt;br /&gt;
|7.200 - 21.600 seconds&lt;br /&gt;
(2 - 6 hours)&lt;br /&gt;
|3.600 - 14.400 seconds&lt;br /&gt;
(1 - 4 hours)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|MAX. DROPS PER FEEDING TIME&lt;br /&gt;
|4 - 25 &lt;br /&gt;
|4 - 25&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|MAX. FEEDING PERIODS&lt;br /&gt;
|4 - 12 &lt;br /&gt;
|4 - 12&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
An example of a feeding protocol for cows would be a drop dispense interval of 30 second; 3 hours between feeding periods (10.800 seconds); max. 8 drops per feeding period and max. 6 feeding periods. This means that a cow can visit 6 times a day and stays for at least 4 minutes if it eats all it&#039;s concentrates. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For other species different protocols apply, below a few experimental protocol variables currently known: &lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+DAFNE feeding protocols:&lt;br /&gt;
!&lt;br /&gt;
!Sheep&lt;br /&gt;
!Buffalo&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|MAX. DROPS PER FEEDING TIME&lt;br /&gt;
|8&lt;br /&gt;
|8&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|CONCENTRATES PER DROP (G)&lt;br /&gt;
|7&lt;br /&gt;
|37&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|MAX. FEEDING PERIODS&lt;br /&gt;
|3&lt;br /&gt;
|5&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|MAX. CUP DROPS PER DAY&lt;br /&gt;
|24&lt;br /&gt;
|40&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Training and adaptation period ==&lt;br /&gt;
The overall duration of the training and adaptation period last from 7 to 20 days, both indoor and outdoor. Animals that are already used to feeding boxes in the barn are generally easier to train to use the GreenFeed. Because of that indoor adaptation is generally on the shorter end of this adaptation period. The outdoor animals are generally on the longer end of the adaptation period, as they are not used to being confined. For the outdoor GreenFeed it is suggested to keep the animals confined to a smaller lot with the GreenFeed, during adaptation, before being let out to the larger pasture, for faster adaptation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For the entire adaptation period it is essential to locate the GreenFeed within the eyesight of the animals.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
During training the “drop dispense interval” can be slightly adjusted, for example reduced to 10 seconds in first days of adaptation, then increased to 20 seconds and then it is possible to use the experimental protocol. Outdoor could be useful to provide a small amount of feed around the GreenFeed unit or near to the GreenFeed chute. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Using a camera installed on the top of the unit can be useful for training, so the user can drop feed when animals are near to the GreenFeed unit. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If using side shieldings, it is important to set the funnel at largest size and reduced regularly day by day up to the end of the training period and the start of the experimental trial. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In some cases, there might be animals that are more difficult to train. In this case it is good practice to guide them into the GreenFeed and evaluate their behaviour. If they are reluctant, it is advisable not to involve them in the experimental trial. Generally, 50% of the animals adapt autonomously, 25% of the animals need an intervention, and the remaining 25% are more reluctant. A good training and adaptation period provides for the success at least 70% of indoor animals and at least 50% of grazing animals.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Having non-users located beside users of machines has proven to be helpful when later training those non-users.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Spread concentrates in the chute or using salt licks may help entice animals to use the machine.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When based on grazing, it is important that the machine is moved to the edge of the fresh pasture once strip wire is moved – animals should not have to move far to reach the machine as this will impact number of visits.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Data analysis ==&lt;br /&gt;
GreenFeed devices produce a lot of data which can be very overwhelming to handle. In March 2025, a new technical note came out in JDS communications about a new open-source tool to simplify processing and data reporting from GreenFeed systems, making it easier to get flexible, useful, and impactful data. The package offers functions for downloading, processing, and reporting GreenFeed data and is freely available at the Comprehensive R Archive Network (CRAN; &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/greenfeedr/&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;) All functions of version 1.0.2 of the greenfeedr package are described in this article.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;greenfeedr: An R package for processing and reporting GreenFeed data Martinez-Boggio, Guillermo et al. JDS Communications, Volume 6, Issue 2, 227 - 230 &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Problems faced and upgrades ==&lt;br /&gt;
Table reports all the problems faced including solution and possible home-made upgrades found by the several institutions.&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+&lt;br /&gt;
!PROBLEM&lt;br /&gt;
!SOLUTION&lt;br /&gt;
!SUGGESTIONS/UPGRADES&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Feed clogging in the bin&lt;br /&gt;
|Unclog the feed bin and try a more solid pellet. Prevent the feed bin from moist.&lt;br /&gt;
|Extra molasses in feed pellet.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Motor problem&lt;br /&gt;
|Replaced using C-Lock spare parts and assistance.&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Airflow problems&lt;br /&gt;
|Replaced using C-Lock spare parts and assistance.&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Connectivity problem&lt;br /&gt;
|Replaced using C-Lock spare parts and assistance.&lt;br /&gt;
When caused by low coverage of the provider for the sim card used: Shutting down the device for a while and powering it back up can restore connectivity. You might have to repeat this a few times.&lt;br /&gt;
|In alternative, purchase an external Wi-Fi router or SIM-card router.&lt;br /&gt;
When possible use with the cable instead of cellular connection for better connectivity&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Power supply problem&lt;br /&gt;
|Replaced using C-Lock spare parts and assistance.&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Batteries under solar panel are getting low and smart solar controllers decide battery is too flat. &lt;br /&gt;
|Moving from lead acid to lithium iron phosphate (LiFePO4) batteries has largely eliminated the problem. This is because LiFePO4 give a constant output voltage.&lt;br /&gt;
|RFID identification problems&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|RFID identification problems&lt;br /&gt;
|Caused by either low power supply (check and replace power supply if needed) or antenna problems (follow instructions from C-lock to find the cause and replace if needed).&lt;br /&gt;
When placing ISO 11784/5 tags too close to own tags (&amp;lt;5 cm), the ISO 11784/5 tag cannot be read by the system. The own tag does work on its own systems. &lt;br /&gt;
|ISO 11784/5 tags are recognized by the system. Other tags might not be. An extra ISO 11784/5 tag can be added to the collar. &lt;br /&gt;
No interference with AMS systems observed. &lt;br /&gt;
Place the ISO 11784/5 tags at least 5 cm away from other tags, even if the GreenFeed system does not recognize the other tag. &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Leaky CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; cylinder and lower CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; release&lt;br /&gt;
|Replaced CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; cylinder by C-Lock.&lt;br /&gt;
|Make sure to never hold the CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; tool upside down when attached to a CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; cylinder.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Concentration sensor&lt;br /&gt;
|Replaced using C-Lock spare parts and assistance.&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Shipping time and shipping issues in some parts of the world (e.g., Europe and Oceania)&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|List of “must have spare parts” to create a personal warehouse.&lt;br /&gt;
European or Oceanian dealer?&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Feed bin brush chewed by a rodent&lt;br /&gt;
|Tack on feed bin chute.&lt;br /&gt;
|Internal component more sealed.&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
Despite the various problems encountered, all users consider the assistance provided by the C-Lock very good (video tutorials, operating instructions...). E-mail reply is quickly (few hours considering time zone). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is recommended to keep spare parts in stock.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Small ruminants ==&lt;br /&gt;
The adapted GreenFeed for small ruminants has a lower flow, at 15L/min and thereby has a lower detection limit.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Protocol at [https://www.inrae.fr/en INRAE] for Meat Sheep ===&lt;br /&gt;
Below you find a protocol used at INRAE, France, for measuring methane emissions in meat sheep:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; emissions are recorded with two Sheep GreenFeed devices manufactured by the C-Lock company (US) (Rozier et al., 2021)&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Rozier A., François D., Maupetit D., Legoff Y., and TortereauF. 2021. First estimations of methane emissions using Sheep GreenFeed in the Romane breed. 72&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;nd&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; EAAP, 2021, Davos, Switzerland. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One device is installed per pen of 30-40 individuals. A drop (small amount of concentrate) is delivered by the device in order to attract animals. To be valid, a visit of animal must last at least 2 minutes. To optimize the number of efficient visits and considering that we don’t want too much concentrate to be delivered by GreenFeed devices, we set the following parameters: a given day is divided in 4 periods of 6 hours each. During each period, each animal can get a maximum of 6 drops of concentrate, these drops being delivered with an interval of 30 seconds. Animals can visit the device even if they can’t get any drop, and if this visit lasts more than 2 minutes, GHG are recorded. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Similarly to the phenotyping of feed intake, animals are accustomed to the pen and the device during a minimum of 2 weeks, and the control lasts 6 weeks after the adaptation period. During this period of control, animals are fed as usual. Feed intakes can be recorded over the same period, but it must be reminded that the concentrate delivered by the Sheep GreenFeed devices to a given animal can be eaten by another one. This can bias daily feed intake calculation. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
During the control period, animals are weighed on a weekly basis, mainly for the computation of different GHG traits. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
With Sheep GreenFeed, raw data are not available: GHG emissions, expressed in gram per day can be downloaded from the C-Lock website, with one value per visit. For Sheep GreenFeed, animals may visit the device whenever they want, and several times a day. However, the production of methane is not constant over 24 hours. Therefore, GHG emissions have to be corrected for the moment of the visit. This moment can be either the hour of the day (24 levels) or the period (from 4 to 6 periods can be defined, depending on how often animals are fed during the day). Individual emission rates are obtained with a repeatability model: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = µ + Pen + Day + Animal + Hour + Ɛ  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The animal emission rates are the animal LSMeans estimates from this model. Individual CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; estimates are obtained by applying the same repeatability model on CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Horned animals ==&lt;br /&gt;
The adapted GreenFeed for cattle and other ruminants with large horns is mostly used in Africa and for Bison.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Questions and answers ==&lt;br /&gt;
 &#039;&#039;&#039;Q1. What’s the pasture size?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 A1. Cows graze grass which is about 1.500 kg DM/ha, or 9 cm in height.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 A2. Usually, 40 cows we allocate 0.48 ha for 24 hours.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &#039;&#039;&#039;Q2. How do you move your GreenFeed unit?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 A1. We take chimneys off and load them into a truck.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 A2. A trailer as the C-Lock one is fine for short moving between pastures.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &#039;&#039;&#039;Q3. How often do you change air filters?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 A1. Once per week in more than enough (about 20 animals per GreenFeed unit)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 A2. Every 3 days (more than 25 animals per GreenFeed unit)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 A3. Every 14 days (less than 10 animals per GreenFeed Unit)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 A4. When the airflow is below 27 L/s (advised by GreenFeed Email Alerts &amp;amp; Reminders)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &#039;&#039;&#039;Q4. Do you use C-Lock final data or preliminary data?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 A1. Final data reviewed, corrected for calibrations and outliers by C-Lock.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 A2. Final data. Between C-Lock final data and preliminary data there is a difference of about 5%.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Cvangemert</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://wiki.icar.org/index.php?title=Section_20:_Methane_measuring_methods&amp;diff=4905</id>
		<title>Section 20: Methane measuring methods</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://wiki.icar.org/index.php?title=Section_20:_Methane_measuring_methods&amp;diff=4905"/>
		<updated>2026-02-18T07:39:24Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Cvangemert: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;big&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;b&amp;gt;NOTE: This version of Section 20 has been approved by the working group&#039;s Chair.  Please be aware that further revisions may occur before final review and approval by the Board and ICAR members per the [[Approval of Page Process]].&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/b&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Several factors influence the choice of measurement method such as cost, level of accuracy, precision, scope of application, and scale, which vary across disciplines (Cassandro et al., 2013&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Cassandro, M. 2013. Comparing local and cosmopolitan cattle breeds on added values for milk and cheese production and their predicted methane emissions. Animal Genetic Resources/Ressources génétiques animales/Recursos genéticos animales, available on CJO2013. doi:10.1017/S2078 63361200077X&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;; Hammond et al., 2016A&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Hammond, K.J., Crompton, L.A., Bannink, A., Dijkstra, J., Yáñez-Ruiz, D.R., O’Kiely, P., Kebreab, E., Eugenè, M.A., Yu, Z., Shingfield, K.J., Schwarm, A., Hristov, A.N., and Reynolds, C.K. 2016A. Review of current in vivo measurement techniques for quantifying enteric methane emission from ruminants. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 219:13–30. doi:10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2016.05.018.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;; Garnsworthy et al., 2019&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Garnsworthy, P.C. Difford, G.F. Bell, M.J. Bayat, A.R. Huhtanen, P. Kuhla, B. Lassen, J. Peiren, N. Pszczola, M; Sorg, D. Visker, M.H., and Yan, T. 2019 Comparison of Methods to Measure Methane for Use in Genetic Evaluation of Dairy Cattle. Animals 9:837, 12p.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;). For instance, genetic selection programs require CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; measurements on thousands of related individuals under the environmental conditions in which the animals are expected to perform (Falconer and Mackay, 1996&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Falconer, D., and Macka,y T. 1996. Introduction to quantitative genetics (4th edn). ISBN-13: 978-0582243026; ISBN-10: 0582243025&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;). This can be challenging because dairy cattle perform in a wide range of conditions (e.g. grazing vs indoor housing). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are a number of different measurement methods currently being employed, each with advantages and disadvantages in terms of the factors listed above. The currently accepted and widely used measurement methods are listed and described below. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The main features of methods for measuring CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; output by individual animals are summarised in Table 4. Values for each feature are based on experience of experts in METHAGENE WG2 who have used the methods. All values are relative, and somewhat subjective, because absolute values will depend on installation and implementation of each method at different research centres. It should be noted that the measuring methods can be divided in two major sections: methods that measure the concentration and flux of CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (e.g. the respiration chamber), and methods that measure the flux of CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; through the device (e.g. GreenFeed). This affects the useability of the methods for answering research questions – please see also the recommendations at the end of these guidelines.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Respiration chamber]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Portable Accumulation Chamber|Portable Accumulation Chambers]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Wearables]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Breath sampling during milk and feeding]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Section 20: Sniffer SOP|Sniffer SOP]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Greenfeed SOP]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Laser Methane Detector]]&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! colspan=&amp;quot;3&amp;quot; | &#039;&#039;Table 1.  Table one caption (in first row of the table).&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|- style=&amp;quot;background-color:#efefef;&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+&lt;br /&gt;
!Method&lt;br /&gt;
!Purchase cost&lt;br /&gt;
!Running costs&lt;br /&gt;
!Labour&lt;br /&gt;
!Repeatability&lt;br /&gt;
!Behaviour alteration&lt;br /&gt;
!Throughput&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Respiration chamber&lt;br /&gt;
|High&lt;br /&gt;
|High&lt;br /&gt;
|High&lt;br /&gt;
|High&lt;br /&gt;
|High&lt;br /&gt;
|Low&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|SF6 technique&lt;br /&gt;
|Medium&lt;br /&gt;
|High&lt;br /&gt;
|High&lt;br /&gt;
|Medium&lt;br /&gt;
|Medium&lt;br /&gt;
|Medium&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Breath sampling during milking and feeding&lt;br /&gt;
|Low&lt;br /&gt;
|Low&lt;br /&gt;
|Low&lt;br /&gt;
|Medium&lt;br /&gt;
|None&lt;br /&gt;
|High&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|GreenFeed&lt;br /&gt;
|Medium&lt;br /&gt;
|Medium&lt;br /&gt;
|Medium&lt;br /&gt;
|Medium&lt;br /&gt;
|Medium&lt;br /&gt;
|Medium&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Laser methane detector&lt;br /&gt;
|Low&lt;br /&gt;
|Low&lt;br /&gt;
|High&lt;br /&gt;
|Low&lt;br /&gt;
|Low-Medium&lt;br /&gt;
|Medium&lt;br /&gt;
|}Table 4. Summary of the main features of methods for measuring CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; output by individual animals.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Cvangemert</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://wiki.icar.org/index.php?title=Sniffer_SOP&amp;diff=4904</id>
		<title>Sniffer SOP</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://wiki.icar.org/index.php?title=Sniffer_SOP&amp;diff=4904"/>
		<updated>2026-02-18T07:38:19Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Cvangemert: Cvangemert moved page Sniffer SOP to Section 20: Sniffer SOP&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;#REDIRECT [[Section 20: Sniffer SOP]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Cvangemert</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://wiki.icar.org/index.php?title=Section_20:_Sniffer_SOP&amp;diff=4903</id>
		<title>Section 20: Sniffer SOP</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://wiki.icar.org/index.php?title=Section_20:_Sniffer_SOP&amp;diff=4903"/>
		<updated>2026-02-18T07:38:19Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Cvangemert: Cvangemert moved page Sniffer SOP to Section 20: Sniffer SOP&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;big&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;b&amp;gt;NOTE: This version of Section 20 has been approved by the working group&#039;s Chair.  Please be aware that further revisions may occur before final review and approval by the Board and ICAR members per the [[Approval of Page Process]].&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/b&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Introduction ==&lt;br /&gt;
Accurate measurement of methane emissions in ruminants is crucial to develop robust national or international greenhouse gas emission inventories and to evaluate mitigation strategies for their reduction. Over years many instruments and techniques have been developed and used for research purposes. Between all instruments and techniques available, Sniffer method has assumed significance. Sniffer has been developed to measure and collect data about methane (CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) and carbon dioxide (CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) emissions in the breath of ruminants during milking and/or feeding. The feed bin might be in an automatic milking system (AMS) or in an automatic feeding system (AFS). Before considering all features, advantages and disadvantages of the system, it is important to remember that they have been originally designed to detect dangerous gas leaks. Breath-sampling methods are non-invasive because, once installed, animals are unaware of the equipment and animals are in their normal environment. Animals follow their normal routine, which includes milking and feeding, so no training of animals, handling or change in diet are required. Equipment is relatively cheap and running costs are negligible. In Sniffer method, gases are continuously sampled into a sampling tube installed in the feed bin or through. The other end of the sampling tube is connected to an infrared CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration analyser. Data are collected every 1-5 seconds by the Sniffer.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Equipment description ==&lt;br /&gt;
On the market several suppliers of this product are available, but all systems share the same basic structure consisting of: gas meter, pressure inlet, flow meter, pressure outlet and a tube to suction with filter. It is essential to have a filter at level of the suction tube to avoid clogging of the cylinder with dust, saliva or feed. In the tube between the cylinder and the gas meter, whose diameter is 2-4 mm, one or more filters can be inserted which ensure the removal of impurities and debris from the animal’s breath. For the correct functioning of the system and for the collection of good quality data, the aspiration pump must work with an aspiration volume of 0.5-1.5 L/s. In more complex systems and to deal with particular needs (e.g., high environmental humidity) a dryer tube can also be inserted. Generally, Sniffer systems are provided of at least two gas meters: one for the methane (CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) and one for carbon dioxide (CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;); further gas meters could be available, e.g., oxygen (O&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;), nitrous oxide (N&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;O) and water (H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;O). Gas cards used to estimate CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentrations have different ranges, depending on which sensor is used and how it is calibrated. Generally for CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; it is best to have a range between 0-25.000ppm, sensors with a range of 0-20.000ppm or 50.000ppm are also functional. For CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;  a range of 0-2.000ppm or 0-5.000 ppm is generally used. Internet connection is guaranteed through a 5G modem or through a Wi-Fi router. Internet connection allows data storage or download. Connections problems can occur; therefore, a hard disk can be provided to ensure data still collected when connection is lost. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is important to install the Sniffer sampling tube in a position that is not so visible to the animal to avoid frequent damages. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One unit, when installed in the automated milking system (AMS), can measure as many animals as the capacity of the AMS, generally up to 130 animals per day. Sniffers can also be installed in concentrate feeders. This is not often done as it does not give you simultaneous milking records and because concentrate feeders are generally more open than the AMS. Which means there is more influence on the measurements by for example the wind. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If there are power cuts, the system restarts automatically when power is restored. Some systems have a battery included to operate the system during a power cut.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Overview of commercially available sniffers ==&lt;br /&gt;
Currently there are different devices on the market that can be used as a sniffer. This section gives an overview of the different sniffers. &lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Agscent.png|thumb|157x157px|Agscent Air]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Agscent ===&lt;br /&gt;
Agscent is a company based in Australia, you can find their website [https://agscent.com/ here.] They have developed the Agscent Air, current model: GHG 2100. This device uses a TDL (Tunable Diode Laser) sensor for CH4 and a NDIR (Non-Dispersive InfraRed) sensor for CO2. With a measurement range of 0-20.000ppm for CO2 and 0-40.000ppm for CH4. The datasheet for this device can be downloaded [https://agscent.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Agscent-GHG-2100-tech-flyer.pdf here] and you can find the device on the website [https://agscent.com/products/agscent-air/#air-ghg here]. Currently this device is used in Australia and the USA. They have also developed the agscent x optiweigh, which combines the sniffer sensor with a weighting station for in the pasture. The datasheet for this device can be downloaded [https://agscent.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Agscent-Optiweigh-flyer.pdf here] and you can find the device on their website [https://agscent.com/products/agscent-air/#air-optiweigh here]. Currently these combined devices are being used in Australia. Validations for the combined and standalone devices were conducted by multiple institutions, you can find a summary [[:File:Agscent Air GHG Validation Case Study 2025.pdf|here.]] Preliminary results of one of these validation studies was presented at the State of the Science summit in 2025. You can find the poster [[:File:ADSA 2025 NS ed.pdf|here]] and the abstract [[:File:Abstracts BOOK 2025 20250624-1249.pdf|here]], number 1155. A preliminary paper on a follow-up study can be found [[:File:Reyes et al. - Enteric methane (paper).pdf|here.]] The report for one of the other validations can be found [[:File:Report Agscent 4-2024 external.pdf|here.]] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Agscent Air falls into the middle price range for a sniffer, for more information please contact Daniela Carnovale ([Mailto:daniela@agscent.com daniela@agscent.com])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
During the [[Section 20: Activities|Denmark-The Netherlands project]] the Axetris methane sensor will be tested, this is the same methane sensor that the Agscent Air uses. It has been installed in the original Carltech v1 casing. Testing in the Air Quality lab has been completed for these devices and these sensors functioned as well as the other sensors tested. On-farm testing is still in progress. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Analox ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:PXL 20250722 143934376.jpg|thumb|343x343px|HerdLab system, for all gasses.]]&lt;br /&gt;
Analox is a company based in the UK, you can find their website [https://analoxgroup.com/ here.] They have developed the HerdLab system. This device can measure 6 different gasses. The measurement range for CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is dependent on which variant of the sensor you choose, generally it will be 0-2.000 ppm, they also offer 0-1.000 ppm and 0-5.000 ppm. For CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; the range is also dependent on the variant of sensor you choose, generally it will be 0-20.000 ppm, they also offer 0-2.000, 0-5.000 and 0-50.000. This device can also measure oxygen (O&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;), hydrogen (H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;), ammonia (NH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) and nitric oxide (NO), if needed. It uses a combination of NDIR, paramagnetic and electrochemical sensors to analyze the concentrations. The datasheet for this device can be found [[:File:Herd Lab Brochure - Final Version.pdf|here]]. A short introductory presentation [[:File:Measuring Methane Emissions Introduction.pdf|here]] with associated video to be found [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2O9cDKg94W0 here.] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This system is originally developed to measure up to 6 bays in a herringbone system, at the same time. Thereby, HerdLab can be applied to multiple AMS systems at the same time and multiple bays in a rotary system too. Due to this possibility price range is more dynamic than for other devices included in the list. When using one system for one AMS the HerdLab falls into the medium price range for a sniffer. Price will change when you want to measure more gasses or more animals, for measuring in multiple AMS systems (at the same farm) or multiple bays the increase in costs would be low, as you already have the system in place. For more information please contact Adrian Howe ([Mailto:adrian.howe@analoxgroup.com adrian.howe@analoxgroup.com]).[[File:Arcoflex.jpg|thumb|151x151px|ASCH001]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Arcoflex ===&lt;br /&gt;
Arcoflex is a company based in Australia, you can find their website [https://www.arcoflex.com.au/ here.] They have developed a sniffer device different from the others currently on the market, as it is a passive device it does not require tubes to suck up the air. The sensor is directly placed in a feed bin above where the mouth from the cow will be. This sniffer is currently being used in Australia and New Zealand. Currently the version ASCH401 is available commercially, this device can only measure methane. Version ASCH402 will also include a CO2 sensor, this version is still under development. They have submitted a paper for review on device. You can download an earlier version of this paper [[Media:Enteric Methane Monitoring in Dairies.pdf|here]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The ASCH401 and ACH402 both fall into the lower price range for a sniffer, for more information please contact Geoff Schaller ([Mailto:geoff@arcoflex.com.au geoff@arcoflex.com.au])&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Carltech V2.jpg|thumb|181x181px|Carltech v2]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Carltech ===&lt;br /&gt;
Carltech is a company based in The Netherlands, you can find their website [https://carltech.nl/ here.]They have developed a a new version of the WD_WUR sniffer, which will be tested in the SOP sniffer project. This device can measure CO2 in the range 0-50.000ppm and CH4 in the range of 0-2.000ppm, optionally a O2 sensor can be included. Currently the older models are being used in The Netherlands. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The WD_WUR falls into the lower price range for a sniffer, for more information please contact Koen Böggemann ([Mailto:koen@carltech.nl koen@carltech.nl])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== C-lock ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Simplescan.jpg|thumb|163x163px|SimpleScan]]&lt;br /&gt;
C-lock is a company based in The USA, you can find their website [https://www.c-lockinc.com/ here.]Their development is mostly focused on the [[Greenfeed SOP|Greenfeed]], but they have also developed a sniffer, the SimpleScan. This sniffer uses the exact same sensors as their GreenFeed, TDL for CH4 with a range of 0-40.000ppm and NDIR for CO2 with a range of 0-20.000ppm. According to C-Lock their CH4 sensor is precise to about 1 ppm. This device can be outfitted with optional O&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; sensors. C-lock uses their own filtering algorithms and knowledge on finalized data for the final results. The datasheet for the SimpleScan can be downloaded [[Media:SimpleScan FactSheet.pdf|here.]]   &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The simple scan falls into the higher price range for a sniffer, for more information please contact Robert Whittington ([Mailto:rwhittington@c-lockinc.com rwhittington@c-lockinc.com])  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This product has been discontinued by the manufacturer.  &lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Gasera.png|thumb|181x181px|Gasera one pulse]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Gasera ===&lt;br /&gt;
Gasera is a company based in Finland, you can find their website [https://gasera.fi/ here.] They have developed multiple gas analysers, of which the Gasera one pulse can be used to measure CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. This device can be used for many different application as it can measure up to 9 gasses and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;O. Their sensor is based on combining the cantilever enhanced photoacoustic detection technology with a broad band IR source and narrow bandpass optical filters. It measures CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; in the range 0,3 – 30.000ppm and measures CH4 in the range 1-100.000ppm. Both ranges can be configured to achieve the detection performance required. The datasheet for this device can be found [[Media:Gasera brochure OnePulse.pdf|here]] and you can find the device on the website [https://gasera.fi/product/gasera-one-pulse/ here.]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
They have also developed the Gasera one GHG, this device can measure CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, NO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;O, but no CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;.&#039;&#039;&#039; This device is based on combining the cantilever enhanced photoacoustic detection technology with quantum cascade laser source operating at a Mid-IR fundamental spectral absorption line of CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and N&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;O. This combination provides very high sensitivity (ppb level) to reliably measure ambient background levels of greenhouse gases methane (CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) and nitrous oxide (N&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;O). It has a recommended recalibration period of 12 months. You can download the datasheet for this device [[Media:GASERA ONE GHG.pdf|here]] and find more information on the website [https://gasera.fi/product/gasera-one-ghg-greenhouse-gas-analyzer/ here].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Gasera one pulse falls into the higher price range for a sniffer, for more information please contact gasera [https://gasera.fi/company/distribution/ here].&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Gasmet.png|thumb|149x149px|GT5000]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Gasmet ===&lt;br /&gt;
Gasmet is a company based in Finland, you can find their website [https://www.gasmet.com/ here]. They have developed multiple gas analyzers for many different applications, the GT5000 can measure up to 50 gasses. It can measure both CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; up to 100.000ppm, the range can be adjusted to what is needed. This device uses a FTIR (Fourier Transformed InfraRed) sensor. The benefit of this sensor is that it can easily detect other or unknown gasses which you were not aware of and you can then add them to your detection. You can download the datasheet for this device [[Media:Gasmet GT5000 Terra Technical Data.pdf|here]] and find more information on the website [https://www.gasmet.com/products/category/portable-gas-analyzers/gt5000-terra/ here.]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The GT 5000 falls into the higher price range for a sniffer, for more information please contact Jockum Törnqvist ([Mailto:jockum.tornqvist@gasmet.fi jockum.tornqvist@gasmet.fi])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Edinburgh Sensors ===&lt;br /&gt;
Edinburgh Sensors is a company based in the UK, you can find their website [https://edinburghsensors.com/ here.] They develop sensors that can be used for measuring CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; in the breath of ruminants. They produce the boxed gascard and the guardian NG. These sensors can be used to build your own sniffer, by combining the sensors with, amongst others, a datalogger and waterproof casing. The measurement range is dependent on which type of gascard for CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; you include in the build. Currently the completely assembled Guardian sniffers are being used in Finland, Denmark and Spain. [[File:Guardian NEIKER.jpg|200px|thumb|Guardian build in Spain at [https://neiker.eus/en/ NEIKER]]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are companies that can build the complete sniffer from these sensors. One of these companies is DuoTec, you can find their website [https://duotec.dk/ here.] Contact person for inquiries for this company would be: Rasmus Bendsen ([Mailto:raw@duotec.dk raw@duotec.dk])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another company that can build a sniffer from these sensors is Bramtech, they build the sniffers that are currently used by Aarhus University. They currently have no plans to expand further into this business.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
During the [[Section 20: Activities|Denmark-The Netherlands project]] the Edinburgh methane sensor will be tested. It has been installed in the original Carltech v1 casing. Testing in the Air Quality lab has been completed for these devices and these sensors functioned as well as the other sensors tested. On-farm testing is still in progress. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Most often the Guardians are assembled in house by the research groups themselves.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In general this device, once completed falls in the lower price range for sniffers. You can contact Edinburgh Sensors [https://edinburghsensors.com/contact/ here.]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:MooLogger.jpg|thumb|175x175px|MooLogger]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Tecnosens  ===&lt;br /&gt;
Tecnosens is a company based in Italy, you can find their website [https://www.tecnosens.it/en here.] They have developed the MooLooger, currently there are two versions available, the MooLooger standard and the MooLogger advanced. The MooLogger has a measurement range of 0-5.000ppm for CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and 0-50.000ppm for CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and uses a NDIR sensor. Optionally this device can measure O&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; in the range of 0-25.000ppm. Currently the MooLogger is being used, on small or large scale, in Italy, Spain, Canada, USA, Switzerland and Uruguay. You can download the datasheet for this device [[Media:MooLogger Plus Oct 2024.pdf|here]] and find more information on the MooLogger on the website [https://www.tecnosens.it/en/Tecnosens-products/moologger here.] They have multiple instruction video&#039;s available on their [https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLR1KvTMU2thuf-xpkTuHM6fs_WRVtwoz6 youtube channel.] For this device a multiplexer is available to use one MooLogger and measure in multiple AMS.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The MooLooger falls in the lower price range for a sniffer, for more information please contact Greta Bonacina ([Mailto:gbonacina@tecnosens.it gbonacina@tecnosens.it]).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Nikira labs ===&lt;br /&gt;
Nikira labs is a company bases in the USA, you can find their website [https://www.nikiralabs.com/ here]. They have developed the CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;/CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;/H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;O analyser. This device has a measurements range of 100-20.000ppm for CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and 1-20.000ppm for CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and can optionally detect H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;O in the range of 500-20.000 ppm. The datasheet for this device can be downloaded from their website [https://www.nikiralabs.com/ch4-co2-h2o-analyzer here.]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;/CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;/H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;O analyser falls into the higher price range for a sniffer, for more information please contact Nikira Labs [https://www.nikiralabs.com/contact-9 here.]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== La Trobe Uni ===&lt;br /&gt;
The research institute, as a part of La Trobe university based in Australia, has developed a sniffer inhouse, you can find their website [https://www.latrobe.edu.au/ here.] They are still working on commercializing their sniffer device.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When commercialized they aim to have the sniffer fall into the lower price range, for more information please contact Aniruddha (Ani) Desai ([Mailto:A.Desai@latrobe.edu.au A.Desai@latrobe.edu.au]).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Comparison of technical details of commercially available sniffers ==&lt;br /&gt;
As part of the [[Section 20: Ongoing activities|DNK-NLD project]] Wageningen Livestock Research has collected technical information on all commercially available sniffers directly from the companies. An excel file showing these details for all the sniffers can be downloaded [[Media:Comparison technical details sniffers ICAR.xlsx|here]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Experimental protocols ==&lt;br /&gt;
No particular experimental protocols are applied. Once installed, the system runs continuously. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Change in diet are not required.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Training and adaptation period ==&lt;br /&gt;
Training, handling or adaptation period are not required.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Problems faced and upgrades ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Device waterproof ===&lt;br /&gt;
Sniffer devices are not always completely waterproof. Considering that there is electrical wiring inside and that in some cases the intervention of a technician is necessary, it is important to choose an IP65 box or to equip the Sniffer box with a waterproof coating.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Clogging problems ===&lt;br /&gt;
To avoid clogging of the pipes, ideally a venting hose is provided. This pipe is connected to the compressed air outlet pipe of the AMS. When the gate of the milking robot opens, allowing the animal to exit, compressed air is blown into the venting hose. This air flow in the direction of the cylinder helps to avoid clogging. Currently some sniffers have the option for a blow-back system.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Animals identification ===&lt;br /&gt;
Antenna for ID reader is not always successful. It is suggested to use AMS data identification and merge them later on.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Calibration procedure ===&lt;br /&gt;
In many cases problems of calibration drift can occur. It is necessary to standardize zero and span calibrating procedure.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Personell in charge of the trial ===&lt;br /&gt;
It is essential to have a good technician who monitors Sniffer&#039;s activities on daily basis and who also knows the AMS and AFS system. Among the activities that the technician must carry out: setting up, moving equipment, daily data monitoring and download, checking up on equipment at irregularities, fixing problems, downloading AMS data and ordering spare parts. If a good technician is not available, it is essential to have an alert system (sms, e-mail) of anomalies.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Filter replace ===&lt;br /&gt;
Filter obturations by dust or condensation can occur. It is possible to prevent these problems changing external filter every 15 days and change internal filter every 6 months. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Questions and answers ==&lt;br /&gt;
 &#039;&#039;&#039;Q1. What’s the cost of the system?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 A1. Very dependent on which system and producer, you can see an indication for pricing in the comparison excel file. If you want an exact quote, please contact the companies.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &#039;&#039;&#039;Q2. How many animals per Sniffer?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Depending on where the sniffer is installed, it can measure as many animals as can visit that location. If an AMS can milk 130 cows per day, then the sniffer can measure 130 cows per day.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &#039;&#039;&#039;Q3. How long does the experimental trial take?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 A1. For genetic evaluation purposes we plan to collect data for many years.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &#039;&#039;&#039;Q4. How do you identify animals in Sniffer?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 A1. We use AMS identification, easier and more accurate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 A2. We use AMS identification. It is possible to use also external RFID tag reader but it need validation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &#039;&#039;&#039;Q5. It is necessary to have gas cards with wide detection limit (0-10.000 CH4 and 0-50.000 CO2)?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 A1. Not necessary considering animals’ emission, so probably are cheaper than other gas cards with different detection limit.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Cvangemert</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://wiki.icar.org/index.php?title=Section_20:_Methane_measuring_methods&amp;diff=4902</id>
		<title>Section 20: Methane measuring methods</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://wiki.icar.org/index.php?title=Section_20:_Methane_measuring_methods&amp;diff=4902"/>
		<updated>2026-02-18T07:37:06Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Cvangemert: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;big&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;b&amp;gt;NOTE: This version of Section 20 has been approved by the working group&#039;s Chair.  Please be aware that further revisions may occur before final review and approval by the Board and ICAR members per the [[Approval of Page Process]].&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/b&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Several factors influence the choice of measurement method such as cost, level of accuracy, precision, scope of application, and scale, which vary across disciplines (Cassandro et al., 2013&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Cassandro, M. 2013. Comparing local and cosmopolitan cattle breeds on added values for milk and cheese production and their predicted methane emissions. Animal Genetic Resources/Ressources génétiques animales/Recursos genéticos animales, available on CJO2013. doi:10.1017/S2078 63361200077X&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;; Hammond et al., 2016A&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Hammond, K.J., Crompton, L.A., Bannink, A., Dijkstra, J., Yáñez-Ruiz, D.R., O’Kiely, P., Kebreab, E., Eugenè, M.A., Yu, Z., Shingfield, K.J., Schwarm, A., Hristov, A.N., and Reynolds, C.K. 2016A. Review of current in vivo measurement techniques for quantifying enteric methane emission from ruminants. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 219:13–30. doi:10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2016.05.018.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;; Garnsworthy et al., 2019&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Garnsworthy, P.C. Difford, G.F. Bell, M.J. Bayat, A.R. Huhtanen, P. Kuhla, B. Lassen, J. Peiren, N. Pszczola, M; Sorg, D. Visker, M.H., and Yan, T. 2019 Comparison of Methods to Measure Methane for Use in Genetic Evaluation of Dairy Cattle. Animals 9:837, 12p.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;). For instance, genetic selection programs require CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; measurements on thousands of related individuals under the environmental conditions in which the animals are expected to perform (Falconer and Mackay, 1996&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Falconer, D., and Macka,y T. 1996. Introduction to quantitative genetics (4th edn). ISBN-13: 978-0582243026; ISBN-10: 0582243025&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;). This can be challenging because dairy cattle perform in a wide range of conditions (e.g. grazing vs indoor housing). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are a number of different measurement methods currently being employed, each with advantages and disadvantages in terms of the factors listed above. The currently accepted and widely used measurement methods are listed and described below. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The main features of methods for measuring CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; output by individual animals are summarised in Table 4. Values for each feature are based on experience of experts in METHAGENE WG2 who have used the methods. All values are relative, and somewhat subjective, because absolute values will depend on installation and implementation of each method at different research centres. It should be noted that the measuring methods can be divided in two major sections: methods that measure the concentration and flux of CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (e.g. the respiration chamber), and methods that measure the flux of CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; through the device (e.g. GreenFeed). This affects the useability of the methods for answering research questions – please see also the recommendations at the end of these guidelines.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Respiration chamber]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Portable Accumulation Chamber|Portable Accumulation Chambers]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Wearables]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Breath sampling during milk and feeding]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Sniffer SOP]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Greenfeed SOP]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Laser Methane Detector]]&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! colspan=&amp;quot;3&amp;quot; | &#039;&#039;Table 1.  Table one caption (in first row of the table).&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|- style=&amp;quot;background-color:#efefef;&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+&lt;br /&gt;
!Method&lt;br /&gt;
!Purchase cost&lt;br /&gt;
!Running costs&lt;br /&gt;
!Labour&lt;br /&gt;
!Repeatability&lt;br /&gt;
!Behaviour alteration&lt;br /&gt;
!Throughput&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Respiration chamber&lt;br /&gt;
|High&lt;br /&gt;
|High&lt;br /&gt;
|High&lt;br /&gt;
|High&lt;br /&gt;
|High&lt;br /&gt;
|Low&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|SF6 technique&lt;br /&gt;
|Medium&lt;br /&gt;
|High&lt;br /&gt;
|High&lt;br /&gt;
|Medium&lt;br /&gt;
|Medium&lt;br /&gt;
|Medium&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Breath sampling during milking and feeding&lt;br /&gt;
|Low&lt;br /&gt;
|Low&lt;br /&gt;
|Low&lt;br /&gt;
|Medium&lt;br /&gt;
|None&lt;br /&gt;
|High&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|GreenFeed&lt;br /&gt;
|Medium&lt;br /&gt;
|Medium&lt;br /&gt;
|Medium&lt;br /&gt;
|Medium&lt;br /&gt;
|Medium&lt;br /&gt;
|Medium&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Laser methane detector&lt;br /&gt;
|Low&lt;br /&gt;
|Low&lt;br /&gt;
|High&lt;br /&gt;
|Low&lt;br /&gt;
|Low-Medium&lt;br /&gt;
|Medium&lt;br /&gt;
|}Table 4. Summary of the main features of methods for measuring CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; output by individual animals.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Cvangemert</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://wiki.icar.org/index.php?title=Section_20:_Sniffer_SOP&amp;diff=4899</id>
		<title>Section 20: Sniffer SOP</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://wiki.icar.org/index.php?title=Section_20:_Sniffer_SOP&amp;diff=4899"/>
		<updated>2026-02-11T13:48:56Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Cvangemert: reordered sniffers alphabetically&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;big&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;b&amp;gt;NOTE: This version of Section 20 has been approved by the working group&#039;s Chair.  Please be aware that further revisions may occur before final review and approval by the Board and ICAR members per the [[Approval of Page Process]].&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/b&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Introduction ==&lt;br /&gt;
Accurate measurement of methane emissions in ruminants is crucial to develop robust national or international greenhouse gas emission inventories and to evaluate mitigation strategies for their reduction. Over years many instruments and techniques have been developed and used for research purposes. Between all instruments and techniques available, Sniffer method has assumed significance. Sniffer has been developed to measure and collect data about methane (CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) and carbon dioxide (CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) emissions in the breath of ruminants during milking and/or feeding. The feed bin might be in an automatic milking system (AMS) or in an automatic feeding system (AFS). Before considering all features, advantages and disadvantages of the system, it is important to remember that they have been originally designed to detect dangerous gas leaks. Breath-sampling methods are non-invasive because, once installed, animals are unaware of the equipment and animals are in their normal environment. Animals follow their normal routine, which includes milking and feeding, so no training of animals, handling or change in diet are required. Equipment is relatively cheap and running costs are negligible. In Sniffer method, gases are continuously sampled into a sampling tube installed in the feed bin or through. The other end of the sampling tube is connected to an infrared CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration analyser. Data are collected every 1-5 seconds by the Sniffer.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Equipment description ==&lt;br /&gt;
On the market several suppliers of this product are available, but all systems share the same basic structure consisting of: gas meter, pressure inlet, flow meter, pressure outlet and a tube to suction with filter. It is essential to have a filter at level of the suction tube to avoid clogging of the cylinder with dust, saliva or feed. In the tube between the cylinder and the gas meter, whose diameter is 2-4 mm, one or more filters can be inserted which ensure the removal of impurities and debris from the animal’s breath. For the correct functioning of the system and for the collection of good quality data, the aspiration pump must work with an aspiration volume of 0.5-1.5 L/s. In more complex systems and to deal with particular needs (e.g., high environmental humidity) a dryer tube can also be inserted. Generally, Sniffer systems are provided of at least two gas meters: one for the methane (CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) and one for carbon dioxide (CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;); further gas meters could be available, e.g., oxygen (O&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;), nitrous oxide (N&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;O) and water (H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;O). Gas cards used to estimate CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentrations have different ranges, depending on which sensor is used and how it is calibrated. Generally for CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; it is best to have a range between 0-25.000ppm, sensors with a range of 0-20.000ppm or 50.000ppm are also functional. For CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;  a range of 0-2.000ppm or 0-5.000 ppm is generally used. Internet connection is guaranteed through a 5G modem or through a Wi-Fi router. Internet connection allows data storage or download. Connections problems can occur; therefore, a hard disk can be provided to ensure data still collected when connection is lost. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is important to install the Sniffer sampling tube in a position that is not so visible to the animal to avoid frequent damages. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One unit, when installed in the automated milking system (AMS), can measure as many animals as the capacity of the AMS, generally up to 130 animals per day. Sniffers can also be installed in concentrate feeders. This is not often done as it does not give you simultaneous milking records and because concentrate feeders are generally more open than the AMS. Which means there is more influence on the measurements by for example the wind. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If there are power cuts, the system restarts automatically when power is restored. Some systems have a battery included to operate the system during a power cut.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Overview of commercially available sniffers ==&lt;br /&gt;
Currently there are different devices on the market that can be used as a sniffer. This section gives an overview of the different sniffers. &lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Agscent.png|thumb|157x157px|Agscent Air]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Agscent ===&lt;br /&gt;
Agscent is a company based in Australia, you can find their website [https://agscent.com/ here.] They have developed the Agscent Air, current model: GHG 2100. This device uses a TDL (Tunable Diode Laser) sensor for CH4 and a NDIR (Non-Dispersive InfraRed) sensor for CO2. With a measurement range of 0-20.000ppm for CO2 and 0-40.000ppm for CH4. The datasheet for this device can be downloaded [https://agscent.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Agscent-GHG-2100-tech-flyer.pdf here] and you can find the device on the website [https://agscent.com/products/agscent-air/#air-ghg here]. Currently this device is used in Australia and the USA. They have also developed the agscent x optiweigh, which combines the sniffer sensor with a weighting station for in the pasture. The datasheet for this device can be downloaded [https://agscent.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Agscent-Optiweigh-flyer.pdf here] and you can find the device on their website [https://agscent.com/products/agscent-air/#air-optiweigh here]. Currently these combined devices are being used in Australia. Validations for the combined and standalone devices were conducted by multiple institutions, you can find a summary [[:File:Agscent Air GHG Validation Case Study 2025.pdf|here.]] Preliminary results of one of these validation studies was presented at the State of the Science summit in 2025. You can find the poster [[:File:ADSA 2025 NS ed.pdf|here]] and the abstract [[:File:Abstracts BOOK 2025 20250624-1249.pdf|here]], number 1155. A preliminary paper on a follow-up study can be found [[:File:Reyes et al. - Enteric methane (paper).pdf|here.]] The report for one of the other validations can be found [[:File:Report Agscent 4-2024 external.pdf|here.]] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Agscent Air falls into the middle price range for a sniffer, for more information please contact Daniela Carnovale ([Mailto:daniela@agscent.com daniela@agscent.com])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
During the [[Section 20: Activities|Denmark-The Netherlands project]] the Axetris methane sensor will be tested, this is the same methane sensor that the Agscent Air uses. It has been installed in the original Carltech v1 casing. Testing in the Air Quality lab has been completed for these devices and these sensors functioned as well as the other sensors tested. On-farm testing is still in progress. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Analox ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:PXL 20250722 143934376.jpg|thumb|343x343px|HerdLab system, for all gasses.]]&lt;br /&gt;
Analox is a company based in the UK, you can find their website [https://analoxgroup.com/ here.] They have developed the HerdLab system. This device can measure 6 different gasses. The measurement range for CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is dependent on which variant of the sensor you choose, generally it will be 0-2.000 ppm, they also offer 0-1.000 ppm and 0-5.000 ppm. For CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; the range is also dependent on the variant of sensor you choose, generally it will be 0-20.000 ppm, they also offer 0-2.000, 0-5.000 and 0-50.000. This device can also measure oxygen (O&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;), hydrogen (H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;), ammonia (NH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) and nitric oxide (NO), if needed. It uses a combination of NDIR, paramagnetic and electrochemical sensors to analyze the concentrations. The datasheet for this device can be found [[:File:Herd Lab Brochure - Final Version.pdf|here]]. A short introductory presentation [[:File:Measuring Methane Emissions Introduction.pdf|here]] with associated video to be found [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2O9cDKg94W0 here.] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This system is originally developed to measure up to 6 bays in a herringbone system, at the same time. Thereby, HerdLab can be applied to multiple AMS systems at the same time and multiple bays in a rotary system too. Due to this possibility price range is more dynamic than for other devices included in the list. When using one system for one AMS the HerdLab falls into the medium price range for a sniffer. Price will change when you want to measure more gasses or more animals, for measuring in multiple AMS systems (at the same farm) or multiple bays the increase in costs would be low, as you already have the system in place. For more information please contact Adrian Howe ([Mailto:adrian.howe@analoxgroup.com adrian.howe@analoxgroup.com]).[[File:Arcoflex.jpg|thumb|151x151px|ASCH001]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Arcoflex ===&lt;br /&gt;
Arcoflex is a company based in Australia, you can find their website [https://www.arcoflex.com.au/ here.] They have developed a sniffer device different from the others currently on the market, as it is a passive device it does not require tubes to suck up the air. The sensor is directly placed in a feed bin above where the mouth from the cow will be. This sniffer is currently being used in Australia and New Zealand. Currently the version ASCH401 is available commercially, this device can only measure methane. Version ASCH402 will also include a CO2 sensor, this version is still under development. They have submitted a paper for review on device. You can download an earlier version of this paper [[Media:Enteric Methane Monitoring in Dairies.pdf|here]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The ASCH401 and ACH402 both fall into the lower price range for a sniffer, for more information please contact Geoff Schaller ([Mailto:geoff@arcoflex.com.au geoff@arcoflex.com.au])&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Carltech V2.jpg|thumb|181x181px|Carltech v2]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Carltech ===&lt;br /&gt;
Carltech is a company based in The Netherlands, you can find their website [https://carltech.nl/ here.]They have developed a a new version of the WD_WUR sniffer, which will be tested in the SOP sniffer project. This device can measure CO2 in the range 0-50.000ppm and CH4 in the range of 0-2.000ppm, optionally a O2 sensor can be included. Currently the older models are being used in The Netherlands. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The WD_WUR falls into the lower price range for a sniffer, for more information please contact Koen Böggemann ([Mailto:koen@carltech.nl koen@carltech.nl])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== C-lock ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Simplescan.jpg|thumb|163x163px|SimpleScan]]&lt;br /&gt;
C-lock is a company based in The USA, you can find their website [https://www.c-lockinc.com/ here.]Their development is mostly focused on the [[Greenfeed SOP|Greenfeed]], but they have also developed a sniffer, the SimpleScan. This sniffer uses the exact same sensors as their GreenFeed, TDL for CH4 with a range of 0-40.000ppm and NDIR for CO2 with a range of 0-20.000ppm. According to C-Lock their CH4 sensor is precise to about 1 ppm. This device can be outfitted with optional O&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; sensors. C-lock uses their own filtering algorithms and knowledge on finalized data for the final results. The datasheet for the SimpleScan can be downloaded [[Media:SimpleScan FactSheet.pdf|here.]]   &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The simple scan falls into the higher price range for a sniffer, for more information please contact Robert Whittington ([Mailto:rwhittington@c-lockinc.com rwhittington@c-lockinc.com])  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This product has been discontinued by the manufacturer.  &lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Gasera.png|thumb|181x181px|Gasera one pulse]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Gasera ===&lt;br /&gt;
Gasera is a company based in Finland, you can find their website [https://gasera.fi/ here.] They have developed multiple gas analysers, of which the Gasera one pulse can be used to measure CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. This device can be used for many different application as it can measure up to 9 gasses and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;O. Their sensor is based on combining the cantilever enhanced photoacoustic detection technology with a broad band IR source and narrow bandpass optical filters. It measures CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; in the range 0,3 – 30.000ppm and measures CH4 in the range 1-100.000ppm. Both ranges can be configured to achieve the detection performance required. The datasheet for this device can be found [[Media:Gasera brochure OnePulse.pdf|here]] and you can find the device on the website [https://gasera.fi/product/gasera-one-pulse/ here.]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
They have also developed the Gasera one GHG, this device can measure CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, NO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;O, but no CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;.&#039;&#039;&#039; This device is based on combining the cantilever enhanced photoacoustic detection technology with quantum cascade laser source operating at a Mid-IR fundamental spectral absorption line of CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and N&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;O. This combination provides very high sensitivity (ppb level) to reliably measure ambient background levels of greenhouse gases methane (CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) and nitrous oxide (N&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;O). It has a recommended recalibration period of 12 months. You can download the datasheet for this device [[Media:GASERA ONE GHG.pdf|here]] and find more information on the website [https://gasera.fi/product/gasera-one-ghg-greenhouse-gas-analyzer/ here].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Gasera one pulse falls into the higher price range for a sniffer, for more information please contact gasera [https://gasera.fi/company/distribution/ here].&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Gasmet.png|thumb|149x149px|GT5000]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Gasmet ===&lt;br /&gt;
Gasmet is a company based in Finland, you can find their website [https://www.gasmet.com/ here]. They have developed multiple gas analyzers for many different applications, the GT5000 can measure up to 50 gasses. It can measure both CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; up to 100.000ppm, the range can be adjusted to what is needed. This device uses a FTIR (Fourier Transformed InfraRed) sensor. The benefit of this sensor is that it can easily detect other or unknown gasses which you were not aware of and you can then add them to your detection. You can download the datasheet for this device [[Media:Gasmet GT5000 Terra Technical Data.pdf|here]] and find more information on the website [https://www.gasmet.com/products/category/portable-gas-analyzers/gt5000-terra/ here.]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The GT 5000 falls into the higher price range for a sniffer, for more information please contact Jockum Törnqvist ([Mailto:jockum.tornqvist@gasmet.fi jockum.tornqvist@gasmet.fi])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Edinburgh Sensors ===&lt;br /&gt;
Edinburgh Sensors is a company based in the UK, you can find their website [https://edinburghsensors.com/ here.] They develop sensors that can be used for measuring CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; in the breath of ruminants. They produce the boxed gascard and the guardian NG. These sensors can be used to build your own sniffer, by combining the sensors with, amongst others, a datalogger and waterproof casing. The measurement range is dependent on which type of gascard for CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; you include in the build. Currently the completely assembled Guardian sniffers are being used in Finland, Denmark and Spain. [[File:Guardian NEIKER.jpg|200px|thumb|Guardian build in Spain at [https://neiker.eus/en/ NEIKER]]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are companies that can build the complete sniffer from these sensors. One of these companies is DuoTec, you can find their website [https://duotec.dk/ here.] Contact person for inquiries for this company would be: Rasmus Bendsen ([Mailto:raw@duotec.dk raw@duotec.dk])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another company that can build a sniffer from these sensors is Bramtech, they build the sniffers that are currently used by Aarhus University. They currently have no plans to expand further into this business.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
During the [[Section 20: Activities|Denmark-The Netherlands project]] the Edinburgh methane sensor will be tested. It has been installed in the original Carltech v1 casing. Testing in the Air Quality lab has been completed for these devices and these sensors functioned as well as the other sensors tested. On-farm testing is still in progress. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Most often the Guardians are assembled in house by the research groups themselves.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In general this device, once completed falls in the lower price range for sniffers. You can contact Edinburgh Sensors [https://edinburghsensors.com/contact/ here.]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:MooLogger.jpg|thumb|175x175px|MooLogger]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Tecnosens  ===&lt;br /&gt;
Tecnosens is a company based in Italy, you can find their website [https://www.tecnosens.it/en here.] They have developed the MooLooger, currently there are two versions available, the MooLooger standard and the MooLogger advanced. The MooLogger has a measurement range of 0-5.000ppm for CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and 0-50.000ppm for CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and uses a NDIR sensor. Optionally this device can measure O&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; in the range of 0-25.000ppm. Currently the MooLogger is being used, on small or large scale, in Italy, Spain, Canada, USA, Switzerland and Uruguay. You can download the datasheet for this device [[Media:MooLogger Plus Oct 2024.pdf|here]] and find more information on the MooLogger on the website [https://www.tecnosens.it/en/Tecnosens-products/moologger here.] They have multiple instruction video&#039;s available on their [https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLR1KvTMU2thuf-xpkTuHM6fs_WRVtwoz6 youtube channel.] For this device a multiplexer is available to use one MooLogger and measure in multiple AMS.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The MooLooger falls in the lower price range for a sniffer, for more information please contact Greta Bonacina ([Mailto:gbonacina@tecnosens.it gbonacina@tecnosens.it]).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Nikira labs ===&lt;br /&gt;
Nikira labs is a company bases in the USA, you can find their website [https://www.nikiralabs.com/ here]. They have developed the CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;/CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;/H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;O analyser. This device has a measurements range of 100-20.000ppm for CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and 1-20.000ppm for CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and can optionally detect H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;O in the range of 500-20.000 ppm. The datasheet for this device can be downloaded from their website [https://www.nikiralabs.com/ch4-co2-h2o-analyzer here.]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;/CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;/H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;O analyser falls into the higher price range for a sniffer, for more information please contact Nikira Labs [https://www.nikiralabs.com/contact-9 here.]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== La Trobe Uni ===&lt;br /&gt;
The research institute, as a part of La Trobe university based in Australia, has developed a sniffer inhouse, you can find their website [https://www.latrobe.edu.au/ here.] They are still working on commercializing their sniffer device.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When commercialized they aim to have the sniffer fall into the lower price range, for more information please contact Aniruddha (Ani) Desai ([Mailto:A.Desai@latrobe.edu.au A.Desai@latrobe.edu.au]).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Comparison of technical details of commercially available sniffers ==&lt;br /&gt;
As part of the [[Section 20: Ongoing activities|DNK-NLD project]] Wageningen Livestock Research has collected technical information on all commercially available sniffers directly from the companies. An excel file showing these details for all the sniffers can be downloaded [[Media:Comparison technical details sniffers ICAR.xlsx|here]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Experimental protocols ==&lt;br /&gt;
No particular experimental protocols are applied. Once installed, the system runs continuously. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Change in diet are not required.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Training and adaptation period ==&lt;br /&gt;
Training, handling or adaptation period are not required.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Problems faced and upgrades ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Device waterproof ===&lt;br /&gt;
Sniffer devices are not always completely waterproof. Considering that there is electrical wiring inside and that in some cases the intervention of a technician is necessary, it is important to choose an IP65 box or to equip the Sniffer box with a waterproof coating.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Clogging problems ===&lt;br /&gt;
To avoid clogging of the pipes, ideally a venting hose is provided. This pipe is connected to the compressed air outlet pipe of the AMS. When the gate of the milking robot opens, allowing the animal to exit, compressed air is blown into the venting hose. This air flow in the direction of the cylinder helps to avoid clogging. Currently some sniffers have the option for a blow-back system.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Animals identification ===&lt;br /&gt;
Antenna for ID reader is not always successful. It is suggested to use AMS data identification and merge them later on.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Calibration procedure ===&lt;br /&gt;
In many cases problems of calibration drift can occur. It is necessary to standardize zero and span calibrating procedure.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Personell in charge of the trial ===&lt;br /&gt;
It is essential to have a good technician who monitors Sniffer&#039;s activities on daily basis and who also knows the AMS and AFS system. Among the activities that the technician must carry out: setting up, moving equipment, daily data monitoring and download, checking up on equipment at irregularities, fixing problems, downloading AMS data and ordering spare parts. If a good technician is not available, it is essential to have an alert system (sms, e-mail) of anomalies.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Filter replace ===&lt;br /&gt;
Filter obturations by dust or condensation can occur. It is possible to prevent these problems changing external filter every 15 days and change internal filter every 6 months. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Questions and answers ==&lt;br /&gt;
 &#039;&#039;&#039;Q1. What’s the cost of the system?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 A1. Very dependent on which system and producer, you can see an indication for pricing in the comparison excel file. If you want an exact quote, please contact the companies.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &#039;&#039;&#039;Q2. How many animals per Sniffer?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Depending on where the sniffer is installed, it can measure as many animals as can visit that location. If an AMS can milk 130 cows per day, then the sniffer can measure 130 cows per day.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &#039;&#039;&#039;Q3. How long does the experimental trial take?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 A1. For genetic evaluation purposes we plan to collect data for many years.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &#039;&#039;&#039;Q4. How do you identify animals in Sniffer?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 A1. We use AMS identification, easier and more accurate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 A2. We use AMS identification. It is possible to use also external RFID tag reader but it need validation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &#039;&#039;&#039;Q5. It is necessary to have gas cards with wide detection limit (0-10.000 CH4 and 0-50.000 CO2)?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 A1. Not necessary considering animals’ emission, so probably are cheaper than other gas cards with different detection limit.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Cvangemert</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://wiki.icar.org/index.php?title=Section_20:_Sniffer_SOP&amp;diff=4898</id>
		<title>Section 20: Sniffer SOP</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://wiki.icar.org/index.php?title=Section_20:_Sniffer_SOP&amp;diff=4898"/>
		<updated>2026-02-11T13:29:27Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Cvangemert: Introduction and Q&amp;amp;A&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;big&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;b&amp;gt;NOTE: This version of Section 20 has been approved by the working group&#039;s Chair.  Please be aware that further revisions may occur before final review and approval by the Board and ICAR members per the [[Approval of Page Process]].&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/b&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Introduction ==&lt;br /&gt;
Accurate measurement of methane emissions in ruminants is crucial to develop robust national or international greenhouse gas emission inventories and to evaluate mitigation strategies for their reduction. Over years many instruments and techniques have been developed and used for research purposes. Between all instruments and techniques available, Sniffer method has assumed significance. Sniffer has been developed to measure and collect data about methane (CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) and carbon dioxide (CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) emissions in the breath of ruminants during milking and/or feeding. The feed bin might be in an automatic milking system (AMS) or in an automatic feeding system (AFS). Before considering all features, advantages and disadvantages of the system, it is important to remember that they have been originally designed to detect dangerous gas leaks. Breath-sampling methods are non-invasive because, once installed, animals are unaware of the equipment and animals are in their normal environment. Animals follow their normal routine, which includes milking and feeding, so no training of animals, handling or change in diet are required. Equipment is relatively cheap and running costs are negligible. In Sniffer method, gases are continuously sampled into a sampling tube installed in the feed bin or through. The other end of the sampling tube is connected to an infrared CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration analyser. Data are collected every 1-5 seconds by the Sniffer.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Equipment description ==&lt;br /&gt;
On the market several suppliers of this product are available, but all systems share the same basic structure consisting of: gas meter, pressure inlet, flow meter, pressure outlet and a tube to suction with filter. It is essential to have a filter at level of the suction tube to avoid clogging of the cylinder with dust, saliva or feed. In the tube between the cylinder and the gas meter, whose diameter is 2-4 mm, one or more filters can be inserted which ensure the removal of impurities and debris from the animal’s breath. For the correct functioning of the system and for the collection of good quality data, the aspiration pump must work with an aspiration volume of 0.5-1.5 L/s. In more complex systems and to deal with particular needs (e.g., high environmental humidity) a dryer tube can also be inserted. Generally, Sniffer systems are provided of at least two gas meters: one for the methane (CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) and one for carbon dioxide (CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;); further gas meters could be available, e.g., oxygen (O&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;), nitrous oxide (N&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;O) and water (H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;O). Gas cards used to estimate CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentrations have different ranges, depending on which sensor is used and how it is calibrated. Generally for CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; it is best to have a range between 0-25.000ppm, sensors with a range of 0-20.000ppm or 50.000ppm are also functional. For CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;  a range of 0-2.000ppm or 0-5.000 ppm is generally used. Internet connection is guaranteed through a 5G modem or through a Wi-Fi router. Internet connection allows data storage or download. Connections problems can occur; therefore, a hard disk can be provided to ensure data still collected when connection is lost. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is important to install the Sniffer sampling tube in a position that is not so visible to the animal to avoid frequent damages. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One unit, when installed in the automated milking system (AMS), can measure as many animals as the capacity of the AMS, generally up to 130 animals per day. Sniffers can also be installed in concentrate feeders. This is not often done as it does not give you simultaneous milking records and because concentrate feeders are generally more open than the AMS. Which means there is more influence on the measurements by for example the wind. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If there are power cuts, the system restarts automatically when power is restored. Some systems have a battery included to operate the system during a power cut.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Overview of commercially available sniffers ==&lt;br /&gt;
Currently there are different devices on the market that can be used as a sniffer. This section gives an overview of the different sniffers. &lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Agscent.png|thumb|157x157px|Agscent Air]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Agscent ===&lt;br /&gt;
Agscent is a company based in Australia, you can find their website [https://agscent.com/ here.] They have developed the Agscent Air, current model: GHG 2100. This device uses a TDL (Tunable Diode Laser) sensor for CH4 and a NDIR (Non-Dispersive InfraRed) sensor for CO2. With a measurement range of 0-20.000ppm for CO2 and 0-40.000ppm for CH4. The datasheet for this device can be downloaded [https://agscent.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Agscent-GHG-2100-tech-flyer.pdf here] and you can find the device on the website [https://agscent.com/products/agscent-air/#air-ghg here]. Currently this device is used in Australia and the USA. They have also developed the agscent x optiweigh, which combines the sniffer sensor with a weighting station for in the pasture. The datasheet for this device can be downloaded [https://agscent.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Agscent-Optiweigh-flyer.pdf here] and you can find the device on their website [https://agscent.com/products/agscent-air/#air-optiweigh here]. Currently these combined devices are being used in Australia. Validations for the combined and standalone devices were conducted by multiple institutions, you can find a summary [[:File:Agscent Air GHG Validation Case Study 2025.pdf|here.]] Preliminary results of one of these validation studies was presented at the State of the Science summit in 2025. You can find the poster [[:File:ADSA 2025 NS ed.pdf|here]] and the abstract [[:File:Abstracts BOOK 2025 20250624-1249.pdf|here]], number 1155. A preliminary paper on a follow-up study can be found [[:File:Reyes et al. - Enteric methane (paper).pdf|here.]] The report for one of the other validations can be found [[:File:Report Agscent 4-2024 external.pdf|here.]] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Agscent Air falls into the middle price range for a sniffer, for more information please contact Daniela Carnovale ([Mailto:daniela@agscent.com daniela@agscent.com])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
During the [[Section 20: Activities|Denmark-The Netherlands project]] the Axetris methane sensor will be tested, this is the same methane sensor that the Agscent Air uses. It has been installed in the original Carltech v1 casing. Testing in the Air Quality lab has been completed for these devices and these sensors functioned as well as the other sensors tested. On-farm testing is still in progress. &lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Arcoflex.jpg|thumb|151x151px|ASCH001]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Arcoflex ===&lt;br /&gt;
Arcoflex is a company based in Australia, you can find their website [https://www.arcoflex.com.au/ here.] They have developed a sniffer device different from the others currently on the market, as it is a passive device it does not require tubes to suck up the air. The sensor is directly placed in a feed bin above where the mouth from the cow will be. This sniffer is currently being used in Australia and New Zealand. Currently the version ASCH401 is available commercially, this device can only measure methane. Version ASCH402 will also include a CO2 sensor, this version is still under development. They have submitted a paper for review on device. You can download an earlier version of this paper [[Media:Enteric Methane Monitoring in Dairies.pdf|here]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The ASCH401 and ACH402 both fall into the lower price range for a sniffer, for more information please contact Geoff Schaller ([Mailto:geoff@arcoflex.com.au geoff@arcoflex.com.au])&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Carltech V2.jpg|thumb|181x181px|Carltech v2]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Carltech ===&lt;br /&gt;
Carltech is a company based in The Netherlands, you can find their website [https://carltech.nl/ here.]They have developed a a new version of the WD_WUR sniffer, which will be tested in the SOP sniffer project. This device can measure CO2 in the range 0-50.000ppm and CH4 in the range of 0-2.000ppm, optionally a O2 sensor can be included. Currently the older models are being used in The Netherlands. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The WD_WUR falls into the lower price range for a sniffer, for more information please contact Koen Böggemann ([Mailto:koen@carltech.nl koen@carltech.nl])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== C-lock ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Simplescan.jpg|thumb|163x163px|SimpleScan]]&lt;br /&gt;
C-lock is a company based in The USA, you can find their website [https://www.c-lockinc.com/ here.]Their development is mostly focused on the [[Greenfeed SOP|Greenfeed]], but they have also developed a sniffer, the SimpleScan. This sniffer uses the exact same sensors as their GreenFeed, TDL for CH4 with a range of 0-40.000ppm and NDIR for CO2 with a range of 0-20.000ppm. According to C-Lock their CH4 sensor is precise to about 1 ppm. This device can be outfitted with optional O&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; sensors. C-lock uses their own filtering algorithms and knowledge on finalized data for the final results. The datasheet for the SimpleScan can be downloaded [[Media:SimpleScan FactSheet.pdf|here.]]   &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The simple scan falls into the higher price range for a sniffer, for more information please contact Robert Whittington ([Mailto:rwhittington@c-lockinc.com rwhittington@c-lockinc.com])  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This product has been discontinued by the manufacturer.  &lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Gasera.png|thumb|181x181px|Gasera one pulse]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Gasera ===&lt;br /&gt;
Gasera is a company based in Finland, you can find their website [https://gasera.fi/ here.] They have developed multiple gas analysers, of which the Gasera one pulse can be used to measure CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. This device can be used for many different application as it can measure up to 9 gasses and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;O. Their sensor is based on combining the cantilever enhanced photoacoustic detection technology with a broad band IR source and narrow bandpass optical filters. It measures CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; in the range 0,3 – 30.000ppm and measures CH4 in the range 1-100.000ppm. Both ranges can be configured to achieve the detection performance required. The datasheet for this device can be found [[Media:Gasera brochure OnePulse.pdf|here]] and you can find the device on the website [https://gasera.fi/product/gasera-one-pulse/ here.]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
They have also developed the Gasera one GHG, this device can measure CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, NO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;O, but no CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;.&#039;&#039;&#039; This device is based on combining the cantilever enhanced photoacoustic detection technology with quantum cascade laser source operating at a Mid-IR fundamental spectral absorption line of CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and N&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;O. This combination provides very high sensitivity (ppb level) to reliably measure ambient background levels of greenhouse gases methane (CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) and nitrous oxide (N&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;O). It has a recommended recalibration period of 12 months. You can download the datasheet for this device [[Media:GASERA ONE GHG.pdf|here]] and find more information on the website [https://gasera.fi/product/gasera-one-ghg-greenhouse-gas-analyzer/ here].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Gasera one pulse falls into the higher price range for a sniffer, for more information please contact gasera [https://gasera.fi/company/distribution/ here].&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Gasmet.png|thumb|149x149px|GT5000]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Gasmet ===&lt;br /&gt;
Gasmet is a company based in Finland, you can find their website [https://www.gasmet.com/ here]. They have developed multiple gas analyzers for many different applications, the GT5000 can measure up to 50 gasses. It can measure both CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; up to 100.000ppm, the range can be adjusted to what is needed. This device uses a FTIR (Fourier Transformed InfraRed) sensor. The benefit of this sensor is that it can easily detect other or unknown gasses which you were not aware of and you can then add them to your detection. You can download the datasheet for this device [[Media:Gasmet GT5000 Terra Technical Data.pdf|here]] and find more information on the website [https://www.gasmet.com/products/category/portable-gas-analyzers/gt5000-terra/ here.]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The GT 5000 falls into the higher price range for a sniffer, for more information please contact Jockum Törnqvist ([Mailto:jockum.tornqvist@gasmet.fi jockum.tornqvist@gasmet.fi])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Edinburgh Sensors ===&lt;br /&gt;
Edinburgh Sensors is a company based in the UK, you can find their website [https://edinburghsensors.com/ here.] They develop sensors that can be used for measuring CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; in the breath of ruminants. They produce the boxed gascard and the guardian NG. These sensors can be used to build your own sniffer, by combining the sensors with, amongst others, a datalogger and waterproof casing. The measurement range is dependent on which type of gascard for CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; you include in the build. Currently the completely assembled Guardian sniffers are being used in Finland, Denmark and Spain. [[File:Guardian NEIKER.jpg|200px|thumb|Guardian build in Spain at [https://neiker.eus/en/ NEIKER]]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are companies that can build the complete sniffer from these sensors. One of these companies is DuoTec, you can find their website [https://duotec.dk/ here.] Contact person for inquiries for this company would be: Rasmus Bendsen ([Mailto:raw@duotec.dk raw@duotec.dk])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another company that can build a sniffer from these sensors is Bramtech, they build the sniffers that are currently used by Aarhus University. They currently have no plans to expand further into this business.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
During the [[Section 20: Activities|Denmark-The Netherlands project]] the Edinburgh methane sensor will be tested. It has been installed in the original Carltech v1 casing. Testing in the Air Quality lab has been completed for these devices and these sensors functioned as well as the other sensors tested. On-farm testing is still in progress. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Most often the Guardians are assembled in house by the research groups themselves.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In general this device, once completed falls in the lower price range for sniffers. You can contact Edinburgh Sensors [https://edinburghsensors.com/contact/ here.]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:MooLogger.jpg|thumb|175x175px|MooLogger]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Tecnosens  ===&lt;br /&gt;
Tecnosens is a company based in Italy, you can find their website [https://www.tecnosens.it/en here.] They have developed the MooLooger, currently there are two versions available, the MooLooger standard and the MooLogger advanced. The MooLogger has a measurement range of 0-5.000ppm for CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and 0-50.000ppm for CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and uses a NDIR sensor. Optionally this device can measure O&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; in the range of 0-25.000ppm. Currently the MooLogger is being used, on small or large scale, in Italy, Spain, Canada, USA, Switzerland and Uruguay. You can download the datasheet for this device [[Media:MooLogger Plus Oct 2024.pdf|here]] and find more information on the MooLogger on the website [https://www.tecnosens.it/en/Tecnosens-products/moologger here.] They have multiple instruction video&#039;s available on their [https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLR1KvTMU2thuf-xpkTuHM6fs_WRVtwoz6 youtube channel.] For this device a multiplexer is available to use one MooLogger and measure in multiple AMS.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The MooLooger falls in the lower price range for a sniffer, for more information please contact Greta Bonacina ([Mailto:gbonacina@tecnosens.it gbonacina@tecnosens.it]).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Nikira labs ===&lt;br /&gt;
Nikira labs is a company bases in the USA, you can find their website [https://www.nikiralabs.com/ here]. They have developed the CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;/CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;/H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;O analyser. This device has a measurements range of 100-20.000ppm for CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and 1-20.000ppm for CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and can optionally detect H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;O in the range of 500-20.000 ppm. The datasheet for this device can be downloaded from their website [https://www.nikiralabs.com/ch4-co2-h2o-analyzer here.]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;/CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;/H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;O analyser falls into the higher price range for a sniffer, for more information please contact Nikira Labs [https://www.nikiralabs.com/contact-9 here.]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== La Trobe Uni ===&lt;br /&gt;
The research institute, as a part of La Trobe university based in Australia, has developed a sniffer inhouse, you can find their website [https://www.latrobe.edu.au/ here.] They are still working on commercializing their sniffer device.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When commercialized they aim to have the sniffer fall into the lower price range, for more information please contact Aniruddha (Ani) Desai ([Mailto:A.Desai@latrobe.edu.au A.Desai@latrobe.edu.au]).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Analox ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:PXL 20250722 143934376.jpg|thumb|343x343px|HerdLab system, for all gasses.]]&lt;br /&gt;
Analox is a company based in the UK, you can find their website [https://analoxgroup.com/ here.] They have developed the HerdLab system. This device can measure 6 different gasses. The measurement range for CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is dependent on which variant of the sensor you choose, generally it will be 0-2.000 ppm, they also offer 0-1.000 ppm and 0-5.000 ppm. For CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; the range is also dependent on the variant of sensor you choose, generally it will be 0-20.000 ppm, they also offer 0-2.000, 0-5.000 and 0-50.000. This device can also measure oxygen (O&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;), hydrogen (H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;), ammonia (NH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) and nitric oxide (NO), if needed. It uses a combination of NDIR, paramagnetic and electrochemical sensors to analyze the concentrations. The datasheet for this device can be found [[:File:Herd Lab Brochure - Final Version.pdf|here]]. A short introductory presentation [[:File:Measuring Methane Emissions Introduction.pdf|here]] with associated video to be found [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2O9cDKg94W0 here.] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This system is originally developed to measure up to 6 bays in a herringbone system, at the same time. Thereby, HerdLab can be applied to multiple AMS systems at the same time and multiple bays in a rotary system too. Due to this possibility price range is more dynamic than for other devices included in the list. When using one system for one AMS the HerdLab falls into the medium price range for a sniffer. Price will change when you want to measure more gasses or more animals, for measuring in multiple AMS systems (at the same farm) or multiple bays the increase in costs would be low, as you already have the system in place. For more information please contact Adrian Howe ([Mailto:adrian.howe@analoxgroup.com adrian.howe@analoxgroup.com]).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Comparison of technical details of commercially available sniffers ==&lt;br /&gt;
As part of the [[Section 20: Ongoing activities|DNK-NLD project]] Wageningen Livestock Research has collected technical information on all commercially available sniffers directly from the companies. An excel file showing these details for all the sniffers can be downloaded [[Media:Comparison technical details sniffers ICAR.xlsx|here]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Experimental protocols ==&lt;br /&gt;
No particular experimental protocols are applied. Once installed, the system runs continuously. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Change in diet are not required.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Training and adaptation period ==&lt;br /&gt;
Training, handling or adaptation period are not required.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Problems faced and upgrades ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Device waterproof ===&lt;br /&gt;
Sniffer devices are not always completely waterproof. Considering that there is electrical wiring inside and that in some cases the intervention of a technician is necessary, it is important to choose an IP65 box or to equip the Sniffer box with a waterproof coating.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Clogging problems ===&lt;br /&gt;
To avoid clogging of the pipes, ideally a venting hose is provided. This pipe is connected to the compressed air outlet pipe of the AMS. When the gate of the milking robot opens, allowing the animal to exit, compressed air is blown into the venting hose. This air flow in the direction of the cylinder helps to avoid clogging. Currently some sniffers have the option for a blow-back system.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Animals identification ===&lt;br /&gt;
Antenna for ID reader is not always successful. It is suggested to use AMS data identification and merge them later on.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Calibration procedure ===&lt;br /&gt;
In many cases problems of calibration drift can occur. It is necessary to standardize zero and span calibrating procedure.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Personell in charge of the trial ===&lt;br /&gt;
It is essential to have a good technician who monitors Sniffer&#039;s activities on daily basis and who also knows the AMS and AFS system. Among the activities that the technician must carry out: setting up, moving equipment, daily data monitoring and download, checking up on equipment at irregularities, fixing problems, downloading AMS data and ordering spare parts. If a good technician is not available, it is essential to have an alert system (sms, e-mail) of anomalies.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Filter replace ===&lt;br /&gt;
Filter obturations by dust or condensation can occur. It is possible to prevent these problems changing external filter every 15 days and change internal filter every 6 months. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Questions and answers ==&lt;br /&gt;
 &#039;&#039;&#039;Q1. What’s the cost of the system?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 A1. Very dependent on which system and producer, you can see an indication for pricing in the comparison excel file. If you want an exact quote, please contact the companies.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &#039;&#039;&#039;Q2. How many animals per Sniffer?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Depending on where the sniffer is installed, it can measure as many animals as can visit that location. If an AMS can milk 130 cows per day, then the sniffer can measure 130 cows per day.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &#039;&#039;&#039;Q3. How long does the experimental trial take?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 A1. For genetic evaluation purposes we plan to collect data for many years.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &#039;&#039;&#039;Q4. How do you identify animals in Sniffer?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 A1. We use AMS identification, easier and more accurate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 A2. We use AMS identification. It is possible to use also external RFID tag reader but it need validation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &#039;&#039;&#039;Q5. It is necessary to have gas cards with wide detection limit (0-10.000 CH4 and 0-50.000 CO2)?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 A1. Not necessary considering animals’ emission, so probably are cheaper than other gas cards with different detection limit.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Cvangemert</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://wiki.icar.org/index.php?title=Section_20:_Wearables&amp;diff=4897</id>
		<title>Section 20: Wearables</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://wiki.icar.org/index.php?title=Section_20:_Wearables&amp;diff=4897"/>
		<updated>2026-02-11T13:24:25Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Cvangemert: /* SF6 */ introduction added GRA info&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;big&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;b&amp;gt;NOTE: This version of Section 20 has been approved by the working group&#039;s Chair.  Please be aware that further revisions may occur before final review and approval by the Board and ICAR members per the [[Approval of Page Process]].&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/b&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== SF6 ==&lt;br /&gt;
The SF6 technique samples breath over 24 hours, whereas other techniques use spot samples of breath over periods of minutes throughout the day, so diurnal variation has to be considered. The majority of CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (87-99%) is released by eructation (Blaxter and Joyce, 1963&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Blaxter, K.L., and Joyce, J.P. 1963. The accuracy and ease with which measurements of respiratory metabolism can be made with tracheostomized sheep. Br. J. Nutr. 17:523-537&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;; Murray et al., 1976&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Murray, R.M., Bryant, A.M., and Leng, R.A.. 1976. Rates of production of methane in the rumen and large intestine of sheep. Br. J. Nutr. 36:1-14.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;), which provides a clear signal for sample processing. Please note that the tracheostomy used in Murray et al. (1976)&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:0&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; may have resulted in a higher percentage, but in both publications, it is clear that the majority of the CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is released via eructation. The SF6 tracer gas technique was developed in an attempt to measure CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; emissions by animals without confinement in respiration chambers (Johnson et al., 1994&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Johnson, K., Huyler, M., Westberg, H., Lamb, B., and Zimmerman, P. 1994. Measurement of methane emissions from ruminant livestock using a sulfur hexafluoride tracer technique. Environ. Sci. Technol. 28:359-362.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;). Air is sampled near the animal’s nostrils through a tube attached to a halter and connected to an evacuated canister worn around the animal’s neck or on its back. A capillary tube or orifice plate is used to restrict airflow through the tube so that the canister is between 50 and 70% full in approximately 24 hours. A permeation tube containing SF6 is placed into the rumen of each animal. The pre-determined release rate of SF6 is multiplied by the ratio of CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; to SF6 concentrations in the canister to calculate CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; emission rate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Many research centres have used the SF6 technique with variations in design of sampling and collection equipment, permeation tubes, and gas analysis (Berndt et al., 2014&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Berndt, A., Boland, T.M., Deighton, M.H., Gere, J.I., Grainger, C., Hegarty, R.S., Iwaasa, A.D., Koolaard, J.P., Lassey, K.R., Luo D., Martin, R.J., Martin, C., Moate, P.J., Molano, G., Pinares-Patiño, C., Ribaux, B.E., Swainson, N.M., Waghorn, G.C., and Williams, S.R.O. 2014. Guidelines for use of sulphur hexafluoride (SF6) tracer technique to measure enteric methane emissions from ruminants. Pages 166. M. G. Lambert, ed. New Zealand Agricultural Greenhouse Gas Research Centre, New Zealand. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;). Reliable results depend on following standard protocols, with greatest variation coming from accuracy of determining SF6 release rate from permeation tubes and control of sampling rate. With capillary tubes, sampling rate decreases as pressure in the canister increases, whereas an orifice plate gives a steadier sampling rate over 24 hours (Deighton et al., 2014&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Deighton, M.H., Williams, S.R.O., Hannah, M.C., Eckard, R.J., Boland, T.M., Wales, W.J., and Moate, P.J. 2014. A modified sulphur hexafluoride tracer technique enables accurate determination of enteric methane emissions from ruminants. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 197:47-63.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;). A source of error that has not been evaluated is that animals might interact and share CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; emissions when the sampling tube of one animal is near the head of another animal. There is good agreement between CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; emissions measured by the SF6 technique and respiration chambers, although results from the SF6 technique are more variable (Grainger et al., 2007&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Grainger, C., Clarke, T., McGinn, S.M., Auldist, M.J., Beauchemin, K.A., Hannah, M.C., Waghorn, G.C., Clark, H., and Eckard, R J. 2007. Methane emissions from dairy cows measured using the sulfur hexafluoride (SF6) tracer and chamber techniques. J. Dairy Sci. 90:2755-2766.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;; Muñoz et al., 2012&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Muñoz, C., Yan, T., Wills, D.A., Murray, S., and Gordon, A.W. 2012. Comparison of the sulfur hexafluoride tracer and respiration chamber techniques for estimating methane emissions and correction for rectum methane output from dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 95:3139-3148.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Global Research Alliance (GRA) published new materials from the New Zealand Climate Smart Agriculture Initiative (CSA). This includes guidelines for the SF6 gas tracer technique, you can find those [https://globalresearchalliance.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/SF6-Tracer-Technique-Guidelines_April-2014.pdf here].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== ZELP Sense ==&lt;br /&gt;
[https://www.zelp.co/ ZELP] is a company based in the UK, which has developed a wearable device for cows called [https://www.zelp.co/measurement/ ZELP Sense]. The device continuously measures methane (CH₄) and carbon dioxide (CO₂) emissions from individual cows, in real-world settings, together with estimated dry matter intake (DMI). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== System description ===&lt;br /&gt;
ZELP Sense consists of three key parts: a headpiece, nosepiece, and gas sensing unit. The headpiece, made from ventilated neoprene, correctly positions the nosepiece without restricting the cow&#039;s natural movements or behaviours. The gas sensing unit sits below the cow&#039;s neck. The full device is lightweight and quick and easy to fit to the animal. The headpiece and nosepiece come in multiple sizes to ensure an optimal fit for a wide range of cows.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The device samples ambient and eructed air from close to the cow&#039;s nostrils through the nosepiece. These samples are processed by the gas sensing unit, which contains sensors to track ventilation rate and measure gas concentrations. Data from the device is offloaded via a WiFi connection and processed by ZELP&#039;s Machine Learning models. The device has local data storage allowing it to be used in areas with intermittent connectivity.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Users receive daily CH₄ and CO₂ emission totals (g/day), hourly CH₄ and CO₂ emissions for every hour of data collected (g/hour), and estimated DMI (kg/day), via ZELP&#039;s mobile-optimized web-app. The data can be downloaded for further analysis.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Internal chamber trial (2024): ====&lt;br /&gt;
Three cows, each fitted with a ZELP Sense device, were tested in respiration chambers over a 3-week period, with two 3-day testing sessions, separated by a one-week break. The daily emission totals provided by ZELP Sense showed an average difference of less than 10% versus those provided by respiration chambers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For more details, you can download the latest version of ZELP’s White Paper [https://www.zelp.co/measurement/ here]. These results have been shared at the British Society for Animal Science Conference 2025, EAAP’s AI4AS Conference 2025, and at the ASGGN &amp;amp; ICAR Feed &amp;amp; Gas Workshop held at the 9th International Greenhouse Gas &amp;amp; Animal Agriculture Conference 2025. The poster presentation is available [[:File:ZELP Sense - Chamber Comparison Poster.pdf|here]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== External chamber trials (2025): ====&lt;br /&gt;
Multiple third-party trials of ZELP Sense have now been completed at different research institutions and universities. The trials focused on comparing the methane and carbon dioxide measurements provided by ZELP Sense with those from respiration chambers. Analysis is underway and results are expected to be published in early 2026. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Commercial availability ===&lt;br /&gt;
ZELP Sense is available for pre-order now, with ZELP’s team allocating devices from their upcoming commercial production run on a first-come, first-serve basis. Delivery is expected in the second half of 2026. For more information, and to request a quote, please contact: [Mailto:sense@zelp.co sense@zelp.co].&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Cvangemert</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://wiki.icar.org/index.php?title=Section_20:_Greenfeed_SOP&amp;diff=4896</id>
		<title>Section 20: Greenfeed SOP</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://wiki.icar.org/index.php?title=Section_20:_Greenfeed_SOP&amp;diff=4896"/>
		<updated>2026-02-11T13:22:22Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Cvangemert: /* Introduction */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;big&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;b&amp;gt;NOTE: This version of Section 20 has been approved by the working group&#039;s Chair.  Please be aware that further revisions may occur before final review and approval by the Board and ICAR members per the [[Approval of Page Process]].&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/b&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Introduction ==&lt;br /&gt;
Enteric methane (CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) production and carbon dioxide (CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) production can be measured non-invasively using a GreenFeed emission monitoring system (C-lock Inc. Rapid City, SD, USA). GreenFeed is an adapted feeding station that continuously measures both CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration and the quantitative airflow in order to generate individual gaseous production. GreenFeed is equipped with a fan that pulls air from around the head of the cow with 30-40 L/s. The airflow is measured continuously by a hot-film anemometer that needs to be calibrated monthly. In the air collection pipe continuous subsamples are drawn to analyse the CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration by nondispersive infrared sensors, which are automatically calibrated on a daily basis. Additionally, head positioning is registered by an infrared sensor. This sensor only determines the distance of the cow to the sensor, not what part of the cow causes this distance, could be the nose but also the ear for example. Temperature and radiofrequency identification tags specific to each cow for individual recognition are recorded as well. All variables are logged at a 1 s interval. GreenFeed measures continuously, even if there are no animals present, to correct for background emissions in the barn. The periods within a visit where the head position of the animal is correct are used for measuring gaseous emissions. Quantitative concentrations in g/d were calculated at a 1 s interval, which were then averaged per visit (minimum of 2 min).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Most of the information on this page refers to the standard version of the GreenFeed, most often used for dairy and beef cattle. There are two other versions, which are discussed separately, for small ruminants and for animals with large horns.  GreenFeed can be used both in barn and on pasture. For pasture systems, the GreenFeed is mounted on a trailer and equipped with solar panels. There is also the option of a skid system, an enhanced version of the GreenFeed for heavy-duty application. The skid system consists of a protective housing around the GreenFeed and includes a build in retractable alleyway. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Global Research Alliance ([https://globalresearchalliance.org/ GRA]) published new materials from the New Zealand Climate Smart Agriculture Initiative ([https://www.climatesmartagriculture.org.nz/ CSA]). This includes a technical manual for the GreenFeed, find this page [https://globalresearchalliance.org/library/greenfeed-emission-monitor/ here]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Equipment description ==&lt;br /&gt;
The correct placement of the GreenFeed unit inside the barn is crucial. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Indoor, it is advisable to place it on solid, non-slatted floor, in a location with good ventilation. Irregular ventilation or background emissions from manure may negatively affect the estimates of methane and carbon dioxide emissions. Take into account that installation of the GreenFeed on low-emission floors can be more difficult and take longer. This is because there are fewer anker points available. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Outdoor, the GreenFeed have to be located in a solid place (not in the mud), with a good phone (internet) connection and a good sunlight (if equipped with solar panel). The GreenFeed unit and the grazing site have to be nearby. The grazing area should not be so large as it could impact the number of visits. It may be appropriate to install an electric fence to protect the GreenFeed unit from animals’ damage, but also to avoid animals to enter by side of the GreenFeed; this was not always undertaken and warrants further investigation. A plastic and waterproof cover can be installed on the unit and a weather station on its top. Together with the GreenFeed, the trailer can also be purchased from C-Lock. This trailer is suitable for short distance moving and it is essential for placement in pasture (i.e. the trailer contains a spot where the unit can be attached, since it has to be standing solid to prevent it from getting damaged by cows, where the gas cylinders can stand and contain power supply (solar panel or batteries). If it is necessary to move the GreenFeed unit for longer distances it is essential to have a more solid trailer available and should be compatible with the legal requirements for road vehicles in the respective country.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
All users agree that wooden side shieldings provided by C-Lock are not enough to contain the animal and to reduce the influence of other animals’ emissions. According to user experience to reduce influence of gaseous emissions from cows to the side, a good side shielding must be 0.80-0.90 m wide and adjustable, at least 2.5 m long, both indoor and outdoor. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some advanced users have created a “L-port gate” (Picture 1) that closes behind the animal, so it cannot be pushed out of the unit by other cows. Cows that use this “L-port gate” are calmer (once they are used to it).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
All users consider positive the ventilation noise of the GreenFeed fan. This ventilation noise is easily associated by the animals with the supply of feed, so the animals adapt more quickly.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As regards the feed to be used in GreenFeed, most users use a pellet feed with a diameter of less than 7 mm as suggested by C-Lock. Few users use feed blocks.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:L PortGate.png|center|thumb]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Picture 1. “L-port gate” on the GreenFeed alleyway of Wageningen Livestock Research at Research Facility De Marke.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Experimental protocols ==&lt;br /&gt;
The overall duration of the trial varies, from a minimum of 7 days up to a year, both indoor and outdoor, according to the purpose of the experimental trial. Feeding settings can vary dependent on the preferred feed gift and preferred number of measurements per day. There are two important principles that should be met: the time of a feeding period (and thus gaseous measurement) should be between 2 and 5 minutes (at least 2 minutes, preferably 3-4 minutes), and the number of visits per day should be between 2 and 8, and divided over the day. The number of cows that can visit multiplied by the number of visits per cow per day multiplied by the time per visit should never exceed 24 hours, but preferably not exceed 12 hours (which means occupation of the GreenFeed 50% of the time). In general, one GreenFeed is suitable to measure at maximum 40 to 50 cows and still get decent data. This also leaves the GreenFeed unoccupied for long enough to measure background concentrations, which are needed for calibration.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When more than 50 cows have tags that the GreenFeed can recognize, the system can be programmed to only drop feed for specifically selected cows. The other cows will lose interest and the cows you want to measure can use the GreenFeed enough to get useable data. The GreenFeed does not recognize all tags cows can wear, RFID tags with ISO number 11784/11785 are recognized. When measuring on a commercial farm not all farmers will have tags with the correct ISO number and you will have to attach new RFID tags to the collar of the cow.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The wide variability of the experimental protocol variables can be summarized as follows for cows:&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+&lt;br /&gt;
!&lt;br /&gt;
!INDOOR&lt;br /&gt;
!OUTDOOR&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|DROP DISPENSE INTERVAL&lt;br /&gt;
|10 - 60 seconds&lt;br /&gt;
|10 - 30 seconds&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|MIN. TIME BETWEEN FEEDING PERIODS&lt;br /&gt;
|7.200 - 21.600 seconds&lt;br /&gt;
(2 - 6 hours)&lt;br /&gt;
|3.600 - 14.400 seconds&lt;br /&gt;
(1 - 4 hours)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|MAX. DROPS PER FEEDING TIME&lt;br /&gt;
|4 - 25 &lt;br /&gt;
|4 - 25&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|MAX. FEEDING PERIODS&lt;br /&gt;
|4 - 12 &lt;br /&gt;
|4 - 12&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
An example of a feeding protocol for cows would be a drop dispense interval of 30 second; 3 hours between feeding periods (10.800 seconds); max. 8 drops per feeding period and max. 6 feeding periods. This means that a cow can visit 6 times a day and stays for at least 4 minutes if it eats all it&#039;s concentrates. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For other species different protocols apply, below a few experimental protocol variables currently known: &lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+DAFNE feeding protocols:&lt;br /&gt;
!&lt;br /&gt;
!Sheep&lt;br /&gt;
!Buffalo&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|MAX. DROPS PER FEEDING TIME&lt;br /&gt;
|8&lt;br /&gt;
|8&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|CONCENTRATES PER DROP (G)&lt;br /&gt;
|7&lt;br /&gt;
|37&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|MAX. FEEDING PERIODS&lt;br /&gt;
|3&lt;br /&gt;
|5&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|MAX. CUP DROPS PER DAY&lt;br /&gt;
|24&lt;br /&gt;
|40&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Training and adaptation period ==&lt;br /&gt;
The overall duration of the training and adaptation period last from 7 to 20 days, both indoor and outdoor. Animals that are already used to feeding boxes in the barn are generally easier to train to use the GreenFeed. Because of that indoor adaptation is generally on the shorter end of this adaptation period. The outdoor animals are generally on the longer end of the adaptation period, as they are not used to being confined. For the outdoor GreenFeed it is suggested to keep the animals confined to a smaller lot with the GreenFeed, during adaptation, before being let out to the larger pasture, for faster adaptation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For the entire adaptation period it is essential to locate the GreenFeed within the eyesight of the animals.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
During training the “drop dispense interval” can be slightly adjusted, for example reduced to 10 seconds in first days of adaptation, then increased to 20 seconds and then it is possible to use the experimental protocol. Outdoor could be useful to provide a small amount of feed around the GreenFeed unit or near to the GreenFeed chute. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Using a camera installed on the top of the unit can be useful for training, so the user can drop feed when animals are near to the GreenFeed unit. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If using side shieldings, it is important to set the funnel at largest size and reduced regularly day by day up to the end of the training period and the start of the experimental trial. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In some cases, there might be animals that are more difficult to train. In this case it is good practice to guide them into the GreenFeed and evaluate their behaviour. If they are reluctant, it is advisable not to involve them in the experimental trial. Generally, 50% of the animals adapt autonomously, 25% of the animals need an intervention, and the remaining 25% are more reluctant. A good training and adaptation period provides for the success at least 70% of indoor animals and at least 50% of grazing animals.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Having non-users located beside users of machines has proven to be helpful when later training those non-users.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Spread concentrates in the chute or using salt licks may help entice animals to use the machine.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When based on grazing, it is important that the machine is moved to the edge of the fresh pasture once strip wire is moved – animals should not have to move far to reach the machine as this will impact number of visits.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Data analysis ==&lt;br /&gt;
GreenFeed devices produce a lot of data which can be very overwhelming to handle. In March 2025, a new technical note came out in JDS communications about a new open-source tool to simplify processing and data reporting from GreenFeed systems, making it easier to get flexible, useful, and impactful data. The package offers functions for downloading, processing, and reporting GreenFeed data and is freely available at the Comprehensive R Archive Network (CRAN; &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/greenfeedr/&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;) All functions of version 1.0.2 of the greenfeedr package are described in this article.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;greenfeedr: An R package for processing and reporting GreenFeed data Martinez-Boggio, Guillermo et al. JDS Communications, Volume 6, Issue 2, 227 - 230 &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Problems faced and upgrades ==&lt;br /&gt;
Table reports all the problems faced including solution and possible home-made upgrades found by the several institutions.&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+&lt;br /&gt;
!PROBLEM&lt;br /&gt;
!SOLUTION&lt;br /&gt;
!SUGGESTIONS/UPGRADES&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Feed clogging in the bin&lt;br /&gt;
|Unclog the feed bin and try a more solid pellet. Prevent the feed bin from moist.&lt;br /&gt;
|Extra molasses in feed pellet.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Motor problem&lt;br /&gt;
|Replaced using C-Lock spare parts and assistance.&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Airflow problems&lt;br /&gt;
|Replaced using C-Lock spare parts and assistance.&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Connectivity problem&lt;br /&gt;
|Replaced using C-Lock spare parts and assistance.&lt;br /&gt;
When caused by low coverage of the provider for the sim card used: Shutting down the device for a while and powering it back up can restore connectivity. You might have to repeat this a few times.&lt;br /&gt;
|In alternative, purchase an external Wi-Fi router or SIM-card router.&lt;br /&gt;
When possible use with the cable instead of cellular connection for better connectivity&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Power supply problem&lt;br /&gt;
|Replaced using C-Lock spare parts and assistance.&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Batteries under solar panel are getting low and smart solar controllers decide battery is too flat. &lt;br /&gt;
|Moving from lead acid to lithium iron phosphate (LiFePO4) batteries has largely eliminated the problem. This is because LiFePO4 give a constant output voltage.&lt;br /&gt;
|RFID identification problems&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|RFID identification problems&lt;br /&gt;
|Caused by either low power supply (check and replace power supply if needed) or antenna problems (follow instructions from C-lock to find the cause and replace if needed).&lt;br /&gt;
When placing ISO 11784/5 tags too close to own tags (&amp;lt;5 cm), the ISO 11784/5 tag cannot be read by the system. The own tag does work on its own systems. &lt;br /&gt;
|ISO 11784/5 tags are recognized by the system. Other tags might not be. An extra ISO 11784/5 tag can be added to the collar. &lt;br /&gt;
No interference with AMS systems observed. &lt;br /&gt;
Place the ISO 11784/5 tags at least 5 cm away from other tags, even if the GreenFeed system does not recognize the other tag. &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Leaky CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; cylinder and lower CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; release&lt;br /&gt;
|Replaced CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; cylinder by C-Lock.&lt;br /&gt;
|Make sure to never hold the CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; tool upside down when attached to a CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; cylinder.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Concentration sensor&lt;br /&gt;
|Replaced using C-Lock spare parts and assistance.&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Shipping time and shipping issues in some parts of the world (e.g., Europe and Oceania)&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|List of “must have spare parts” to create a personal warehouse.&lt;br /&gt;
European or Oceanian dealer?&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Feed bin brush chewed by a rodent&lt;br /&gt;
|Tack on feed bin chute.&lt;br /&gt;
|Internal component more sealed.&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
Despite the various problems encountered, all users consider the assistance provided by the C-Lock very good (video tutorials, operating instructions...). E-mail reply is quickly (few hours considering time zone). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is recommended to keep spare parts in stock.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Small ruminants ==&lt;br /&gt;
The adapted GreenFeed for small ruminants has a lower flow, at 15L/min and thereby has a lower detection limit.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Protocol at [https://www.inrae.fr/en INRAE] for Meat Sheep ===&lt;br /&gt;
Below you find a protocol used at INRAE, France, for measuring methane emissions in meat sheep:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; emissions are recorded with two Sheep GreenFeed devices manufactured by the C-Lock company (US) (Rozier et al., 2021)&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Rozier A., François D., Maupetit D., Legoff Y., and TortereauF. 2021. First estimations of methane emissions using Sheep GreenFeed in the Romane breed. 72&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;nd&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; EAAP, 2021, Davos, Switzerland. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One device is installed per pen of 30-40 individuals. A drop (small amount of concentrate) is delivered by the device in order to attract animals. To be valid, a visit of animal must last at least 2 minutes. To optimize the number of efficient visits and considering that we don’t want too much concentrate to be delivered by GreenFeed devices, we set the following parameters: a given day is divided in 4 periods of 6 hours each. During each period, each animal can get a maximum of 6 drops of concentrate, these drops being delivered with an interval of 30 seconds. Animals can visit the device even if they can’t get any drop, and if this visit lasts more than 2 minutes, GHG are recorded. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Similarly to the phenotyping of feed intake, animals are accustomed to the pen and the device during a minimum of 2 weeks, and the control lasts 6 weeks after the adaptation period. During this period of control, animals are fed as usual. Feed intakes can be recorded over the same period, but it must be reminded that the concentrate delivered by the Sheep GreenFeed devices to a given animal can be eaten by another one. This can bias daily feed intake calculation. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
During the control period, animals are weighed on a weekly basis, mainly for the computation of different GHG traits. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
With Sheep GreenFeed, raw data are not available: GHG emissions, expressed in gram per day can be downloaded from the C-Lock website, with one value per visit. For Sheep GreenFeed, animals may visit the device whenever they want, and several times a day. However, the production of methane is not constant over 24 hours. Therefore, GHG emissions have to be corrected for the moment of the visit. This moment can be either the hour of the day (24 levels) or the period (from 4 to 6 periods can be defined, depending on how often animals are fed during the day). Individual emission rates are obtained with a repeatability model: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = µ + Pen + Day + Animal + Hour + Ɛ  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The animal emission rates are the animal LSMeans estimates from this model. Individual CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; estimates are obtained by applying the same repeatability model on CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Horned animals ==&lt;br /&gt;
The adapted GreenFeed for cattle and other ruminants with large horns is mostly used in Africa and for Bison.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Questions and answers ==&lt;br /&gt;
 &#039;&#039;&#039;Q1. What’s the pasture size?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 A1. Cows graze grass which is about 1.500 kg DM/ha, or 9 cm in height.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 A2. Usually, 40 cows we allocate 0.48 ha for 24 hours.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &#039;&#039;&#039;Q2. How do you move your GreenFeed unit?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 A1. We take chimneys off and load them into a truck.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 A2. A trailer as the C-Lock one is fine for short moving between pastures.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &#039;&#039;&#039;Q3. How often do you change air filters?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 A1. Once per week in more than enough (about 20 animals per GreenFeed unit)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 A2. Every 3 days (more than 25 animals per GreenFeed unit)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 A3. Every 14 days (less than 10 animals per GreenFeed Unit)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 A4. When the airflow is below 27 L/s (advised by GreenFeed Email Alerts &amp;amp; Reminders)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &#039;&#039;&#039;Q4. Do you use C-Lock final data or preliminary data?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 A1. Final data reviewed, corrected for calibrations and outliers by C-Lock.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 A2. Final data. Between C-Lock final data and preliminary data there is a difference of about 5%.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Cvangemert</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://wiki.icar.org/index.php?title=Section_20:_Activities&amp;diff=4895</id>
		<title>Section 20: Activities</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://wiki.icar.org/index.php?title=Section_20:_Activities&amp;diff=4895"/>
		<updated>2026-02-10T10:51:53Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Cvangemert: Added maillinks&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;big&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;b&amp;gt;NOTE: This version of Section 20 has been approved by the working group&#039;s Chair.  Please be aware that further revisions may occur before final review and approval by the Board and ICAR members per the [[Approval of Page Process]].&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/b&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
== Global Methane Genetics ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:GMG label.png|right|frameless|300x300px]]&lt;br /&gt;
The Global Methane Genetics (GMG) initiative is a global program to accelerate genetic progress in methane emission in ruminants in the Global North and South. This WUR-ABG coordinated initiative is funded by the [https://www.globalmethanehub.org/ Global Methane Hub] and the [https://www.bezosearthfund.org/ Bezos Earth Fund,] both based on philanthropic funds to support methane mitigation and prevent global warming. If you have questions about the [https://www.wur.nl/en/project/global-methane-genetics-initiative.htm GMG initiative] you can send an email to [Mailto:gmg@wur.nl gmg@wur.nl], contact Roel Veerkamp: [Mailto:roel.veerkamp@wur.nl roel.veerkamp@wur.nl] or Birgit Gredler-Grandl: [Mailto:birgit.gredler-grandl@wur.nl birgit.gredler-grandl@wur.nl].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The initiative holds the following projects:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== &#039;&#039;&#039;Dairy Cattle&#039;&#039;&#039; ===&lt;br /&gt;
We can look to nature to reduce CH4 emissions and use genetic diversity to provide solutions. Genetic improvement, based on identifying animals with genetic predisposition for lower CH4 output and using them to breed for the next generations, is a reliable, cost-effective, and permanent method for transforming livestock&#039;s impact on the environment.  Breeding programs in dairy cattle are run within breeds and across countries. Therefore, the program will accelerate genetic progress by focusing on four major dairy breeds and organizations and countries involved in those breeds. Additionally, the program will acquire considerable leverage through investments in these countries. If you have questions about the dairy cattle section you can contact Birgit Gredler-Grandl: [Mailto:birgit.gredler-grandl@wur.nl birgit.gredler-grandl@wur.nl].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== &#039;&#039;Holstein breed&#039;&#039; ====&lt;br /&gt;
The largest data collection has been for the Holstein breed, but there is a lack of standardization and protocols in terms of equipment and its utilization (farm level, data processing, data sharing agreements, genetic evaluations, and data collections). Governments and breeding organizations in Denmark and the Netherlands will collaborate and collect methane and genotypes on more than 20,000 Holstein cows for the GMG database. Also, Poland and Italy team up to collect data for the GMG database, and their aim is also to collect more than 20,000 Holstein animals and develop genetic evaluations across a wide range of systems.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===== Denmark-The Netherlands =====&lt;br /&gt;
This collaboration between Aarhus University and Wageningen Livestock Research has five main goals. The contact person for questions about this project is Trine Villumsen: [Mailto:tmv@qgg.au.dk tmv@qgg.au.dk].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Setting up Standard Operating Procedures (SOP) for measuring methane using sniffers&lt;br /&gt;
* Setting up international protocols to measure methane on commercial farms&lt;br /&gt;
* Develop software tools to automate the processing of data into a phenotype&lt;br /&gt;
* Combine historical data in both countries for genetic evaluations&lt;br /&gt;
* Measure enteric methane in 20.000 new cows.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===== Poland-Italy =====&lt;br /&gt;
This collaboration has the following main goals. The contact person for questions about this project is Raffaella Finocchiaro [Mailto:raffaellafinocchiaro@anafibj.it raffaellafinocchiaro@anafibj.it].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Measure enteric methane in 20.000 new cows.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== &#039;&#039;Jersey breed&#039;&#039; ====&lt;br /&gt;
Currently, due to the limited data available, the Jersey dairy breed does not have breeding values for methane (CH4) mitigation. The goal of the program is to collect methane genotypes in Canada and Denmark and share this information with the GMG database. The aim is to develop breeding values that will be distributed through the World Jersey Cattle Bureau organization and national Jersey organizations in Australia, Canada, Switzerland, Denmark, France, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands, and New Zealand. If you have questions about the Jersey breed section you can contact Rasmus Bak Stephansen [Mailto:Rasmus.stephansen@qgg.au.dk rasmus.stephansen@qgg.au.dk]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== &#039;&#039;Brown Swiss breed&#039;&#039; ====&lt;br /&gt;
The Brown Swiss (BS) breed faces significant challenges due to its small population size, an divers environments the animals are kept. A collaboration between Germany, Switzerland, and Austria to phenotype enough animals is a prerequisite for utilizing the genetic potential of reducing methane emission of the BS breed. In addition to a population of 250 cows recorded with Greenfeed, and 1250 with the sniffer, progress will be accelerated by recording an additional 3,360 cows with sniffers. If you have questions about the Brown Swiss breed section you can contact Elena Frenken: [Mailto:Fe@fbf-forschung.de fe@fbf-forschung.de].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== &#039;&#039;Red breeds&#039;&#039; ====&lt;br /&gt;
The red breeds are important for crossbreeding in many countries around the world. The project aims to share and collect CH4 data from Red Dairy Cattle (RDC) breeds (in the Nordic countries, Canada, and the United Kingdom (UK)) and share it with the Global Methane Genetics (GMG) Hub. Together, they will set up a shared genetic evaluation for bulls used for crossbreeding in many more countries. If you have questions about the Red breed section you can contact Elisenda Rius-Vilarrasa: [Mailto:Elisenda.Rius-Vilarrasa@vxa.se. Elisenda.Rius-Vilarrasa@vxa.se.]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== &#039;&#039;&#039;Beef Cattle&#039;&#039;&#039; ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== &#039;&#039;Bluegrass (global beef)&#039;&#039; ====&lt;br /&gt;
All industries world-wide have been challenged with reducing emissions and beef is no exception. Genetic selection and specifically genomic selection have been identified as key tools to help meet this challenge. Methane emissions are not a local problem, but a global one and several major beef producing countries who exchange genetic material have, are, and will be collecting methane phenotypes for the purpose of genomic prediction. Individually (including those in Australia), these datasets will be limited in their genomic prediction accuracy. The BLUEGRASS alliance will bring together the key players globally, who collectively have solicited key seed funding from the Global Methane Hub. By sharing data and resources, the development of necessary reference populations will be accelerated. Locally or globally, success in the beef genetics industry has been a model of ‘co-opetition’. Breeders, although competitors, pool resources to build tools that can be used by all to compete with one another. This BLUEGRASS alliance is no different. A global alliance will come together to address this challenge, with or without Australia. Having Australia lead and ignite the alliance with MDC co-funding will create opportunities to direct this global initiative and provide first mover advantages for Australian breeders.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The program is focused on building genomic reference datasets for the main beef breeds in the collaborating countries. The animals to be recorded will be intensively recorded for other production traits, and genotyped, outside this project itself. In each country, trial or research breeding values will be produced and delivered to industry during the life of the project – enabling genetic selection against methane to get underway, and the data will underpin the ability to genomically screen the entire populations of the breeds involved in the respective countries i.e. all seedstock and commercial animals. The data collected will likely assist development of genomic selection against methane in other countries. The accelerated genetic selection and the commercial animal screening will enable real impact to reduce methane from beef cattle. If you have questions about the bluegrass project specifically, you can contact Steve Miller, [Mailto:Steve.miller@une.edu.au steve.miller@une.edu.au] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===== Number of phenotypes =====&lt;br /&gt;
This project will phenotype methane traits in beef cattle populations in the US, Australia, the UK, Ireland, and New Zealand. Around 18.500 phenotypes will be collected over all years and countries. It is estimated that around 7.000 phenotypes will be collected in Australia, around 1.600 in New Zealand, around 800 in the UK, around 2.000 in Ireland and around 7.00 in the USA.&lt;br /&gt;
===== Breeds and traits included =====&lt;br /&gt;
All countries included in the Bluegrass project have different breeds and different target traits included in their measurements, besides the methane phenotypes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Australia will focus on Angus and Hereford seedstock with a research population of Angus, Wagyu, Charolais, Shorthorn and Brahman being a target as well. For the seedstock they will focus on seedstock traits plus methane measurements using PAC measures. For the research populations on seedstock traits plus feed intake, carcass as well as methane measurements with PAC.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For New Zealand priority is the progeny test herds. These are mostly Angus, Hereford and their crosses, including a diallel cross design. Some Angus x Simmental. Complete requirements with seedstock herds of Angus and Hereford. Focus is on the following: progeny test, seedstock traits, conception date (via fetal aging) from natural mate at yearling (then re-breeding), carcass grading on steers, feed intake on heifers, rumen microbiome on steers and heifers, seedstock traits from seedstock herds&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For the UK focus lies on Angus and Hereford sired animals, both pedigree and crossbred (including from dairy dams) and they focus on liveweights.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For Ireland they include multi-breed/crossbreed. 30% Charolais and Limousin sired from Continental type suckler dams, 30% Holstein-Friesian and 40% beef (mostly Angus) cross dairy. They will focus on feed intake, liveweight and carcass data.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The USA will be measuring Angus focused on seedstock traits from seedstock herds.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== &#039;&#039;US beef&#039;&#039; ====&lt;br /&gt;
This project will accelerate genetic selection for reduced methane emissions from U.S. and Canadian beef cattle, through phenotyping and genotyping the 18 most influential beef breeds in North America.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The primary activities of this project will center on phenotyping and genetic evaluation of the Germplasm Evaluation (GPE) herd, a large, multibreed resource population at the U.S. Meat Animal Research Center (USMARC) in Nebraska, USA. This herd is structured to represent the genetic diversity of the 18 most influential beef breeds in the U.S.. These 18 breeds are: Angus, Red Angus, Hereford, South Devon, Shorthorn, Beefmaster, Brangus, Brahman, Santa Gertrudis, Braunvieh, ChiAngus, Charolais, Gelbvieh, Limousin, Maine-Anjou, Salers, Simmental, Tarentaise.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Recording of methane phenotypes will occur using multiple approaches to not only maximize the number of phenotypes collected, but to also offer a comparison between methodologies within a U.S. beef production system. Based on these findings and in coordination with other GMG project teams, standard operating procedures for methane phenotyping of beef cattle will be developed and integrated into the [https://beefimprovement.org/resource-center/bif-guidelines/ Guidelines for Uniform Beef Improvement Programs] supporting the evolution of these approaches into standard practice and routine evaluation in any beef breeding system. If you have questions about the US beef project specifically, you can contact Matthew Spangler, mspangler2@unl.edu.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===== Main goals =====&lt;br /&gt;
* Recording methane phenotypes from at least 5,500 multi-breed genotyped beef cattle and openly sharing to the GMG database and the public domain.&lt;br /&gt;
* Development and publication of uniform guidelines for both methane phenotyping in beef cattle systems and the integration of methane phenotypes into beef genetic evaluations, through the BIF Guidelines wiki.&lt;br /&gt;
* Dissemination and routine updating of genetic parameter and genomic marker effects critical for the development of genetic selection tools and deployment of methane-reducing breeding programs.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== &#039;&#039;&#039;Sheep&#039;&#039;&#039; ===&lt;br /&gt;
This project focusses on recording methane phenotypes on animals in various populations, e.g. Merino, Texel, Dohne, Corriedale, maternal and terminal. In each case, those animals will be recorded for a range of other production, health, product quality and welfare traits (the exact suite of traits varies between countries). This ensures that it will be possible to determine the genetic relationships between methane traits and the other traits included in current and future selection indexes and breeding programs – meaning that breeders will be able to make informed decisions on any trade-offs between methane and other traits. In total around 16.600 methane phenotypes will be collected over all years and countries. It is estimated that around 7.500 methane phenotypes will be collected in Australia, 3.000 in Uruguay, 4.000 in New Zealand, 1.200 in the UK and 1.000 in the UK. If you have questions about the sheep project specifically, you can contact Daniel Brown, [Mailto:dbrown2@une.edu.au dbrown2@une.edu.au] &lt;br /&gt;
==== Main goals ====&lt;br /&gt;
* Phenotyping and reference populations. Fast tracked phenotyping and  genotyping up to 16,000 records of methane traits across the key countries to facilitate accurate international evaluation of animals (Table 2).&lt;br /&gt;
* Genetic evaluation and models. Breeding values based on international genomic evaluation models to share the benefits of the established reference populations.&lt;br /&gt;
* Proxies. Development and validation of new phenotyping methods to expedite genetic progress.&lt;br /&gt;
* Breeding Programs. Whole farm system models to incorporate methane into breeding objectives in a balanced way and indexes to facilitate selection of breeding candidates.&lt;br /&gt;
* Education and adoption. Stakeholder engagement campaign and international development to ensure world-wide impact.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== &#039;&#039;&#039;Africa&#039;&#039;&#039; ===&lt;br /&gt;
This project focused on three regions of Africa (Eastern, Western and Southern Africa). It will will leverage and  accelerate on-going early research on GHG in these regions, strongly build capacity and team up with researchers to record CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, other economic productive traits and use the records to implement breeding strategies to reduce CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; emission while simultaneously enhancing productivity, food security and employment opportunities in the dairy and beef cattle farming systems; The source of livelihood for many poorly resourced farmers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Tapping into the existing breeding program infrastructure for improved productivity for dairy cattle in the three regions of Africa, this project will result in overall program that will accelerate genetic progress through focus on phenotyping, genotyping and the use of information from the microbiome in the genetic selection of animals in the smallholder dairy system. The overall impact will be better mitigation of negative effects of climate change and more productive cows. Through selection programs based on the index developed with the phenotypic and genomic information from this project.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The major activities include the direct CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; measurements on about 1.655 tropical cattle using [[Greenfeed SOP|GreenFeed]] and the use of [[Laser Methane Detector|LMD]] in smallholder farmers. Genotypic information and phenotypes captured routinely on major important productive traits that influence profitability, income and livelihood of farmers on 1.619 animals. Data sets will be linked to a larger existing data on 9.000 cows with phenotypic and genotypic information from existing projects. If you have questions about the Africa project specifically, you can contact Raphael Mrode, [Mailto:Raphael.mrode@sruc.ac.uk raphael.mrode@sruc.ac.uk]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Main goals ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Methane measurements available on 1.655 tropical cows.&lt;br /&gt;
* Tissue samples and genotypes available on 1.619 tropical cows.&lt;br /&gt;
* Genetic relationship between dairy cows in Western and Eastern Africa estimated.&lt;br /&gt;
* Multi-trait genomic analysis of dairy data and methane in Eastern Africa.&lt;br /&gt;
* Incorporate existing data on over 9.000 cows from existing research projects to enhance genomic prediction.&lt;br /&gt;
* Computation and the roll out of final selection index or sub-indexes developed for improved efficiency - reduced CH4 emission, lower maintenance requirement and increased milk production.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== &#039;&#039;&#039;Latin America&#039;&#039;&#039; ===&lt;br /&gt;
The aim of this project is to accelerate the reduction of enteric methane emissions in beef cattle in Latin America through genetic selection in key breeds relevant to Argentina, Brazil, Uruguay, and Mexico. The focus will be on phenotyping methane emissions and genotyping animals linked to existing genetic improvement programs. Reference populations for genomic selection will be the basis to improve the estimation of genetic merit and select for lower emission. The link with ongoing genetic improvement programs provides data on other economically relevant production traits, thus making it possible to estimate genetic correlations and optimize methane emission reductions with a minimum impact on livestock productivity. This approach minimizes negative impacts on food production while preserving economic, social, and environmental sustainability of beef cattle farming. This collaborative project between national agricultural research institutes (NARI) is supported by breeders’ associations and other key stakeholders. Public-private partnerships and collaborative efforts will scale genetic evaluation for methane emissions as well as the use of lower methane emission genetics on commercial farms. Phenotypic and genomic data from approximately 7.000 animals will be made globally available. In synergy with other projects, it will be possible to increase the size of reference populations leading to an even greater impact on methane emissions mitigation. If you have questions about the Latin America project specifically, you can contact Elly Navajas, [Mailto:Enavajas@inia.org.uy enavajas@inia.org.uy]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For developing methane emission phenotyping platforms and reference populations, it is essential to upgrade methane emission recording equipment as well as standardize and coordinate the measurement of animals. Standardized protocols will be developed in collaboration with ICAR, and the criteria for selecting animals to be measured and genotyped will be established by the research team, including technicians from breeder associations. A critical component of the project involves genetic analyses, such as estimating genetic parameters for methane emission-related traits, validating breeding values in additional populations, and evaluating the impact of selecting for reduced methane emissions. Scientific collaboration will be fostered with other beef cattle projects, focusing on areas such as expertise exchange. Communication strategies will be implemented to engage stakeholders, including breeders, artificial insemination centers, policymakers, and other private stakeholders. Dialogue with teams managing greenhouse gas (GHG) inventories and Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs) will also be enhanced. These activities require active collaboration among countries and stakeholders in Latin America to achieve successful outcomes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Main goals ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* A Latin American collaborative network for accelerating genetic improvement for methane emissions reduction is established by NARIs, universities, breeder societies, and private stakeholders engaged in genetic evaluation programs across South America and Mexico. &lt;br /&gt;
* Methane emission phenotyping platforms are implemented, enabling data collection across key beef cattle breeds, targeting 7.000 methane emission phenotypes and genotypes of animals linked to genetic evaluations. &lt;br /&gt;
* Genomic-enhanced estimated breeding values for methane emissions will be available to breeders: based on pure-breed and multi-breed reference populations enhanced through collaboration and data sharing across beef cattle projects within the GMG initiative. &lt;br /&gt;
* The economic and environmental impact of breeding strategies to reduce methane emissions is assessed, to identify the most promising breeding strategies to accelerate methane emission reduction. The development of breeding objectives combining methane emission reduction with production goals will support policy and incentives for breeders and farmers to overcome adoption barriers and integrate the results into national GHG inventories. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== &#039;&#039;&#039;Microbiome&#039;&#039;&#039; ===&lt;br /&gt;
The micro-HUB project will establish a reference population with metagenome and genotype data, and create a genomic evaluation system that can be used to select the parents of the next generation with microbiome profiles that produce less enteric methane while maintaining genetic progress in profit and health. The genomic evaluation system will be widely open, will target most relevant breeds and production systems. Furthermore, a large global microbiome network will be established to collect existing data and knowledge and ensure knowledge transfer. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This project will start with metagenome and genomic data on 5.430 individuals from the core project partners, we will explore the opportunity to extend and expand our reference population to other countries with suitable data. By combining national data sets with genotypes, microbiome and methane information, we aim to create the largest rumen microbiome reference population globally. We aim to enlarge the reference population by more than 20.000 microbiome sequenced dairy and beef cattle as well as sheep from the Global Methane Genetics (GMG) program. From this, we will facilitate the delivery of genomic breeding values that can be used in global breeding programs to select for a microbiome composition with lower emissions and reduce the abundance of methanogenic pathways in the rumen microbiome of future generations of cattle and sheep. The project partners cover beef, dairy and sheep populations and creates an opportunity to identify a core microbiome (or set of cores) that can be used as a reference for nation-based breeding programs. The project will closely connect to the other projects within the Global Methane Program, to facilitate microbiome sampling, sequencing and genomic analysis. If you have questions about the microbiome project specifically, you can contact Oscar Gonzalez-Recio, [Mailto:Oscar.gonzalezrecio@ed.ac.uk oscar.gonzalezrecio@ed.ac.uk]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Activities ====&lt;br /&gt;
To enlarge the national database partners will obtain additional samples from animals with methane and genotype data from different breeds and production systems within the GMG phenotyping program (dairy and beef cattle). The inclusion of samples from external partners will be encouraged. Partners (also external) will be provided with instruction to collect data and sample rumen microbiome. The micro-Hub will provide stewardship for GMG partners regarding sampling, storage and shipping, as well as bioinformatic analysis. Rumen metagenome sequencing will be centralized in as fewer labs as possible (ideally only one).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Reference populations from partners will be combined, covering a broad range of breeds and productions systems and different geographical regions. Format of the databases will be unified. The combined dataset will be used for the microbiome genomic evaluations. The reference database will be updated with additional data coming from external partners. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We will develop the capabilities to estimate the genomic breeding value for microbiome composition for any genotyped animal in similar productive conditions as those represented in our reference population. The goal is to propose recommendations based on own experience to include estimated genomic breeding values for rumen microbiome profile in breeding programs. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The project will contribute to the activities organized within Global Methane Genetics and the ICAR Feed&amp;amp;Gas working group in building a microbiome network to exchange knowledge, harmonize guidelines and develop protocols. All data generated within the project will be made available through the Global Methane Genetics database. The project will collaborate with the database development to develop microbiome sharing requirements and specifications. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Main goals ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Joint reference metagenome compiled.&lt;br /&gt;
* Microbiome genomic evaluations.&lt;br /&gt;
* Release of SNP coefficients for international genomic evaluations for microbiome compositions.&lt;br /&gt;
* Network building and establishment of platform for rumen metagenome data.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== &#039;&#039;&#039;Working Group meetings&#039;&#039;&#039; ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The six working groups as described above meet two times a year. The GMG working group meetings are aimed to share updates about the GMG projects and discuss gaps, needs and bottlenecks in the field.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Dairy Cattle ====&lt;br /&gt;
15 May 2025: Presentation materials [[:File:250515 GMG meeting Dairy Working Group.pdf|here.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
27 October 2025: Presentation materials [[:File:20251027 GMG Working group Dairy meeting.pdf|here.]] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Sheep ====&lt;br /&gt;
20 May 2025: Presentation materials [[:File:20250520 Meeting GMG Working group sheep.pdf|here.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
11 November 2025: Presentation materials [[:File:20251111 Sheep Working Group GMG presentation.pdf|here.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Microbiome ====&lt;br /&gt;
23 May 2025: Presentation materials [[:File:202505 Global Meeting Genetics Microbiome working group meeting.pdf|here.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
27 November 2025: Presentation materials [[:File:20251127 GMG Microbiome WG presentation.pdf|here.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Latin America ====&lt;br /&gt;
5 June 2025: Presentation materials [[:File:202506 Presentation GMG Working Group Latin America meeting.pdf|here.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
14 November 2025: Presentation materials [[:File:20251114 Latin America GMG Work group meeting.pdf|here.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Africa ====&lt;br /&gt;
23 May 2025: Presentation materials [[:File:20250523 GMG Working group Africa meeting.pdf|here.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
7 November 2025: Presentation materials [[:File:20251107 Africa Workgroup GMG presentation.pdf|here.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Beef ====&lt;br /&gt;
17 June 2025: Presentation materials [[:File:202506 GMG Working group Beef meeting.pdf|here.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
11 November 2025: Presentation materials [[:File:20251106 GMG Working group Beef meeting.pdf|here.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Asia ====&lt;br /&gt;
1 July 2025: Presentation materials [[:File:20250701 AsiaGMG presentation.pdf|here.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
25 November 2025: Presentation materials [[:File:GMG Asia From data to impact.pdf|here]], [[:File:Asia 20251105.pdf|here]], [[:File:2511 GMG Asia MethaneMethods.pdf|here]] and [[:File:ILRI LMD Exp 2025.pdf|here]]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Webinars ====&lt;br /&gt;
On the 22th of May 2025 there was a webinar for all GMG project participants on effective records in the database, you can find the presentation slides [[:File:250515 GMG meeting Dairy Working Group.pdf|here.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== DAFNE ==&lt;br /&gt;
Department of Agriculture and Forest Sciences at the University of Tuscia. Their main purpose is to collect primary emissions data from sniffers and GF to have emissions factors related to the species, breed, physiological state and diet management. They are engaged with ANAFIBJ and sharing data related to Holstein cattle with them for genetic evaluations. Currently they are running trials with sheep and buffalo.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Sheep ===&lt;br /&gt;
For this trial they are comparing 2 grazing methods using 2 groups of Sopravissana sheep, reared at the facility.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# Rotational, 18 sheep. Turns every 4 days on strip paddocks. 18 paddocks in total; 6 heads on 3 strip paddocks per turn of grazing. After 24 days the sheep are back to the first three strips.&lt;br /&gt;
# Continuous, 18 sheep. Continuous grazing on same paddock. 3 paddocks in total; 6 heads per paddock. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Subgroups for both group A and B (6 heads) are randomly arranged every day. The 18 strip paddocks are the same total size as the three continuous paddocks. They have the same number of heads grazing and the same live weight load.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Both groups are balanced for BW, receive the same hay in quantity and quality with ad libitum access and spend the same time at pasture. Daily sampling of the hay and residual per group is done, weekly sub samples of hay and residual are analyzed. In parallel fresh grass is sampled and analyzed to represent the 2 grazing methods. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The GreenFeed is located in the barn, at 9AM this barn is closed for group A and opens for group B and this switches every day. The GreenFeed is the only place they can get concentrates. Nutritional information for this concentrate can be found [[:File:Nutritional table sheep DAFHNE.docx|here]]. Amount of food and cup drops can be found here.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Trial started end of March 2025 and will last 1.5 months. They are using the GF adapted for small ruminants.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Buffalo ===&lt;br /&gt;
This is a continuous trial which will last 4 months per supplement tested. First they monitor the buffalo for 4 weeks without supplement as a control diet and then there will be an 8 week experimental period with the supplement diet. During the entire period the buffalo are confined to the barn. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The buffalo are separated in two groups, in adjacent pens. One group has access to a milking robot, with the MooLogger from [[Sniffer SOP|Tecnosens.]] The other pen has a conventional milking system and the GreenFeed is placed facing this pen.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
All buffaloes are fed the same concentrates. Nutritional information for this concentrate can be found [[:File:Nutritional table Buffalo DAFHNE.docx|here]]. Amount of food and cup drops can be found here. The buffalo’s in the GF group get the concentrates from the GF and about 1 kg of concentrates during milking operations. The buffalo’s in the sniffer group only get concentrates from the milking robot, which is about 2 kg/head/day.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To account for the emissions recorded individually at different times, they compare the emissions data aggregated on a daily basis. They are using the GF adapted for large ruminants with horns&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== GasToGrass ==&lt;br /&gt;
The aim of this project is to develop new breeding solutions for the industry by finding ways to identify animals with lower environmental impact, which can then be selected as part of genetic improvement programs. This project will contribute with new strategies to mitigate greenhouse gas emissions, in sheep production systems. You can find more information on the [https://era-susan.eu/content/grasstogas-grass-gas-strategies-mitigate-ghg-emissions-pasture-based-sheep-systems website]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== MethaBreed ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:P-2025-1-15-2 FBF Logo MethaBreed Logo 01 4C-01 klein.png|thumb|170x170px]]&lt;br /&gt;
The MethaBreed project aims to improve the sustainability of dairy production by developing innovative breeding strategies for dairy cows that simultaneously reduce methane emissions, enhance feed efficiency, and support animal health. A large-scale longitudinal study is being conducted in commercial dairy herds. Using advanced technologies, individual cow traits are recorded across entire lactations and multiple lactation cycles. Data collection includes continuous monitoring of methane emissions using sniffers, feed intake (using CFIT: Cattle Feed Intake System), body weight (using CFIT and scales), and key health parameters. A particular focus lies on the role of the rumen microbiome in methane production. A central goal of MethaBreed is the development of a new breeding value for methane emissions, enabling the selection of animals with lower environmental impact. These data will be integrated with pedigree and genomic information to allow precise breeding decisions. At the same time, the existing breeding value for feed efficiency will be further refined. The outcomes of the project are expected to make a significant contribution towards more climate-friendly dairy production. In the long term, standardized breeding values will be provided, enabling breeding organizations and farmers to actively select for healthier, more efficient, and more sustainable dairy cows. For more information you can visit the following websites from the partners: [https://www.uni-giessen.de/de/fbz/fb09/institute/ith/ag-koenig/forschung/laufend/methabreed University Giessen], [https://www.fbf-forschung.de/aktuelles/methabreed-neues-forschungsprojekt-zur-reduzierung.html FBF], [https://livestock-functional-microbiology.uni-hohenheim.de/en/research-projects#jfmulticontent_c401477-2 University of Hohenheim.] Further partners are [https://www.vit.de/ vit] and [https://www.uni-kiel.de/de/aef/fakultaet/institute/tierzucht-tierhaltung University Kiel]. The project is funded by the German Federal Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Regional Identity on the basis of a resolution of the German Bundestag. The project management is carried out by the Federal Office for Agriculture and Food (BLE) within the framework of the Federal Programme for Livestock Farming. Funding reference numbers: 28KTF23C01–05.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== breed4green ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Logo B4G RZ RGB 1 Transparent.png|right|frameless|228x228px]]&lt;br /&gt;
Direct and indirect traits for feed efficiency and greenhouse gas emissions for breeding and herd management in cattle:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [https://www.rinderzucht.at/projekt/breed4green.html breed4green] project focuses on researching strategies to reduce methane emissions and enhance feed efficiency within the Austrian cattle industry. Measurements of methane and CO2 emissions are conducted on both experimental and commercial farms using the GreenFeed system. The aim of the project is to collect methane and CO2 measurements of approximately 1,000 Fleckvieh and 200 Brown Swiss cows. In addition, various phenotypes such as health, body weight, BCS, metabolism, energy intake and milk mid infrared (MIR) spectra are recorded. Data on feed intake from experimental farms are also available for validation. The genetic potential of direct traits like methane, CO2 and feed efficiency, along with their correlations to health and other traits, will be analyzed. The project also includes the development and validation of MIR equations for emitted methane and energy balance. The focus will be on investigating the use of these indirect traits to reduce methane emissions and improve feed efficiency in breeding programs to pave the way for genomic selection. The results will also be used to optimize herd management. Furthermore, the environmental impact of relevant dairy and beef production systems in Austria will be investigated.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== CH4COW ==&lt;br /&gt;
The Association of Swiss Cattle Breeders ([https://asr-ch.ch/en/About-us/-Zweck-und-Ziele ASR]) has launched a comprehensive phenotyping initiative aimed at establishing routine genetic evaluations for methane emissions based on Swiss derived phenotypic data.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The initial project, [https://qualitasag.ch/en/ch4cow/ CH4COW], started in 2024 and will span four years. Its primary objective is the deployment of methane measuring sniffers (MooLoggers, Tecnosens) across 64 farms throughout Switzerland. Among these, 30 farms house Holstein (HOL) herds, while the remainder keep Brown Swiss cattle. The project is funded by the Swiss Federal Office of Agriculture, several cantonal governments (FR, GR, LU, SG, and ZG), and the ASR.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Brown Swiss part of the CH4COW project is closely linked to the dairy cattle section of the Global Methane Genetics Inititiative.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Project status: All methane measuring sniffers have now been installed on the participating farms, ensuring continuous and standardized data acquisition. Automated data processing pipelines are fully operational, enabling seamless transfer, storage, and organization of incoming data streams. Concurrently, several methodological frameworks for data cleaning, quality control, and the development of robust methane related phenotypes are under active evaluation. These efforts aim to establish reliable phenotype definitions that will ultimately support future single-step genetic evaluations. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you would like to know more about this project you can contact Beat Bapst ([Mailto:beat.bapst@qualitasag.ch beat.bapst@qualitasag.ch]) or Adrien Butty ([Mailto:Adrien.butty@qualitasag.ch adrien.butty@qualitasag.ch])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Presentation materials ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Seminar by Julius van der Werf: Breeding for a changing climate 13-05-2025 ===&lt;br /&gt;
On the 13th of May Julius van de Werf gave a presentation at Wageningen Livestock Research on selection indexes for selecting low methane livestock, focused on sheep. You can find the slides [[:File:20250513 Seminar J.v.d.Werf.pdf|here]]. You can find the recording of the presentation below.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;youtube&amp;gt;PxKmxKVvVEA?si=C6x0keKAvgU009Da&amp;lt;/youtube&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Seminar by Maria Frizzarin: Introduction to milk mid-infrared spectroscopy 10-07-2025 ===&lt;br /&gt;
On the 10th of July Maria Frizzarin gave a presentation at Wageningen Livestock Research on milk mid-infrared spectroscopy, equations development, and applications. You can find the slides [[:File:10072025 Seminar Maria MIR.pdf|here.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Seminar by Sarah-Joe Burn: Breed4Green 25-09-2025 ===&lt;br /&gt;
On the 25th of September Sarah-Joe Burn gave a presentation at Wageningen Livestock Research on measuring methane emissions in commercial farms and establishing a comprehensive dataset for genetic studies. A similar presentations was given at EAAP 2025, you can find the slides to that presentation [[:File:Eaap2025-breed4green-linke.pdf|here]] and the abstract [[:File:2025 Innsbruck EAAP Book Abstracts.pdf|here]], page 250.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== &#039;&#039;&#039;Seminar by Fazel Almasi: Measuring methane in dairy cows using Arcoflex sensors 25-09-2025&#039;&#039;&#039; ===&lt;br /&gt;
On the 25th of September Fazel Almasi gave a presentation at Wageningen Livestock Research on the repeatability and heritability of dairy cow methane concentration using sniffer sensors. You can find the slides to the presentation [[:File:FA-ArcoflexUpdate.pdf|here]]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Joint ICAR Feed&amp;amp;Gas and ASGGN workshop ===&lt;br /&gt;
On the 5th of October the joint workshop between the [https://www.icar.org/group/working-group-feed-and-gas/ ICAR Feed&amp;amp;Gas working group] and the [https://www.asggn.org/ ASGGN] took place before the GGAA conference in Nairobi. The presentations can be found below. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[:File:2025 ASGGN - GGAA - A Taste of the Future Buccal Swabbing for Rumen Microbial ProfilingTB.pdf|A Taste of the Future: Buccal Swabbing for Rumen Microbial Profiling]]​. Presented by Ben Perry ([https://www.bioeconomyscience.co.nz/ NZIBS])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[:File:2638 Booker ILRI GGAA ASGGN Oct 2025.pdf|Rate of Genetic Gain for Methane Emissions in a Maternal Production Flock]]. Presented by Fem Booker ([https://www.bioeconomyscience.co.nz/ NZIBS])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[:File:Boris ICAR2025 v01.pdf|Association between rumen and faecal microbiome and enteric methane emissions in dairy cattle]]. Presented by Boris Sepulveda ([https://agriculture.vic.gov.au/ AV])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[:File:CaeliRichardson GGAA Workshop 2025.pdf|Global Framework to Monitor, Measure, and Account for Methane Reductions from Genetic Selection]]. Presented by Caeli Richardson ([https://abacusbio.com/ Abacusbio])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[:File:GGAA Workshop ICAR and ASGGN Ida Storm.pdf|Danish Perspectives on implementation of GHG regulation]]. Presented by Ida Storm ([https://agricultureandfood.dk/ DAFG])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[:File:GGAA Workshop ICAR and ASGGN Rasmus Stephansen.pdf|Experience with CH4 sniffers, what have we learned so far?]] Presented by Rasmus Stephansen ([https://international.au.dk/ AU])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[:File:GGAA workshop MIR methane presentation.pdf|Overview of the methane equations developed from mid-infrared spectroscopy and their applications.]] Presented by Maria Frizzarin ([https://www.agroscope.admin.ch/agroscope/en/home.html Agroscope])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[:File:HanneHonerlagen ICARpresentation.pdf|Adding microbial data to enhance breeding for lower methane emissions]]. Presented by Hanne Honerlagen ([https://www.wur.nl/en/research-results/chair-groups/animal-sciences/animal-breeding-and-genomics-group.htm WUR-ABG])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[:File:McNaughton ASGGN Workshop final.pdf|GreenFeed for phenotyping – our experiences]]. Presented by Lorna McNaughton ([https://www.lic.co.nz/ LIC])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[:File:MIE ILRI GGAA ASGGN Oct 2025.pdf|Methane Index Explorer: Optimising a Breeding Value Format for Simultaneous Inclusion of Enteric Methane Emissions in Breeding Schemes and National Inventories]]. Presented by Pavithra Ariyarathne ([https://www.bioeconomyscience.co.nz/ NZIBS])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[:File:RiccardoGGAA Presentation RB.pdf|ZELP sense]]. Presented by Riccardo Bica ([https://www.zelp.co/ ZELP])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[:File:ICAR Working group Nairobi 5 Oct2025.pdf|Selection for lower methane livestock, selection index considerations]]. Presented by Julius van der Werf (UNE)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Measuring enteric methane in beef and dairy cattle using PAC. Presented by Timothy Bilton ([https://www.bioeconomyscience.co.nz/ NZIBS])&amp;lt;youtube&amp;gt;https://youtu.be/NjPuotrmkMQ&amp;lt;/youtube&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Estimating methane emissions with the GreenFeed System. Presented by Paul Smith ([https://teagasc.ie/ Teagasc]) &amp;lt;youtube&amp;gt;https://youtu.be/TnHefWoP29I&amp;lt;/youtube&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Cvangemert</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://wiki.icar.org/index.php?title=Section_20:_Activities&amp;diff=4894</id>
		<title>Section 20: Activities</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://wiki.icar.org/index.php?title=Section_20:_Activities&amp;diff=4894"/>
		<updated>2026-02-10T10:43:02Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Cvangemert: /* Presentation materials */ added CH4COW&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;big&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;b&amp;gt;NOTE: This version of Section 20 has been approved by the working group&#039;s Chair.  Please be aware that further revisions may occur before final review and approval by the Board and ICAR members per the [[Approval of Page Process]].&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/b&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
== Global Methane Genetics ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:GMG label.png|right|frameless|300x300px]]&lt;br /&gt;
The Global Methane Genetics (GMG) initiative is a global program to accelerate genetic progress in methane emission in ruminants in the Global North and South. This WUR-ABG coordinated initiative is funded by the [https://www.globalmethanehub.org/ Global Methane Hub] and the [https://www.bezosearthfund.org/ Bezos Earth Fund,] both based on philanthropic funds to support methane mitigation and prevent global warming. If you have questions about the [https://www.wur.nl/en/project/global-methane-genetics-initiative.htm GMG initiative] you can send an email to gmg@wur.nl, contact Roel Veerkamp: roel.veerkamp@wur.nl or Birgit Gredler-Grandl: birgit.gredler-grandl@wur.nl.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The initiative holds the following projects:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== &#039;&#039;&#039;Dairy Cattle&#039;&#039;&#039; ===&lt;br /&gt;
We can look to nature to reduce CH4 emissions and use genetic diversity to provide solutions. Genetic improvement, based on identifying animals with genetic predisposition for lower CH4 output and using them to breed for the next generations, is a reliable, cost-effective, and permanent method for transforming livestock&#039;s impact on the environment.  Breeding programs in dairy cattle are run within breeds and across countries. Therefore, the program will accelerate genetic progress by focusing on four major dairy breeds and organizations and countries involved in those breeds. Additionally, the program will acquire considerable leverage through investments in these countries. If you have questions about the dairy cattle section you can contact Birgit Gredler-Grandl: birgit.gredler-grandl@wur.nl.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== &#039;&#039;Holstein breed&#039;&#039; ====&lt;br /&gt;
The largest data collection has been for the Holstein breed, but there is a lack of standardization and protocols in terms of equipment and its utilization (farm level, data processing, data sharing agreements, genetic evaluations, and data collections). Governments and breeding organizations in Denmark and the Netherlands will collaborate and collect methane and genotypes on more than 20,000 Holstein cows for the GMG database. Also, Poland and Italy team up to collect data for the GMG database, and their aim is also to collect more than 20,000 Holstein animals and develop genetic evaluations across a wide range of systems.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===== Denmark-The Netherlands =====&lt;br /&gt;
This collaboration between Aarhus University and Wageningen Livestock Research has five main goals. The contact person for questions about this project is Trine Villumsen: tmv@qgg.au.dk.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Setting up Standard Operating Procedures (SOP) for measuring methane using sniffers&lt;br /&gt;
* Setting up international protocols to measure methane on commercial farms&lt;br /&gt;
* Develop software tools to automate the processing of data into a phenotype&lt;br /&gt;
* Combine historical data in both countries for genetic evaluations&lt;br /&gt;
* Measure enteric methane in 20.000 new cows.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===== Poland-Italy =====&lt;br /&gt;
This collaboration has the following main goals. The contact person for questions about this project is Raffaella Finocchiaro raffaellafinocchiaro@anafibj.it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Measure enteric methane in 20.000 new cows.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== &#039;&#039;Jersey breed&#039;&#039; ====&lt;br /&gt;
Currently, due to the limited data available, the Jersey dairy breed does not have breeding values for methane (CH4) mitigation. The goal of the program is to collect methane genotypes in Canada and Denmark and share this information with the GMG database. The aim is to develop breeding values that will be distributed through the World Jersey Cattle Bureau organization and national Jersey organizations in Australia, Canada, Switzerland, Denmark, France, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands, and New Zealand. If you have questions about the Jersey breed section you can contact Rasmus Bak Stephansen rasmus.stephansen@qgg.au.dk&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== &#039;&#039;Brown Swiss breed&#039;&#039; ====&lt;br /&gt;
The Brown Swiss (BS) breed faces significant challenges due to its small population size, an divers environments the animals are kept. A collaboration between Germany, Switzerland, and Austria to phenotype enough animals is a prerequisite for utilizing the genetic potential of reducing methane emission of the BS breed. In addition to a population of 250 cows recorded with Greenfeed, and 1250 with the sniffer, progress will be accelerated by recording an additional 3,360 cows with sniffers. If you have questions about the Brown Swiss breed section you can contact Elena Frenken: fe@fbf-forschung.de.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== &#039;&#039;Red breeds&#039;&#039; ====&lt;br /&gt;
The red breeds are important for crossbreeding in many countries around the world. The project aims to share and collect CH4 data from Red Dairy Cattle (RDC) breeds (in the Nordic countries, Canada, and the United Kingdom (UK)) and share it with the Global Methane Genetics (GMG) Hub. Together, they will set up a shared genetic evaluation for bulls used for crossbreeding in many more countries. If you have questions about the Red breed section you can contact Elisenda Rius-Vilarrasa: Elisenda.Rius-Vilarrasa@vxa.se.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== &#039;&#039;&#039;Beef Cattle&#039;&#039;&#039; ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== &#039;&#039;Bluegrass (global beef)&#039;&#039; ====&lt;br /&gt;
All industries world-wide have been challenged with reducing emissions and beef is no exception. Genetic selection and specifically genomic selection have been identified as key tools to help meet this challenge. Methane emissions are not a local problem, but a global one and several major beef producing countries who exchange genetic material have, are, and will be collecting methane phenotypes for the purpose of genomic prediction. Individually (including those in Australia), these datasets will be limited in their genomic prediction accuracy. The BLUEGRASS alliance will bring together the key players globally, who collectively have solicited key seed funding from the Global Methane Hub. By sharing data and resources, the development of necessary reference populations will be accelerated. Locally or globally, success in the beef genetics industry has been a model of ‘co-opetition’. Breeders, although competitors, pool resources to build tools that can be used by all to compete with one another. This BLUEGRASS alliance is no different. A global alliance will come together to address this challenge, with or without Australia. Having Australia lead and ignite the alliance with MDC co-funding will create opportunities to direct this global initiative and provide first mover advantages for Australian breeders.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The program is focused on building genomic reference datasets for the main beef breeds in the collaborating countries. The animals to be recorded will be intensively recorded for other production traits, and genotyped, outside this project itself. In each country, trial or research breeding values will be produced and delivered to industry during the life of the project – enabling genetic selection against methane to get underway, and the data will underpin the ability to genomically screen the entire populations of the breeds involved in the respective countries i.e. all seedstock and commercial animals. The data collected will likely assist development of genomic selection against methane in other countries. The accelerated genetic selection and the commercial animal screening will enable real impact to reduce methane from beef cattle. If you have questions about the bluegrass project specifically, you can contact Steve Miller, steve.miller@une.edu.au &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===== Number of phenotypes =====&lt;br /&gt;
This project will phenotype methane traits in beef cattle populations in the US, Australia, the UK, Ireland, and New Zealand. Around 18.500 phenotypes will be collected over all years and countries. It is estimated that around 7.000 phenotypes will be collected in Australia, around 1.600 in New Zealand, around 800 in the UK, around 2.000 in Ireland and around 7.00 in the USA.&lt;br /&gt;
===== Breeds and traits included =====&lt;br /&gt;
All countries included in the Bluegrass project have different breeds and different target traits included in their measurements, besides the methane phenotypes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Australia will focus on Angus and Hereford seedstock with a research population of Angus, Wagyu, Charolais, Shorthorn and Brahman being a target as well. For the seedstock they will focus on seedstock traits plus methane measurements using PAC measures. For the research populations on seedstock traits plus feed intake, carcass as well as methane measurements with PAC.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For New Zealand priority is the progeny test herds. These are mostly Angus, Hereford and their crosses, including a diallel cross design. Some Angus x Simmental. Complete requirements with seedstock herds of Angus and Hereford. Focus is on the following: progeny test, seedstock traits, conception date (via fetal aging) from natural mate at yearling (then re-breeding), carcass grading on steers, feed intake on heifers, rumen microbiome on steers and heifers, seedstock traits from seedstock herds&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For the UK focus lies on Angus and Hereford sired animals, both pedigree and crossbred (including from dairy dams) and they focus on liveweights.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For Ireland they include multi-breed/crossbreed. 30% Charolais and Limousin sired from Continental type suckler dams, 30% Holstein-Friesian and 40% beef (mostly Angus) cross dairy. They will focus on feed intake, liveweight and carcass data.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The USA will be measuring Angus focused on seedstock traits from seedstock herds.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== &#039;&#039;US beef&#039;&#039; ====&lt;br /&gt;
This project will accelerate genetic selection for reduced methane emissions from U.S. and Canadian beef cattle, through phenotyping and genotyping the 18 most influential beef breeds in North America.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The primary activities of this project will center on phenotyping and genetic evaluation of the Germplasm Evaluation (GPE) herd, a large, multibreed resource population at the U.S. Meat Animal Research Center (USMARC) in Nebraska, USA. This herd is structured to represent the genetic diversity of the 18 most influential beef breeds in the U.S.. These 18 breeds are: Angus, Red Angus, Hereford, South Devon, Shorthorn, Beefmaster, Brangus, Brahman, Santa Gertrudis, Braunvieh, ChiAngus, Charolais, Gelbvieh, Limousin, Maine-Anjou, Salers, Simmental, Tarentaise.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Recording of methane phenotypes will occur using multiple approaches to not only maximize the number of phenotypes collected, but to also offer a comparison between methodologies within a U.S. beef production system. Based on these findings and in coordination with other GMG project teams, standard operating procedures for methane phenotyping of beef cattle will be developed and integrated into the [https://beefimprovement.org/resource-center/bif-guidelines/ Guidelines for Uniform Beef Improvement Programs] supporting the evolution of these approaches into standard practice and routine evaluation in any beef breeding system. If you have questions about the US beef project specifically, you can contact Matthew Spangler, mspangler2@unl.edu.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===== Main goals =====&lt;br /&gt;
* Recording methane phenotypes from at least 5,500 multi-breed genotyped beef cattle and openly sharing to the GMG database and the public domain.&lt;br /&gt;
* Development and publication of uniform guidelines for both methane phenotyping in beef cattle systems and the integration of methane phenotypes into beef genetic evaluations, through the BIF Guidelines wiki.&lt;br /&gt;
* Dissemination and routine updating of genetic parameter and genomic marker effects critical for the development of genetic selection tools and deployment of methane-reducing breeding programs.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== &#039;&#039;&#039;Sheep&#039;&#039;&#039; ===&lt;br /&gt;
This project focusses on recording methane phenotypes on animals in various populations, e.g. Merino, Texel, Dohne, Corriedale, maternal and terminal. In each case, those animals will be recorded for a range of other production, health, product quality and welfare traits (the exact suite of traits varies between countries). This ensures that it will be possible to determine the genetic relationships between methane traits and the other traits included in current and future selection indexes and breeding programs – meaning that breeders will be able to make informed decisions on any trade-offs between methane and other traits. In total around 16.600 methane phenotypes will be collected over all years and countries. It is estimated that around 7.500 methane phenotypes will be collected in Australia, 3.000 in Uruguay, 4.000 in New Zealand, 1.200 in the UK and 1.000 in the UK. If you have questions about the sheep project specifically, you can contact Daniel Brown, dbrown2@une.edu.au &lt;br /&gt;
==== Main goals ====&lt;br /&gt;
* Phenotyping and reference populations. Fast tracked phenotyping and  genotyping up to 16,000 records of methane traits across the key countries to facilitate accurate international evaluation of animals (Table 2).&lt;br /&gt;
* Genetic evaluation and models. Breeding values based on international genomic evaluation models to share the benefits of the established reference populations.&lt;br /&gt;
* Proxies. Development and validation of new phenotyping methods to expedite genetic progress.&lt;br /&gt;
* Breeding Programs. Whole farm system models to incorporate methane into breeding objectives in a balanced way and indexes to facilitate selection of breeding candidates.&lt;br /&gt;
* Education and adoption. Stakeholder engagement campaign and international development to ensure world-wide impact.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== &#039;&#039;&#039;Africa&#039;&#039;&#039; ===&lt;br /&gt;
This project focused on three regions of Africa (Eastern, Western and Southern Africa). It will will leverage and  accelerate on-going early research on GHG in these regions, strongly build capacity and team up with researchers to record CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, other economic productive traits and use the records to implement breeding strategies to reduce CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; emission while simultaneously enhancing productivity, food security and employment opportunities in the dairy and beef cattle farming systems; The source of livelihood for many poorly resourced farmers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Tapping into the existing breeding program infrastructure for improved productivity for dairy cattle in the three regions of Africa, this project will result in overall program that will accelerate genetic progress through focus on phenotyping, genotyping and the use of information from the microbiome in the genetic selection of animals in the smallholder dairy system. The overall impact will be better mitigation of negative effects of climate change and more productive cows. Through selection programs based on the index developed with the phenotypic and genomic information from this project.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The major activities include the direct CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; measurements on about 1.655 tropical cattle using [[Greenfeed SOP|GreenFeed]] and the use of [[Laser Methane Detector|LMD]] in smallholder farmers. Genotypic information and phenotypes captured routinely on major important productive traits that influence profitability, income and livelihood of farmers on 1.619 animals. Data sets will be linked to a larger existing data on 9.000 cows with phenotypic and genotypic information from existing projects. If you have questions about the Africa project specifically, you can contact Raphael Mrode, raphael.mrode@sruc.ac.uk&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Main goals ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Methane measurements available on 1.655 tropical cows.&lt;br /&gt;
* Tissue samples and genotypes available on 1.619 tropical cows.&lt;br /&gt;
* Genetic relationship between dairy cows in Western and Eastern Africa estimated.&lt;br /&gt;
* Multi-trait genomic analysis of dairy data and methane in Eastern Africa.&lt;br /&gt;
* Incorporate existing data on over 9.000 cows from existing research projects to enhance genomic prediction.&lt;br /&gt;
* Computation and the roll out of final selection index or sub-indexes developed for improved efficiency - reduced CH4 emission, lower maintenance requirement and increased milk production.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== &#039;&#039;&#039;Latin America&#039;&#039;&#039; ===&lt;br /&gt;
The aim of this project is to accelerate the reduction of enteric methane emissions in beef cattle in Latin America through genetic selection in key breeds relevant to Argentina, Brazil, Uruguay, and Mexico. The focus will be on phenotyping methane emissions and genotyping animals linked to existing genetic improvement programs. Reference populations for genomic selection will be the basis to improve the estimation of genetic merit and select for lower emission. The link with ongoing genetic improvement programs provides data on other economically relevant production traits, thus making it possible to estimate genetic correlations and optimize methane emission reductions with a minimum impact on livestock productivity. This approach minimizes negative impacts on food production while preserving economic, social, and environmental sustainability of beef cattle farming. This collaborative project between national agricultural research institutes (NARI) is supported by breeders’ associations and other key stakeholders. Public-private partnerships and collaborative efforts will scale genetic evaluation for methane emissions as well as the use of lower methane emission genetics on commercial farms. Phenotypic and genomic data from approximately 7.000 animals will be made globally available. In synergy with other projects, it will be possible to increase the size of reference populations leading to an even greater impact on methane emissions mitigation. If you have questions about the Latin America project specifically, you can contact Elly Navajas, enavajas@inia.org.uy&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For developing methane emission phenotyping platforms and reference populations, it is essential to upgrade methane emission recording equipment as well as standardize and coordinate the measurement of animals. Standardized protocols will be developed in collaboration with ICAR, and the criteria for selecting animals to be measured and genotyped will be established by the research team, including technicians from breeder associations. A critical component of the project involves genetic analyses, such as estimating genetic parameters for methane emission-related traits, validating breeding values in additional populations, and evaluating the impact of selecting for reduced methane emissions. Scientific collaboration will be fostered with other beef cattle projects, focusing on areas such as expertise exchange. Communication strategies will be implemented to engage stakeholders, including breeders, artificial insemination centers, policymakers, and other private stakeholders. Dialogue with teams managing greenhouse gas (GHG) inventories and Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs) will also be enhanced. These activities require active collaboration among countries and stakeholders in Latin America to achieve successful outcomes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Main goals ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* A Latin American collaborative network for accelerating genetic improvement for methane emissions reduction is established by NARIs, universities, breeder societies, and private stakeholders engaged in genetic evaluation programs across South America and Mexico. &lt;br /&gt;
* Methane emission phenotyping platforms are implemented, enabling data collection across key beef cattle breeds, targeting 7.000 methane emission phenotypes and genotypes of animals linked to genetic evaluations. &lt;br /&gt;
* Genomic-enhanced estimated breeding values for methane emissions will be available to breeders: based on pure-breed and multi-breed reference populations enhanced through collaboration and data sharing across beef cattle projects within the GMG initiative. &lt;br /&gt;
* The economic and environmental impact of breeding strategies to reduce methane emissions is assessed, to identify the most promising breeding strategies to accelerate methane emission reduction. The development of breeding objectives combining methane emission reduction with production goals will support policy and incentives for breeders and farmers to overcome adoption barriers and integrate the results into national GHG inventories. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== &#039;&#039;&#039;Microbiome&#039;&#039;&#039; ===&lt;br /&gt;
The micro-HUB project will establish a reference population with metagenome and genotype data, and create a genomic evaluation system that can be used to select the parents of the next generation with microbiome profiles that produce less enteric methane while maintaining genetic progress in profit and health. The genomic evaluation system will be widely open, will target most relevant breeds and production systems. Furthermore, a large global microbiome network will be established to collect existing data and knowledge and ensure knowledge transfer. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This project will start with metagenome and genomic data on 5.430 individuals from the core project partners, we will explore the opportunity to extend and expand our reference population to other countries with suitable data. By combining national data sets with genotypes, microbiome and methane information, we aim to create the largest rumen microbiome reference population globally. We aim to enlarge the reference population by more than 20.000 microbiome sequenced dairy and beef cattle as well as sheep from the Global Methane Genetics (GMG) program. From this, we will facilitate the delivery of genomic breeding values that can be used in global breeding programs to select for a microbiome composition with lower emissions and reduce the abundance of methanogenic pathways in the rumen microbiome of future generations of cattle and sheep. The project partners cover beef, dairy and sheep populations and creates an opportunity to identify a core microbiome (or set of cores) that can be used as a reference for nation-based breeding programs. The project will closely connect to the other projects within the Global Methane Program, to facilitate microbiome sampling, sequencing and genomic analysis. If you have questions about the microbiome project specifically, you can contact Oscar Gonzalez-Recio, oscar.gonzalezrecio@ed.ac.uk&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Activities ====&lt;br /&gt;
To enlarge the national database partners will obtain additional samples from animals with methane and genotype data from different breeds and production systems within the GMG phenotyping program (dairy and beef cattle). The inclusion of samples from external partners will be encouraged. Partners (also external) will be provided with instruction to collect data and sample rumen microbiome. The micro-Hub will provide stewardship for GMG partners regarding sampling, storage and shipping, as well as bioinformatic analysis. Rumen metagenome sequencing will be centralized in as fewer labs as possible (ideally only one).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Reference populations from partners will be combined, covering a broad range of breeds and productions systems and different geographical regions. Format of the databases will be unified. The combined dataset will be used for the microbiome genomic evaluations. The reference database will be updated with additional data coming from external partners. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We will develop the capabilities to estimate the genomic breeding value for microbiome composition for any genotyped animal in similar productive conditions as those represented in our reference population. The goal is to propose recommendations based on own experience to include estimated genomic breeding values for rumen microbiome profile in breeding programs. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The project will contribute to the activities organized within Global Methane Genetics and the ICAR Feed&amp;amp;Gas working group in building a microbiome network to exchange knowledge, harmonize guidelines and develop protocols. All data generated within the project will be made available through the Global Methane Genetics database. The project will collaborate with the database development to develop microbiome sharing requirements and specifications. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Main goals ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Joint reference metagenome compiled.&lt;br /&gt;
* Microbiome genomic evaluations.&lt;br /&gt;
* Release of SNP coefficients for international genomic evaluations for microbiome compositions.&lt;br /&gt;
* Network building and establishment of platform for rumen metagenome data.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== &#039;&#039;&#039;Working Group meetings&#039;&#039;&#039; ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The six working groups as described above meet two times a year. The GMG working group meetings are aimed to share updates about the GMG projects and discuss gaps, needs and bottlenecks in the field.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Dairy Cattle ====&lt;br /&gt;
15 May 2025: Presentation materials [[:File:250515 GMG meeting Dairy Working Group.pdf|here.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
27 October 2025: Presentation materials [[:File:20251027 GMG Working group Dairy meeting.pdf|here.]] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Sheep ====&lt;br /&gt;
20 May 2025: Presentation materials [[:File:20250520 Meeting GMG Working group sheep.pdf|here.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
11 November 2025: Presentation materials [[:File:20251111 Sheep Working Group GMG presentation.pdf|here.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Microbiome ====&lt;br /&gt;
23 May 2025: Presentation materials [[:File:202505 Global Meeting Genetics Microbiome working group meeting.pdf|here.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
27 November 2025: Presentation materials [[:File:20251127 GMG Microbiome WG presentation.pdf|here.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Latin America ====&lt;br /&gt;
5 June 2025: Presentation materials [[:File:202506 Presentation GMG Working Group Latin America meeting.pdf|here.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
14 November 2025: Presentation materials [[:File:20251114 Latin America GMG Work group meeting.pdf|here.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Africa ====&lt;br /&gt;
23 May 2025: Presentation materials [[:File:20250523 GMG Working group Africa meeting.pdf|here.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
7 November 2025: Presentation materials [[:File:20251107 Africa Workgroup GMG presentation.pdf|here.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Beef ====&lt;br /&gt;
17 June 2025: Presentation materials [[:File:202506 GMG Working group Beef meeting.pdf|here.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
11 November 2025: Presentation materials [[:File:20251106 GMG Working group Beef meeting.pdf|here.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Asia ====&lt;br /&gt;
1 July 2025: Presentation materials [[:File:20250701 AsiaGMG presentation.pdf|here.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
25 November 2025: Presentation materials [[:File:GMG Asia From data to impact.pdf|here]], [[:File:Asia 20251105.pdf|here]], [[:File:2511 GMG Asia MethaneMethods.pdf|here]] and [[:File:ILRI LMD Exp 2025.pdf|here]]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Webinars ====&lt;br /&gt;
On the 22th of May 2025 there was a webinar for all GMG project participants on effective records in the database, you can find the presentation slides [[:File:250515 GMG meeting Dairy Working Group.pdf|here.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== DAFNE ==&lt;br /&gt;
Department of Agriculture and Forest Sciences at the University of Tuscia. Their main purpose is to collect primary emissions data from sniffers and GF to have emissions factors related to the species, breed, physiological state and diet management. They are engaged with ANAFIBJ and sharing data related to Holstein cattle with them for genetic evaluations. Currently they are running trials with sheep and buffalo.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Sheep ===&lt;br /&gt;
For this trial they are comparing 2 grazing methods using 2 groups of Sopravissana sheep, reared at the facility.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# Rotational, 18 sheep. Turns every 4 days on strip paddocks. 18 paddocks in total; 6 heads on 3 strip paddocks per turn of grazing. After 24 days the sheep are back to the first three strips.&lt;br /&gt;
# Continuous, 18 sheep. Continuous grazing on same paddock. 3 paddocks in total; 6 heads per paddock. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Subgroups for both group A and B (6 heads) are randomly arranged every day. The 18 strip paddocks are the same total size as the three continuous paddocks. They have the same number of heads grazing and the same live weight load.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Both groups are balanced for BW, receive the same hay in quantity and quality with ad libitum access and spend the same time at pasture. Daily sampling of the hay and residual per group is done, weekly sub samples of hay and residual are analyzed. In parallel fresh grass is sampled and analyzed to represent the 2 grazing methods. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The GreenFeed is located in the barn, at 9AM this barn is closed for group A and opens for group B and this switches every day. The GreenFeed is the only place they can get concentrates. Nutritional information for this concentrate can be found [[:File:Nutritional table sheep DAFHNE.docx|here]]. Amount of food and cup drops can be found here.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Trial started end of March 2025 and will last 1.5 months. They are using the GF adapted for small ruminants.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Buffalo ===&lt;br /&gt;
This is a continuous trial which will last 4 months per supplement tested. First they monitor the buffalo for 4 weeks without supplement as a control diet and then there will be an 8 week experimental period with the supplement diet. During the entire period the buffalo are confined to the barn. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The buffalo are separated in two groups, in adjacent pens. One group has access to a milking robot, with the MooLogger from [[Sniffer SOP|Tecnosens.]] The other pen has a conventional milking system and the GreenFeed is placed facing this pen.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
All buffaloes are fed the same concentrates. Nutritional information for this concentrate can be found [[:File:Nutritional table Buffalo DAFHNE.docx|here]]. Amount of food and cup drops can be found here. The buffalo’s in the GF group get the concentrates from the GF and about 1 kg of concentrates during milking operations. The buffalo’s in the sniffer group only get concentrates from the milking robot, which is about 2 kg/head/day.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To account for the emissions recorded individually at different times, they compare the emissions data aggregated on a daily basis. They are using the GF adapted for large ruminants with horns&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== GasToGrass ==&lt;br /&gt;
The aim of this project is to develop new breeding solutions for the industry by finding ways to identify animals with lower environmental impact, which can then be selected as part of genetic improvement programs. This project will contribute with new strategies to mitigate greenhouse gas emissions, in sheep production systems. You can find more information on the [https://era-susan.eu/content/grasstogas-grass-gas-strategies-mitigate-ghg-emissions-pasture-based-sheep-systems website]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== MethaBreed ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:P-2025-1-15-2 FBF Logo MethaBreed Logo 01 4C-01 klein.png|thumb|170x170px]]&lt;br /&gt;
The MethaBreed project aims to improve the sustainability of dairy production by developing innovative breeding strategies for dairy cows that simultaneously reduce methane emissions, enhance feed efficiency, and support animal health. A large-scale longitudinal study is being conducted in commercial dairy herds. Using advanced technologies, individual cow traits are recorded across entire lactations and multiple lactation cycles. Data collection includes continuous monitoring of methane emissions using sniffers, feed intake (using CFIT: Cattle Feed Intake System), body weight (using CFIT and scales), and key health parameters. A particular focus lies on the role of the rumen microbiome in methane production. A central goal of MethaBreed is the development of a new breeding value for methane emissions, enabling the selection of animals with lower environmental impact. These data will be integrated with pedigree and genomic information to allow precise breeding decisions. At the same time, the existing breeding value for feed efficiency will be further refined. The outcomes of the project are expected to make a significant contribution towards more climate-friendly dairy production. In the long term, standardized breeding values will be provided, enabling breeding organizations and farmers to actively select for healthier, more efficient, and more sustainable dairy cows. For more information you can visit the following websites from the partners: [https://www.uni-giessen.de/de/fbz/fb09/institute/ith/ag-koenig/forschung/laufend/methabreed University Giessen], [https://www.fbf-forschung.de/aktuelles/methabreed-neues-forschungsprojekt-zur-reduzierung.html FBF], [https://livestock-functional-microbiology.uni-hohenheim.de/en/research-projects#jfmulticontent_c401477-2 University of Hohenheim.] Further partners are [https://www.vit.de/ vit] and [https://www.uni-kiel.de/de/aef/fakultaet/institute/tierzucht-tierhaltung University Kiel]. The project is funded by the German Federal Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Regional Identity on the basis of a resolution of the German Bundestag. The project management is carried out by the Federal Office for Agriculture and Food (BLE) within the framework of the Federal Programme for Livestock Farming. Funding reference numbers: 28KTF23C01–05.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== breed4green ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Logo B4G RZ RGB 1 Transparent.png|right|frameless|228x228px]]&lt;br /&gt;
Direct and indirect traits for feed efficiency and greenhouse gas emissions for breeding and herd management in cattle:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [https://www.rinderzucht.at/projekt/breed4green.html breed4green] project focuses on researching strategies to reduce methane emissions and enhance feed efficiency within the Austrian cattle industry. Measurements of methane and CO2 emissions are conducted on both experimental and commercial farms using the GreenFeed system. The aim of the project is to collect methane and CO2 measurements of approximately 1,000 Fleckvieh and 200 Brown Swiss cows. In addition, various phenotypes such as health, body weight, BCS, metabolism, energy intake and milk mid infrared (MIR) spectra are recorded. Data on feed intake from experimental farms are also available for validation. The genetic potential of direct traits like methane, CO2 and feed efficiency, along with their correlations to health and other traits, will be analyzed. The project also includes the development and validation of MIR equations for emitted methane and energy balance. The focus will be on investigating the use of these indirect traits to reduce methane emissions and improve feed efficiency in breeding programs to pave the way for genomic selection. The results will also be used to optimize herd management. Furthermore, the environmental impact of relevant dairy and beef production systems in Austria will be investigated.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== CH4COW ==&lt;br /&gt;
The Association of Swiss Cattle Breeders (ASR) has launched a comprehensive phenotyping initiative aimed at establishing routine genetic evaluations for methane emissions based on Swiss derived phenotypic data.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The initial project, [https://qualitasag.ch/en/ch4cow/ CH4COW], started in 2024 and will span four years. Its primary objective is the deployment of methane measuring sniffers (MooLoggers, Tecnosens) across 64 farms throughout Switzerland. Among these, 30 farms house Holstein (HOL) herds, while the remainder keep Brown Swiss cattle. The project is funded by the Swiss Federal Office of Agriculture, several cantonal governments (FR, GR, LU, SG, and ZG), and the ASR.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Brown Swiss part of the CH4COW project is closely linked to the dairy cattle section of the Global Methane Genetics Inititiative.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Project status: All methane measuring sniffers have now been installed on the participating farms, ensuring continuous and standardized data acquisition. Automated data processing pipelines are fully operational, enabling seamless transfer, storage, and organization of incoming data streams. Concurrently, several methodological frameworks for data cleaning, quality control, and the development of robust methane related phenotypes are under active evaluation. These efforts aim to establish reliable phenotype definitions that will ultimately support future single-step genetic evaluations. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you would like to know more about this project you can contact [mailto:&amp;amp;#x20;beat.bapst@qualitasag.ch Beat Bapst] (link to beat.bapst@qualitasag.ch) or Adrien Butty (link to adrien.butty@qualitasag.ch)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Presentation materials ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Seminar by Julius van der Werf: Breeding for a changing climate 13-05-2025 ===&lt;br /&gt;
On the 13th of May Julius van de Werf gave a presentation at Wageningen Livestock Research on selection indexes for selecting low methane livestock, focused on sheep. You can find the slides [[:File:20250513 Seminar J.v.d.Werf.pdf|here]]. You can find the recording of the presentation below.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;youtube&amp;gt;PxKmxKVvVEA?si=C6x0keKAvgU009Da&amp;lt;/youtube&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Seminar by Maria Frizzarin: Introduction to milk mid-infrared spectroscopy 10-07-2025 ===&lt;br /&gt;
On the 10th of July Maria Frizzarin gave a presentation at Wageningen Livestock Research on milk mid-infrared spectroscopy, equations development, and applications. You can find the slides [[:File:10072025 Seminar Maria MIR.pdf|here.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Seminar by Sarah-Joe Burn: Breed4Green 25-09-2025 ===&lt;br /&gt;
On the 25th of September Sarah-Joe Burn gave a presentation at Wageningen Livestock Research on measuring methane emissions in commercial farms and establishing a comprehensive dataset for genetic studies. A similar presentations was given at EAAP 2025, you can find the slides to that presentation [[:File:Eaap2025-breed4green-linke.pdf|here]] and the abstract [[:File:2025 Innsbruck EAAP Book Abstracts.pdf|here]], page 250.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== &#039;&#039;&#039;Seminar by Fazel Almasi: Measuring methane in dairy cows using Arcoflex sensors 25-09-2025&#039;&#039;&#039; ===&lt;br /&gt;
On the 25th of September Fazel Almasi gave a presentation at Wageningen Livestock Research on the repeatability and heritability of dairy cow methane concentration using sniffer sensors. You can find the slides to the presentation [[:File:FA-ArcoflexUpdate.pdf|here]]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Joint ICAR Feed&amp;amp;Gas and ASGGN workshop ===&lt;br /&gt;
On the 5th of October the joint workshop between the [https://www.icar.org/group/working-group-feed-and-gas/ ICAR Feed&amp;amp;Gas working group] and the [https://www.asggn.org/ ASGGN] took place before the GGAA conference in Nairobi. The presentations can be found below. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[:File:2025 ASGGN - GGAA - A Taste of the Future Buccal Swabbing for Rumen Microbial ProfilingTB.pdf|A Taste of the Future: Buccal Swabbing for Rumen Microbial Profiling]]​. Presented by Ben Perry ([https://www.bioeconomyscience.co.nz/ NZIBS])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[:File:2638 Booker ILRI GGAA ASGGN Oct 2025.pdf|Rate of Genetic Gain for Methane Emissions in a Maternal Production Flock]]. Presented by Fem Booker ([https://www.bioeconomyscience.co.nz/ NZIBS])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[:File:Boris ICAR2025 v01.pdf|Association between rumen and faecal microbiome and enteric methane emissions in dairy cattle]]. Presented by Boris Sepulveda ([https://agriculture.vic.gov.au/ AV])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[:File:CaeliRichardson GGAA Workshop 2025.pdf|Global Framework to Monitor, Measure, and Account for Methane Reductions from Genetic Selection]]. Presented by Caeli Richardson ([https://abacusbio.com/ Abacusbio])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[:File:GGAA Workshop ICAR and ASGGN Ida Storm.pdf|Danish Perspectives on implementation of GHG regulation]]. Presented by Ida Storm ([https://agricultureandfood.dk/ DAFG])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[:File:GGAA Workshop ICAR and ASGGN Rasmus Stephansen.pdf|Experience with CH4 sniffers, what have we learned so far?]] Presented by Rasmus Stephansen ([https://international.au.dk/ AU])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[:File:GGAA workshop MIR methane presentation.pdf|Overview of the methane equations developed from mid-infrared spectroscopy and their applications.]] Presented by Maria Frizzarin ([https://www.agroscope.admin.ch/agroscope/en/home.html Agroscope])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[:File:HanneHonerlagen ICARpresentation.pdf|Adding microbial data to enhance breeding for lower methane emissions]]. Presented by Hanne Honerlagen ([https://www.wur.nl/en/research-results/chair-groups/animal-sciences/animal-breeding-and-genomics-group.htm WUR-ABG])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[:File:McNaughton ASGGN Workshop final.pdf|GreenFeed for phenotyping – our experiences]]. Presented by Lorna McNaughton ([https://www.lic.co.nz/ LIC])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[:File:MIE ILRI GGAA ASGGN Oct 2025.pdf|Methane Index Explorer: Optimising a Breeding Value Format for Simultaneous Inclusion of Enteric Methane Emissions in Breeding Schemes and National Inventories]]. Presented by Pavithra Ariyarathne ([https://www.bioeconomyscience.co.nz/ NZIBS])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[:File:RiccardoGGAA Presentation RB.pdf|ZELP sense]]. Presented by Riccardo Bica ([https://www.zelp.co/ ZELP])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[:File:ICAR Working group Nairobi 5 Oct2025.pdf|Selection for lower methane livestock, selection index considerations]]. Presented by Julius van der Werf (UNE)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Measuring enteric methane in beef and dairy cattle using PAC. Presented by Timothy Bilton ([https://www.bioeconomyscience.co.nz/ NZIBS])&amp;lt;youtube&amp;gt;https://youtu.be/NjPuotrmkMQ&amp;lt;/youtube&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Estimating methane emissions with the GreenFeed System. Presented by Paul Smith ([https://teagasc.ie/ Teagasc]) &amp;lt;youtube&amp;gt;https://youtu.be/TnHefWoP29I&amp;lt;/youtube&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Cvangemert</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://wiki.icar.org/index.php?title=Section_20:_Activities&amp;diff=4876</id>
		<title>Section 20: Activities</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://wiki.icar.org/index.php?title=Section_20:_Activities&amp;diff=4876"/>
		<updated>2026-01-30T09:41:06Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Cvangemert: added projects and seminars&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;big&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;b&amp;gt;NOTE: This version of Section 20 has been approved by the working group&#039;s Chair.  Please be aware that further revisions may occur before final review and approval by the Board and ICAR members per the [[Approval of Page Process]].&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/b&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
== Global Methane Genetics ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:GMG label.png|right|frameless|300x300px]]&lt;br /&gt;
The Global Methane Genetics (GMG) initiative is a global program to accelerate genetic progress in methane emission in ruminants in the Global North and South. This WUR-ABG coordinated initiative is funded by the [https://www.globalmethanehub.org/ Global Methane Hub] and the [https://www.bezosearthfund.org/ Bezos Earth Fund,] both based on philanthropic funds to support methane mitigation and prevent global warming. If you have questions about the [https://www.wur.nl/en/project/global-methane-genetics-initiative.htm GMG initiative] you can send an email to gmg@wur.nl, contact Roel Veerkamp: roel.veerkamp@wur.nl or Birgit Gredler-Grandl: birgit.gredler-grandl@wur.nl.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The initiative holds the following projects:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== &#039;&#039;&#039;Dairy Cattle&#039;&#039;&#039; ===&lt;br /&gt;
We can look to nature to reduce CH4 emissions and use genetic diversity to provide solutions. Genetic improvement, based on identifying animals with genetic predisposition for lower CH4 output and using them to breed for the next generations, is a reliable, cost-effective, and permanent method for transforming livestock&#039;s impact on the environment.  Breeding programs in dairy cattle are run within breeds and across countries. Therefore, the program will accelerate genetic progress by focusing on four major dairy breeds and organizations and countries involved in those breeds. Additionally, the program will acquire considerable leverage through investments in these countries. If you have questions about the dairy cattle section you can contact Birgit Gredler-Grandl: birgit.gredler-grandl@wur.nl.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== &#039;&#039;Holstein breed&#039;&#039; ====&lt;br /&gt;
The largest data collection has been for the Holstein breed, but there is a lack of standardization and protocols in terms of equipment and its utilization (farm level, data processing, data sharing agreements, genetic evaluations, and data collections). Governments and breeding organizations in Denmark and the Netherlands will collaborate and collect methane and genotypes on more than 20,000 Holstein cows for the GMG database. Also, Poland and Italy team up to collect data for the GMG database, and their aim is also to collect more than 20,000 Holstein animals and develop genetic evaluations across a wide range of systems.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===== Denmark-The Netherlands =====&lt;br /&gt;
This collaboration between Aarhus University and Wageningen Livestock Research has five main goals. The contact person for questions about this project is Trine Villumsen: tmv@qgg.au.dk.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Setting up Standard Operating Procedures (SOP) for measuring methane using sniffers&lt;br /&gt;
* Setting up international protocols to measure methane on commercial farms&lt;br /&gt;
* Develop software tools to automate the processing of data into a phenotype&lt;br /&gt;
* Combine historical data in both countries for genetic evaluations&lt;br /&gt;
* Measure enteric methane in 20.000 new cows.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===== Poland-Italy =====&lt;br /&gt;
This collaboration has the following main goals. The contact person for questions about this project is Raffaella Finocchiaro raffaellafinocchiaro@anafibj.it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Measure enteric methane in 20.000 new cows.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== &#039;&#039;Jersey breed&#039;&#039; ====&lt;br /&gt;
Currently, due to the limited data available, the Jersey dairy breed does not have breeding values for methane (CH4) mitigation. The goal of the program is to collect methane genotypes in Canada and Denmark and share this information with the GMG database. The aim is to develop breeding values that will be distributed through the World Jersey Cattle Bureau organization and national Jersey organizations in Australia, Canada, Switzerland, Denmark, France, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands, and New Zealand. If you have questions about the Jersey breed section you can contact Rasmus Bak Stephansen rasmus.stephansen@qgg.au.dk&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== &#039;&#039;Brown Swiss breed&#039;&#039; ====&lt;br /&gt;
The Brown Swiss (BS) breed faces significant challenges due to its small population size, an divers environments the animals are kept. A collaboration between Germany, Switzerland, and Austria to phenotype enough animals is a prerequisite for utilizing the genetic potential of reducing methane emission of the BS breed. In addition to a population of 250 cows recorded with Greenfeed, and 1250 with the sniffer, progress will be accelerated by recording an additional 3,360 cows with sniffers. If you have questions about the Brown Swiss breed section you can contact Elena Frenken: fe@fbf-forschung.de.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== &#039;&#039;Red breeds&#039;&#039; ====&lt;br /&gt;
The red breeds are important for crossbreeding in many countries around the world. The project aims to share and collect CH4 data from Red Dairy Cattle (RDC) breeds (in the Nordic countries, Canada, and the United Kingdom (UK)) and share it with the Global Methane Genetics (GMG) Hub. Together, they will set up a shared genetic evaluation for bulls used for crossbreeding in many more countries. If you have questions about the Red breed section you can contact Elisenda Rius-Vilarrasa: Elisenda.Rius-Vilarrasa@vxa.se.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== &#039;&#039;&#039;Beef Cattle&#039;&#039;&#039; ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== &#039;&#039;Bluegrass (global beef)&#039;&#039; ====&lt;br /&gt;
All industries world-wide have been challenged with reducing emissions and beef is no exception. Genetic selection and specifically genomic selection have been identified as key tools to help meet this challenge. Methane emissions are not a local problem, but a global one and several major beef producing countries who exchange genetic material have, are, and will be collecting methane phenotypes for the purpose of genomic prediction. Individually (including those in Australia), these datasets will be limited in their genomic prediction accuracy. The BLUEGRASS alliance will bring together the key players globally, who collectively have solicited key seed funding from the Global Methane Hub. By sharing data and resources, the development of necessary reference populations will be accelerated. Locally or globally, success in the beef genetics industry has been a model of ‘co-opetition’. Breeders, although competitors, pool resources to build tools that can be used by all to compete with one another. This BLUEGRASS alliance is no different. A global alliance will come together to address this challenge, with or without Australia. Having Australia lead and ignite the alliance with MDC co-funding will create opportunities to direct this global initiative and provide first mover advantages for Australian breeders.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The program is focused on building genomic reference datasets for the main beef breeds in the collaborating countries. The animals to be recorded will be intensively recorded for other production traits, and genotyped, outside this project itself. In each country, trial or research breeding values will be produced and delivered to industry during the life of the project – enabling genetic selection against methane to get underway, and the data will underpin the ability to genomically screen the entire populations of the breeds involved in the respective countries i.e. all seedstock and commercial animals. The data collected will likely assist development of genomic selection against methane in other countries. The accelerated genetic selection and the commercial animal screening will enable real impact to reduce methane from beef cattle. If you have questions about the bluegrass project specifically, you can contact Steve Miller, steve.miller@une.edu.au &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===== Number of phenotypes =====&lt;br /&gt;
This project will phenotype methane traits in beef cattle populations in the US, Australia, the UK, Ireland, and New Zealand. Around 18.500 phenotypes will be collected over all years and countries. It is estimated that around 7.000 phenotypes will be collected in Australia, around 1.600 in New Zealand, around 800 in the UK, around 2.000 in Ireland and around 7.00 in the USA.&lt;br /&gt;
===== Breeds and traits included =====&lt;br /&gt;
All countries included in the Bluegrass project have different breeds and different target traits included in their measurements, besides the methane phenotypes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Australia will focus on Angus and Hereford seedstock with a research population of Angus, Wagyu, Charolais, Shorthorn and Brahman being a target as well. For the seedstock they will focus on seedstock traits plus methane measurements using PAC measures. For the research populations on seedstock traits plus feed intake, carcass as well as methane measurements with PAC.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For New Zealand priority is the progeny test herds. These are mostly Angus, Hereford and their crosses, including a diallel cross design. Some Angus x Simmental. Complete requirements with seedstock herds of Angus and Hereford. Focus is on the following: progeny test, seedstock traits, conception date (via fetal aging) from natural mate at yearling (then re-breeding), carcass grading on steers, feed intake on heifers, rumen microbiome on steers and heifers, seedstock traits from seedstock herds&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For the UK focus lies on Angus and Hereford sired animals, both pedigree and crossbred (including from dairy dams) and they focus on liveweights.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For Ireland they include multi-breed/crossbreed. 30% Charolais and Limousin sired from Continental type suckler dams, 30% Holstein-Friesian and 40% beef (mostly Angus) cross dairy. They will focus on feed intake, liveweight and carcass data.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The USA will be measuring Angus focused on seedstock traits from seedstock herds.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== &#039;&#039;US beef&#039;&#039; ====&lt;br /&gt;
This project will accelerate genetic selection for reduced methane emissions from U.S. and Canadian beef cattle, through phenotyping and genotyping the 18 most influential beef breeds in North America.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The primary activities of this project will center on phenotyping and genetic evaluation of the Germplasm Evaluation (GPE) herd, a large, multibreed resource population at the U.S. Meat Animal Research Center (USMARC) in Nebraska, USA. This herd is structured to represent the genetic diversity of the 18 most influential beef breeds in the U.S.. These 18 breeds are: Angus, Red Angus, Hereford, South Devon, Shorthorn, Beefmaster, Brangus, Brahman, Santa Gertrudis, Braunvieh, ChiAngus, Charolais, Gelbvieh, Limousin, Maine-Anjou, Salers, Simmental, Tarentaise.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Recording of methane phenotypes will occur using multiple approaches to not only maximize the number of phenotypes collected, but to also offer a comparison between methodologies within a U.S. beef production system. Based on these findings and in coordination with other GMG project teams, standard operating procedures for methane phenotyping of beef cattle will be developed and integrated into the [https://beefimprovement.org/resource-center/bif-guidelines/ Guidelines for Uniform Beef Improvement Programs] supporting the evolution of these approaches into standard practice and routine evaluation in any beef breeding system. If you have questions about the US beef project specifically, you can contact Matthew Spangler, mspangler2@unl.edu.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===== Main goals =====&lt;br /&gt;
* Recording methane phenotypes from at least 5,500 multi-breed genotyped beef cattle and openly sharing to the GMG database and the public domain.&lt;br /&gt;
* Development and publication of uniform guidelines for both methane phenotyping in beef cattle systems and the integration of methane phenotypes into beef genetic evaluations, through the BIF Guidelines wiki.&lt;br /&gt;
* Dissemination and routine updating of genetic parameter and genomic marker effects critical for the development of genetic selection tools and deployment of methane-reducing breeding programs.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== &#039;&#039;&#039;Sheep&#039;&#039;&#039; ===&lt;br /&gt;
This project focusses on recording methane phenotypes on animals in various populations, e.g. Merino, Texel, Dohne, Corriedale, maternal and terminal. In each case, those animals will be recorded for a range of other production, health, product quality and welfare traits (the exact suite of traits varies between countries). This ensures that it will be possible to determine the genetic relationships between methane traits and the other traits included in current and future selection indexes and breeding programs – meaning that breeders will be able to make informed decisions on any trade-offs between methane and other traits. In total around 16.600 methane phenotypes will be collected over all years and countries. It is estimated that around 7.500 methane phenotypes will be collected in Australia, 3.000 in Uruguay, 4.000 in New Zealand, 1.200 in the UK and 1.000 in the UK. If you have questions about the sheep project specifically, you can contact Daniel Brown, dbrown2@une.edu.au &lt;br /&gt;
==== Main goals ====&lt;br /&gt;
* Phenotyping and reference populations. Fast tracked phenotyping and  genotyping up to 16,000 records of methane traits across the key countries to facilitate accurate international evaluation of animals (Table 2).&lt;br /&gt;
* Genetic evaluation and models. Breeding values based on international genomic evaluation models to share the benefits of the established reference populations.&lt;br /&gt;
* Proxies. Development and validation of new phenotyping methods to expedite genetic progress.&lt;br /&gt;
* Breeding Programs. Whole farm system models to incorporate methane into breeding objectives in a balanced way and indexes to facilitate selection of breeding candidates.&lt;br /&gt;
* Education and adoption. Stakeholder engagement campaign and international development to ensure world-wide impact.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== &#039;&#039;&#039;Africa&#039;&#039;&#039; ===&lt;br /&gt;
This project focused on three regions of Africa (Eastern, Western and Southern Africa). It will will leverage and  accelerate on-going early research on GHG in these regions, strongly build capacity and team up with researchers to record CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, other economic productive traits and use the records to implement breeding strategies to reduce CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; emission while simultaneously enhancing productivity, food security and employment opportunities in the dairy and beef cattle farming systems; The source of livelihood for many poorly resourced farmers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Tapping into the existing breeding program infrastructure for improved productivity for dairy cattle in the three regions of Africa, this project will result in overall program that will accelerate genetic progress through focus on phenotyping, genotyping and the use of information from the microbiome in the genetic selection of animals in the smallholder dairy system. The overall impact will be better mitigation of negative effects of climate change and more productive cows. Through selection programs based on the index developed with the phenotypic and genomic information from this project.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The major activities include the direct CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; measurements on about 1.655 tropical cattle using [[Greenfeed SOP|GreenFeed]] and the use of [[Laser Methane Detector|LMD]] in smallholder farmers. Genotypic information and phenotypes captured routinely on major important productive traits that influence profitability, income and livelihood of farmers on 1.619 animals. Data sets will be linked to a larger existing data on 9.000 cows with phenotypic and genotypic information from existing projects. If you have questions about the Africa project specifically, you can contact Raphael Mrode, raphael.mrode@sruc.ac.uk&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Main goals ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Methane measurements available on 1.655 tropical cows.&lt;br /&gt;
* Tissue samples and genotypes available on 1.619 tropical cows.&lt;br /&gt;
* Genetic relationship between dairy cows in Western and Eastern Africa estimated.&lt;br /&gt;
* Multi-trait genomic analysis of dairy data and methane in Eastern Africa.&lt;br /&gt;
* Incorporate existing data on over 9.000 cows from existing research projects to enhance genomic prediction.&lt;br /&gt;
* Computation and the roll out of final selection index or sub-indexes developed for improved efficiency - reduced CH4 emission, lower maintenance requirement and increased milk production.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== &#039;&#039;&#039;Latin America&#039;&#039;&#039; ===&lt;br /&gt;
The aim of this project is to accelerate the reduction of enteric methane emissions in beef cattle in Latin America through genetic selection in key breeds relevant to Argentina, Brazil, Uruguay, and Mexico. The focus will be on phenotyping methane emissions and genotyping animals linked to existing genetic improvement programs. Reference populations for genomic selection will be the basis to improve the estimation of genetic merit and select for lower emission. The link with ongoing genetic improvement programs provides data on other economically relevant production traits, thus making it possible to estimate genetic correlations and optimize methane emission reductions with a minimum impact on livestock productivity. This approach minimizes negative impacts on food production while preserving economic, social, and environmental sustainability of beef cattle farming. This collaborative project between national agricultural research institutes (NARI) is supported by breeders’ associations and other key stakeholders. Public-private partnerships and collaborative efforts will scale genetic evaluation for methane emissions as well as the use of lower methane emission genetics on commercial farms. Phenotypic and genomic data from approximately 7.000 animals will be made globally available. In synergy with other projects, it will be possible to increase the size of reference populations leading to an even greater impact on methane emissions mitigation. If you have questions about the Latin America project specifically, you can contact Elly Navajas, enavajas@inia.org.uy&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For developing methane emission phenotyping platforms and reference populations, it is essential to upgrade methane emission recording equipment as well as standardize and coordinate the measurement of animals. Standardized protocols will be developed in collaboration with ICAR, and the criteria for selecting animals to be measured and genotyped will be established by the research team, including technicians from breeder associations. A critical component of the project involves genetic analyses, such as estimating genetic parameters for methane emission-related traits, validating breeding values in additional populations, and evaluating the impact of selecting for reduced methane emissions. Scientific collaboration will be fostered with other beef cattle projects, focusing on areas such as expertise exchange. Communication strategies will be implemented to engage stakeholders, including breeders, artificial insemination centers, policymakers, and other private stakeholders. Dialogue with teams managing greenhouse gas (GHG) inventories and Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs) will also be enhanced. These activities require active collaboration among countries and stakeholders in Latin America to achieve successful outcomes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Main goals ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* A Latin American collaborative network for accelerating genetic improvement for methane emissions reduction is established by NARIs, universities, breeder societies, and private stakeholders engaged in genetic evaluation programs across South America and Mexico. &lt;br /&gt;
* Methane emission phenotyping platforms are implemented, enabling data collection across key beef cattle breeds, targeting 7.000 methane emission phenotypes and genotypes of animals linked to genetic evaluations. &lt;br /&gt;
* Genomic-enhanced estimated breeding values for methane emissions will be available to breeders: based on pure-breed and multi-breed reference populations enhanced through collaboration and data sharing across beef cattle projects within the GMG initiative. &lt;br /&gt;
* The economic and environmental impact of breeding strategies to reduce methane emissions is assessed, to identify the most promising breeding strategies to accelerate methane emission reduction. The development of breeding objectives combining methane emission reduction with production goals will support policy and incentives for breeders and farmers to overcome adoption barriers and integrate the results into national GHG inventories. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== &#039;&#039;&#039;Microbiome&#039;&#039;&#039; ===&lt;br /&gt;
The micro-HUB project will establish a reference population with metagenome and genotype data, and create a genomic evaluation system that can be used to select the parents of the next generation with microbiome profiles that produce less enteric methane while maintaining genetic progress in profit and health. The genomic evaluation system will be widely open, will target most relevant breeds and production systems. Furthermore, a large global microbiome network will be established to collect existing data and knowledge and ensure knowledge transfer. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This project will start with metagenome and genomic data on 5.430 individuals from the core project partners, we will explore the opportunity to extend and expand our reference population to other countries with suitable data. By combining national data sets with genotypes, microbiome and methane information, we aim to create the largest rumen microbiome reference population globally. We aim to enlarge the reference population by more than 20.000 microbiome sequenced dairy and beef cattle as well as sheep from the Global Methane Genetics (GMG) program. From this, we will facilitate the delivery of genomic breeding values that can be used in global breeding programs to select for a microbiome composition with lower emissions and reduce the abundance of methanogenic pathways in the rumen microbiome of future generations of cattle and sheep. The project partners cover beef, dairy and sheep populations and creates an opportunity to identify a core microbiome (or set of cores) that can be used as a reference for nation-based breeding programs. The project will closely connect to the other projects within the Global Methane Program, to facilitate microbiome sampling, sequencing and genomic analysis. If you have questions about the microbiome project specifically, you can contact Oscar Gonzalez-Recio, oscar.gonzalezrecio@ed.ac.uk&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Activities ====&lt;br /&gt;
To enlarge the national database partners will obtain additional samples from animals with methane and genotype data from different breeds and production systems within the GMG phenotyping program (dairy and beef cattle). The inclusion of samples from external partners will be encouraged. Partners (also external) will be provided with instruction to collect data and sample rumen microbiome. The micro-Hub will provide stewardship for GMG partners regarding sampling, storage and shipping, as well as bioinformatic analysis. Rumen metagenome sequencing will be centralized in as fewer labs as possible (ideally only one).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Reference populations from partners will be combined, covering a broad range of breeds and productions systems and different geographical regions. Format of the databases will be unified. The combined dataset will be used for the microbiome genomic evaluations. The reference database will be updated with additional data coming from external partners. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We will develop the capabilities to estimate the genomic breeding value for microbiome composition for any genotyped animal in similar productive conditions as those represented in our reference population. The goal is to propose recommendations based on own experience to include estimated genomic breeding values for rumen microbiome profile in breeding programs. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The project will contribute to the activities organized within Global Methane Genetics and the ICAR Feed&amp;amp;Gas working group in building a microbiome network to exchange knowledge, harmonize guidelines and develop protocols. All data generated within the project will be made available through the Global Methane Genetics database. The project will collaborate with the database development to develop microbiome sharing requirements and specifications. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Main goals ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Joint reference metagenome compiled.&lt;br /&gt;
* Microbiome genomic evaluations.&lt;br /&gt;
* Release of SNP coefficients for international genomic evaluations for microbiome compositions.&lt;br /&gt;
* Network building and establishment of platform for rumen metagenome data.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== &#039;&#039;&#039;Working Group meetings&#039;&#039;&#039; ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The six working groups as described above meet two times a year. The GMG working group meetings are aimed to share updates about the GMG projects and discuss gaps, needs and bottlenecks in the field.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Dairy Cattle ====&lt;br /&gt;
15 May 2025: Presentation materials [[:File:250515 GMG meeting Dairy Working Group.pdf|here.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
27 October 2025: Presentation materials [[:File:20251027 GMG Working group Dairy meeting.pdf|here.]] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Sheep ====&lt;br /&gt;
20 May 2025: Presentation materials [[:File:20250520 Meeting GMG Working group sheep.pdf|here.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
11 November 2025: Presentation materials [[:File:20251111 Sheep Working Group GMG presentation.pdf|here.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Microbiome ====&lt;br /&gt;
23 May 2025: Presentation materials [[:File:202505 Global Meeting Genetics Microbiome working group meeting.pdf|here.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
27 November 2025: Presentation materials [[:File:20251127 GMG Microbiome WG presentation.pdf|here.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Latin America ====&lt;br /&gt;
5 June 2025: Presentation materials [[:File:202506 Presentation GMG Working Group Latin America meeting.pdf|here.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
14 November 2025: Presentation materials [[:File:20251114 Latin America GMG Work group meeting.pdf|here.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Africa ====&lt;br /&gt;
23 May 2025: Presentation materials [[:File:20250523 GMG Working group Africa meeting.pdf|here.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
7 November 2025: Presentation materials [[:File:20251107 Africa Workgroup GMG presentation.pdf|here.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Beef ====&lt;br /&gt;
17 June 2025: Presentation materials [[:File:202506 GMG Working group Beef meeting.pdf|here.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
11 November 2025: Presentation materials [[:File:20251106 GMG Working group Beef meeting.pdf|here.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Asia ====&lt;br /&gt;
1 July 2025: Presentation materials [[:File:20250701 AsiaGMG presentation.pdf|here.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
25 November 2025: Presentation materials [[:File:GMG Asia From data to impact.pdf|here]], [[:File:Asia 20251105.pdf|here]], [[:File:2511 GMG Asia MethaneMethods.pdf|here]] and [[:File:ILRI LMD Exp 2025.pdf|here]]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Webinars ====&lt;br /&gt;
On the 22th of May 2025 there was a webinar for all GMG project participants on effective records in the database, you can find the presentation slides [[:File:250515 GMG meeting Dairy Working Group.pdf|here.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== DAFNE ==&lt;br /&gt;
Department of Agriculture and Forest Sciences at the University of Tuscia. Their main purpose is to collect primary emissions data from sniffers and GF to have emissions factors related to the species, breed, physiological state and diet management. They are engaged with ANAFIBJ and sharing data related to Holstein cattle with them for genetic evaluations. Currently they are running trials with sheep and buffalo.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Sheep ===&lt;br /&gt;
For this trial they are comparing 2 grazing methods using 2 groups of Sopravissana sheep, reared at the facility.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# Rotational, 18 sheep. Turns every 4 days on strip paddocks. 18 paddocks in total; 6 heads on 3 strip paddocks per turn of grazing. After 24 days the sheep are back to the first three strips.&lt;br /&gt;
# Continuous, 18 sheep. Continuous grazing on same paddock. 3 paddocks in total; 6 heads per paddock. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Subgroups for both group A and B (6 heads) are randomly arranged every day. The 18 strip paddocks are the same total size as the three continuous paddocks. They have the same number of heads grazing and the same live weight load.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Both groups are balanced for BW, receive the same hay in quantity and quality with ad libitum access and spend the same time at pasture. Daily sampling of the hay and residual per group is done, weekly sub samples of hay and residual are analyzed. In parallel fresh grass is sampled and analyzed to represent the 2 grazing methods. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The GreenFeed is located in the barn, at 9AM this barn is closed for group A and opens for group B and this switches every day. The GreenFeed is the only place they can get concentrates. Nutritional information for this concentrate can be found [[:File:Nutritional table sheep DAFHNE.docx|here]]. Amount of food and cup drops can be found here.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Trial started end of March 2025 and will last 1.5 months. They are using the GF adapted for small ruminants.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Buffalo ===&lt;br /&gt;
This is a continuous trial which will last 4 months per supplement tested. First they monitor the buffalo for 4 weeks without supplement as a control diet and then there will be an 8 week experimental period with the supplement diet. During the entire period the buffalo are confined to the barn. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The buffalo are separated in two groups, in adjacent pens. One group has access to a milking robot, with the MooLogger from [[Sniffer SOP|Tecnosens.]] The other pen has a conventional milking system and the GreenFeed is placed facing this pen.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
All buffaloes are fed the same concentrates. Nutritional information for this concentrate can be found [[:File:Nutritional table Buffalo DAFHNE.docx|here]]. Amount of food and cup drops can be found here. The buffalo’s in the GF group get the concentrates from the GF and about 1 kg of concentrates during milking operations. The buffalo’s in the sniffer group only get concentrates from the milking robot, which is about 2 kg/head/day.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To account for the emissions recorded individually at different times, they compare the emissions data aggregated on a daily basis. They are using the GF adapted for large ruminants with horns&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== GasToGrass ==&lt;br /&gt;
The aim of this project is to develop new breeding solutions for the industry by finding ways to identify animals with lower environmental impact, which can then be selected as part of genetic improvement programs. This project will contribute with new strategies to mitigate greenhouse gas emissions, in sheep production systems. You can find more information on the [https://era-susan.eu/content/grasstogas-grass-gas-strategies-mitigate-ghg-emissions-pasture-based-sheep-systems website]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== MethaBreed ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:P-2025-1-15-2 FBF Logo MethaBreed Logo 01 4C-01 klein.png|thumb|170x170px]]&lt;br /&gt;
The MethaBreed project aims to improve the sustainability of dairy production by developing innovative breeding strategies for dairy cows that simultaneously reduce methane emissions, enhance feed efficiency, and support animal health. A large-scale longitudinal study is being conducted in commercial dairy herds. Using advanced technologies, individual cow traits are recorded across entire lactations and multiple lactation cycles. Data collection includes continuous monitoring of methane emissions using sniffers, feed intake (using CFIT: Cattle Feed Intake System), body weight (using CFIT and scales), and key health parameters. A particular focus lies on the role of the rumen microbiome in methane production. A central goal of MethaBreed is the development of a new breeding value for methane emissions, enabling the selection of animals with lower environmental impact. These data will be integrated with pedigree and genomic information to allow precise breeding decisions. At the same time, the existing breeding value for feed efficiency will be further refined. The outcomes of the project are expected to make a significant contribution towards more climate-friendly dairy production. In the long term, standardized breeding values will be provided, enabling breeding organizations and farmers to actively select for healthier, more efficient, and more sustainable dairy cows. For more information you can visit the following websites from the partners: [https://www.uni-giessen.de/de/fbz/fb09/institute/ith/ag-koenig/forschung/laufend/methabreed University Giessen], [https://www.fbf-forschung.de/aktuelles/methabreed-neues-forschungsprojekt-zur-reduzierung.html FBF], [https://livestock-functional-microbiology.uni-hohenheim.de/en/research-projects#jfmulticontent_c401477-2 University of Hohenheim.] Further partners are [https://www.vit.de/ vit] and [https://www.uni-kiel.de/de/aef/fakultaet/institute/tierzucht-tierhaltung University Kiel]. The project is funded by the German Federal Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Regional Identity on the basis of a resolution of the German Bundestag. The project management is carried out by the Federal Office for Agriculture and Food (BLE) within the framework of the Federal Programme for Livestock Farming. Funding reference numbers: 28KTF23C01–05.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== breed4green ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Logo B4G RZ RGB 1 Transparent.png|right|frameless|228x228px]]&lt;br /&gt;
Direct and indirect traits for feed efficiency and greenhouse gas emissions for breeding and herd management in cattle:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [https://www.rinderzucht.at/projekt/breed4green.html breed4green] project focuses on researching strategies to reduce methane emissions and enhance feed efficiency within the Austrian cattle industry. Measurements of methane and CO2 emissions are conducted on both experimental and commercial farms using the GreenFeed system. The aim of the project is to collect methane and CO2 measurements of approximately 1,000 Fleckvieh and 200 Brown Swiss cows. In addition, various phenotypes such as health, body weight, BCS, metabolism, energy intake and milk mid infrared (MIR) spectra are recorded. Data on feed intake from experimental farms are also available for validation. The genetic potential of direct traits like methane, CO2 and feed efficiency, along with their correlations to health and other traits, will be analyzed. The project also includes the development and validation of MIR equations for emitted methane and energy balance. The focus will be on investigating the use of these indirect traits to reduce methane emissions and improve feed efficiency in breeding programs to pave the way for genomic selection. The results will also be used to optimize herd management. Furthermore, the environmental impact of relevant dairy and beef production systems in Austria will be investigated.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Presentation materials ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Seminar by Julius van der Werf: Breeding for a changing climate 13-05-2025 ===&lt;br /&gt;
On the 13th of May Julius van de Werf gave a presentation at Wageningen Livestock Research on selection indexes for selecting low methane livestock, focused on sheep. You can find the slides [[:File:20250513 Seminar J.v.d.Werf.pdf|here]]. You can find the recording of the presentation below.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;youtube&amp;gt;PxKmxKVvVEA?si=C6x0keKAvgU009Da&amp;lt;/youtube&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Seminar by Maria Frizzarin: Introduction to milk mid-infrared spectroscopy 10-07-2025 ===&lt;br /&gt;
On the 10th of July Maria Frizzarin gave a presentation at Wageningen Livestock Research on milk mid-infrared spectroscopy, equations development, and applications. You can find the slides [[:File:10072025 Seminar Maria MIR.pdf|here.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Seminar by Sarah-Joe Burn: Breed4Green 25-09-2025 ===&lt;br /&gt;
On the 25th of September Sarah-Joe Burn gave a presentation at Wageningen Livestock Research on measuring methane emissions in commercial farms and establishing a comprehensive dataset for genetic studies. A similar presentations was given at EAAP 2025, you can find the slides to that presentation [[:File:Eaap2025-breed4green-linke.pdf|here]] and the abstract [[:File:2025 Innsbruck EAAP Book Abstracts.pdf|here]], page 250.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== &#039;&#039;&#039;Seminar by Fazel Almasi: Measuring methane in dairy cows using Arcoflex sensors 25-09-2025&#039;&#039;&#039; ===&lt;br /&gt;
On the 25th of September Fazel Almasi gave a presentation at Wageningen Livestock Research on the repeatability and heritability of dairy cow methane concentration using sniffer sensors. You can find the slides to the presentation [[:File:FA-ArcoflexUpdate.pdf|here]]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Joint ICAR Feed&amp;amp;Gas and ASGGN workshop ===&lt;br /&gt;
On the 5th of October the joint workshop between the [https://www.icar.org/group/working-group-feed-and-gas/ ICAR Feed&amp;amp;Gas working group] and the [https://www.asggn.org/ ASGGN] took place before the GGAA conference in Nairobi. The presentations can be found below. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[:File:2025 ASGGN - GGAA - A Taste of the Future Buccal Swabbing for Rumen Microbial ProfilingTB.pdf|A Taste of the Future: Buccal Swabbing for Rumen Microbial Profiling]]​. Presented by Ben Perry ([https://www.bioeconomyscience.co.nz/ NZIBS])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[:File:2638 Booker ILRI GGAA ASGGN Oct 2025.pdf|Rate of Genetic Gain for Methane Emissions in a Maternal Production Flock]]. Presented by Fem Booker ([https://www.bioeconomyscience.co.nz/ NZIBS])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[:File:Boris ICAR2025 v01.pdf|Association between rumen and faecal microbiome and enteric methane emissions in dairy cattle]]. Presented by Boris Sepulveda ([https://agriculture.vic.gov.au/ AV])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[:File:CaeliRichardson GGAA Workshop 2025.pdf|Global Framework to Monitor, Measure, and Account for Methane Reductions from Genetic Selection]]. Presented by Caeli Richardson ([https://abacusbio.com/ Abacusbio])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[:File:GGAA Workshop ICAR and ASGGN Ida Storm.pdf|Danish Perspectives on implementation of GHG regulation]]. Presented by Ida Storm ([https://agricultureandfood.dk/ DAFG])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[:File:GGAA Workshop ICAR and ASGGN Rasmus Stephansen.pdf|Experience with CH4 sniffers, what have we learned so far?]] Presented by Rasmus Stephansen ([https://international.au.dk/ AU])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[:File:GGAA workshop MIR methane presentation.pdf|Overview of the methane equations developed from mid-infrared spectroscopy and their applications.]] Presented by Maria Frizzarin ([https://www.agroscope.admin.ch/agroscope/en/home.html Agroscope])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[:File:HanneHonerlagen ICARpresentation.pdf|Adding microbial data to enhance breeding for lower methane emissions]]. Presented by Hanne Honerlagen ([https://www.wur.nl/en/research-results/chair-groups/animal-sciences/animal-breeding-and-genomics-group.htm WUR-ABG])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[:File:McNaughton ASGGN Workshop final.pdf|GreenFeed for phenotyping – our experiences]]. Presented by Lorna McNaughton ([https://www.lic.co.nz/ LIC])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[:File:MIE ILRI GGAA ASGGN Oct 2025.pdf|Methane Index Explorer: Optimising a Breeding Value Format for Simultaneous Inclusion of Enteric Methane Emissions in Breeding Schemes and National Inventories]]. Presented by Pavithra Ariyarathne ([https://www.bioeconomyscience.co.nz/ NZIBS])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[:File:RiccardoGGAA Presentation RB.pdf|ZELP sense]]. Presented by Riccardo Bica ([https://www.zelp.co/ ZELP])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[:File:ICAR Working group Nairobi 5 Oct2025.pdf|Selection for lower methane livestock, selection index considerations]]. Presented by Julius van der Werf (UNE)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Measuring enteric methane in beef and dairy cattle using PAC. Presented by Timothy Bilton ([https://www.bioeconomyscience.co.nz/ NZIBS])&amp;lt;youtube&amp;gt;https://youtu.be/NjPuotrmkMQ&amp;lt;/youtube&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Estimating methane emissions with the GreenFeed System. Presented by Paul Smith ([https://teagasc.ie/ Teagasc]) &amp;lt;youtube&amp;gt;https://youtu.be/TnHefWoP29I&amp;lt;/youtube&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Cvangemert</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://wiki.icar.org/index.php?title=Section_20:_Activities&amp;diff=4875</id>
		<title>Section 20: Activities</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://wiki.icar.org/index.php?title=Section_20:_Activities&amp;diff=4875"/>
		<updated>2026-01-30T09:34:17Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Cvangemert: WG meetings added and restructured&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;big&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;b&amp;gt;NOTE: This version of Section 20 has been approved by the working group&#039;s Chair.  Please be aware that further revisions may occur before final review and approval by the Board and ICAR members per the [[Approval of Page Process]].&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/b&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
== Global Methane Genetics ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:GMG label.png|right|frameless|300x300px]]&lt;br /&gt;
The Global Methane Genetics (GMG) initiative is a global program to accelerate genetic progress in methane emission in ruminants in the Global North and South. This WUR-ABG coordinated initiative is funded by the [https://www.globalmethanehub.org/ Global Methane Hub] and the [https://www.bezosearthfund.org/ Bezos Earth Fund,] both based on philanthropic funds to support methane mitigation and prevent global warming. If you have questions about the [https://www.wur.nl/en/project/global-methane-genetics-initiative.htm GMG initiative] you can send an email to gmg@wur.nl, contact Roel Veerkamp: roel.veerkamp@wur.nl or Birgit Gredler-Grandl: birgit.gredler-grandl@wur.nl.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The initiative holds the following projects:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== &#039;&#039;&#039;Dairy Cattle&#039;&#039;&#039; ===&lt;br /&gt;
We can look to nature to reduce CH4 emissions and use genetic diversity to provide solutions. Genetic improvement, based on identifying animals with genetic predisposition for lower CH4 output and using them to breed for the next generations, is a reliable, cost-effective, and permanent method for transforming livestock&#039;s impact on the environment.  Breeding programs in dairy cattle are run within breeds and across countries. Therefore, the program will accelerate genetic progress by focusing on four major dairy breeds and organizations and countries involved in those breeds. Additionally, the program will acquire considerable leverage through investments in these countries. If you have questions about the dairy cattle section you can contact Birgit Gredler-Grandl: birgit.gredler-grandl@wur.nl.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== &#039;&#039;Holstein breed&#039;&#039; ====&lt;br /&gt;
The largest data collection has been for the Holstein breed, but there is a lack of standardization and protocols in terms of equipment and its utilization (farm level, data processing, data sharing agreements, genetic evaluations, and data collections). Governments and breeding organizations in Denmark and the Netherlands will collaborate and collect methane and genotypes on more than 20,000 Holstein cows for the GMG database. Also, Poland and Italy team up to collect data for the GMG database, and their aim is also to collect more than 20,000 Holstein animals and develop genetic evaluations across a wide range of systems.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===== Denmark-The Netherlands =====&lt;br /&gt;
This collaboration between Aarhus University and Wageningen Livestock Research has five main goals. The contact person for questions about this project is Trine Villumsen: tmv@qgg.au.dk.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Setting up Standard Operating Procedures (SOP) for measuring methane using sniffers&lt;br /&gt;
* Setting up international protocols to measure methane on commercial farms&lt;br /&gt;
* Develop software tools to automate the processing of data into a phenotype&lt;br /&gt;
* Combine historical data in both countries for genetic evaluations&lt;br /&gt;
* Measure enteric methane in 20.000 new cows.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===== Poland-Italy =====&lt;br /&gt;
This collaboration has the following main goals. The contact person for questions about this project is Raffaella Finocchiaro raffaellafinocchiaro@anafibj.it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Measure enteric methane in 20.000 new cows.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== &#039;&#039;Jersey breed&#039;&#039; ====&lt;br /&gt;
Currently, due to the limited data available, the Jersey dairy breed does not have breeding values for methane (CH4) mitigation. The goal of the program is to collect methane genotypes in Canada and Denmark and share this information with the GMG database. The aim is to develop breeding values that will be distributed through the World Jersey Cattle Bureau organization and national Jersey organizations in Australia, Canada, Switzerland, Denmark, France, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands, and New Zealand. If you have questions about the Jersey breed section you can contact Rasmus Bak Stephansen rasmus.stephansen@qgg.au.dk&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== &#039;&#039;Brown Swiss breed&#039;&#039; ====&lt;br /&gt;
The Brown Swiss (BS) breed faces significant challenges due to its small population size, an divers environments the animals are kept. A collaboration between Germany, Switzerland, and Austria to phenotype enough animals is a prerequisite for utilizing the genetic potential of reducing methane emission of the BS breed. In addition to a population of 250 cows recorded with Greenfeed, and 1250 with the sniffer, progress will be accelerated by recording an additional 3,360 cows with sniffers. If you have questions about the Brown Swiss breed section you can contact Elena Frenken: fe@fbf-forschung.de.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== &#039;&#039;Red breeds&#039;&#039; ====&lt;br /&gt;
The red breeds are important for crossbreeding in many countries around the world. The project aims to share and collect CH4 data from Red Dairy Cattle (RDC) breeds (in the Nordic countries, Canada, and the United Kingdom (UK)) and share it with the Global Methane Genetics (GMG) Hub. Together, they will set up a shared genetic evaluation for bulls used for crossbreeding in many more countries. If you have questions about the Red breed section you can contact Elisenda Rius-Vilarrasa: Elisenda.Rius-Vilarrasa@vxa.se.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== &#039;&#039;&#039;Beef Cattle&#039;&#039;&#039; ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== &#039;&#039;Bluegrass (global beef)&#039;&#039; ====&lt;br /&gt;
All industries world-wide have been challenged with reducing emissions and beef is no exception. Genetic selection and specifically genomic selection have been identified as key tools to help meet this challenge. Methane emissions are not a local problem, but a global one and several major beef producing countries who exchange genetic material have, are, and will be collecting methane phenotypes for the purpose of genomic prediction. Individually (including those in Australia), these datasets will be limited in their genomic prediction accuracy. The BLUEGRASS alliance will bring together the key players globally, who collectively have solicited key seed funding from the Global Methane Hub. By sharing data and resources, the development of necessary reference populations will be accelerated. Locally or globally, success in the beef genetics industry has been a model of ‘co-opetition’. Breeders, although competitors, pool resources to build tools that can be used by all to compete with one another. This BLUEGRASS alliance is no different. A global alliance will come together to address this challenge, with or without Australia. Having Australia lead and ignite the alliance with MDC co-funding will create opportunities to direct this global initiative and provide first mover advantages for Australian breeders.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The program is focused on building genomic reference datasets for the main beef breeds in the collaborating countries. The animals to be recorded will be intensively recorded for other production traits, and genotyped, outside this project itself. In each country, trial or research breeding values will be produced and delivered to industry during the life of the project – enabling genetic selection against methane to get underway, and the data will underpin the ability to genomically screen the entire populations of the breeds involved in the respective countries i.e. all seedstock and commercial animals. The data collected will likely assist development of genomic selection against methane in other countries. The accelerated genetic selection and the commercial animal screening will enable real impact to reduce methane from beef cattle. If you have questions about the bluegrass project specifically, you can contact Steve Miller, steve.miller@une.edu.au &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===== Number of phenotypes =====&lt;br /&gt;
This project will phenotype methane traits in beef cattle populations in the US, Australia, the UK, Ireland, and New Zealand. Around 18.500 phenotypes will be collected over all years and countries. It is estimated that around 7.000 phenotypes will be collected in Australia, around 1.600 in New Zealand, around 800 in the UK, around 2.000 in Ireland and around 7.00 in the USA.&lt;br /&gt;
===== Breeds and traits included =====&lt;br /&gt;
All countries included in the Bluegrass project have different breeds and different target traits included in their measurements, besides the methane phenotypes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Australia will focus on Angus and Hereford seedstock with a research population of Angus, Wagyu, Charolais, Shorthorn and Brahman being a target as well. For the seedstock they will focus on seedstock traits plus methane measurements using PAC measures. For the research populations on seedstock traits plus feed intake, carcass as well as methane measurements with PAC.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For New Zealand priority is the progeny test herds. These are mostly Angus, Hereford and their crosses, including a diallel cross design. Some Angus x Simmental. Complete requirements with seedstock herds of Angus and Hereford. Focus is on the following: progeny test, seedstock traits, conception date (via fetal aging) from natural mate at yearling (then re-breeding), carcass grading on steers, feed intake on heifers, rumen microbiome on steers and heifers, seedstock traits from seedstock herds&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For the UK focus lies on Angus and Hereford sired animals, both pedigree and crossbred (including from dairy dams) and they focus on liveweights.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For Ireland they include multi-breed/crossbreed. 30% Charolais and Limousin sired from Continental type suckler dams, 30% Holstein-Friesian and 40% beef (mostly Angus) cross dairy. They will focus on feed intake, liveweight and carcass data.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The USA will be measuring Angus focused on seedstock traits from seedstock herds.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== &#039;&#039;US beef&#039;&#039; ====&lt;br /&gt;
This project will accelerate genetic selection for reduced methane emissions from U.S. and Canadian beef cattle, through phenotyping and genotyping the 18 most influential beef breeds in North America.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The primary activities of this project will center on phenotyping and genetic evaluation of the Germplasm Evaluation (GPE) herd, a large, multibreed resource population at the U.S. Meat Animal Research Center (USMARC) in Nebraska, USA. This herd is structured to represent the genetic diversity of the 18 most influential beef breeds in the U.S.. These 18 breeds are: Angus, Red Angus, Hereford, South Devon, Shorthorn, Beefmaster, Brangus, Brahman, Santa Gertrudis, Braunvieh, ChiAngus, Charolais, Gelbvieh, Limousin, Maine-Anjou, Salers, Simmental, Tarentaise.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Recording of methane phenotypes will occur using multiple approaches to not only maximize the number of phenotypes collected, but to also offer a comparison between methodologies within a U.S. beef production system. Based on these findings and in coordination with other GMG project teams, standard operating procedures for methane phenotyping of beef cattle will be developed and integrated into the [https://beefimprovement.org/resource-center/bif-guidelines/ Guidelines for Uniform Beef Improvement Programs] supporting the evolution of these approaches into standard practice and routine evaluation in any beef breeding system. If you have questions about the US beef project specifically, you can contact Matthew Spangler, mspangler2@unl.edu.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===== Main goals =====&lt;br /&gt;
* Recording methane phenotypes from at least 5,500 multi-breed genotyped beef cattle and openly sharing to the GMG database and the public domain.&lt;br /&gt;
* Development and publication of uniform guidelines for both methane phenotyping in beef cattle systems and the integration of methane phenotypes into beef genetic evaluations, through the BIF Guidelines wiki.&lt;br /&gt;
* Dissemination and routine updating of genetic parameter and genomic marker effects critical for the development of genetic selection tools and deployment of methane-reducing breeding programs.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== &#039;&#039;&#039;Sheep&#039;&#039;&#039; ===&lt;br /&gt;
This project focusses on recording methane phenotypes on animals in various populations, e.g. Merino, Texel, Dohne, Corriedale, maternal and terminal. In each case, those animals will be recorded for a range of other production, health, product quality and welfare traits (the exact suite of traits varies between countries). This ensures that it will be possible to determine the genetic relationships between methane traits and the other traits included in current and future selection indexes and breeding programs – meaning that breeders will be able to make informed decisions on any trade-offs between methane and other traits. In total around 16.600 methane phenotypes will be collected over all years and countries. It is estimated that around 7.500 methane phenotypes will be collected in Australia, 3.000 in Uruguay, 4.000 in New Zealand, 1.200 in the UK and 1.000 in the UK. If you have questions about the sheep project specifically, you can contact Daniel Brown, dbrown2@une.edu.au &lt;br /&gt;
==== Main goals ====&lt;br /&gt;
* Phenotyping and reference populations. Fast tracked phenotyping and  genotyping up to 16,000 records of methane traits across the key countries to facilitate accurate international evaluation of animals (Table 2).&lt;br /&gt;
* Genetic evaluation and models. Breeding values based on international genomic evaluation models to share the benefits of the established reference populations.&lt;br /&gt;
* Proxies. Development and validation of new phenotyping methods to expedite genetic progress.&lt;br /&gt;
* Breeding Programs. Whole farm system models to incorporate methane into breeding objectives in a balanced way and indexes to facilitate selection of breeding candidates.&lt;br /&gt;
* Education and adoption. Stakeholder engagement campaign and international development to ensure world-wide impact.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== &#039;&#039;&#039;Africa&#039;&#039;&#039; ===&lt;br /&gt;
This project focused on three regions of Africa (Eastern, Western and Southern Africa). It will will leverage and  accelerate on-going early research on GHG in these regions, strongly build capacity and team up with researchers to record CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, other economic productive traits and use the records to implement breeding strategies to reduce CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; emission while simultaneously enhancing productivity, food security and employment opportunities in the dairy and beef cattle farming systems; The source of livelihood for many poorly resourced farmers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Tapping into the existing breeding program infrastructure for improved productivity for dairy cattle in the three regions of Africa, this project will result in overall program that will accelerate genetic progress through focus on phenotyping, genotyping and the use of information from the microbiome in the genetic selection of animals in the smallholder dairy system. The overall impact will be better mitigation of negative effects of climate change and more productive cows. Through selection programs based on the index developed with the phenotypic and genomic information from this project.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The major activities include the direct CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; measurements on about 1.655 tropical cattle using [[Greenfeed SOP|GreenFeed]] and the use of [[Laser Methane Detector|LMD]] in smallholder farmers. Genotypic information and phenotypes captured routinely on major important productive traits that influence profitability, income and livelihood of farmers on 1.619 animals. Data sets will be linked to a larger existing data on 9.000 cows with phenotypic and genotypic information from existing projects. If you have questions about the Africa project specifically, you can contact Raphael Mrode, raphael.mrode@sruc.ac.uk&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Main goals ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Methane measurements available on 1.655 tropical cows.&lt;br /&gt;
* Tissue samples and genotypes available on 1.619 tropical cows.&lt;br /&gt;
* Genetic relationship between dairy cows in Western and Eastern Africa estimated.&lt;br /&gt;
* Multi-trait genomic analysis of dairy data and methane in Eastern Africa.&lt;br /&gt;
* Incorporate existing data on over 9.000 cows from existing research projects to enhance genomic prediction.&lt;br /&gt;
* Computation and the roll out of final selection index or sub-indexes developed for improved efficiency - reduced CH4 emission, lower maintenance requirement and increased milk production.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== &#039;&#039;&#039;Latin America&#039;&#039;&#039; ===&lt;br /&gt;
The aim of this project is to accelerate the reduction of enteric methane emissions in beef cattle in Latin America through genetic selection in key breeds relevant to Argentina, Brazil, Uruguay, and Mexico. The focus will be on phenotyping methane emissions and genotyping animals linked to existing genetic improvement programs. Reference populations for genomic selection will be the basis to improve the estimation of genetic merit and select for lower emission. The link with ongoing genetic improvement programs provides data on other economically relevant production traits, thus making it possible to estimate genetic correlations and optimize methane emission reductions with a minimum impact on livestock productivity. This approach minimizes negative impacts on food production while preserving economic, social, and environmental sustainability of beef cattle farming. This collaborative project between national agricultural research institutes (NARI) is supported by breeders’ associations and other key stakeholders. Public-private partnerships and collaborative efforts will scale genetic evaluation for methane emissions as well as the use of lower methane emission genetics on commercial farms. Phenotypic and genomic data from approximately 7.000 animals will be made globally available. In synergy with other projects, it will be possible to increase the size of reference populations leading to an even greater impact on methane emissions mitigation. If you have questions about the Latin America project specifically, you can contact Elly Navajas, enavajas@inia.org.uy&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For developing methane emission phenotyping platforms and reference populations, it is essential to upgrade methane emission recording equipment as well as standardize and coordinate the measurement of animals. Standardized protocols will be developed in collaboration with ICAR, and the criteria for selecting animals to be measured and genotyped will be established by the research team, including technicians from breeder associations. A critical component of the project involves genetic analyses, such as estimating genetic parameters for methane emission-related traits, validating breeding values in additional populations, and evaluating the impact of selecting for reduced methane emissions. Scientific collaboration will be fostered with other beef cattle projects, focusing on areas such as expertise exchange. Communication strategies will be implemented to engage stakeholders, including breeders, artificial insemination centers, policymakers, and other private stakeholders. Dialogue with teams managing greenhouse gas (GHG) inventories and Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs) will also be enhanced. These activities require active collaboration among countries and stakeholders in Latin America to achieve successful outcomes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Main goals ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* A Latin American collaborative network for accelerating genetic improvement for methane emissions reduction is established by NARIs, universities, breeder societies, and private stakeholders engaged in genetic evaluation programs across South America and Mexico. &lt;br /&gt;
* Methane emission phenotyping platforms are implemented, enabling data collection across key beef cattle breeds, targeting 7.000 methane emission phenotypes and genotypes of animals linked to genetic evaluations. &lt;br /&gt;
* Genomic-enhanced estimated breeding values for methane emissions will be available to breeders: based on pure-breed and multi-breed reference populations enhanced through collaboration and data sharing across beef cattle projects within the GMG initiative. &lt;br /&gt;
* The economic and environmental impact of breeding strategies to reduce methane emissions is assessed, to identify the most promising breeding strategies to accelerate methane emission reduction. The development of breeding objectives combining methane emission reduction with production goals will support policy and incentives for breeders and farmers to overcome adoption barriers and integrate the results into national GHG inventories. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== &#039;&#039;&#039;Microbiome&#039;&#039;&#039; ===&lt;br /&gt;
The micro-HUB project will establish a reference population with metagenome and genotype data, and create a genomic evaluation system that can be used to select the parents of the next generation with microbiome profiles that produce less enteric methane while maintaining genetic progress in profit and health. The genomic evaluation system will be widely open, will target most relevant breeds and production systems. Furthermore, a large global microbiome network will be established to collect existing data and knowledge and ensure knowledge transfer. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This project will start with metagenome and genomic data on 5.430 individuals from the core project partners, we will explore the opportunity to extend and expand our reference population to other countries with suitable data. By combining national data sets with genotypes, microbiome and methane information, we aim to create the largest rumen microbiome reference population globally. We aim to enlarge the reference population by more than 20.000 microbiome sequenced dairy and beef cattle as well as sheep from the Global Methane Genetics (GMG) program. From this, we will facilitate the delivery of genomic breeding values that can be used in global breeding programs to select for a microbiome composition with lower emissions and reduce the abundance of methanogenic pathways in the rumen microbiome of future generations of cattle and sheep. The project partners cover beef, dairy and sheep populations and creates an opportunity to identify a core microbiome (or set of cores) that can be used as a reference for nation-based breeding programs. The project will closely connect to the other projects within the Global Methane Program, to facilitate microbiome sampling, sequencing and genomic analysis. If you have questions about the microbiome project specifically, you can contact Oscar Gonzalez-Recio, oscar.gonzalezrecio@ed.ac.uk&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Activities ====&lt;br /&gt;
To enlarge the national database partners will obtain additional samples from animals with methane and genotype data from different breeds and production systems within the GMG phenotyping program (dairy and beef cattle). The inclusion of samples from external partners will be encouraged. Partners (also external) will be provided with instruction to collect data and sample rumen microbiome. The micro-Hub will provide stewardship for GMG partners regarding sampling, storage and shipping, as well as bioinformatic analysis. Rumen metagenome sequencing will be centralized in as fewer labs as possible (ideally only one).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Reference populations from partners will be combined, covering a broad range of breeds and productions systems and different geographical regions. Format of the databases will be unified. The combined dataset will be used for the microbiome genomic evaluations. The reference database will be updated with additional data coming from external partners. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We will develop the capabilities to estimate the genomic breeding value for microbiome composition for any genotyped animal in similar productive conditions as those represented in our reference population. The goal is to propose recommendations based on own experience to include estimated genomic breeding values for rumen microbiome profile in breeding programs. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The project will contribute to the activities organized within Global Methane Genetics and the ICAR Feed&amp;amp;Gas working group in building a microbiome network to exchange knowledge, harmonize guidelines and develop protocols. All data generated within the project will be made available through the Global Methane Genetics database. The project will collaborate with the database development to develop microbiome sharing requirements and specifications. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Main goals ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Joint reference metagenome compiled.&lt;br /&gt;
* Microbiome genomic evaluations.&lt;br /&gt;
* Release of SNP coefficients for international genomic evaluations for microbiome compositions.&lt;br /&gt;
* Network building and establishment of platform for rumen metagenome data.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== &#039;&#039;&#039;Working Group meetings&#039;&#039;&#039; ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The six working groups as described above meet two times a year. The GMG working group meetings are aimed to share updates about the GMG projects and discuss gaps, needs and bottlenecks in the field.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Dairy Cattle ====&lt;br /&gt;
15 May 2025: Presentation materials [[:File:250515 GMG meeting Dairy Working Group.pdf|here.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
27 October 2025: Presentation materials [[:File:20251027 GMG Working group Dairy meeting.pdf|here.]] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Sheep ====&lt;br /&gt;
20 May 2025: Presentation materials [[:File:20250520 Meeting GMG Working group sheep.pdf|here.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
11 November 2025: Presentation materials [[:File:20251111 Sheep Working Group GMG presentation.pdf|here.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Microbiome ====&lt;br /&gt;
23 May 2025: Presentation materials [[:File:202505 Global Meeting Genetics Microbiome working group meeting.pdf|here.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
27 November 2025: Presentation materials [[:File:20251127 GMG Microbiome WG presentation.pdf|here.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Latin America ====&lt;br /&gt;
5 June 2025: Presentation materials [[:File:202506 Presentation GMG Working Group Latin America meeting.pdf|here.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
14 November 2025: Presentation materials [[:File:20251114 Latin America GMG Work group meeting.pdf|here.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Africa ====&lt;br /&gt;
23 May 2025: Presentation materials [[:File:20250523 GMG Working group Africa meeting.pdf|here.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
7 November 2025: Presentation materials [[:File:20251107 Africa Workgroup GMG presentation.pdf|here.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Beef ====&lt;br /&gt;
17 June 2025: Presentation materials [[:File:202506 GMG Working group Beef meeting.pdf|here.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
11 November 2025: Presentation materials [[:File:20251106 GMG Working group Beef meeting.pdf|here.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Asia ====&lt;br /&gt;
1 July 2025: Presentation materials [[:File:20250701 AsiaGMG presentation.pdf|here.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
25 November 2025: Presentation materials [[:File:GMG Asia From data to impact.pdf|here]], [[:File:Asia 20251105.pdf|here]], [[:File:2511 GMG Asia MethaneMethods.pdf|here]] and [[:File:ILRI LMD Exp 2025.pdf|here]]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Webinars ====&lt;br /&gt;
On the 22th of May 2025 there was a webinar for all GMG project participants on effective records in the database, you can find the presentation slides [[:File:250515 GMG meeting Dairy Working Group.pdf|here.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== DAFNE ==&lt;br /&gt;
Department of Agriculture and Forest Sciences at the University of Tuscia. Their main purpose is to collect primary emissions data from sniffers and GF to have emissions factors related to the species, breed, physiological state and diet management. They are engaged with ANAFIBJ and sharing data related to Holstein cattle with them for genetic evaluations. Currently they are running trials with sheep and buffalo.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Sheep ===&lt;br /&gt;
For this trial they are comparing 2 grazing methods using 2 groups of Sopravissana sheep, reared at the facility.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# Rotational, 18 sheep. Turns every 4 days on strip paddocks. 18 paddocks in total; 6 heads on 3 strip paddocks per turn of grazing. After 24 days the sheep are back to the first three strips.&lt;br /&gt;
# Continuous, 18 sheep. Continuous grazing on same paddock. 3 paddocks in total; 6 heads per paddock. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Subgroups for both group A and B (6 heads) are randomly arranged every day. The 18 strip paddocks are the same total size as the three continuous paddocks. They have the same number of heads grazing and the same live weight load.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Both groups are balanced for BW, receive the same hay in quantity and quality with ad libitum access and spend the same time at pasture. Daily sampling of the hay and residual per group is done, weekly sub samples of hay and residual are analyzed. In parallel fresh grass is sampled and analyzed to represent the 2 grazing methods. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The GreenFeed is located in the barn, at 9AM this barn is closed for group A and opens for group B and this switches every day. The GreenFeed is the only place they can get concentrates. Nutritional information for this concentrate can be found [[:File:Nutritional table sheep DAFHNE.docx|here]]. Amount of food and cup drops can be found here.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Trial started end of March 2025 and will last 1.5 months. They are using the GF adapted for small ruminants.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Buffalo ===&lt;br /&gt;
This is a continuous trial which will last 4 months per supplement tested. First they monitor the buffalo for 4 weeks without supplement as a control diet and then there will be an 8 week experimental period with the supplement diet. During the entire period the buffalo are confined to the barn. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The buffalo are separated in two groups, in adjacent pens. One group has access to a milking robot, with the MooLogger from [[Sniffer SOP|Tecnosens.]] The other pen has a conventional milking system and the GreenFeed is placed facing this pen.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
All buffaloes are fed the same concentrates. Nutritional information for this concentrate can be found [[:File:Nutritional table Buffalo DAFHNE.docx|here]]. Amount of food and cup drops can be found here. The buffalo’s in the GF group get the concentrates from the GF and about 1 kg of concentrates during milking operations. The buffalo’s in the sniffer group only get concentrates from the milking robot, which is about 2 kg/head/day.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To account for the emissions recorded individually at different times, they compare the emissions data aggregated on a daily basis. They are using the GF adapted for large ruminants with horns&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== MethaBreed ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:P-2025-1-15-2 FBF Logo MethaBreed Logo 01 4C-01 klein.png|thumb|170x170px]]&lt;br /&gt;
The MethaBreed project aims to improve the sustainability of dairy production by developing innovative breeding strategies for dairy cows that simultaneously reduce methane emissions, enhance feed efficiency, and support animal health. A large-scale longitudinal study is being conducted in commercial dairy herds. Using advanced technologies, individual cow traits are recorded across entire lactations and multiple lactation cycles. Data collection includes continuous monitoring of methane emissions using sniffers, feed intake (using CFIT: Cattle Feed Intake System), body weight (using CFIT and scales), and key health parameters. A particular focus lies on the role of the rumen microbiome in methane production. A central goal of MethaBreed is the development of a new breeding value for methane emissions, enabling the selection of animals with lower environmental impact. These data will be integrated with pedigree and genomic information to allow precise breeding decisions. At the same time, the existing breeding value for feed efficiency will be further refined. The outcomes of the project are expected to make a significant contribution towards more climate-friendly dairy production. In the long term, standardized breeding values will be provided, enabling breeding organizations and farmers to actively select for healthier, more efficient, and more sustainable dairy cows. For more information you can visit the following websites from the partners: [https://www.uni-giessen.de/de/fbz/fb09/institute/ith/ag-koenig/forschung/laufend/methabreed University Giessen], [https://www.fbf-forschung.de/aktuelles/methabreed-neues-forschungsprojekt-zur-reduzierung.html FBF], [https://livestock-functional-microbiology.uni-hohenheim.de/en/research-projects#jfmulticontent_c401477-2 University of Hohenheim.] Further partners are [https://www.vit.de/ vit] and [https://www.uni-kiel.de/de/aef/fakultaet/institute/tierzucht-tierhaltung University Kiel]. The project is funded by the German Federal Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Regional Identity on the basis of a resolution of the German Bundestag. The project management is carried out by the Federal Office for Agriculture and Food (BLE) within the framework of the Federal Programme for Livestock Farming. Funding reference numbers: 28KTF23C01–05.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== breed4green ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Logo B4G RZ RGB 1 Transparent.png|right|frameless|228x228px]]&lt;br /&gt;
Direct and indirect traits for feed efficiency and greenhouse gas emissions for breeding and herd management in cattle:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [https://www.rinderzucht.at/projekt/breed4green.html breed4green] project focuses on researching strategies to reduce methane emissions and enhance feed efficiency within the Austrian cattle industry. Measurements of methane and CO2 emissions are conducted on both experimental and commercial farms using the GreenFeed system. The aim of the project is to collect methane and CO2 measurements of approximately 1,000 Fleckvieh and 200 Brown Swiss cows. In addition, various phenotypes such as health, body weight, BCS, metabolism, energy intake and milk mid infrared (MIR) spectra are recorded. Data on feed intake from experimental farms are also available for validation. The genetic potential of direct traits like methane, CO2 and feed efficiency, along with their correlations to health and other traits, will be analyzed. The project also includes the development and validation of MIR equations for emitted methane and energy balance. The focus will be on investigating the use of these indirect traits to reduce methane emissions and improve feed efficiency in breeding programs to pave the way for genomic selection. The results will also be used to optimize herd management. Furthermore, the environmental impact of relevant dairy and beef production systems in Austria will be investigated.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Presentation materials ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Seminar by Julius van der Werf: Breeding for a changing climate 13-05-2025 ===&lt;br /&gt;
On the 13th of May Julius van de Werf gave a presentation at Wageningen Livestock Research on selection indexes for selecting low methane livestock, focused on sheep. You can find the slides [[:File:20250513 Seminar J.v.d.Werf.pdf|here]]. You can find the recording of the presentation below.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;youtube&amp;gt;PxKmxKVvVEA?si=C6x0keKAvgU009Da&amp;lt;/youtube&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Seminar by Maria Frizzarin: Introduction to milk mid-infrared spectroscopy 10-07-2025 ===&lt;br /&gt;
On the 10th of July Maria Frizzarin gave a presentation at Wageningen Livestock Research on milk mid-infrared spectroscopy, equations development, and applications. You can find the slides [[:File:10072025 Seminar Maria MIR.pdf|here.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Seminar by Sarah-Joe Burn: Breed4Green 25-09-2025 ===&lt;br /&gt;
On the 25th of September Sarah-Joe Burn gave a presentation at Wageningen Livestock Research on measuring methane emissions in commercial farms and establishing a comprehensive dataset for genetic studies. A similar presentations was given at EAAP 2025, you can find the slides to that presentation [[:File:Eaap2025-breed4green-linke.pdf|here]] and the abstract [[:File:2025 Innsbruck EAAP Book Abstracts.pdf|here]], page 250.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Joint ICAR Feed&amp;amp;Gas and ASGGN workshop ===&lt;br /&gt;
On the 5th of October the joint workshop between the [https://www.icar.org/group/working-group-feed-and-gas/ ICAR Feed&amp;amp;Gas working group] and the [https://www.asggn.org/ ASGGN] took place before the GGAA conference in Nairobi. The presentations can be found below. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[:File:2025 ASGGN - GGAA - A Taste of the Future Buccal Swabbing for Rumen Microbial ProfilingTB.pdf|A Taste of the Future: Buccal Swabbing for Rumen Microbial Profiling]]​. Presented by Ben Perry ([https://www.bioeconomyscience.co.nz/ NZIBS])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[:File:2638 Booker ILRI GGAA ASGGN Oct 2025.pdf|Rate of Genetic Gain for Methane Emissions in a Maternal Production Flock]]. Presented by Fem Booker ([https://www.bioeconomyscience.co.nz/ NZIBS])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[:File:Boris ICAR2025 v01.pdf|Association between rumen and faecal microbiome and enteric methane emissions in dairy cattle]]. Presented by Boris Sepulveda ([https://agriculture.vic.gov.au/ AV])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[:File:CaeliRichardson GGAA Workshop 2025.pdf|Global Framework to Monitor, Measure, and Account for Methane Reductions from Genetic Selection]]. Presented by Caeli Richardson ([https://abacusbio.com/ Abacusbio])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[:File:GGAA Workshop ICAR and ASGGN Ida Storm.pdf|Danish Perspectives on implementation of GHG regulation]]. Presented by Ida Storm ([https://agricultureandfood.dk/ DAFG])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[:File:GGAA Workshop ICAR and ASGGN Rasmus Stephansen.pdf|Experience with CH4 sniffers, what have we learned so far?]] Presented by Rasmus Stephansen ([https://international.au.dk/ AU])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[:File:GGAA workshop MIR methane presentation.pdf|Overview of the methane equations developed from mid-infrared spectroscopy and their applications.]] Presented by Maria Frizzarin ([https://www.agroscope.admin.ch/agroscope/en/home.html Agroscope])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[:File:HanneHonerlagen ICARpresentation.pdf|Adding microbial data to enhance breeding for lower methane emissions]]. Presented by Hanne Honerlagen ([https://www.wur.nl/en/research-results/chair-groups/animal-sciences/animal-breeding-and-genomics-group.htm WUR-ABG])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[:File:McNaughton ASGGN Workshop final.pdf|GreenFeed for phenotyping – our experiences]]. Presented by Lorna McNaughton ([https://www.lic.co.nz/ LIC])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[:File:MIE ILRI GGAA ASGGN Oct 2025.pdf|Methane Index Explorer: Optimising a Breeding Value Format for Simultaneous Inclusion of Enteric Methane Emissions in Breeding Schemes and National Inventories]]. Presented by Pavithra Ariyarathne ([https://www.bioeconomyscience.co.nz/ NZIBS])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[:File:RiccardoGGAA Presentation RB.pdf|ZELP sense]]. Presented by Riccardo Bica ([https://www.zelp.co/ ZELP])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[:File:ICAR Working group Nairobi 5 Oct2025.pdf|Selection for lower methane livestock, selection index considerations]]. Presented by Julius van der Werf (UNE)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Measuring enteric methane in beef and dairy cattle using PAC. Presented by Timothy Bilton ([https://www.bioeconomyscience.co.nz/ NZIBS])&amp;lt;youtube&amp;gt;https://youtu.be/NjPuotrmkMQ&amp;lt;/youtube&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Estimating methane emissions with the GreenFeed System. Presented by Paul Smith ([https://teagasc.ie/ Teagasc]) &amp;lt;youtube&amp;gt;https://youtu.be/TnHefWoP29I&amp;lt;/youtube&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Cvangemert</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://wiki.icar.org/index.php?title=Section_20:_Activities&amp;diff=4834</id>
		<title>Section 20: Activities</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://wiki.icar.org/index.php?title=Section_20:_Activities&amp;diff=4834"/>
		<updated>2026-01-20T09:03:31Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Cvangemert: /* Presentation materials */ added breed4green&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;big&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;b&amp;gt;NOTE: This version of Section 20 has been approved by the working group&#039;s Chair.  Please be aware that further revisions may occur before final review and approval by the Board and ICAR members per the [[Approval of Page Process]].&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/b&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
== Global Methane Genetics ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:GMG label.png|right|frameless|300x300px]]&lt;br /&gt;
The Global Methane Genetics (GMG) initiative is a global program to accelerate genetic progress in methane emission in ruminants in the Global North and South. This WUR-ABG coordinated initiative is funded by the [https://www.globalmethanehub.org/ Global Methane Hub] and the [https://www.bezosearthfund.org/ Bezos Earth Fund,] both based on philanthropic funds to support methane mitigation and prevent global warming. If you have questions about the [https://www.wur.nl/en/project/global-methane-genetics-initiative.htm GMG initiative] you can send an email to gmg@wur.nl, contact Roel Veerkamp: roel.veerkamp@wur.nl or Birgit Gredler-Grandl: birgit.gredler-grandl@wur.nl.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The initiative holds the following projects:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== &#039;&#039;&#039;Dairy Cattle&#039;&#039;&#039; ===&lt;br /&gt;
We can look to nature to reduce CH4 emissions and use genetic diversity to provide solutions. Genetic improvement, based on identifying animals with genetic predisposition for lower CH4 output and using them to breed for the next generations, is a reliable, cost-effective, and permanent method for transforming livestock&#039;s impact on the environment.  Breeding programs in dairy cattle are run within breeds and across countries. Therefore, the program will accelerate genetic progress by focusing on four major dairy breeds and organizations and countries involved in those breeds. Additionally, the program will acquire considerable leverage through investments in these countries. If you have questions about the dairy cattle section you can contact Birgit Gredler-Grandl: birgit.gredler-grandl@wur.nl.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== &#039;&#039;Holstein breed&#039;&#039; ====&lt;br /&gt;
The largest data collection has been for the Holstein breed, but there is a lack of standardization and protocols in terms of equipment and its utilization (farm level, data processing, data sharing agreements, genetic evaluations, and data collections). Governments and breeding organizations in Denmark and the Netherlands will collaborate and collect methane and genotypes on more than 20,000 Holstein cows for the GMG database. Also, Poland and Italy team up to collect data for the GMG database, and their aim is also to collect more than 20,000 Holstein animals and develop genetic evaluations across a wide range of systems.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===== Denmark-The Netherlands =====&lt;br /&gt;
This collaboration between Aarhus University and Wageningen Livestock Research has five main goals. The contact person for questions about this project is Trine Villumsen: tmv@qgg.au.dk.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Setting up Standard Operating Procedures (SOP) for measuring methane using sniffers&lt;br /&gt;
* Setting up international protocols to measure methane on commercial farms&lt;br /&gt;
* Develop software tools to automate the processing of data into a phenotype&lt;br /&gt;
* Combine historical data in both countries for genetic evaluations&lt;br /&gt;
* Measure enteric methane in 20.000 new cows.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===== Poland-Italy =====&lt;br /&gt;
This collaboration has the following main goals. The contact person for questions about this project is Raffaella Finocchiaro raffaellafinocchiaro@anafibj.it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Measure enteric methane in 20.000 new cows.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== &#039;&#039;Jersey breed&#039;&#039; ====&lt;br /&gt;
Currently, due to the limited data available, the Jersey dairy breed does not have breeding values for methane (CH4) mitigation. The goal of the program is to collect methane genotypes in Canada and Denmark and share this information with the GMG database. The aim is to develop breeding values that will be distributed through the World Jersey Cattle Bureau organization and national Jersey organizations in Australia, Canada, Switzerland, Denmark, France, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands, and New Zealand. If you have questions about the Jersey breed section you can contact Rasmus Bak Stephansen rasmus.stephansen@qgg.au.dk&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== &#039;&#039;Brown Swiss breed&#039;&#039; ====&lt;br /&gt;
The Brown Swiss (BS) breed faces significant challenges due to its small population size, an divers environments the animals are kept. A collaboration between Germany, Switzerland, and Austria to phenotype enough animals is a prerequisite for utilizing the genetic potential of reducing methane emission of the BS breed. In addition to a population of 250 cows recorded with Greenfeed, and 1250 with the sniffer, progress will be accelerated by recording an additional 3,360 cows with sniffers. If you have questions about the Brown Swiss breed section you can contact Elena Frenken: fe@fbf-forschung.de.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== &#039;&#039;Red breeds&#039;&#039; ====&lt;br /&gt;
The red breeds are important for crossbreeding in many countries around the world. The project aims to share and collect CH4 data from Red Dairy Cattle (RDC) breeds (in the Nordic countries, Canada, and the United Kingdom (UK)) and share it with the Global Methane Genetics (GMG) Hub. Together, they will set up a shared genetic evaluation for bulls used for crossbreeding in many more countries. If you have questions about the Red breed section you can contact Elisenda Rius-Vilarrasa: Elisenda.Rius-Vilarrasa@vxa.se.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== &#039;&#039;&#039;Beef Cattle&#039;&#039;&#039; ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== &#039;&#039;Bluegrass (global beef)&#039;&#039; ====&lt;br /&gt;
All industries world-wide have been challenged with reducing emissions and beef is no exception. Genetic selection and specifically genomic selection have been identified as key tools to help meet this challenge. Methane emissions are not a local problem, but a global one and several major beef producing countries who exchange genetic material have, are, and will be collecting methane phenotypes for the purpose of genomic prediction. Individually (including those in Australia), these datasets will be limited in their genomic prediction accuracy. The BLUEGRASS alliance will bring together the key players globally, who collectively have solicited key seed funding from the Global Methane Hub. By sharing data and resources, the development of necessary reference populations will be accelerated. Locally or globally, success in the beef genetics industry has been a model of ‘co-opetition’. Breeders, although competitors, pool resources to build tools that can be used by all to compete with one another. This BLUEGRASS alliance is no different. A global alliance will come together to address this challenge, with or without Australia. Having Australia lead and ignite the alliance with MDC co-funding will create opportunities to direct this global initiative and provide first mover advantages for Australian breeders.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The program is focused on building genomic reference datasets for the main beef breeds in the collaborating countries. The animals to be recorded will be intensively recorded for other production traits, and genotyped, outside this project itself. In each country, trial or research breeding values will be produced and delivered to industry during the life of the project – enabling genetic selection against methane to get underway, and the data will underpin the ability to genomically screen the entire populations of the breeds involved in the respective countries i.e. all seedstock and commercial animals. The data collected will likely assist development of genomic selection against methane in other countries. The accelerated genetic selection and the commercial animal screening will enable real impact to reduce methane from beef cattle. If you have questions about the bluegrass project specifically, you can contact Steve Miller, steve.miller@une.edu.au &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===== Number of phenotypes =====&lt;br /&gt;
This project will phenotype methane traits in beef cattle populations in the US, Australia, the UK, Ireland, and New Zealand. Around 18.500 phenotypes will be collected over all years and countries. It is estimated that around 7.000 phenotypes will be collected in Australia, around 1.600 in New Zealand, around 800 in the UK, around 2.000 in Ireland and around 7.00 in the USA.&lt;br /&gt;
===== Breeds and traits included =====&lt;br /&gt;
All countries included in the Bluegrass project have different breeds and different target traits included in their measurements, besides the methane phenotypes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Australia will focus on Angus and Hereford seedstock with a research population of Angus, Wagyu, Charolais, Shorthorn and Brahman being a target as well. For the seedstock they will focus on seedstock traits plus methane measurements using PAC measures. For the research populations on seedstock traits plus feed intake, carcass as well as methane measurements with PAC.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For New Zealand priority is the progeny test herds. These are mostly Angus, Hereford and their crosses, including a diallel cross design. Some Angus x Simmental. Complete requirements with seedstock herds of Angus and Hereford. Focus is on the following: progeny test, seedstock traits, conception date (via fetal aging) from natural mate at yearling (then re-breeding), carcass grading on steers, feed intake on heifers, rumen microbiome on steers and heifers, seedstock traits from seedstock herds&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For the UK focus lies on Angus and Hereford sired animals, both pedigree and crossbred (including from dairy dams) and they focus on liveweights.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For Ireland they include multi-breed/crossbreed. 30% Charolais and Limousin sired from Continental type suckler dams, 30% Holstein-Friesian and 40% beef (mostly Angus) cross dairy. They will focus on feed intake, liveweight and carcass data.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The USA will be measuring Angus focused on seedstock traits from seedstock herds.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== &#039;&#039;US beef&#039;&#039; ====&lt;br /&gt;
This project will accelerate genetic selection for reduced methane emissions from U.S. and Canadian beef cattle, through phenotyping and genotyping the 18 most influential beef breeds in North America.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The primary activities of this project will center on phenotyping and genetic evaluation of the Germplasm Evaluation (GPE) herd, a large, multibreed resource population at the U.S. Meat Animal Research Center (USMARC) in Nebraska, USA. This herd is structured to represent the genetic diversity of the 18 most influential beef breeds in the U.S.. These 18 breeds are: Angus, Red Angus, Hereford, South Devon, Shorthorn, Beefmaster, Brangus, Brahman, Santa Gertrudis, Braunvieh, ChiAngus, Charolais, Gelbvieh, Limousin, Maine-Anjou, Salers, Simmental, Tarentaise.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Recording of methane phenotypes will occur using multiple approaches to not only maximize the number of phenotypes collected, but to also offer a comparison between methodologies within a U.S. beef production system. Based on these findings and in coordination with other GMG project teams, standard operating procedures for methane phenotyping of beef cattle will be developed and integrated into the [https://beefimprovement.org/resource-center/bif-guidelines/ Guidelines for Uniform Beef Improvement Programs] supporting the evolution of these approaches into standard practice and routine evaluation in any beef breeding system. If you have questions about the US beef project specifically, you can contact Matthew Spangler, mspangler2@unl.edu.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===== Main goals =====&lt;br /&gt;
* Recording methane phenotypes from at least 5,500 multi-breed genotyped beef cattle and openly sharing to the GMG database and the public domain.&lt;br /&gt;
* Development and publication of uniform guidelines for both methane phenotyping in beef cattle systems and the integration of methane phenotypes into beef genetic evaluations, through the BIF Guidelines wiki.&lt;br /&gt;
* Dissemination and routine updating of genetic parameter and genomic marker effects critical for the development of genetic selection tools and deployment of methane-reducing breeding programs.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== &#039;&#039;&#039;Sheep&#039;&#039;&#039; ===&lt;br /&gt;
This project focusses on recording methane phenotypes on animals in various populations, e.g. Merino, Texel, Dohne, Corriedale, maternal and terminal. In each case, those animals will be recorded for a range of other production, health, product quality and welfare traits (the exact suite of traits varies between countries). This ensures that it will be possible to determine the genetic relationships between methane traits and the other traits included in current and future selection indexes and breeding programs – meaning that breeders will be able to make informed decisions on any trade-offs between methane and other traits. In total around 16.600 methane phenotypes will be collected over all years and countries. It is estimated that around 7.500 methane phenotypes will be collected in Australia, 3.000 in Uruguay, 4.000 in New Zealand, 1.200 in the UK and 1.000 in the UK. If you have questions about the sheep project specifically, you can contact Daniel Brown, dbrown2@une.edu.au &lt;br /&gt;
==== Main goals ====&lt;br /&gt;
* Phenotyping and reference populations. Fast tracked phenotyping and  genotyping up to 16,000 records of methane traits across the key countries to facilitate accurate international evaluation of animals (Table 2).&lt;br /&gt;
* Genetic evaluation and models. Breeding values based on international genomic evaluation models to share the benefits of the established reference populations.&lt;br /&gt;
* Proxies. Development and validation of new phenotyping methods to expedite genetic progress.&lt;br /&gt;
* Breeding Programs. Whole farm system models to incorporate methane into breeding objectives in a balanced way and indexes to facilitate selection of breeding candidates.&lt;br /&gt;
* Education and adoption. Stakeholder engagement campaign and international development to ensure world-wide impact.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== &#039;&#039;&#039;Africa&#039;&#039;&#039; ===&lt;br /&gt;
This project focused on three regions of Africa (Eastern, Western and Southern Africa). It will will leverage and  accelerate on-going early research on GHG in these regions, strongly build capacity and team up with researchers to record CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, other economic productive traits and use the records to implement breeding strategies to reduce CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; emission while simultaneously enhancing productivity, food security and employment opportunities in the dairy and beef cattle farming systems; The source of livelihood for many poorly resourced farmers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Tapping into the existing breeding program infrastructure for improved productivity for dairy cattle in the three regions of Africa, this project will result in overall program that will accelerate genetic progress through focus on phenotyping, genotyping and the use of information from the microbiome in the genetic selection of animals in the smallholder dairy system. The overall impact will be better mitigation of negative effects of climate change and more productive cows. Through selection programs based on the index developed with the phenotypic and genomic information from this project.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The major activities include the direct CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; measurements on about 1.655 tropical cattle using [[Greenfeed SOP|GreenFeed]] and the use of [[Laser Methane Detector|LMD]] in smallholder farmers. Genotypic information and phenotypes captured routinely on major important productive traits that influence profitability, income and livelihood of farmers on 1.619 animals. Data sets will be linked to a larger existing data on 9.000 cows with phenotypic and genotypic information from existing projects. If you have questions about the Africa project specifically, you can contact Raphael Mrode, raphael.mrode@sruc.ac.uk&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Main goals ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Methane measurements available on 1.655 tropical cows.&lt;br /&gt;
* Tissue samples and genotypes available on 1.619 tropical cows.&lt;br /&gt;
* Genetic relationship between dairy cows in Western and Eastern Africa estimated.&lt;br /&gt;
* Multi-trait genomic analysis of dairy data and methane in Eastern Africa.&lt;br /&gt;
* Incorporate existing data on over 9.000 cows from existing research projects to enhance genomic prediction.&lt;br /&gt;
* Computation and the roll out of final selection index or sub-indexes developed for improved efficiency - reduced CH4 emission, lower maintenance requirement and increased milk production.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== &#039;&#039;&#039;Latin America&#039;&#039;&#039; ===&lt;br /&gt;
The aim of this project is to accelerate the reduction of enteric methane emissions in beef cattle in Latin America through genetic selection in key breeds relevant to Argentina, Brazil, Uruguay, and Mexico. The focus will be on phenotyping methane emissions and genotyping animals linked to existing genetic improvement programs. Reference populations for genomic selection will be the basis to improve the estimation of genetic merit and select for lower emission. The link with ongoing genetic improvement programs provides data on other economically relevant production traits, thus making it possible to estimate genetic correlations and optimize methane emission reductions with a minimum impact on livestock productivity. This approach minimizes negative impacts on food production while preserving economic, social, and environmental sustainability of beef cattle farming. This collaborative project between national agricultural research institutes (NARI) is supported by breeders’ associations and other key stakeholders. Public-private partnerships and collaborative efforts will scale genetic evaluation for methane emissions as well as the use of lower methane emission genetics on commercial farms. Phenotypic and genomic data from approximately 7.000 animals will be made globally available. In synergy with other projects, it will be possible to increase the size of reference populations leading to an even greater impact on methane emissions mitigation. If you have questions about the Latin America project specifically, you can contact Elly Navajas, enavajas@inia.org.uy&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For developing methane emission phenotyping platforms and reference populations, it is essential to upgrade methane emission recording equipment as well as standardize and coordinate the measurement of animals. Standardized protocols will be developed in collaboration with ICAR, and the criteria for selecting animals to be measured and genotyped will be established by the research team, including technicians from breeder associations. A critical component of the project involves genetic analyses, such as estimating genetic parameters for methane emission-related traits, validating breeding values in additional populations, and evaluating the impact of selecting for reduced methane emissions. Scientific collaboration will be fostered with other beef cattle projects, focusing on areas such as expertise exchange. Communication strategies will be implemented to engage stakeholders, including breeders, artificial insemination centers, policymakers, and other private stakeholders. Dialogue with teams managing greenhouse gas (GHG) inventories and Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs) will also be enhanced. These activities require active collaboration among countries and stakeholders in Latin America to achieve successful outcomes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Main goals ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* A Latin American collaborative network for accelerating genetic improvement for methane emissions reduction is established by NARIs, universities, breeder societies, and private stakeholders engaged in genetic evaluation programs across South America and Mexico. &lt;br /&gt;
* Methane emission phenotyping platforms are implemented, enabling data collection across key beef cattle breeds, targeting 7.000 methane emission phenotypes and genotypes of animals linked to genetic evaluations. &lt;br /&gt;
* Genomic-enhanced estimated breeding values for methane emissions will be available to breeders: based on pure-breed and multi-breed reference populations enhanced through collaboration and data sharing across beef cattle projects within the GMG initiative. &lt;br /&gt;
* The economic and environmental impact of breeding strategies to reduce methane emissions is assessed, to identify the most promising breeding strategies to accelerate methane emission reduction. The development of breeding objectives combining methane emission reduction with production goals will support policy and incentives for breeders and farmers to overcome adoption barriers and integrate the results into national GHG inventories. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== &#039;&#039;&#039;Microbiome&#039;&#039;&#039; ===&lt;br /&gt;
The micro-HUB project will establish a reference population with metagenome and genotype data, and create a genomic evaluation system that can be used to select the parents of the next generation with microbiome profiles that produce less enteric methane while maintaining genetic progress in profit and health. The genomic evaluation system will be widely open, will target most relevant breeds and production systems. Furthermore, a large global microbiome network will be established to collect existing data and knowledge and ensure knowledge transfer. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This project will start with metagenome and genomic data on 5.430 individuals from the core project partners, we will explore the opportunity to extend and expand our reference population to other countries with suitable data. By combining national data sets with genotypes, microbiome and methane information, we aim to create the largest rumen microbiome reference population globally. We aim to enlarge the reference population by more than 20.000 microbiome sequenced dairy and beef cattle as well as sheep from the Global Methane Genetics (GMG) program. From this, we will facilitate the delivery of genomic breeding values that can be used in global breeding programs to select for a microbiome composition with lower emissions and reduce the abundance of methanogenic pathways in the rumen microbiome of future generations of cattle and sheep. The project partners cover beef, dairy and sheep populations and creates an opportunity to identify a core microbiome (or set of cores) that can be used as a reference for nation-based breeding programs. The project will closely connect to the other projects within the Global Methane Program, to facilitate microbiome sampling, sequencing and genomic analysis. If you have questions about the microbiome project specifically, you can contact Oscar Gonzalez-Recio, oscar.gonzalezrecio@ed.ac.uk&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Activities ====&lt;br /&gt;
To enlarge the national database partners will obtain additional samples from animals with methane and genotype data from different breeds and production systems within the GMG phenotyping program (dairy and beef cattle). The inclusion of samples from external partners will be encouraged. Partners (also external) will be provided with instruction to collect data and sample rumen microbiome. The micro-Hub will provide stewardship for GMG partners regarding sampling, storage and shipping, as well as bioinformatic analysis. Rumen metagenome sequencing will be centralized in as fewer labs as possible (ideally only one).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Reference populations from partners will be combined, covering a broad range of breeds and productions systems and different geographical regions. Format of the databases will be unified. The combined dataset will be used for the microbiome genomic evaluations. The reference database will be updated with additional data coming from external partners. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We will develop the capabilities to estimate the genomic breeding value for microbiome composition for any genotyped animal in similar productive conditions as those represented in our reference population. The goal is to propose recommendations based on own experience to include estimated genomic breeding values for rumen microbiome profile in breeding programs. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The project will contribute to the activities organized within Global Methane Genetics and the ICAR Feed&amp;amp;Gas working group in building a microbiome network to exchange knowledge, harmonize guidelines and develop protocols. All data generated within the project will be made available through the Global Methane Genetics database. The project will collaborate with the database development to develop microbiome sharing requirements and specifications. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Main goals ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Joint reference metagenome compiled.&lt;br /&gt;
* Microbiome genomic evaluations.&lt;br /&gt;
* Release of SNP coefficients for international genomic evaluations for microbiome compositions.&lt;br /&gt;
* Network building and establishment of platform for rumen metagenome data.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== &#039;&#039;&#039;Working Group meetings&#039;&#039;&#039; ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The six working groups as described above meet two times a year to discuss the progress of their projects and to share knowledge. There are also general webinars organized for the project participants throughout the years.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Dairy Cattle ====&lt;br /&gt;
On the 15th of May 2025 the Working Group Dairy cattle met for the first time and shared their current progress, you can find the presentation slides [[:File:250515 GMG meeting Dairy Working Group.pdf|here.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On the 27&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;th&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; of October 2025 the Working Group Cattle had their second meeting, the current progress was shared and other projects and bottlenecks were discussed. You can find the presentation slides [[:File:20251027 GMG Working group Dairy meeting.pdf|here.]] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Sheep ====&lt;br /&gt;
On the 20th of May 2025 the Working Sheep met for the first time and shared their current progress, you can find the presentation slides [[:File:20250520 Meeting GMG Working group sheep.pdf|here.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On the 11&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;th&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; of November 2025 the Working Group Sheep had their second meeting, the current progress was shared and other projects and bottlenecks were discussed. You can find the presentation slides [[:File:20251111 Sheep Working Group GMG presentation.pdf|here.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Microbiome ====&lt;br /&gt;
On the 23th of May 2025 the Working Group Microbiome met for the first time and shared their current progress, you can find the presentation slides [[:File:202505 Global Meeting Genetics Microbiome working group meeting.pdf|here.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On the 27&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;th&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; of November 2025 the Working Group Microbiome had their second meeting, the current progress was shared and other projects and bottlenecks were discussed. You can find the presentation slides [[:File:20251127 GMG Microbiome WG presentation.pdf|here.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On the 2&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;nd&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; of December 2025 the Working group microbiome organized a Q&amp;amp;A session about microbiome sampling. You can find the slides [[:File:20251202 GMG meeting MicroHub Q&amp;amp;A.pdf|here.]] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Latin America ====&lt;br /&gt;
On the 5th of June 2025 the Working Group Latin America met for the first time and shared their current progress, you can find the presentation slides [[:File:202506 Presentation GMG Working Group Latin America meeting.pdf|here.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On the 14&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;th&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; of November 2025 the Working Group Latin America had their second meeting, the current progress was shared and other projects and bottlenecks were discussed. You can find the presentation slides [[:File:20251114 Latin America GMG Work group meeting.pdf|here.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Africa ====&lt;br /&gt;
On the 23th of May 2025 the Working Group Africa met for the first time and shared their current progress, you can find the presentation slides [[:File:20250523 GMG Working group Africa meeting.pdf|here.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On the 7&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;th&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; of November 2025 the Working Group Africa had their second meeting, the current progress was shared and other projects and bottlenecks were discussed. You can find the presentation slides [[:File:20251107 Africa Workgroup GMG presentation.pdf|here.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Beef ====&lt;br /&gt;
On the 17th of June 2025 the Working Group Beef met for the first time and shared their current progress, you can find the presentation slides [[:File:202506 GMG Working group Beef meeting.pdf|here.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On the 11&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;th&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; of November 2025 the Working Group Beef had their second meeting, the current progress was shared and other projects and bottlenecks were discussed. You can find the presentation slides [[:File:20251106 GMG Working group Beef meeting.pdf|here.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Asia ====&lt;br /&gt;
On the 1th of July 2025 the Working Group Asia met for the first time and shared their current progress, you can find the presentation slides [[:File:20250701 AsiaGMG presentation.pdf|here.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On the 25&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;th&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; of November the Working Group Asia organized a webinar for parties interested in contributing to the Asia group. You can find slides on data to impact [[:File:GMG Asia From data to impact.pdf|here]], an introduction into the GMG [[:File:Asia 20251105.pdf|here]], slides on methane recording techniques [[:File:2511 GMG Asia MethaneMethods.pdf|here]] and a presentation about [[Laser Methane Detector|LMD]] and their experiences from ILRI [[:File:ILRI LMD Exp 2025.pdf|here]]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Webinars ====&lt;br /&gt;
On the 22th of May 2025 there was a webinar for all GMG project participants on effective records in the database, you can find the presentation slides [[:File:250515 GMG meeting Dairy Working Group.pdf|here.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== DAFNE ==&lt;br /&gt;
Department of Agriculture and Forest Sciences at the University of Tuscia. Their main purpose is to collect primary emissions data from sniffers and GF to have emissions factors related to the species, breed, physiological state and diet management. They are engaged with ANAFIBJ and sharing data related to Holstein cattle with them for genetic evaluations. Currently they are running trials with sheep and buffalo.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Sheep ===&lt;br /&gt;
For this trial they are comparing 2 grazing methods using 2 groups of Sopravissana sheep, reared at the facility.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# Rotational, 18 sheep. Turns every 4 days on strip paddocks. 18 paddocks in total; 6 heads on 3 strip paddocks per turn of grazing. After 24 days the sheep are back to the first three strips.&lt;br /&gt;
# Continuous, 18 sheep. Continuous grazing on same paddock. 3 paddocks in total; 6 heads per paddock. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Subgroups for both group A and B (6 heads) are randomly arranged every day. The 18 strip paddocks are the same total size as the three continuous paddocks. They have the same number of heads grazing and the same live weight load.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Both groups are balanced for BW, receive the same hay in quantity and quality with ad libitum access and spend the same time at pasture. Daily sampling of the hay and residual per group is done, weekly sub samples of hay and residual are analyzed. In parallel fresh grass is sampled and analyzed to represent the 2 grazing methods. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The GreenFeed is located in the barn, at 9AM this barn is closed for group A and opens for group B and this switches every day. The GreenFeed is the only place they can get concentrates. Nutritional information for this concentrate can be found [[:File:Nutritional table sheep DAFHNE.docx|here]]. Amount of food and cup drops can be found here.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Trial started end of March 2025 and will last 1.5 months. They are using the GF adapted for small ruminants.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Buffalo ===&lt;br /&gt;
This is a continuous trial which will last 4 months per supplement tested. First they monitor the buffalo for 4 weeks without supplement as a control diet and then there will be an 8 week experimental period with the supplement diet. During the entire period the buffalo are confined to the barn. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The buffalo are separated in two groups, in adjacent pens. One group has access to a milking robot, with the MooLogger from [[Sniffer SOP|Tecnosens.]] The other pen has a conventional milking system and the GreenFeed is placed facing this pen.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
All buffaloes are fed the same concentrates. Nutritional information for this concentrate can be found [[:File:Nutritional table Buffalo DAFHNE.docx|here]]. Amount of food and cup drops can be found here. The buffalo’s in the GF group get the concentrates from the GF and about 1 kg of concentrates during milking operations. The buffalo’s in the sniffer group only get concentrates from the milking robot, which is about 2 kg/head/day.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To account for the emissions recorded individually at different times, they compare the emissions data aggregated on a daily basis. They are using the GF adapted for large ruminants with horns&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== MethaBreed ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:P-2025-1-15-2 FBF Logo MethaBreed Logo 01 4C-01 klein.png|thumb|170x170px]]&lt;br /&gt;
The MethaBreed project aims to improve the sustainability of dairy production by developing innovative breeding strategies for dairy cows that simultaneously reduce methane emissions, enhance feed efficiency, and support animal health. A large-scale longitudinal study is being conducted in commercial dairy herds. Using advanced technologies, individual cow traits are recorded across entire lactations and multiple lactation cycles. Data collection includes continuous monitoring of methane emissions using sniffers, feed intake (using CFIT: Cattle Feed Intake System), body weight (using CFIT and scales), and key health parameters. A particular focus lies on the role of the rumen microbiome in methane production. A central goal of MethaBreed is the development of a new breeding value for methane emissions, enabling the selection of animals with lower environmental impact. These data will be integrated with pedigree and genomic information to allow precise breeding decisions. At the same time, the existing breeding value for feed efficiency will be further refined. The outcomes of the project are expected to make a significant contribution towards more climate-friendly dairy production. In the long term, standardized breeding values will be provided, enabling breeding organizations and farmers to actively select for healthier, more efficient, and more sustainable dairy cows. For more information you can visit the following websites from the partners: [https://www.uni-giessen.de/de/fbz/fb09/institute/ith/ag-koenig/forschung/laufend/methabreed University Giessen], [https://www.fbf-forschung.de/aktuelles/methabreed-neues-forschungsprojekt-zur-reduzierung.html FBF], [https://livestock-functional-microbiology.uni-hohenheim.de/en/research-projects#jfmulticontent_c401477-2 University of Hohenheim.] Further partners are [https://www.vit.de/ vit] and [https://www.uni-kiel.de/de/aef/fakultaet/institute/tierzucht-tierhaltung University Kiel]. The project is funded by the German Federal Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Regional Identity on the basis of a resolution of the German Bundestag. The project management is carried out by the Federal Office for Agriculture and Food (BLE) within the framework of the Federal Programme for Livestock Farming. Funding reference numbers: 28KTF23C01–05.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== breed4green ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Logo B4G RZ RGB 1 Transparent.png|right|frameless|228x228px]]&lt;br /&gt;
Direct and indirect traits for feed efficiency and greenhouse gas emissions for breeding and herd management in cattle:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [https://www.rinderzucht.at/projekt/breed4green.html breed4green] project focuses on researching strategies to reduce methane emissions and enhance feed efficiency within the Austrian cattle industry. Measurements of methane and CO2 emissions are conducted on both experimental and commercial farms using the GreenFeed system. The aim of the project is to collect methane and CO2 measurements of approximately 1,000 Fleckvieh and 200 Brown Swiss cows. In addition, various phenotypes such as health, body weight, BCS, metabolism, energy intake and milk mid infrared (MIR) spectra are recorded. Data on feed intake from experimental farms are also available for validation. The genetic potential of direct traits like methane, CO2 and feed efficiency, along with their correlations to health and other traits, will be analyzed. The project also includes the development and validation of MIR equations for emitted methane and energy balance. The focus will be on investigating the use of these indirect traits to reduce methane emissions and improve feed efficiency in breeding programs to pave the way for genomic selection. The results will also be used to optimize herd management. Furthermore, the environmental impact of relevant dairy and beef production systems in Austria will be investigated.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Presentation materials ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Seminar by Julius van der Werf: Breeding for a changing climate 13-05-2025 ===&lt;br /&gt;
On the 13th of May Julius van de Werf gave a presentation at Wageningen Livestock Research on selection indexes for selecting low methane livestock, focused on sheep. You can find the slides [[:File:20250513 Seminar J.v.d.Werf.pdf|here]]. You can find the recording of the presentation below.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;youtube&amp;gt;PxKmxKVvVEA?si=C6x0keKAvgU009Da&amp;lt;/youtube&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Seminar by Maria Frizzarin: Introduction to milk mid-infrared spectroscopy 10-07-2025 ===&lt;br /&gt;
On the 10th of July Maria Frizzarin gave a presentation at Wageningen Livestock Research on milk mid-infrared spectroscopy, equations development, and applications. You can find the slides [[:File:10072025 Seminar Maria MIR.pdf|here.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Seminar by Sarah-Joe Burn: Breed4Green 25-09-2025 ===&lt;br /&gt;
On the 25th of September Sarah-Joe Burn gave a presentation at Wageningen Livestock Research on measuring methane emissions in commercial farms and establishing a comprehensive dataset for genetic studies. A similar presentations was given at EAAP 2025, you can find the slides to that presentation [[:File:Eaap2025-breed4green-linke.pdf|here]] and the abstract [[:File:2025 Innsbruck EAAP Book Abstracts.pdf|here]], page 250.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Joint ICAR Feed&amp;amp;Gas and ASGGN workshop ===&lt;br /&gt;
On the 5th of October the joint workshop between the [https://www.icar.org/group/working-group-feed-and-gas/ ICAR Feed&amp;amp;Gas working group] and the [https://www.asggn.org/ ASGGN] took place before the GGAA conference in Nairobi. The presentations can be found below. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[:File:2025 ASGGN - GGAA - A Taste of the Future Buccal Swabbing for Rumen Microbial ProfilingTB.pdf|A Taste of the Future: Buccal Swabbing for Rumen Microbial Profiling]]​. Presented by Ben Perry ([https://www.bioeconomyscience.co.nz/ NZIBS])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[:File:2638 Booker ILRI GGAA ASGGN Oct 2025.pdf|Rate of Genetic Gain for Methane Emissions in a Maternal Production Flock]]. Presented by Fem Booker ([https://www.bioeconomyscience.co.nz/ NZIBS])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[:File:Boris ICAR2025 v01.pdf|Association between rumen and faecal microbiome and enteric methane emissions in dairy cattle]]. Presented by Boris Sepulveda ([https://agriculture.vic.gov.au/ AV])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[:File:CaeliRichardson GGAA Workshop 2025.pdf|Global Framework to Monitor, Measure, and Account for Methane Reductions from Genetic Selection]]. Presented by Caeli Richardson ([https://abacusbio.com/ Abacusbio])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[:File:GGAA Workshop ICAR and ASGGN Ida Storm.pdf|Danish Perspectives on implementation of GHG regulation]]. Presented by Ida Storm ([https://agricultureandfood.dk/ DAFG])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[:File:GGAA Workshop ICAR and ASGGN Rasmus Stephansen.pdf|Experience with CH4 sniffers, what have we learned so far?]] Presented by Rasmus Stephansen ([https://international.au.dk/ AU])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[:File:GGAA workshop MIR methane presentation.pdf|Overview of the methane equations developed from mid-infrared spectroscopy and their applications.]] Presented by Maria Frizzarin ([https://www.agroscope.admin.ch/agroscope/en/home.html Agroscope])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[:File:HanneHonerlagen ICARpresentation.pdf|Adding microbial data to enhance breeding for lower methane emissions]]. Presented by Hanne Honerlagen ([https://www.wur.nl/en/research-results/chair-groups/animal-sciences/animal-breeding-and-genomics-group.htm WUR-ABG])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[:File:McNaughton ASGGN Workshop final.pdf|GreenFeed for phenotyping – our experiences]]. Presented by Lorna McNaughton ([https://www.lic.co.nz/ LIC])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[:File:MIE ILRI GGAA ASGGN Oct 2025.pdf|Methane Index Explorer: Optimising a Breeding Value Format for Simultaneous Inclusion of Enteric Methane Emissions in Breeding Schemes and National Inventories]]. Presented by Pavithra Ariyarathne ([https://www.bioeconomyscience.co.nz/ NZIBS])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[:File:RiccardoGGAA Presentation RB.pdf|ZELP sense]]. Presented by Riccardo Bica ([https://www.zelp.co/ ZELP])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[:File:ICAR Working group Nairobi 5 Oct2025.pdf|Selection for lower methane livestock, selection index considerations]]. Presented by Julius van der Werf (UNE)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Measuring enteric methane in beef and dairy cattle using PAC. Presented by Timothy Bilton ([https://www.bioeconomyscience.co.nz/ NZIBS])&amp;lt;youtube&amp;gt;https://youtu.be/NjPuotrmkMQ&amp;lt;/youtube&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Estimating methane emissions with the GreenFeed System. Presented by Paul Smith ([https://teagasc.ie/ Teagasc]) &amp;lt;youtube&amp;gt;https://youtu.be/TnHefWoP29I&amp;lt;/youtube&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Cvangemert</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://wiki.icar.org/index.php?title=File:Logo_B4G_RZ_RGB_1_Transparent.png&amp;diff=4833</id>
		<title>File:Logo B4G RZ RGB 1 Transparent.png</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://wiki.icar.org/index.php?title=File:Logo_B4G_RZ_RGB_1_Transparent.png&amp;diff=4833"/>
		<updated>2026-01-20T09:02:32Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Cvangemert: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;breed4green logo&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Cvangemert</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://wiki.icar.org/index.php?title=Section_20:_Activities&amp;diff=4831</id>
		<title>Section 20: Activities</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://wiki.icar.org/index.php?title=Section_20:_Activities&amp;diff=4831"/>
		<updated>2026-01-07T09:05:29Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Cvangemert: added further partners and funding body for MethaBreed&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;big&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;b&amp;gt;NOTE: This version of Section 20 has been approved by the working group&#039;s Chair.  Please be aware that further revisions may occur before final review and approval by the Board and ICAR members per the [[Approval of Page Process]].&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/b&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
== Global Methane Genetics ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:GMG label.png|right|frameless|300x300px]]&lt;br /&gt;
The Global Methane Genetics (GMG) initiative is a global program to accelerate genetic progress in methane emission in ruminants in the Global North and South. This WUR-ABG coordinated initiative is funded by the [https://www.globalmethanehub.org/ Global Methane Hub] and the [https://www.bezosearthfund.org/ Bezos Earth Fund,] both based on philanthropic funds to support methane mitigation and prevent global warming. If you have questions about the [https://www.wur.nl/en/project/global-methane-genetics-initiative.htm GMG initiative] you can send an email to gmg@wur.nl, contact Roel Veerkamp: roel.veerkamp@wur.nl or Birgit Gredler-Grandl: birgit.gredler-grandl@wur.nl.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The initiative holds the following projects:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== &#039;&#039;&#039;Dairy Cattle&#039;&#039;&#039; ===&lt;br /&gt;
We can look to nature to reduce CH4 emissions and use genetic diversity to provide solutions. Genetic improvement, based on identifying animals with genetic predisposition for lower CH4 output and using them to breed for the next generations, is a reliable, cost-effective, and permanent method for transforming livestock&#039;s impact on the environment.  Breeding programs in dairy cattle are run within breeds and across countries. Therefore, the program will accelerate genetic progress by focusing on four major dairy breeds and organizations and countries involved in those breeds. Additionally, the program will acquire considerable leverage through investments in these countries. If you have questions about the dairy cattle section you can contact Birgit Gredler-Grandl: birgit.gredler-grandl@wur.nl.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== &#039;&#039;Holstein breed&#039;&#039; ====&lt;br /&gt;
The largest data collection has been for the Holstein breed, but there is a lack of standardization and protocols in terms of equipment and its utilization (farm level, data processing, data sharing agreements, genetic evaluations, and data collections). Governments and breeding organizations in Denmark and the Netherlands will collaborate and collect methane and genotypes on more than 20,000 Holstein cows for the GMG database. Also, Poland and Italy team up to collect data for the GMG database, and their aim is also to collect more than 20,000 Holstein animals and develop genetic evaluations across a wide range of systems.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===== Denmark-The Netherlands =====&lt;br /&gt;
This collaboration between Aarhus University and Wageningen Livestock Research has five main goals. The contact person for questions about this project is Trine Villumsen: tmv@qgg.au.dk.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Setting up Standard Operating Procedures (SOP) for measuring methane using sniffers&lt;br /&gt;
* Setting up international protocols to measure methane on commercial farms&lt;br /&gt;
* Develop software tools to automate the processing of data into a phenotype&lt;br /&gt;
* Combine historical data in both countries for genetic evaluations&lt;br /&gt;
* Measure enteric methane in 20.000 new cows.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===== Poland-Italy =====&lt;br /&gt;
This collaboration has the following main goals. The contact person for questions about this project is Raffaella Finocchiaro raffaellafinocchiaro@anafibj.it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Measure enteric methane in 20.000 new cows.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== &#039;&#039;Jersey breed&#039;&#039; ====&lt;br /&gt;
Currently, due to the limited data available, the Jersey dairy breed does not have breeding values for methane (CH4) mitigation. The goal of the program is to collect methane genotypes in Canada and Denmark and share this information with the GMG database. The aim is to develop breeding values that will be distributed through the World Jersey Cattle Bureau organization and national Jersey organizations in Australia, Canada, Switzerland, Denmark, France, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands, and New Zealand. If you have questions about the Jersey breed section you can contact Rasmus Bak Stephansen rasmus.stephansen@qgg.au.dk&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== &#039;&#039;Brown Swiss breed&#039;&#039; ====&lt;br /&gt;
The Brown Swiss (BS) breed faces significant challenges due to its small population size, an divers environments the animals are kept. A collaboration between Germany, Switzerland, and Austria to phenotype enough animals is a prerequisite for utilizing the genetic potential of reducing methane emission of the BS breed. In addition to a population of 250 cows recorded with Greenfeed, and 1250 with the sniffer, progress will be accelerated by recording an additional 3,360 cows with sniffers. If you have questions about the Brown Swiss breed section you can contact Elena Frenken: fe@fbf-forschung.de.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== &#039;&#039;Red breeds&#039;&#039; ====&lt;br /&gt;
The red breeds are important for crossbreeding in many countries around the world. The project aims to share and collect CH4 data from Red Dairy Cattle (RDC) breeds (in the Nordic countries, Canada, and the United Kingdom (UK)) and share it with the Global Methane Genetics (GMG) Hub. Together, they will set up a shared genetic evaluation for bulls used for crossbreeding in many more countries. If you have questions about the Red breed section you can contact Elisenda Rius-Vilarrasa: Elisenda.Rius-Vilarrasa@vxa.se.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== &#039;&#039;&#039;Beef Cattle&#039;&#039;&#039; ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== &#039;&#039;Bluegrass (global beef)&#039;&#039; ====&lt;br /&gt;
All industries world-wide have been challenged with reducing emissions and beef is no exception. Genetic selection and specifically genomic selection have been identified as key tools to help meet this challenge. Methane emissions are not a local problem, but a global one and several major beef producing countries who exchange genetic material have, are, and will be collecting methane phenotypes for the purpose of genomic prediction. Individually (including those in Australia), these datasets will be limited in their genomic prediction accuracy. The BLUEGRASS alliance will bring together the key players globally, who collectively have solicited key seed funding from the Global Methane Hub. By sharing data and resources, the development of necessary reference populations will be accelerated. Locally or globally, success in the beef genetics industry has been a model of ‘co-opetition’. Breeders, although competitors, pool resources to build tools that can be used by all to compete with one another. This BLUEGRASS alliance is no different. A global alliance will come together to address this challenge, with or without Australia. Having Australia lead and ignite the alliance with MDC co-funding will create opportunities to direct this global initiative and provide first mover advantages for Australian breeders.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The program is focused on building genomic reference datasets for the main beef breeds in the collaborating countries. The animals to be recorded will be intensively recorded for other production traits, and genotyped, outside this project itself. In each country, trial or research breeding values will be produced and delivered to industry during the life of the project – enabling genetic selection against methane to get underway, and the data will underpin the ability to genomically screen the entire populations of the breeds involved in the respective countries i.e. all seedstock and commercial animals. The data collected will likely assist development of genomic selection against methane in other countries. The accelerated genetic selection and the commercial animal screening will enable real impact to reduce methane from beef cattle. If you have questions about the bluegrass project specifically, you can contact Steve Miller, steve.miller@une.edu.au &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===== Number of phenotypes =====&lt;br /&gt;
This project will phenotype methane traits in beef cattle populations in the US, Australia, the UK, Ireland, and New Zealand. Around 18.500 phenotypes will be collected over all years and countries. It is estimated that around 7.000 phenotypes will be collected in Australia, around 1.600 in New Zealand, around 800 in the UK, around 2.000 in Ireland and around 7.00 in the USA.&lt;br /&gt;
===== Breeds and traits included =====&lt;br /&gt;
All countries included in the Bluegrass project have different breeds and different target traits included in their measurements, besides the methane phenotypes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Australia will focus on Angus and Hereford seedstock with a research population of Angus, Wagyu, Charolais, Shorthorn and Brahman being a target as well. For the seedstock they will focus on seedstock traits plus methane measurements using PAC measures. For the research populations on seedstock traits plus feed intake, carcass as well as methane measurements with PAC.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For New Zealand priority is the progeny test herds. These are mostly Angus, Hereford and their crosses, including a diallel cross design. Some Angus x Simmental. Complete requirements with seedstock herds of Angus and Hereford. Focus is on the following: progeny test, seedstock traits, conception date (via fetal aging) from natural mate at yearling (then re-breeding), carcass grading on steers, feed intake on heifers, rumen microbiome on steers and heifers, seedstock traits from seedstock herds&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For the UK focus lies on Angus and Hereford sired animals, both pedigree and crossbred (including from dairy dams) and they focus on liveweights.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For Ireland they include multi-breed/crossbreed. 30% Charolais and Limousin sired from Continental type suckler dams, 30% Holstein-Friesian and 40% beef (mostly Angus) cross dairy. They will focus on feed intake, liveweight and carcass data.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The USA will be measuring Angus focused on seedstock traits from seedstock herds.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== &#039;&#039;US beef&#039;&#039; ====&lt;br /&gt;
This project will accelerate genetic selection for reduced methane emissions from U.S. and Canadian beef cattle, through phenotyping and genotyping the 18 most influential beef breeds in North America.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The primary activities of this project will center on phenotyping and genetic evaluation of the Germplasm Evaluation (GPE) herd, a large, multibreed resource population at the U.S. Meat Animal Research Center (USMARC) in Nebraska, USA. This herd is structured to represent the genetic diversity of the 18 most influential beef breeds in the U.S.. These 18 breeds are: Angus, Red Angus, Hereford, South Devon, Shorthorn, Beefmaster, Brangus, Brahman, Santa Gertrudis, Braunvieh, ChiAngus, Charolais, Gelbvieh, Limousin, Maine-Anjou, Salers, Simmental, Tarentaise.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Recording of methane phenotypes will occur using multiple approaches to not only maximize the number of phenotypes collected, but to also offer a comparison between methodologies within a U.S. beef production system. Based on these findings and in coordination with other GMG project teams, standard operating procedures for methane phenotyping of beef cattle will be developed and integrated into the [https://beefimprovement.org/resource-center/bif-guidelines/ Guidelines for Uniform Beef Improvement Programs] supporting the evolution of these approaches into standard practice and routine evaluation in any beef breeding system. If you have questions about the US beef project specifically, you can contact Matthew Spangler, mspangler2@unl.edu.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===== Main goals =====&lt;br /&gt;
* Recording methane phenotypes from at least 5,500 multi-breed genotyped beef cattle and openly sharing to the GMG database and the public domain.&lt;br /&gt;
* Development and publication of uniform guidelines for both methane phenotyping in beef cattle systems and the integration of methane phenotypes into beef genetic evaluations, through the BIF Guidelines wiki.&lt;br /&gt;
* Dissemination and routine updating of genetic parameter and genomic marker effects critical for the development of genetic selection tools and deployment of methane-reducing breeding programs.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== &#039;&#039;&#039;Sheep&#039;&#039;&#039; ===&lt;br /&gt;
This project focusses on recording methane phenotypes on animals in various populations, e.g. Merino, Texel, Dohne, Corriedale, maternal and terminal. In each case, those animals will be recorded for a range of other production, health, product quality and welfare traits (the exact suite of traits varies between countries). This ensures that it will be possible to determine the genetic relationships between methane traits and the other traits included in current and future selection indexes and breeding programs – meaning that breeders will be able to make informed decisions on any trade-offs between methane and other traits. In total around 16.600 methane phenotypes will be collected over all years and countries. It is estimated that around 7.500 methane phenotypes will be collected in Australia, 3.000 in Uruguay, 4.000 in New Zealand, 1.200 in the UK and 1.000 in the UK. If you have questions about the sheep project specifically, you can contact Daniel Brown, dbrown2@une.edu.au &lt;br /&gt;
==== Main goals ====&lt;br /&gt;
* Phenotyping and reference populations. Fast tracked phenotyping and  genotyping up to 16,000 records of methane traits across the key countries to facilitate accurate international evaluation of animals (Table 2).&lt;br /&gt;
* Genetic evaluation and models. Breeding values based on international genomic evaluation models to share the benefits of the established reference populations.&lt;br /&gt;
* Proxies. Development and validation of new phenotyping methods to expedite genetic progress.&lt;br /&gt;
* Breeding Programs. Whole farm system models to incorporate methane into breeding objectives in a balanced way and indexes to facilitate selection of breeding candidates.&lt;br /&gt;
* Education and adoption. Stakeholder engagement campaign and international development to ensure world-wide impact.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== &#039;&#039;&#039;Africa&#039;&#039;&#039; ===&lt;br /&gt;
This project focused on three regions of Africa (Eastern, Western and Southern Africa). It will will leverage and  accelerate on-going early research on GHG in these regions, strongly build capacity and team up with researchers to record CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, other economic productive traits and use the records to implement breeding strategies to reduce CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; emission while simultaneously enhancing productivity, food security and employment opportunities in the dairy and beef cattle farming systems; The source of livelihood for many poorly resourced farmers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Tapping into the existing breeding program infrastructure for improved productivity for dairy cattle in the three regions of Africa, this project will result in overall program that will accelerate genetic progress through focus on phenotyping, genotyping and the use of information from the microbiome in the genetic selection of animals in the smallholder dairy system. The overall impact will be better mitigation of negative effects of climate change and more productive cows. Through selection programs based on the index developed with the phenotypic and genomic information from this project.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The major activities include the direct CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; measurements on about 1.655 tropical cattle using [[Greenfeed SOP|GreenFeed]] and the use of [[Laser Methane Detector|LMD]] in smallholder farmers. Genotypic information and phenotypes captured routinely on major important productive traits that influence profitability, income and livelihood of farmers on 1.619 animals. Data sets will be linked to a larger existing data on 9.000 cows with phenotypic and genotypic information from existing projects. If you have questions about the Africa project specifically, you can contact Raphael Mrode, raphael.mrode@sruc.ac.uk&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Main goals ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Methane measurements available on 1.655 tropical cows.&lt;br /&gt;
* Tissue samples and genotypes available on 1.619 tropical cows.&lt;br /&gt;
* Genetic relationship between dairy cows in Western and Eastern Africa estimated.&lt;br /&gt;
* Multi-trait genomic analysis of dairy data and methane in Eastern Africa.&lt;br /&gt;
* Incorporate existing data on over 9.000 cows from existing research projects to enhance genomic prediction.&lt;br /&gt;
* Computation and the roll out of final selection index or sub-indexes developed for improved efficiency - reduced CH4 emission, lower maintenance requirement and increased milk production.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== &#039;&#039;&#039;Latin America&#039;&#039;&#039; ===&lt;br /&gt;
The aim of this project is to accelerate the reduction of enteric methane emissions in beef cattle in Latin America through genetic selection in key breeds relevant to Argentina, Brazil, Uruguay, and Mexico. The focus will be on phenotyping methane emissions and genotyping animals linked to existing genetic improvement programs. Reference populations for genomic selection will be the basis to improve the estimation of genetic merit and select for lower emission. The link with ongoing genetic improvement programs provides data on other economically relevant production traits, thus making it possible to estimate genetic correlations and optimize methane emission reductions with a minimum impact on livestock productivity. This approach minimizes negative impacts on food production while preserving economic, social, and environmental sustainability of beef cattle farming. This collaborative project between national agricultural research institutes (NARI) is supported by breeders’ associations and other key stakeholders. Public-private partnerships and collaborative efforts will scale genetic evaluation for methane emissions as well as the use of lower methane emission genetics on commercial farms. Phenotypic and genomic data from approximately 7.000 animals will be made globally available. In synergy with other projects, it will be possible to increase the size of reference populations leading to an even greater impact on methane emissions mitigation. If you have questions about the Latin America project specifically, you can contact Elly Navajas, enavajas@inia.org.uy&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For developing methane emission phenotyping platforms and reference populations, it is essential to upgrade methane emission recording equipment as well as standardize and coordinate the measurement of animals. Standardized protocols will be developed in collaboration with ICAR, and the criteria for selecting animals to be measured and genotyped will be established by the research team, including technicians from breeder associations. A critical component of the project involves genetic analyses, such as estimating genetic parameters for methane emission-related traits, validating breeding values in additional populations, and evaluating the impact of selecting for reduced methane emissions. Scientific collaboration will be fostered with other beef cattle projects, focusing on areas such as expertise exchange. Communication strategies will be implemented to engage stakeholders, including breeders, artificial insemination centers, policymakers, and other private stakeholders. Dialogue with teams managing greenhouse gas (GHG) inventories and Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs) will also be enhanced. These activities require active collaboration among countries and stakeholders in Latin America to achieve successful outcomes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Main goals ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* A Latin American collaborative network for accelerating genetic improvement for methane emissions reduction is established by NARIs, universities, breeder societies, and private stakeholders engaged in genetic evaluation programs across South America and Mexico. &lt;br /&gt;
* Methane emission phenotyping platforms are implemented, enabling data collection across key beef cattle breeds, targeting 7.000 methane emission phenotypes and genotypes of animals linked to genetic evaluations. &lt;br /&gt;
* Genomic-enhanced estimated breeding values for methane emissions will be available to breeders: based on pure-breed and multi-breed reference populations enhanced through collaboration and data sharing across beef cattle projects within the GMG initiative. &lt;br /&gt;
* The economic and environmental impact of breeding strategies to reduce methane emissions is assessed, to identify the most promising breeding strategies to accelerate methane emission reduction. The development of breeding objectives combining methane emission reduction with production goals will support policy and incentives for breeders and farmers to overcome adoption barriers and integrate the results into national GHG inventories. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== &#039;&#039;&#039;Microbiome&#039;&#039;&#039; ===&lt;br /&gt;
The micro-HUB project will establish a reference population with metagenome and genotype data, and create a genomic evaluation system that can be used to select the parents of the next generation with microbiome profiles that produce less enteric methane while maintaining genetic progress in profit and health. The genomic evaluation system will be widely open, will target most relevant breeds and production systems. Furthermore, a large global microbiome network will be established to collect existing data and knowledge and ensure knowledge transfer. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This project will start with metagenome and genomic data on 5.430 individuals from the core project partners, we will explore the opportunity to extend and expand our reference population to other countries with suitable data. By combining national data sets with genotypes, microbiome and methane information, we aim to create the largest rumen microbiome reference population globally. We aim to enlarge the reference population by more than 20.000 microbiome sequenced dairy and beef cattle as well as sheep from the Global Methane Genetics (GMG) program. From this, we will facilitate the delivery of genomic breeding values that can be used in global breeding programs to select for a microbiome composition with lower emissions and reduce the abundance of methanogenic pathways in the rumen microbiome of future generations of cattle and sheep. The project partners cover beef, dairy and sheep populations and creates an opportunity to identify a core microbiome (or set of cores) that can be used as a reference for nation-based breeding programs. The project will closely connect to the other projects within the Global Methane Program, to facilitate microbiome sampling, sequencing and genomic analysis. If you have questions about the microbiome project specifically, you can contact Oscar Gonzalez-Recio, oscar.gonzalezrecio@ed.ac.uk&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Activities ====&lt;br /&gt;
To enlarge the national database partners will obtain additional samples from animals with methane and genotype data from different breeds and production systems within the GMG phenotyping program (dairy and beef cattle). The inclusion of samples from external partners will be encouraged. Partners (also external) will be provided with instruction to collect data and sample rumen microbiome. The micro-Hub will provide stewardship for GMG partners regarding sampling, storage and shipping, as well as bioinformatic analysis. Rumen metagenome sequencing will be centralized in as fewer labs as possible (ideally only one).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Reference populations from partners will be combined, covering a broad range of breeds and productions systems and different geographical regions. Format of the databases will be unified. The combined dataset will be used for the microbiome genomic evaluations. The reference database will be updated with additional data coming from external partners. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We will develop the capabilities to estimate the genomic breeding value for microbiome composition for any genotyped animal in similar productive conditions as those represented in our reference population. The goal is to propose recommendations based on own experience to include estimated genomic breeding values for rumen microbiome profile in breeding programs. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The project will contribute to the activities organized within Global Methane Genetics and the ICAR Feed&amp;amp;Gas working group in building a microbiome network to exchange knowledge, harmonize guidelines and develop protocols. All data generated within the project will be made available through the Global Methane Genetics database. The project will collaborate with the database development to develop microbiome sharing requirements and specifications. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Main goals ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Joint reference metagenome compiled.&lt;br /&gt;
* Microbiome genomic evaluations.&lt;br /&gt;
* Release of SNP coefficients for international genomic evaluations for microbiome compositions.&lt;br /&gt;
* Network building and establishment of platform for rumen metagenome data.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== &#039;&#039;&#039;Working Group meetings&#039;&#039;&#039; ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The six working groups as described above meet two times a year to discuss the progress of their projects and to share knowledge. There are also general webinars organized for the project participants throughout the years.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Dairy Cattle ====&lt;br /&gt;
On the 15th of May 2025 the Working Group Dairy cattle met for the first time and shared their current progress, you can find the presentation slides [[:File:250515 GMG meeting Dairy Working Group.pdf|here.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On the 27&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;th&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; of October 2025 the Working Group Cattle had their second meeting, the current progress was shared and other projects and bottlenecks were discussed. You can find the presentation slides [[:File:20251027 GMG Working group Dairy meeting.pdf|here.]] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Sheep ====&lt;br /&gt;
On the 20th of May 2025 the Working Sheep met for the first time and shared their current progress, you can find the presentation slides [[:File:20250520 Meeting GMG Working group sheep.pdf|here.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On the 11&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;th&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; of November 2025 the Working Group Sheep had their second meeting, the current progress was shared and other projects and bottlenecks were discussed. You can find the presentation slides [[:File:20251111 Sheep Working Group GMG presentation.pdf|here.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Microbiome ====&lt;br /&gt;
On the 23th of May 2025 the Working Group Microbiome met for the first time and shared their current progress, you can find the presentation slides [[:File:202505 Global Meeting Genetics Microbiome working group meeting.pdf|here.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On the 27&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;th&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; of November 2025 the Working Group Microbiome had their second meeting, the current progress was shared and other projects and bottlenecks were discussed. You can find the presentation slides [[:File:20251127 GMG Microbiome WG presentation.pdf|here.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On the 2&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;nd&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; of December 2025 the Working group microbiome organized a Q&amp;amp;A session about microbiome sampling. You can find the slides [[:File:20251202 GMG meeting MicroHub Q&amp;amp;A.pdf|here.]] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Latin America ====&lt;br /&gt;
On the 5th of June 2025 the Working Group Latin America met for the first time and shared their current progress, you can find the presentation slides [[:File:202506 Presentation GMG Working Group Latin America meeting.pdf|here.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On the 14&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;th&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; of November 2025 the Working Group Latin America had their second meeting, the current progress was shared and other projects and bottlenecks were discussed. You can find the presentation slides [[:File:20251114 Latin America GMG Work group meeting.pdf|here.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Africa ====&lt;br /&gt;
On the 23th of May 2025 the Working Group Africa met for the first time and shared their current progress, you can find the presentation slides [[:File:20250523 GMG Working group Africa meeting.pdf|here.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On the 7&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;th&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; of November 2025 the Working Group Africa had their second meeting, the current progress was shared and other projects and bottlenecks were discussed. You can find the presentation slides [[:File:20251107 Africa Workgroup GMG presentation.pdf|here.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Beef ====&lt;br /&gt;
On the 17th of June 2025 the Working Group Beef met for the first time and shared their current progress, you can find the presentation slides [[:File:202506 GMG Working group Beef meeting.pdf|here.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On the 11&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;th&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; of November 2025 the Working Group Beef had their second meeting, the current progress was shared and other projects and bottlenecks were discussed. You can find the presentation slides [[:File:20251106 GMG Working group Beef meeting.pdf|here.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Asia ====&lt;br /&gt;
On the 1th of July 2025 the Working Group Asia met for the first time and shared their current progress, you can find the presentation slides [[:File:20250701 AsiaGMG presentation.pdf|here.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On the 25&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;th&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; of November the Working Group Asia organized a webinar for parties interested in contributing to the Asia group. You can find slides on data to impact [[:File:GMG Asia From data to impact.pdf|here]], an introduction into the GMG [[:File:Asia 20251105.pdf|here]], slides on methane recording techniques [[:File:2511 GMG Asia MethaneMethods.pdf|here]] and a presentation about [[Laser Methane Detector|LMD]] and their experiences from ILRI [[:File:ILRI LMD Exp 2025.pdf|here]]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Webinars ====&lt;br /&gt;
On the 22th of May 2025 there was a webinar for all GMG project participants on effective records in the database, you can find the presentation slides [[:File:250515 GMG meeting Dairy Working Group.pdf|here.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== DAFNE ==&lt;br /&gt;
Department of Agriculture and Forest Sciences at the University of Tuscia. Their main purpose is to collect primary emissions data from sniffers and GF to have emissions factors related to the species, breed, physiological state and diet management. They are engaged with ANAFIBJ and sharing data related to Holstein cattle with them for genetic evaluations. Currently they are running trials with sheep and buffalo.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Sheep ===&lt;br /&gt;
For this trial they are comparing 2 grazing methods using 2 groups of Sopravissana sheep, reared at the facility.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# Rotational, 18 sheep. Turns every 4 days on strip paddocks. 18 paddocks in total; 6 heads on 3 strip paddocks per turn of grazing. After 24 days the sheep are back to the first three strips.&lt;br /&gt;
# Continuous, 18 sheep. Continuous grazing on same paddock. 3 paddocks in total; 6 heads per paddock. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Subgroups for both group A and B (6 heads) are randomly arranged every day. The 18 strip paddocks are the same total size as the three continuous paddocks. They have the same number of heads grazing and the same live weight load.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Both groups are balanced for BW, receive the same hay in quantity and quality with ad libitum access and spend the same time at pasture. Daily sampling of the hay and residual per group is done, weekly sub samples of hay and residual are analyzed. In parallel fresh grass is sampled and analyzed to represent the 2 grazing methods. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The GreenFeed is located in the barn, at 9AM this barn is closed for group A and opens for group B and this switches every day. The GreenFeed is the only place they can get concentrates. Nutritional information for this concentrate can be found [[:File:Nutritional table sheep DAFHNE.docx|here]]. Amount of food and cup drops can be found here.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Trial started end of March 2025 and will last 1.5 months. They are using the GF adapted for small ruminants.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Buffalo ===&lt;br /&gt;
This is a continuous trial which will last 4 months per supplement tested. First they monitor the buffalo for 4 weeks without supplement as a control diet and then there will be an 8 week experimental period with the supplement diet. During the entire period the buffalo are confined to the barn. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The buffalo are separated in two groups, in adjacent pens. One group has access to a milking robot, with the MooLogger from [[Sniffer SOP|Tecnosens.]] The other pen has a conventional milking system and the GreenFeed is placed facing this pen.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
All buffaloes are fed the same concentrates. Nutritional information for this concentrate can be found [[:File:Nutritional table Buffalo DAFHNE.docx|here]]. Amount of food and cup drops can be found here. The buffalo’s in the GF group get the concentrates from the GF and about 1 kg of concentrates during milking operations. The buffalo’s in the sniffer group only get concentrates from the milking robot, which is about 2 kg/head/day.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To account for the emissions recorded individually at different times, they compare the emissions data aggregated on a daily basis. They are using the GF adapted for large ruminants with horns&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== MethaBreed ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:P-2025-1-15-2 FBF Logo MethaBreed Logo 01 4C-01 klein.png|thumb|170x170px]]&lt;br /&gt;
The MethaBreed project aims to improve the sustainability of dairy production by developing innovative breeding strategies for dairy cows that simultaneously reduce methane emissions, enhance feed efficiency, and support animal health. A large-scale longitudinal study is being conducted in commercial dairy herds. Using advanced technologies, individual cow traits are recorded across entire lactations and multiple lactation cycles. Data collection includes continuous monitoring of methane emissions using sniffers, feed intake (using CFIT: Cattle Feed Intake System), body weight (using CFIT and scales), and key health parameters. A particular focus lies on the role of the rumen microbiome in methane production. A central goal of MethaBreed is the development of a new breeding value for methane emissions, enabling the selection of animals with lower environmental impact. These data will be integrated with pedigree and genomic information to allow precise breeding decisions. At the same time, the existing breeding value for feed efficiency will be further refined. The outcomes of the project are expected to make a significant contribution towards more climate-friendly dairy production. In the long term, standardized breeding values will be provided, enabling breeding organizations and farmers to actively select for healthier, more efficient, and more sustainable dairy cows. For more information you can visit the following websites from the partners: [https://www.uni-giessen.de/de/fbz/fb09/institute/ith/ag-koenig/forschung/laufend/methabreed University Giessen], [https://www.fbf-forschung.de/aktuelles/methabreed-neues-forschungsprojekt-zur-reduzierung.html FBF], [https://livestock-functional-microbiology.uni-hohenheim.de/en/research-projects#jfmulticontent_c401477-2 University of Hohenheim.] Further partners are [https://www.vit.de/ vit] and [https://www.uni-kiel.de/de/aef/fakultaet/institute/tierzucht-tierhaltung University Kiel]. The project is funded by the German Federal Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Regional Identity on the basis of a resolution of the German Bundestag. The project management is carried out by the Federal Office for Agriculture and Food (BLE) within the framework of the Federal Programme for Livestock Farming. Funding reference numbers: 28KTF23C01–05.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Presentation materials ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Seminar by Julius van der Werf: Breeding for a changing climate 13-05-2025 ===&lt;br /&gt;
On the 13th of May Julius van de Werf gave a presentation at Wageningen Livestock Research on selection indexes for selecting low methane livestock, focused on sheep. You can find the slides [[:File:20250513 Seminar J.v.d.Werf.pdf|here]]. You can find the recording of the presentation below.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;youtube&amp;gt;PxKmxKVvVEA?si=C6x0keKAvgU009Da&amp;lt;/youtube&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Seminar by Maria Frizzarin: Introduction to milk mid-infrared spectroscopy 10-07-2025 ===&lt;br /&gt;
On the 10th of July Maria Frizzarin gave a presentation at Wageningen Livestock Research on milk mid-infrared spectroscopy, equations development, and applications. You can find the slides [[:File:10072025 Seminar Maria MIR.pdf|here.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Seminar by Sarah-Joe Burn: Breed4Green 25-09-2025 ===&lt;br /&gt;
On the 25th of September Sarah-Joe Burn gave a presentation at Wageningen Livestock Research on measuring methane emissions in commercial farms and establishing a comprehensive dataset for genetic studies. A similar presentations was given at EAAP 2025, you can find the slides to that presentation [[:File:Eaap2025-breed4green-linke.pdf|here]] and the abstract [[:File:2025 Innsbruck EAAP Book Abstracts.pdf|here]], page 250.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Joint ICAR Feed&amp;amp;Gas and ASGGN workshop ===&lt;br /&gt;
On the 5th of October the joint workshop between the [https://www.icar.org/group/working-group-feed-and-gas/ ICAR Feed&amp;amp;Gas working group] and the [https://www.asggn.org/ ASGGN] took place before the GGAA conference in Nairobi. The presentations can be found below. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[:File:2025 ASGGN - GGAA - A Taste of the Future Buccal Swabbing for Rumen Microbial ProfilingTB.pdf|A Taste of the Future: Buccal Swabbing for Rumen Microbial Profiling]]​. Presented by Ben Perry ([https://www.bioeconomyscience.co.nz/ NZIBS])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[:File:2638 Booker ILRI GGAA ASGGN Oct 2025.pdf|Rate of Genetic Gain for Methane Emissions in a Maternal Production Flock]]. Presented by Fem Booker ([https://www.bioeconomyscience.co.nz/ NZIBS])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[:File:Boris ICAR2025 v01.pdf|Association between rumen and faecal microbiome and enteric methane emissions in dairy cattle]]. Presented by Boris Sepulveda ([https://agriculture.vic.gov.au/ AV])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[:File:CaeliRichardson GGAA Workshop 2025.pdf|Global Framework to Monitor, Measure, and Account for Methane Reductions from Genetic Selection]]. Presented by Caeli Richardson ([https://abacusbio.com/ Abacusbio])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[:File:GGAA Workshop ICAR and ASGGN Ida Storm.pdf|Danish Perspectives on implementation of GHG regulation]]. Presented by Ida Storm ([https://agricultureandfood.dk/ DAFG])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[:File:GGAA Workshop ICAR and ASGGN Rasmus Stephansen.pdf|Experience with CH4 sniffers, what have we learned so far?]] Presented by Rasmus Stephansen ([https://international.au.dk/ AU])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[:File:GGAA workshop MIR methane presentation.pdf|Overview of the methane equations developed from mid-infrared spectroscopy and their applications.]] Presented by Maria Frizzarin ([https://www.agroscope.admin.ch/agroscope/en/home.html Agroscope])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[:File:HanneHonerlagen ICARpresentation.pdf|Adding microbial data to enhance breeding for lower methane emissions]]. Presented by Hanne Honerlagen ([https://www.wur.nl/en/research-results/chair-groups/animal-sciences/animal-breeding-and-genomics-group.htm WUR-ABG])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[:File:McNaughton ASGGN Workshop final.pdf|GreenFeed for phenotyping – our experiences]]. Presented by Lorna McNaughton ([https://www.lic.co.nz/ LIC])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[:File:MIE ILRI GGAA ASGGN Oct 2025.pdf|Methane Index Explorer: Optimising a Breeding Value Format for Simultaneous Inclusion of Enteric Methane Emissions in Breeding Schemes and National Inventories]]. Presented by Pavithra Ariyarathne ([https://www.bioeconomyscience.co.nz/ NZIBS])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[:File:RiccardoGGAA Presentation RB.pdf|ZELP sense]]. Presented by Riccardo Bica ([https://www.zelp.co/ ZELP])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[:File:ICAR Working group Nairobi 5 Oct2025.pdf|Selection for lower methane livestock, selection index considerations]]. Presented by Julius van der Werf (UNE)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Measuring enteric methane in beef and dairy cattle using PAC. Presented by Timothy Bilton ([https://www.bioeconomyscience.co.nz/ NZIBS])&amp;lt;youtube&amp;gt;https://youtu.be/NjPuotrmkMQ&amp;lt;/youtube&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Estimating methane emissions with the GreenFeed System. Presented by Paul Smith ([https://teagasc.ie/ Teagasc]) &amp;lt;youtube&amp;gt;https://youtu.be/TnHefWoP29I&amp;lt;/youtube&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Cvangemert</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://wiki.icar.org/index.php?title=Section_20:_Activities&amp;diff=4830</id>
		<title>Section 20: Activities</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://wiki.icar.org/index.php?title=Section_20:_Activities&amp;diff=4830"/>
		<updated>2026-01-07T08:16:57Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Cvangemert: Added smaller logo, first one was too big&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;big&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;b&amp;gt;NOTE: This version of Section 20 has been approved by the working group&#039;s Chair.  Please be aware that further revisions may occur before final review and approval by the Board and ICAR members per the [[Approval of Page Process]].&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/b&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
== Global Methane Genetics ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:GMG label.png|right|frameless|300x300px]]&lt;br /&gt;
The Global Methane Genetics (GMG) initiative is a global program to accelerate genetic progress in methane emission in ruminants in the Global North and South. This WUR-ABG coordinated initiative is funded by the [https://www.globalmethanehub.org/ Global Methane Hub] and the [https://www.bezosearthfund.org/ Bezos Earth Fund,] both based on philanthropic funds to support methane mitigation and prevent global warming. If you have questions about the [https://www.wur.nl/en/project/global-methane-genetics-initiative.htm GMG initiative] you can send an email to gmg@wur.nl, contact Roel Veerkamp: roel.veerkamp@wur.nl or Birgit Gredler-Grandl: birgit.gredler-grandl@wur.nl.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The initiative holds the following projects:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== &#039;&#039;&#039;Dairy Cattle&#039;&#039;&#039; ===&lt;br /&gt;
We can look to nature to reduce CH4 emissions and use genetic diversity to provide solutions. Genetic improvement, based on identifying animals with genetic predisposition for lower CH4 output and using them to breed for the next generations, is a reliable, cost-effective, and permanent method for transforming livestock&#039;s impact on the environment.  Breeding programs in dairy cattle are run within breeds and across countries. Therefore, the program will accelerate genetic progress by focusing on four major dairy breeds and organizations and countries involved in those breeds. Additionally, the program will acquire considerable leverage through investments in these countries. If you have questions about the dairy cattle section you can contact Birgit Gredler-Grandl: birgit.gredler-grandl@wur.nl.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== &#039;&#039;Holstein breed&#039;&#039; ====&lt;br /&gt;
The largest data collection has been for the Holstein breed, but there is a lack of standardization and protocols in terms of equipment and its utilization (farm level, data processing, data sharing agreements, genetic evaluations, and data collections). Governments and breeding organizations in Denmark and the Netherlands will collaborate and collect methane and genotypes on more than 20,000 Holstein cows for the GMG database. Also, Poland and Italy team up to collect data for the GMG database, and their aim is also to collect more than 20,000 Holstein animals and develop genetic evaluations across a wide range of systems.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===== Denmark-The Netherlands =====&lt;br /&gt;
This collaboration between Aarhus University and Wageningen Livestock Research has five main goals. The contact person for questions about this project is Trine Villumsen: tmv@qgg.au.dk.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Setting up Standard Operating Procedures (SOP) for measuring methane using sniffers&lt;br /&gt;
* Setting up international protocols to measure methane on commercial farms&lt;br /&gt;
* Develop software tools to automate the processing of data into a phenotype&lt;br /&gt;
* Combine historical data in both countries for genetic evaluations&lt;br /&gt;
* Measure enteric methane in 20.000 new cows.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===== Poland-Italy =====&lt;br /&gt;
This collaboration has the following main goals. The contact person for questions about this project is Raffaella Finocchiaro raffaellafinocchiaro@anafibj.it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Measure enteric methane in 20.000 new cows.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== &#039;&#039;Jersey breed&#039;&#039; ====&lt;br /&gt;
Currently, due to the limited data available, the Jersey dairy breed does not have breeding values for methane (CH4) mitigation. The goal of the program is to collect methane genotypes in Canada and Denmark and share this information with the GMG database. The aim is to develop breeding values that will be distributed through the World Jersey Cattle Bureau organization and national Jersey organizations in Australia, Canada, Switzerland, Denmark, France, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands, and New Zealand. If you have questions about the Jersey breed section you can contact Rasmus Bak Stephansen rasmus.stephansen@qgg.au.dk&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== &#039;&#039;Brown Swiss breed&#039;&#039; ====&lt;br /&gt;
The Brown Swiss (BS) breed faces significant challenges due to its small population size, an divers environments the animals are kept. A collaboration between Germany, Switzerland, and Austria to phenotype enough animals is a prerequisite for utilizing the genetic potential of reducing methane emission of the BS breed. In addition to a population of 250 cows recorded with Greenfeed, and 1250 with the sniffer, progress will be accelerated by recording an additional 3,360 cows with sniffers. If you have questions about the Brown Swiss breed section you can contact Elena Frenken: fe@fbf-forschung.de.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== &#039;&#039;Red breeds&#039;&#039; ====&lt;br /&gt;
The red breeds are important for crossbreeding in many countries around the world. The project aims to share and collect CH4 data from Red Dairy Cattle (RDC) breeds (in the Nordic countries, Canada, and the United Kingdom (UK)) and share it with the Global Methane Genetics (GMG) Hub. Together, they will set up a shared genetic evaluation for bulls used for crossbreeding in many more countries. If you have questions about the Red breed section you can contact Elisenda Rius-Vilarrasa: Elisenda.Rius-Vilarrasa@vxa.se.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== &#039;&#039;&#039;Beef Cattle&#039;&#039;&#039; ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== &#039;&#039;Bluegrass (global beef)&#039;&#039; ====&lt;br /&gt;
All industries world-wide have been challenged with reducing emissions and beef is no exception. Genetic selection and specifically genomic selection have been identified as key tools to help meet this challenge. Methane emissions are not a local problem, but a global one and several major beef producing countries who exchange genetic material have, are, and will be collecting methane phenotypes for the purpose of genomic prediction. Individually (including those in Australia), these datasets will be limited in their genomic prediction accuracy. The BLUEGRASS alliance will bring together the key players globally, who collectively have solicited key seed funding from the Global Methane Hub. By sharing data and resources, the development of necessary reference populations will be accelerated. Locally or globally, success in the beef genetics industry has been a model of ‘co-opetition’. Breeders, although competitors, pool resources to build tools that can be used by all to compete with one another. This BLUEGRASS alliance is no different. A global alliance will come together to address this challenge, with or without Australia. Having Australia lead and ignite the alliance with MDC co-funding will create opportunities to direct this global initiative and provide first mover advantages for Australian breeders.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The program is focused on building genomic reference datasets for the main beef breeds in the collaborating countries. The animals to be recorded will be intensively recorded for other production traits, and genotyped, outside this project itself. In each country, trial or research breeding values will be produced and delivered to industry during the life of the project – enabling genetic selection against methane to get underway, and the data will underpin the ability to genomically screen the entire populations of the breeds involved in the respective countries i.e. all seedstock and commercial animals. The data collected will likely assist development of genomic selection against methane in other countries. The accelerated genetic selection and the commercial animal screening will enable real impact to reduce methane from beef cattle. If you have questions about the bluegrass project specifically, you can contact Steve Miller, steve.miller@une.edu.au &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===== Number of phenotypes =====&lt;br /&gt;
This project will phenotype methane traits in beef cattle populations in the US, Australia, the UK, Ireland, and New Zealand. Around 18.500 phenotypes will be collected over all years and countries. It is estimated that around 7.000 phenotypes will be collected in Australia, around 1.600 in New Zealand, around 800 in the UK, around 2.000 in Ireland and around 7.00 in the USA.&lt;br /&gt;
===== Breeds and traits included =====&lt;br /&gt;
All countries included in the Bluegrass project have different breeds and different target traits included in their measurements, besides the methane phenotypes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Australia will focus on Angus and Hereford seedstock with a research population of Angus, Wagyu, Charolais, Shorthorn and Brahman being a target as well. For the seedstock they will focus on seedstock traits plus methane measurements using PAC measures. For the research populations on seedstock traits plus feed intake, carcass as well as methane measurements with PAC.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For New Zealand priority is the progeny test herds. These are mostly Angus, Hereford and their crosses, including a diallel cross design. Some Angus x Simmental. Complete requirements with seedstock herds of Angus and Hereford. Focus is on the following: progeny test, seedstock traits, conception date (via fetal aging) from natural mate at yearling (then re-breeding), carcass grading on steers, feed intake on heifers, rumen microbiome on steers and heifers, seedstock traits from seedstock herds&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For the UK focus lies on Angus and Hereford sired animals, both pedigree and crossbred (including from dairy dams) and they focus on liveweights.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For Ireland they include multi-breed/crossbreed. 30% Charolais and Limousin sired from Continental type suckler dams, 30% Holstein-Friesian and 40% beef (mostly Angus) cross dairy. They will focus on feed intake, liveweight and carcass data.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The USA will be measuring Angus focused on seedstock traits from seedstock herds.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== &#039;&#039;US beef&#039;&#039; ====&lt;br /&gt;
This project will accelerate genetic selection for reduced methane emissions from U.S. and Canadian beef cattle, through phenotyping and genotyping the 18 most influential beef breeds in North America.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The primary activities of this project will center on phenotyping and genetic evaluation of the Germplasm Evaluation (GPE) herd, a large, multibreed resource population at the U.S. Meat Animal Research Center (USMARC) in Nebraska, USA. This herd is structured to represent the genetic diversity of the 18 most influential beef breeds in the U.S.. These 18 breeds are: Angus, Red Angus, Hereford, South Devon, Shorthorn, Beefmaster, Brangus, Brahman, Santa Gertrudis, Braunvieh, ChiAngus, Charolais, Gelbvieh, Limousin, Maine-Anjou, Salers, Simmental, Tarentaise.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Recording of methane phenotypes will occur using multiple approaches to not only maximize the number of phenotypes collected, but to also offer a comparison between methodologies within a U.S. beef production system. Based on these findings and in coordination with other GMG project teams, standard operating procedures for methane phenotyping of beef cattle will be developed and integrated into the [https://beefimprovement.org/resource-center/bif-guidelines/ Guidelines for Uniform Beef Improvement Programs] supporting the evolution of these approaches into standard practice and routine evaluation in any beef breeding system. If you have questions about the US beef project specifically, you can contact Matthew Spangler, mspangler2@unl.edu.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===== Main goals =====&lt;br /&gt;
* Recording methane phenotypes from at least 5,500 multi-breed genotyped beef cattle and openly sharing to the GMG database and the public domain.&lt;br /&gt;
* Development and publication of uniform guidelines for both methane phenotyping in beef cattle systems and the integration of methane phenotypes into beef genetic evaluations, through the BIF Guidelines wiki.&lt;br /&gt;
* Dissemination and routine updating of genetic parameter and genomic marker effects critical for the development of genetic selection tools and deployment of methane-reducing breeding programs.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== &#039;&#039;&#039;Sheep&#039;&#039;&#039; ===&lt;br /&gt;
This project focusses on recording methane phenotypes on animals in various populations, e.g. Merino, Texel, Dohne, Corriedale, maternal and terminal. In each case, those animals will be recorded for a range of other production, health, product quality and welfare traits (the exact suite of traits varies between countries). This ensures that it will be possible to determine the genetic relationships between methane traits and the other traits included in current and future selection indexes and breeding programs – meaning that breeders will be able to make informed decisions on any trade-offs between methane and other traits. In total around 16.600 methane phenotypes will be collected over all years and countries. It is estimated that around 7.500 methane phenotypes will be collected in Australia, 3.000 in Uruguay, 4.000 in New Zealand, 1.200 in the UK and 1.000 in the UK. If you have questions about the sheep project specifically, you can contact Daniel Brown, dbrown2@une.edu.au &lt;br /&gt;
==== Main goals ====&lt;br /&gt;
* Phenotyping and reference populations. Fast tracked phenotyping and  genotyping up to 16,000 records of methane traits across the key countries to facilitate accurate international evaluation of animals (Table 2).&lt;br /&gt;
* Genetic evaluation and models. Breeding values based on international genomic evaluation models to share the benefits of the established reference populations.&lt;br /&gt;
* Proxies. Development and validation of new phenotyping methods to expedite genetic progress.&lt;br /&gt;
* Breeding Programs. Whole farm system models to incorporate methane into breeding objectives in a balanced way and indexes to facilitate selection of breeding candidates.&lt;br /&gt;
* Education and adoption. Stakeholder engagement campaign and international development to ensure world-wide impact.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== &#039;&#039;&#039;Africa&#039;&#039;&#039; ===&lt;br /&gt;
This project focused on three regions of Africa (Eastern, Western and Southern Africa). It will will leverage and  accelerate on-going early research on GHG in these regions, strongly build capacity and team up with researchers to record CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, other economic productive traits and use the records to implement breeding strategies to reduce CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; emission while simultaneously enhancing productivity, food security and employment opportunities in the dairy and beef cattle farming systems; The source of livelihood for many poorly resourced farmers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Tapping into the existing breeding program infrastructure for improved productivity for dairy cattle in the three regions of Africa, this project will result in overall program that will accelerate genetic progress through focus on phenotyping, genotyping and the use of information from the microbiome in the genetic selection of animals in the smallholder dairy system. The overall impact will be better mitigation of negative effects of climate change and more productive cows. Through selection programs based on the index developed with the phenotypic and genomic information from this project.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The major activities include the direct CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; measurements on about 1.655 tropical cattle using [[Greenfeed SOP|GreenFeed]] and the use of [[Laser Methane Detector|LMD]] in smallholder farmers. Genotypic information and phenotypes captured routinely on major important productive traits that influence profitability, income and livelihood of farmers on 1.619 animals. Data sets will be linked to a larger existing data on 9.000 cows with phenotypic and genotypic information from existing projects. If you have questions about the Africa project specifically, you can contact Raphael Mrode, raphael.mrode@sruc.ac.uk&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Main goals ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Methane measurements available on 1.655 tropical cows.&lt;br /&gt;
* Tissue samples and genotypes available on 1.619 tropical cows.&lt;br /&gt;
* Genetic relationship between dairy cows in Western and Eastern Africa estimated.&lt;br /&gt;
* Multi-trait genomic analysis of dairy data and methane in Eastern Africa.&lt;br /&gt;
* Incorporate existing data on over 9.000 cows from existing research projects to enhance genomic prediction.&lt;br /&gt;
* Computation and the roll out of final selection index or sub-indexes developed for improved efficiency - reduced CH4 emission, lower maintenance requirement and increased milk production.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== &#039;&#039;&#039;Latin America&#039;&#039;&#039; ===&lt;br /&gt;
The aim of this project is to accelerate the reduction of enteric methane emissions in beef cattle in Latin America through genetic selection in key breeds relevant to Argentina, Brazil, Uruguay, and Mexico. The focus will be on phenotyping methane emissions and genotyping animals linked to existing genetic improvement programs. Reference populations for genomic selection will be the basis to improve the estimation of genetic merit and select for lower emission. The link with ongoing genetic improvement programs provides data on other economically relevant production traits, thus making it possible to estimate genetic correlations and optimize methane emission reductions with a minimum impact on livestock productivity. This approach minimizes negative impacts on food production while preserving economic, social, and environmental sustainability of beef cattle farming. This collaborative project between national agricultural research institutes (NARI) is supported by breeders’ associations and other key stakeholders. Public-private partnerships and collaborative efforts will scale genetic evaluation for methane emissions as well as the use of lower methane emission genetics on commercial farms. Phenotypic and genomic data from approximately 7.000 animals will be made globally available. In synergy with other projects, it will be possible to increase the size of reference populations leading to an even greater impact on methane emissions mitigation. If you have questions about the Latin America project specifically, you can contact Elly Navajas, enavajas@inia.org.uy&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For developing methane emission phenotyping platforms and reference populations, it is essential to upgrade methane emission recording equipment as well as standardize and coordinate the measurement of animals. Standardized protocols will be developed in collaboration with ICAR, and the criteria for selecting animals to be measured and genotyped will be established by the research team, including technicians from breeder associations. A critical component of the project involves genetic analyses, such as estimating genetic parameters for methane emission-related traits, validating breeding values in additional populations, and evaluating the impact of selecting for reduced methane emissions. Scientific collaboration will be fostered with other beef cattle projects, focusing on areas such as expertise exchange. Communication strategies will be implemented to engage stakeholders, including breeders, artificial insemination centers, policymakers, and other private stakeholders. Dialogue with teams managing greenhouse gas (GHG) inventories and Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs) will also be enhanced. These activities require active collaboration among countries and stakeholders in Latin America to achieve successful outcomes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Main goals ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* A Latin American collaborative network for accelerating genetic improvement for methane emissions reduction is established by NARIs, universities, breeder societies, and private stakeholders engaged in genetic evaluation programs across South America and Mexico. &lt;br /&gt;
* Methane emission phenotyping platforms are implemented, enabling data collection across key beef cattle breeds, targeting 7.000 methane emission phenotypes and genotypes of animals linked to genetic evaluations. &lt;br /&gt;
* Genomic-enhanced estimated breeding values for methane emissions will be available to breeders: based on pure-breed and multi-breed reference populations enhanced through collaboration and data sharing across beef cattle projects within the GMG initiative. &lt;br /&gt;
* The economic and environmental impact of breeding strategies to reduce methane emissions is assessed, to identify the most promising breeding strategies to accelerate methane emission reduction. The development of breeding objectives combining methane emission reduction with production goals will support policy and incentives for breeders and farmers to overcome adoption barriers and integrate the results into national GHG inventories. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== &#039;&#039;&#039;Microbiome&#039;&#039;&#039; ===&lt;br /&gt;
The micro-HUB project will establish a reference population with metagenome and genotype data, and create a genomic evaluation system that can be used to select the parents of the next generation with microbiome profiles that produce less enteric methane while maintaining genetic progress in profit and health. The genomic evaluation system will be widely open, will target most relevant breeds and production systems. Furthermore, a large global microbiome network will be established to collect existing data and knowledge and ensure knowledge transfer. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This project will start with metagenome and genomic data on 5.430 individuals from the core project partners, we will explore the opportunity to extend and expand our reference population to other countries with suitable data. By combining national data sets with genotypes, microbiome and methane information, we aim to create the largest rumen microbiome reference population globally. We aim to enlarge the reference population by more than 20.000 microbiome sequenced dairy and beef cattle as well as sheep from the Global Methane Genetics (GMG) program. From this, we will facilitate the delivery of genomic breeding values that can be used in global breeding programs to select for a microbiome composition with lower emissions and reduce the abundance of methanogenic pathways in the rumen microbiome of future generations of cattle and sheep. The project partners cover beef, dairy and sheep populations and creates an opportunity to identify a core microbiome (or set of cores) that can be used as a reference for nation-based breeding programs. The project will closely connect to the other projects within the Global Methane Program, to facilitate microbiome sampling, sequencing and genomic analysis. If you have questions about the microbiome project specifically, you can contact Oscar Gonzalez-Recio, oscar.gonzalezrecio@ed.ac.uk&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Activities ====&lt;br /&gt;
To enlarge the national database partners will obtain additional samples from animals with methane and genotype data from different breeds and production systems within the GMG phenotyping program (dairy and beef cattle). The inclusion of samples from external partners will be encouraged. Partners (also external) will be provided with instruction to collect data and sample rumen microbiome. The micro-Hub will provide stewardship for GMG partners regarding sampling, storage and shipping, as well as bioinformatic analysis. Rumen metagenome sequencing will be centralized in as fewer labs as possible (ideally only one).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Reference populations from partners will be combined, covering a broad range of breeds and productions systems and different geographical regions. Format of the databases will be unified. The combined dataset will be used for the microbiome genomic evaluations. The reference database will be updated with additional data coming from external partners. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We will develop the capabilities to estimate the genomic breeding value for microbiome composition for any genotyped animal in similar productive conditions as those represented in our reference population. The goal is to propose recommendations based on own experience to include estimated genomic breeding values for rumen microbiome profile in breeding programs. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The project will contribute to the activities organized within Global Methane Genetics and the ICAR Feed&amp;amp;Gas working group in building a microbiome network to exchange knowledge, harmonize guidelines and develop protocols. All data generated within the project will be made available through the Global Methane Genetics database. The project will collaborate with the database development to develop microbiome sharing requirements and specifications. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Main goals ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Joint reference metagenome compiled.&lt;br /&gt;
* Microbiome genomic evaluations.&lt;br /&gt;
* Release of SNP coefficients for international genomic evaluations for microbiome compositions.&lt;br /&gt;
* Network building and establishment of platform for rumen metagenome data.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== &#039;&#039;&#039;Working Group meetings&#039;&#039;&#039; ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The six working groups as described above meet two times a year to discuss the progress of their projects and to share knowledge. There are also general webinars organized for the project participants throughout the years.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Dairy Cattle ====&lt;br /&gt;
On the 15th of May 2025 the Working Group Dairy cattle met for the first time and shared their current progress, you can find the presentation slides [[:File:250515 GMG meeting Dairy Working Group.pdf|here.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On the 27&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;th&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; of October 2025 the Working Group Cattle had their second meeting, the current progress was shared and other projects and bottlenecks were discussed. You can find the presentation slides [[:File:20251027 GMG Working group Dairy meeting.pdf|here.]] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Sheep ====&lt;br /&gt;
On the 20th of May 2025 the Working Sheep met for the first time and shared their current progress, you can find the presentation slides [[:File:20250520 Meeting GMG Working group sheep.pdf|here.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On the 11&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;th&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; of November 2025 the Working Group Sheep had their second meeting, the current progress was shared and other projects and bottlenecks were discussed. You can find the presentation slides [[:File:20251111 Sheep Working Group GMG presentation.pdf|here.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Microbiome ====&lt;br /&gt;
On the 23th of May 2025 the Working Group Microbiome met for the first time and shared their current progress, you can find the presentation slides [[:File:202505 Global Meeting Genetics Microbiome working group meeting.pdf|here.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On the 27&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;th&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; of November 2025 the Working Group Microbiome had their second meeting, the current progress was shared and other projects and bottlenecks were discussed. You can find the presentation slides [[:File:20251127 GMG Microbiome WG presentation.pdf|here.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On the 2&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;nd&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; of December 2025 the Working group microbiome organized a Q&amp;amp;A session about microbiome sampling. You can find the slides [[:File:20251202 GMG meeting MicroHub Q&amp;amp;A.pdf|here.]] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Latin America ====&lt;br /&gt;
On the 5th of June 2025 the Working Group Latin America met for the first time and shared their current progress, you can find the presentation slides [[:File:202506 Presentation GMG Working Group Latin America meeting.pdf|here.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On the 14&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;th&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; of November 2025 the Working Group Latin America had their second meeting, the current progress was shared and other projects and bottlenecks were discussed. You can find the presentation slides [[:File:20251114 Latin America GMG Work group meeting.pdf|here.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Africa ====&lt;br /&gt;
On the 23th of May 2025 the Working Group Africa met for the first time and shared their current progress, you can find the presentation slides [[:File:20250523 GMG Working group Africa meeting.pdf|here.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On the 7&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;th&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; of November 2025 the Working Group Africa had their second meeting, the current progress was shared and other projects and bottlenecks were discussed. You can find the presentation slides [[:File:20251107 Africa Workgroup GMG presentation.pdf|here.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Beef ====&lt;br /&gt;
On the 17th of June 2025 the Working Group Beef met for the first time and shared their current progress, you can find the presentation slides [[:File:202506 GMG Working group Beef meeting.pdf|here.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On the 11&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;th&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; of November 2025 the Working Group Beef had their second meeting, the current progress was shared and other projects and bottlenecks were discussed. You can find the presentation slides [[:File:20251106 GMG Working group Beef meeting.pdf|here.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Asia ====&lt;br /&gt;
On the 1th of July 2025 the Working Group Asia met for the first time and shared their current progress, you can find the presentation slides [[:File:20250701 AsiaGMG presentation.pdf|here.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On the 25&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;th&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; of November the Working Group Asia organized a webinar for parties interested in contributing to the Asia group. You can find slides on data to impact [[:File:GMG Asia From data to impact.pdf|here]], an introduction into the GMG [[:File:Asia 20251105.pdf|here]], slides on methane recording techniques [[:File:2511 GMG Asia MethaneMethods.pdf|here]] and a presentation about [[Laser Methane Detector|LMD]] and their experiences from ILRI [[:File:ILRI LMD Exp 2025.pdf|here]]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Webinars ====&lt;br /&gt;
On the 22th of May 2025 there was a webinar for all GMG project participants on effective records in the database, you can find the presentation slides [[:File:250515 GMG meeting Dairy Working Group.pdf|here.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== DAFNE ==&lt;br /&gt;
Department of Agriculture and Forest Sciences at the University of Tuscia. Their main purpose is to collect primary emissions data from sniffers and GF to have emissions factors related to the species, breed, physiological state and diet management. They are engaged with ANAFIBJ and sharing data related to Holstein cattle with them for genetic evaluations. Currently they are running trials with sheep and buffalo.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Sheep ===&lt;br /&gt;
For this trial they are comparing 2 grazing methods using 2 groups of Sopravissana sheep, reared at the facility.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# Rotational, 18 sheep. Turns every 4 days on strip paddocks. 18 paddocks in total; 6 heads on 3 strip paddocks per turn of grazing. After 24 days the sheep are back to the first three strips.&lt;br /&gt;
# Continuous, 18 sheep. Continuous grazing on same paddock. 3 paddocks in total; 6 heads per paddock. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Subgroups for both group A and B (6 heads) are randomly arranged every day. The 18 strip paddocks are the same total size as the three continuous paddocks. They have the same number of heads grazing and the same live weight load.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Both groups are balanced for BW, receive the same hay in quantity and quality with ad libitum access and spend the same time at pasture. Daily sampling of the hay and residual per group is done, weekly sub samples of hay and residual are analyzed. In parallel fresh grass is sampled and analyzed to represent the 2 grazing methods. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The GreenFeed is located in the barn, at 9AM this barn is closed for group A and opens for group B and this switches every day. The GreenFeed is the only place they can get concentrates. Nutritional information for this concentrate can be found [[:File:Nutritional table sheep DAFHNE.docx|here]]. Amount of food and cup drops can be found here.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Trial started end of March 2025 and will last 1.5 months. They are using the GF adapted for small ruminants.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Buffalo ===&lt;br /&gt;
This is a continuous trial which will last 4 months per supplement tested. First they monitor the buffalo for 4 weeks without supplement as a control diet and then there will be an 8 week experimental period with the supplement diet. During the entire period the buffalo are confined to the barn. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The buffalo are separated in two groups, in adjacent pens. One group has access to a milking robot, with the MooLogger from [[Sniffer SOP|Tecnosens.]] The other pen has a conventional milking system and the GreenFeed is placed facing this pen.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
All buffaloes are fed the same concentrates. Nutritional information for this concentrate can be found [[:File:Nutritional table Buffalo DAFHNE.docx|here]]. Amount of food and cup drops can be found here. The buffalo’s in the GF group get the concentrates from the GF and about 1 kg of concentrates during milking operations. The buffalo’s in the sniffer group only get concentrates from the milking robot, which is about 2 kg/head/day.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To account for the emissions recorded individually at different times, they compare the emissions data aggregated on a daily basis. They are using the GF adapted for large ruminants with horns&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== MethaBreed ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:P-2025-1-15-2 FBF Logo MethaBreed Logo 01 4C-01 klein.png|thumb|170x170px]]&lt;br /&gt;
The MethaBreed project aims to improve the sustainability of dairy production by developing innovative breeding strategies for dairy cows that simultaneously reduce methane emissions, enhance feed efficiency, and support animal health. A large-scale longitudinal study is being conducted in commercial dairy herds. Using advanced technologies, individual cow traits are recorded across entire lactations and multiple lactation cycles. Data collection includes continuous monitoring of methane emissions using sniffers, feed intake (using CFIT: Cattle Feed Intake System), body weight (using CFIT and scales), and key health parameters. A particular focus lies on the role of the rumen microbiome in methane production. A central goal of MethaBreed is the development of a new breeding value for methane emissions, enabling the selection of animals with lower environmental impact. These data will be integrated with pedigree and genomic information to allow precise breeding decisions. At the same time, the existing breeding value for feed efficiency will be further refined. The outcomes of the project are expected to make a significant contribution towards more climate-friendly dairy production. In the long term, standardized breeding values will be provided, enabling breeding organizations and farmers to actively select for healthier, more efficient, and more sustainable dairy cows. For more information you can visit the following websites from the partners: [https://www.uni-giessen.de/de/fbz/fb09/institute/ith/ag-koenig/forschung/laufend/methabreed University Giessen], [https://www.fbf-forschung.de/aktuelles/methabreed-neues-forschungsprojekt-zur-reduzierung.html FBF], [https://livestock-functional-microbiology.uni-hohenheim.de/en/research-projects#jfmulticontent_c401477-2 University of Hohenheim.]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Presentation materials ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Seminar by Julius van der Werf: Breeding for a changing climate 13-05-2025 ===&lt;br /&gt;
On the 13th of May Julius van de Werf gave a presentation at Wageningen Livestock Research on selection indexes for selecting low methane livestock, focused on sheep. You can find the slides [[:File:20250513 Seminar J.v.d.Werf.pdf|here]]. You can find the recording of the presentation below.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;youtube&amp;gt;PxKmxKVvVEA?si=C6x0keKAvgU009Da&amp;lt;/youtube&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Seminar by Maria Frizzarin: Introduction to milk mid-infrared spectroscopy 10-07-2025 ===&lt;br /&gt;
On the 10th of July Maria Frizzarin gave a presentation at Wageningen Livestock Research on milk mid-infrared spectroscopy, equations development, and applications. You can find the slides [[:File:10072025 Seminar Maria MIR.pdf|here.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Seminar by Sarah-Joe Burn: Breed4Green 25-09-2025 ===&lt;br /&gt;
On the 25th of September Sarah-Joe Burn gave a presentation at Wageningen Livestock Research on measuring methane emissions in commercial farms and establishing a comprehensive dataset for genetic studies. A similar presentations was given at EAAP 2025, you can find the slides to that presentation [[:File:Eaap2025-breed4green-linke.pdf|here]] and the abstract [[:File:2025 Innsbruck EAAP Book Abstracts.pdf|here]], page 250.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Joint ICAR Feed&amp;amp;Gas and ASGGN workshop ===&lt;br /&gt;
On the 5th of October the joint workshop between the [https://www.icar.org/group/working-group-feed-and-gas/ ICAR Feed&amp;amp;Gas working group] and the [https://www.asggn.org/ ASGGN] took place before the GGAA conference in Nairobi. The presentations can be found below. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[:File:2025 ASGGN - GGAA - A Taste of the Future Buccal Swabbing for Rumen Microbial ProfilingTB.pdf|A Taste of the Future: Buccal Swabbing for Rumen Microbial Profiling]]​. Presented by Ben Perry ([https://www.bioeconomyscience.co.nz/ NZIBS])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[:File:2638 Booker ILRI GGAA ASGGN Oct 2025.pdf|Rate of Genetic Gain for Methane Emissions in a Maternal Production Flock]]. Presented by Fem Booker ([https://www.bioeconomyscience.co.nz/ NZIBS])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[:File:Boris ICAR2025 v01.pdf|Association between rumen and faecal microbiome and enteric methane emissions in dairy cattle]]. Presented by Boris Sepulveda ([https://agriculture.vic.gov.au/ AV])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[:File:CaeliRichardson GGAA Workshop 2025.pdf|Global Framework to Monitor, Measure, and Account for Methane Reductions from Genetic Selection]]. Presented by Caeli Richardson ([https://abacusbio.com/ Abacusbio])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[:File:GGAA Workshop ICAR and ASGGN Ida Storm.pdf|Danish Perspectives on implementation of GHG regulation]]. Presented by Ida Storm ([https://agricultureandfood.dk/ DAFG])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[:File:GGAA Workshop ICAR and ASGGN Rasmus Stephansen.pdf|Experience with CH4 sniffers, what have we learned so far?]] Presented by Rasmus Stephansen ([https://international.au.dk/ AU])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[:File:GGAA workshop MIR methane presentation.pdf|Overview of the methane equations developed from mid-infrared spectroscopy and their applications.]] Presented by Maria Frizzarin ([https://www.agroscope.admin.ch/agroscope/en/home.html Agroscope])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[:File:HanneHonerlagen ICARpresentation.pdf|Adding microbial data to enhance breeding for lower methane emissions]]. Presented by Hanne Honerlagen ([https://www.wur.nl/en/research-results/chair-groups/animal-sciences/animal-breeding-and-genomics-group.htm WUR-ABG])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[:File:McNaughton ASGGN Workshop final.pdf|GreenFeed for phenotyping – our experiences]]. Presented by Lorna McNaughton ([https://www.lic.co.nz/ LIC])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[:File:MIE ILRI GGAA ASGGN Oct 2025.pdf|Methane Index Explorer: Optimising a Breeding Value Format for Simultaneous Inclusion of Enteric Methane Emissions in Breeding Schemes and National Inventories]]. Presented by Pavithra Ariyarathne ([https://www.bioeconomyscience.co.nz/ NZIBS])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[:File:RiccardoGGAA Presentation RB.pdf|ZELP sense]]. Presented by Riccardo Bica ([https://www.zelp.co/ ZELP])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[:File:ICAR Working group Nairobi 5 Oct2025.pdf|Selection for lower methane livestock, selection index considerations]]. Presented by Julius van der Werf (UNE)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Measuring enteric methane in beef and dairy cattle using PAC. Presented by Timothy Bilton ([https://www.bioeconomyscience.co.nz/ NZIBS])&amp;lt;youtube&amp;gt;https://youtu.be/NjPuotrmkMQ&amp;lt;/youtube&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Estimating methane emissions with the GreenFeed System. Presented by Paul Smith ([https://teagasc.ie/ Teagasc]) &amp;lt;youtube&amp;gt;https://youtu.be/TnHefWoP29I&amp;lt;/youtube&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Cvangemert</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://wiki.icar.org/index.php?title=File:P-2025-1-15-2_FBF_Logo_MethaBreed_Logo_01_4C-01_klein.png&amp;diff=4829</id>
		<title>File:P-2025-1-15-2 FBF Logo MethaBreed Logo 01 4C-01 klein.png</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://wiki.icar.org/index.php?title=File:P-2025-1-15-2_FBF_Logo_MethaBreed_Logo_01_4C-01_klein.png&amp;diff=4829"/>
		<updated>2026-01-07T08:15:22Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Cvangemert: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;MethaBreed logo klein&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Cvangemert</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://wiki.icar.org/index.php?title=Section_20:_Activities&amp;diff=4828</id>
		<title>Section 20: Activities</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://wiki.icar.org/index.php?title=Section_20:_Activities&amp;diff=4828"/>
		<updated>2026-01-07T08:13:11Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Cvangemert: /* MethaBreed */ added logo&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;big&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;b&amp;gt;NOTE: This version of Section 20 has been approved by the working group&#039;s Chair.  Please be aware that further revisions may occur before final review and approval by the Board and ICAR members per the [[Approval of Page Process]].&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/b&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
== Global Methane Genetics ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:GMG label.png|right|frameless|300x300px]]&lt;br /&gt;
The Global Methane Genetics (GMG) initiative is a global program to accelerate genetic progress in methane emission in ruminants in the Global North and South. This WUR-ABG coordinated initiative is funded by the [https://www.globalmethanehub.org/ Global Methane Hub] and the [https://www.bezosearthfund.org/ Bezos Earth Fund,] both based on philanthropic funds to support methane mitigation and prevent global warming. If you have questions about the [https://www.wur.nl/en/project/global-methane-genetics-initiative.htm GMG initiative] you can send an email to gmg@wur.nl, contact Roel Veerkamp: roel.veerkamp@wur.nl or Birgit Gredler-Grandl: birgit.gredler-grandl@wur.nl.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The initiative holds the following projects:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== &#039;&#039;&#039;Dairy Cattle&#039;&#039;&#039; ===&lt;br /&gt;
We can look to nature to reduce CH4 emissions and use genetic diversity to provide solutions. Genetic improvement, based on identifying animals with genetic predisposition for lower CH4 output and using them to breed for the next generations, is a reliable, cost-effective, and permanent method for transforming livestock&#039;s impact on the environment.  Breeding programs in dairy cattle are run within breeds and across countries. Therefore, the program will accelerate genetic progress by focusing on four major dairy breeds and organizations and countries involved in those breeds. Additionally, the program will acquire considerable leverage through investments in these countries. If you have questions about the dairy cattle section you can contact Birgit Gredler-Grandl: birgit.gredler-grandl@wur.nl.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== &#039;&#039;Holstein breed&#039;&#039; ====&lt;br /&gt;
The largest data collection has been for the Holstein breed, but there is a lack of standardization and protocols in terms of equipment and its utilization (farm level, data processing, data sharing agreements, genetic evaluations, and data collections). Governments and breeding organizations in Denmark and the Netherlands will collaborate and collect methane and genotypes on more than 20,000 Holstein cows for the GMG database. Also, Poland and Italy team up to collect data for the GMG database, and their aim is also to collect more than 20,000 Holstein animals and develop genetic evaluations across a wide range of systems.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===== Denmark-The Netherlands =====&lt;br /&gt;
This collaboration between Aarhus University and Wageningen Livestock Research has five main goals. The contact person for questions about this project is Trine Villumsen: tmv@qgg.au.dk.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Setting up Standard Operating Procedures (SOP) for measuring methane using sniffers&lt;br /&gt;
* Setting up international protocols to measure methane on commercial farms&lt;br /&gt;
* Develop software tools to automate the processing of data into a phenotype&lt;br /&gt;
* Combine historical data in both countries for genetic evaluations&lt;br /&gt;
* Measure enteric methane in 20.000 new cows.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===== Poland-Italy =====&lt;br /&gt;
This collaboration has the following main goals. The contact person for questions about this project is Raffaella Finocchiaro raffaellafinocchiaro@anafibj.it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Measure enteric methane in 20.000 new cows.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== &#039;&#039;Jersey breed&#039;&#039; ====&lt;br /&gt;
Currently, due to the limited data available, the Jersey dairy breed does not have breeding values for methane (CH4) mitigation. The goal of the program is to collect methane genotypes in Canada and Denmark and share this information with the GMG database. The aim is to develop breeding values that will be distributed through the World Jersey Cattle Bureau organization and national Jersey organizations in Australia, Canada, Switzerland, Denmark, France, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands, and New Zealand. If you have questions about the Jersey breed section you can contact Rasmus Bak Stephansen rasmus.stephansen@qgg.au.dk&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== &#039;&#039;Brown Swiss breed&#039;&#039; ====&lt;br /&gt;
The Brown Swiss (BS) breed faces significant challenges due to its small population size, an divers environments the animals are kept. A collaboration between Germany, Switzerland, and Austria to phenotype enough animals is a prerequisite for utilizing the genetic potential of reducing methane emission of the BS breed. In addition to a population of 250 cows recorded with Greenfeed, and 1250 with the sniffer, progress will be accelerated by recording an additional 3,360 cows with sniffers. If you have questions about the Brown Swiss breed section you can contact Elena Frenken: fe@fbf-forschung.de.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== &#039;&#039;Red breeds&#039;&#039; ====&lt;br /&gt;
The red breeds are important for crossbreeding in many countries around the world. The project aims to share and collect CH4 data from Red Dairy Cattle (RDC) breeds (in the Nordic countries, Canada, and the United Kingdom (UK)) and share it with the Global Methane Genetics (GMG) Hub. Together, they will set up a shared genetic evaluation for bulls used for crossbreeding in many more countries. If you have questions about the Red breed section you can contact Elisenda Rius-Vilarrasa: Elisenda.Rius-Vilarrasa@vxa.se.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== &#039;&#039;&#039;Beef Cattle&#039;&#039;&#039; ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== &#039;&#039;Bluegrass (global beef)&#039;&#039; ====&lt;br /&gt;
All industries world-wide have been challenged with reducing emissions and beef is no exception. Genetic selection and specifically genomic selection have been identified as key tools to help meet this challenge. Methane emissions are not a local problem, but a global one and several major beef producing countries who exchange genetic material have, are, and will be collecting methane phenotypes for the purpose of genomic prediction. Individually (including those in Australia), these datasets will be limited in their genomic prediction accuracy. The BLUEGRASS alliance will bring together the key players globally, who collectively have solicited key seed funding from the Global Methane Hub. By sharing data and resources, the development of necessary reference populations will be accelerated. Locally or globally, success in the beef genetics industry has been a model of ‘co-opetition’. Breeders, although competitors, pool resources to build tools that can be used by all to compete with one another. This BLUEGRASS alliance is no different. A global alliance will come together to address this challenge, with or without Australia. Having Australia lead and ignite the alliance with MDC co-funding will create opportunities to direct this global initiative and provide first mover advantages for Australian breeders.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The program is focused on building genomic reference datasets for the main beef breeds in the collaborating countries. The animals to be recorded will be intensively recorded for other production traits, and genotyped, outside this project itself. In each country, trial or research breeding values will be produced and delivered to industry during the life of the project – enabling genetic selection against methane to get underway, and the data will underpin the ability to genomically screen the entire populations of the breeds involved in the respective countries i.e. all seedstock and commercial animals. The data collected will likely assist development of genomic selection against methane in other countries. The accelerated genetic selection and the commercial animal screening will enable real impact to reduce methane from beef cattle. If you have questions about the bluegrass project specifically, you can contact Steve Miller, steve.miller@une.edu.au &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===== Number of phenotypes =====&lt;br /&gt;
This project will phenotype methane traits in beef cattle populations in the US, Australia, the UK, Ireland, and New Zealand. Around 18.500 phenotypes will be collected over all years and countries. It is estimated that around 7.000 phenotypes will be collected in Australia, around 1.600 in New Zealand, around 800 in the UK, around 2.000 in Ireland and around 7.00 in the USA.&lt;br /&gt;
===== Breeds and traits included =====&lt;br /&gt;
All countries included in the Bluegrass project have different breeds and different target traits included in their measurements, besides the methane phenotypes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Australia will focus on Angus and Hereford seedstock with a research population of Angus, Wagyu, Charolais, Shorthorn and Brahman being a target as well. For the seedstock they will focus on seedstock traits plus methane measurements using PAC measures. For the research populations on seedstock traits plus feed intake, carcass as well as methane measurements with PAC.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For New Zealand priority is the progeny test herds. These are mostly Angus, Hereford and their crosses, including a diallel cross design. Some Angus x Simmental. Complete requirements with seedstock herds of Angus and Hereford. Focus is on the following: progeny test, seedstock traits, conception date (via fetal aging) from natural mate at yearling (then re-breeding), carcass grading on steers, feed intake on heifers, rumen microbiome on steers and heifers, seedstock traits from seedstock herds&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For the UK focus lies on Angus and Hereford sired animals, both pedigree and crossbred (including from dairy dams) and they focus on liveweights.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For Ireland they include multi-breed/crossbreed. 30% Charolais and Limousin sired from Continental type suckler dams, 30% Holstein-Friesian and 40% beef (mostly Angus) cross dairy. They will focus on feed intake, liveweight and carcass data.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The USA will be measuring Angus focused on seedstock traits from seedstock herds.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== &#039;&#039;US beef&#039;&#039; ====&lt;br /&gt;
This project will accelerate genetic selection for reduced methane emissions from U.S. and Canadian beef cattle, through phenotyping and genotyping the 18 most influential beef breeds in North America.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The primary activities of this project will center on phenotyping and genetic evaluation of the Germplasm Evaluation (GPE) herd, a large, multibreed resource population at the U.S. Meat Animal Research Center (USMARC) in Nebraska, USA. This herd is structured to represent the genetic diversity of the 18 most influential beef breeds in the U.S.. These 18 breeds are: Angus, Red Angus, Hereford, South Devon, Shorthorn, Beefmaster, Brangus, Brahman, Santa Gertrudis, Braunvieh, ChiAngus, Charolais, Gelbvieh, Limousin, Maine-Anjou, Salers, Simmental, Tarentaise.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Recording of methane phenotypes will occur using multiple approaches to not only maximize the number of phenotypes collected, but to also offer a comparison between methodologies within a U.S. beef production system. Based on these findings and in coordination with other GMG project teams, standard operating procedures for methane phenotyping of beef cattle will be developed and integrated into the [https://beefimprovement.org/resource-center/bif-guidelines/ Guidelines for Uniform Beef Improvement Programs] supporting the evolution of these approaches into standard practice and routine evaluation in any beef breeding system. If you have questions about the US beef project specifically, you can contact Matthew Spangler, mspangler2@unl.edu.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===== Main goals =====&lt;br /&gt;
* Recording methane phenotypes from at least 5,500 multi-breed genotyped beef cattle and openly sharing to the GMG database and the public domain.&lt;br /&gt;
* Development and publication of uniform guidelines for both methane phenotyping in beef cattle systems and the integration of methane phenotypes into beef genetic evaluations, through the BIF Guidelines wiki.&lt;br /&gt;
* Dissemination and routine updating of genetic parameter and genomic marker effects critical for the development of genetic selection tools and deployment of methane-reducing breeding programs.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== &#039;&#039;&#039;Sheep&#039;&#039;&#039; ===&lt;br /&gt;
This project focusses on recording methane phenotypes on animals in various populations, e.g. Merino, Texel, Dohne, Corriedale, maternal and terminal. In each case, those animals will be recorded for a range of other production, health, product quality and welfare traits (the exact suite of traits varies between countries). This ensures that it will be possible to determine the genetic relationships between methane traits and the other traits included in current and future selection indexes and breeding programs – meaning that breeders will be able to make informed decisions on any trade-offs between methane and other traits. In total around 16.600 methane phenotypes will be collected over all years and countries. It is estimated that around 7.500 methane phenotypes will be collected in Australia, 3.000 in Uruguay, 4.000 in New Zealand, 1.200 in the UK and 1.000 in the UK. If you have questions about the sheep project specifically, you can contact Daniel Brown, dbrown2@une.edu.au &lt;br /&gt;
==== Main goals ====&lt;br /&gt;
* Phenotyping and reference populations. Fast tracked phenotyping and  genotyping up to 16,000 records of methane traits across the key countries to facilitate accurate international evaluation of animals (Table 2).&lt;br /&gt;
* Genetic evaluation and models. Breeding values based on international genomic evaluation models to share the benefits of the established reference populations.&lt;br /&gt;
* Proxies. Development and validation of new phenotyping methods to expedite genetic progress.&lt;br /&gt;
* Breeding Programs. Whole farm system models to incorporate methane into breeding objectives in a balanced way and indexes to facilitate selection of breeding candidates.&lt;br /&gt;
* Education and adoption. Stakeholder engagement campaign and international development to ensure world-wide impact.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== &#039;&#039;&#039;Africa&#039;&#039;&#039; ===&lt;br /&gt;
This project focused on three regions of Africa (Eastern, Western and Southern Africa). It will will leverage and  accelerate on-going early research on GHG in these regions, strongly build capacity and team up with researchers to record CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, other economic productive traits and use the records to implement breeding strategies to reduce CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; emission while simultaneously enhancing productivity, food security and employment opportunities in the dairy and beef cattle farming systems; The source of livelihood for many poorly resourced farmers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Tapping into the existing breeding program infrastructure for improved productivity for dairy cattle in the three regions of Africa, this project will result in overall program that will accelerate genetic progress through focus on phenotyping, genotyping and the use of information from the microbiome in the genetic selection of animals in the smallholder dairy system. The overall impact will be better mitigation of negative effects of climate change and more productive cows. Through selection programs based on the index developed with the phenotypic and genomic information from this project.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The major activities include the direct CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; measurements on about 1.655 tropical cattle using [[Greenfeed SOP|GreenFeed]] and the use of [[Laser Methane Detector|LMD]] in smallholder farmers. Genotypic information and phenotypes captured routinely on major important productive traits that influence profitability, income and livelihood of farmers on 1.619 animals. Data sets will be linked to a larger existing data on 9.000 cows with phenotypic and genotypic information from existing projects. If you have questions about the Africa project specifically, you can contact Raphael Mrode, raphael.mrode@sruc.ac.uk&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Main goals ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Methane measurements available on 1.655 tropical cows.&lt;br /&gt;
* Tissue samples and genotypes available on 1.619 tropical cows.&lt;br /&gt;
* Genetic relationship between dairy cows in Western and Eastern Africa estimated.&lt;br /&gt;
* Multi-trait genomic analysis of dairy data and methane in Eastern Africa.&lt;br /&gt;
* Incorporate existing data on over 9.000 cows from existing research projects to enhance genomic prediction.&lt;br /&gt;
* Computation and the roll out of final selection index or sub-indexes developed for improved efficiency - reduced CH4 emission, lower maintenance requirement and increased milk production.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== &#039;&#039;&#039;Latin America&#039;&#039;&#039; ===&lt;br /&gt;
The aim of this project is to accelerate the reduction of enteric methane emissions in beef cattle in Latin America through genetic selection in key breeds relevant to Argentina, Brazil, Uruguay, and Mexico. The focus will be on phenotyping methane emissions and genotyping animals linked to existing genetic improvement programs. Reference populations for genomic selection will be the basis to improve the estimation of genetic merit and select for lower emission. The link with ongoing genetic improvement programs provides data on other economically relevant production traits, thus making it possible to estimate genetic correlations and optimize methane emission reductions with a minimum impact on livestock productivity. This approach minimizes negative impacts on food production while preserving economic, social, and environmental sustainability of beef cattle farming. This collaborative project between national agricultural research institutes (NARI) is supported by breeders’ associations and other key stakeholders. Public-private partnerships and collaborative efforts will scale genetic evaluation for methane emissions as well as the use of lower methane emission genetics on commercial farms. Phenotypic and genomic data from approximately 7.000 animals will be made globally available. In synergy with other projects, it will be possible to increase the size of reference populations leading to an even greater impact on methane emissions mitigation. If you have questions about the Latin America project specifically, you can contact Elly Navajas, enavajas@inia.org.uy&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For developing methane emission phenotyping platforms and reference populations, it is essential to upgrade methane emission recording equipment as well as standardize and coordinate the measurement of animals. Standardized protocols will be developed in collaboration with ICAR, and the criteria for selecting animals to be measured and genotyped will be established by the research team, including technicians from breeder associations. A critical component of the project involves genetic analyses, such as estimating genetic parameters for methane emission-related traits, validating breeding values in additional populations, and evaluating the impact of selecting for reduced methane emissions. Scientific collaboration will be fostered with other beef cattle projects, focusing on areas such as expertise exchange. Communication strategies will be implemented to engage stakeholders, including breeders, artificial insemination centers, policymakers, and other private stakeholders. Dialogue with teams managing greenhouse gas (GHG) inventories and Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs) will also be enhanced. These activities require active collaboration among countries and stakeholders in Latin America to achieve successful outcomes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Main goals ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* A Latin American collaborative network for accelerating genetic improvement for methane emissions reduction is established by NARIs, universities, breeder societies, and private stakeholders engaged in genetic evaluation programs across South America and Mexico. &lt;br /&gt;
* Methane emission phenotyping platforms are implemented, enabling data collection across key beef cattle breeds, targeting 7.000 methane emission phenotypes and genotypes of animals linked to genetic evaluations. &lt;br /&gt;
* Genomic-enhanced estimated breeding values for methane emissions will be available to breeders: based on pure-breed and multi-breed reference populations enhanced through collaboration and data sharing across beef cattle projects within the GMG initiative. &lt;br /&gt;
* The economic and environmental impact of breeding strategies to reduce methane emissions is assessed, to identify the most promising breeding strategies to accelerate methane emission reduction. The development of breeding objectives combining methane emission reduction with production goals will support policy and incentives for breeders and farmers to overcome adoption barriers and integrate the results into national GHG inventories. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== &#039;&#039;&#039;Microbiome&#039;&#039;&#039; ===&lt;br /&gt;
The micro-HUB project will establish a reference population with metagenome and genotype data, and create a genomic evaluation system that can be used to select the parents of the next generation with microbiome profiles that produce less enteric methane while maintaining genetic progress in profit and health. The genomic evaluation system will be widely open, will target most relevant breeds and production systems. Furthermore, a large global microbiome network will be established to collect existing data and knowledge and ensure knowledge transfer. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This project will start with metagenome and genomic data on 5.430 individuals from the core project partners, we will explore the opportunity to extend and expand our reference population to other countries with suitable data. By combining national data sets with genotypes, microbiome and methane information, we aim to create the largest rumen microbiome reference population globally. We aim to enlarge the reference population by more than 20.000 microbiome sequenced dairy and beef cattle as well as sheep from the Global Methane Genetics (GMG) program. From this, we will facilitate the delivery of genomic breeding values that can be used in global breeding programs to select for a microbiome composition with lower emissions and reduce the abundance of methanogenic pathways in the rumen microbiome of future generations of cattle and sheep. The project partners cover beef, dairy and sheep populations and creates an opportunity to identify a core microbiome (or set of cores) that can be used as a reference for nation-based breeding programs. The project will closely connect to the other projects within the Global Methane Program, to facilitate microbiome sampling, sequencing and genomic analysis. If you have questions about the microbiome project specifically, you can contact Oscar Gonzalez-Recio, oscar.gonzalezrecio@ed.ac.uk&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Activities ====&lt;br /&gt;
To enlarge the national database partners will obtain additional samples from animals with methane and genotype data from different breeds and production systems within the GMG phenotyping program (dairy and beef cattle). The inclusion of samples from external partners will be encouraged. Partners (also external) will be provided with instruction to collect data and sample rumen microbiome. The micro-Hub will provide stewardship for GMG partners regarding sampling, storage and shipping, as well as bioinformatic analysis. Rumen metagenome sequencing will be centralized in as fewer labs as possible (ideally only one).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Reference populations from partners will be combined, covering a broad range of breeds and productions systems and different geographical regions. Format of the databases will be unified. The combined dataset will be used for the microbiome genomic evaluations. The reference database will be updated with additional data coming from external partners. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We will develop the capabilities to estimate the genomic breeding value for microbiome composition for any genotyped animal in similar productive conditions as those represented in our reference population. The goal is to propose recommendations based on own experience to include estimated genomic breeding values for rumen microbiome profile in breeding programs. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The project will contribute to the activities organized within Global Methane Genetics and the ICAR Feed&amp;amp;Gas working group in building a microbiome network to exchange knowledge, harmonize guidelines and develop protocols. All data generated within the project will be made available through the Global Methane Genetics database. The project will collaborate with the database development to develop microbiome sharing requirements and specifications. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Main goals ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Joint reference metagenome compiled.&lt;br /&gt;
* Microbiome genomic evaluations.&lt;br /&gt;
* Release of SNP coefficients for international genomic evaluations for microbiome compositions.&lt;br /&gt;
* Network building and establishment of platform for rumen metagenome data.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== &#039;&#039;&#039;Working Group meetings&#039;&#039;&#039; ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The six working groups as described above meet two times a year to discuss the progress of their projects and to share knowledge. There are also general webinars organized for the project participants throughout the years.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Dairy Cattle ====&lt;br /&gt;
On the 15th of May 2025 the Working Group Dairy cattle met for the first time and shared their current progress, you can find the presentation slides [[:File:250515 GMG meeting Dairy Working Group.pdf|here.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On the 27&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;th&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; of October 2025 the Working Group Cattle had their second meeting, the current progress was shared and other projects and bottlenecks were discussed. You can find the presentation slides [[:File:20251027 GMG Working group Dairy meeting.pdf|here.]] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Sheep ====&lt;br /&gt;
On the 20th of May 2025 the Working Sheep met for the first time and shared their current progress, you can find the presentation slides [[:File:20250520 Meeting GMG Working group sheep.pdf|here.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On the 11&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;th&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; of November 2025 the Working Group Sheep had their second meeting, the current progress was shared and other projects and bottlenecks were discussed. You can find the presentation slides [[:File:20251111 Sheep Working Group GMG presentation.pdf|here.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Microbiome ====&lt;br /&gt;
On the 23th of May 2025 the Working Group Microbiome met for the first time and shared their current progress, you can find the presentation slides [[:File:202505 Global Meeting Genetics Microbiome working group meeting.pdf|here.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On the 27&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;th&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; of November 2025 the Working Group Microbiome had their second meeting, the current progress was shared and other projects and bottlenecks were discussed. You can find the presentation slides [[:File:20251127 GMG Microbiome WG presentation.pdf|here.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On the 2&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;nd&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; of December 2025 the Working group microbiome organized a Q&amp;amp;A session about microbiome sampling. You can find the slides [[:File:20251202 GMG meeting MicroHub Q&amp;amp;A.pdf|here.]] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Latin America ====&lt;br /&gt;
On the 5th of June 2025 the Working Group Latin America met for the first time and shared their current progress, you can find the presentation slides [[:File:202506 Presentation GMG Working Group Latin America meeting.pdf|here.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On the 14&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;th&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; of November 2025 the Working Group Latin America had their second meeting, the current progress was shared and other projects and bottlenecks were discussed. You can find the presentation slides [[:File:20251114 Latin America GMG Work group meeting.pdf|here.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Africa ====&lt;br /&gt;
On the 23th of May 2025 the Working Group Africa met for the first time and shared their current progress, you can find the presentation slides [[:File:20250523 GMG Working group Africa meeting.pdf|here.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On the 7&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;th&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; of November 2025 the Working Group Africa had their second meeting, the current progress was shared and other projects and bottlenecks were discussed. You can find the presentation slides [[:File:20251107 Africa Workgroup GMG presentation.pdf|here.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Beef ====&lt;br /&gt;
On the 17th of June 2025 the Working Group Beef met for the first time and shared their current progress, you can find the presentation slides [[:File:202506 GMG Working group Beef meeting.pdf|here.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On the 11&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;th&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; of November 2025 the Working Group Beef had their second meeting, the current progress was shared and other projects and bottlenecks were discussed. You can find the presentation slides [[:File:20251106 GMG Working group Beef meeting.pdf|here.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Asia ====&lt;br /&gt;
On the 1th of July 2025 the Working Group Asia met for the first time and shared their current progress, you can find the presentation slides [[:File:20250701 AsiaGMG presentation.pdf|here.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On the 25&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;th&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; of November the Working Group Asia organized a webinar for parties interested in contributing to the Asia group. You can find slides on data to impact [[:File:GMG Asia From data to impact.pdf|here]], an introduction into the GMG [[:File:Asia 20251105.pdf|here]], slides on methane recording techniques [[:File:2511 GMG Asia MethaneMethods.pdf|here]] and a presentation about [[Laser Methane Detector|LMD]] and their experiences from ILRI [[:File:ILRI LMD Exp 2025.pdf|here]]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Webinars ====&lt;br /&gt;
On the 22th of May 2025 there was a webinar for all GMG project participants on effective records in the database, you can find the presentation slides [[:File:250515 GMG meeting Dairy Working Group.pdf|here.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== DAFNE ==&lt;br /&gt;
Department of Agriculture and Forest Sciences at the University of Tuscia. Their main purpose is to collect primary emissions data from sniffers and GF to have emissions factors related to the species, breed, physiological state and diet management. They are engaged with ANAFIBJ and sharing data related to Holstein cattle with them for genetic evaluations. Currently they are running trials with sheep and buffalo.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Sheep ===&lt;br /&gt;
For this trial they are comparing 2 grazing methods using 2 groups of Sopravissana sheep, reared at the facility.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# Rotational, 18 sheep. Turns every 4 days on strip paddocks. 18 paddocks in total; 6 heads on 3 strip paddocks per turn of grazing. After 24 days the sheep are back to the first three strips.&lt;br /&gt;
# Continuous, 18 sheep. Continuous grazing on same paddock. 3 paddocks in total; 6 heads per paddock. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Subgroups for both group A and B (6 heads) are randomly arranged every day. The 18 strip paddocks are the same total size as the three continuous paddocks. They have the same number of heads grazing and the same live weight load.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Both groups are balanced for BW, receive the same hay in quantity and quality with ad libitum access and spend the same time at pasture. Daily sampling of the hay and residual per group is done, weekly sub samples of hay and residual are analyzed. In parallel fresh grass is sampled and analyzed to represent the 2 grazing methods. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The GreenFeed is located in the barn, at 9AM this barn is closed for group A and opens for group B and this switches every day. The GreenFeed is the only place they can get concentrates. Nutritional information for this concentrate can be found [[:File:Nutritional table sheep DAFHNE.docx|here]]. Amount of food and cup drops can be found here.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Trial started end of March 2025 and will last 1.5 months. They are using the GF adapted for small ruminants.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Buffalo ===&lt;br /&gt;
This is a continuous trial which will last 4 months per supplement tested. First they monitor the buffalo for 4 weeks without supplement as a control diet and then there will be an 8 week experimental period with the supplement diet. During the entire period the buffalo are confined to the barn. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The buffalo are separated in two groups, in adjacent pens. One group has access to a milking robot, with the MooLogger from [[Sniffer SOP|Tecnosens.]] The other pen has a conventional milking system and the GreenFeed is placed facing this pen.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
All buffaloes are fed the same concentrates. Nutritional information for this concentrate can be found [[:File:Nutritional table Buffalo DAFHNE.docx|here]]. Amount of food and cup drops can be found here. The buffalo’s in the GF group get the concentrates from the GF and about 1 kg of concentrates during milking operations. The buffalo’s in the sniffer group only get concentrates from the milking robot, which is about 2 kg/head/day.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To account for the emissions recorded individually at different times, they compare the emissions data aggregated on a daily basis. They are using the GF adapted for large ruminants with horns&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== MethaBreed ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:P-2025-1-15-2 FBF Logo MethaBreed Logo 01 4C-01.png|thumb|175x175px]]&lt;br /&gt;
The MethaBreed project aims to improve the sustainability of dairy production by developing innovative breeding strategies for dairy cows that simultaneously reduce methane emissions, enhance feed efficiency, and support animal health. A large-scale longitudinal study is being conducted in commercial dairy herds. Using advanced technologies, individual cow traits are recorded across entire lactations and multiple lactation cycles. Data collection includes continuous monitoring of methane emissions using sniffers, feed intake (using CFIT: Cattle Feed Intake System), body weight (using CFIT and scales), and key health parameters. A particular focus lies on the role of the rumen microbiome in methane production. A central goal of MethaBreed is the development of a new breeding value for methane emissions, enabling the selection of animals with lower environmental impact. These data will be integrated with pedigree and genomic information to allow precise breeding decisions. At the same time, the existing breeding value for feed efficiency will be further refined. The outcomes of the project are expected to make a significant contribution towards more climate-friendly dairy production. In the long term, standardized breeding values will be provided, enabling breeding organizations and farmers to actively select for healthier, more efficient, and more sustainable dairy cows. For more information you can visit the following websites from the partners: [https://www.uni-giessen.de/de/fbz/fb09/institute/ith/ag-koenig/forschung/laufend/methabreed University Giessen], [https://www.fbf-forschung.de/aktuelles/methabreed-neues-forschungsprojekt-zur-reduzierung.html FBF], [https://livestock-functional-microbiology.uni-hohenheim.de/en/research-projects#jfmulticontent_c401477-2 University of Hohenheim.]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Presentation materials ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Seminar by Julius van der Werf: Breeding for a changing climate 13-05-2025 ===&lt;br /&gt;
On the 13th of May Julius van de Werf gave a presentation at Wageningen Livestock Research on selection indexes for selecting low methane livestock, focused on sheep. You can find the slides [[:File:20250513 Seminar J.v.d.Werf.pdf|here]]. You can find the recording of the presentation below.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;youtube&amp;gt;PxKmxKVvVEA?si=C6x0keKAvgU009Da&amp;lt;/youtube&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Seminar by Maria Frizzarin: Introduction to milk mid-infrared spectroscopy 10-07-2025 ===&lt;br /&gt;
On the 10th of July Maria Frizzarin gave a presentation at Wageningen Livestock Research on milk mid-infrared spectroscopy, equations development, and applications. You can find the slides [[:File:10072025 Seminar Maria MIR.pdf|here.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Seminar by Sarah-Joe Burn: Breed4Green 25-09-2025 ===&lt;br /&gt;
On the 25th of September Sarah-Joe Burn gave a presentation at Wageningen Livestock Research on measuring methane emissions in commercial farms and establishing a comprehensive dataset for genetic studies. A similar presentations was given at EAAP 2025, you can find the slides to that presentation [[:File:Eaap2025-breed4green-linke.pdf|here]] and the abstract [[:File:2025 Innsbruck EAAP Book Abstracts.pdf|here]], page 250.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Joint ICAR Feed&amp;amp;Gas and ASGGN workshop ===&lt;br /&gt;
On the 5th of October the joint workshop between the [https://www.icar.org/group/working-group-feed-and-gas/ ICAR Feed&amp;amp;Gas working group] and the [https://www.asggn.org/ ASGGN] took place before the GGAA conference in Nairobi. The presentations can be found below. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[:File:2025 ASGGN - GGAA - A Taste of the Future Buccal Swabbing for Rumen Microbial ProfilingTB.pdf|A Taste of the Future: Buccal Swabbing for Rumen Microbial Profiling]]​. Presented by Ben Perry ([https://www.bioeconomyscience.co.nz/ NZIBS])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[:File:2638 Booker ILRI GGAA ASGGN Oct 2025.pdf|Rate of Genetic Gain for Methane Emissions in a Maternal Production Flock]]. Presented by Fem Booker ([https://www.bioeconomyscience.co.nz/ NZIBS])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[:File:Boris ICAR2025 v01.pdf|Association between rumen and faecal microbiome and enteric methane emissions in dairy cattle]]. Presented by Boris Sepulveda ([https://agriculture.vic.gov.au/ AV])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[:File:CaeliRichardson GGAA Workshop 2025.pdf|Global Framework to Monitor, Measure, and Account for Methane Reductions from Genetic Selection]]. Presented by Caeli Richardson ([https://abacusbio.com/ Abacusbio])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[:File:GGAA Workshop ICAR and ASGGN Ida Storm.pdf|Danish Perspectives on implementation of GHG regulation]]. Presented by Ida Storm ([https://agricultureandfood.dk/ DAFG])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[:File:GGAA Workshop ICAR and ASGGN Rasmus Stephansen.pdf|Experience with CH4 sniffers, what have we learned so far?]] Presented by Rasmus Stephansen ([https://international.au.dk/ AU])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[:File:GGAA workshop MIR methane presentation.pdf|Overview of the methane equations developed from mid-infrared spectroscopy and their applications.]] Presented by Maria Frizzarin ([https://www.agroscope.admin.ch/agroscope/en/home.html Agroscope])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[:File:HanneHonerlagen ICARpresentation.pdf|Adding microbial data to enhance breeding for lower methane emissions]]. Presented by Hanne Honerlagen ([https://www.wur.nl/en/research-results/chair-groups/animal-sciences/animal-breeding-and-genomics-group.htm WUR-ABG])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[:File:McNaughton ASGGN Workshop final.pdf|GreenFeed for phenotyping – our experiences]]. Presented by Lorna McNaughton ([https://www.lic.co.nz/ LIC])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[:File:MIE ILRI GGAA ASGGN Oct 2025.pdf|Methane Index Explorer: Optimising a Breeding Value Format for Simultaneous Inclusion of Enteric Methane Emissions in Breeding Schemes and National Inventories]]. Presented by Pavithra Ariyarathne ([https://www.bioeconomyscience.co.nz/ NZIBS])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[:File:RiccardoGGAA Presentation RB.pdf|ZELP sense]]. Presented by Riccardo Bica ([https://www.zelp.co/ ZELP])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[:File:ICAR Working group Nairobi 5 Oct2025.pdf|Selection for lower methane livestock, selection index considerations]]. Presented by Julius van der Werf (UNE)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Measuring enteric methane in beef and dairy cattle using PAC. Presented by Timothy Bilton ([https://www.bioeconomyscience.co.nz/ NZIBS])&amp;lt;youtube&amp;gt;https://youtu.be/NjPuotrmkMQ&amp;lt;/youtube&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Estimating methane emissions with the GreenFeed System. Presented by Paul Smith ([https://teagasc.ie/ Teagasc]) &amp;lt;youtube&amp;gt;https://youtu.be/TnHefWoP29I&amp;lt;/youtube&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Cvangemert</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://wiki.icar.org/index.php?title=File:P-2025-1-15-2_FBF_Logo_MethaBreed_Logo_01_4C-01.png&amp;diff=4827</id>
		<title>File:P-2025-1-15-2 FBF Logo MethaBreed Logo 01 4C-01.png</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://wiki.icar.org/index.php?title=File:P-2025-1-15-2_FBF_Logo_MethaBreed_Logo_01_4C-01.png&amp;diff=4827"/>
		<updated>2026-01-07T08:10:59Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Cvangemert: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;MethaBreed logo&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Cvangemert</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://wiki.icar.org/index.php?title=Section_20:_Activities&amp;diff=4826</id>
		<title>Section 20: Activities</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://wiki.icar.org/index.php?title=Section_20:_Activities&amp;diff=4826"/>
		<updated>2026-01-07T08:08:43Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Cvangemert: Adjusted MethaBreed to include links to partners&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;big&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;b&amp;gt;NOTE: This version of Section 20 has been approved by the working group&#039;s Chair.  Please be aware that further revisions may occur before final review and approval by the Board and ICAR members per the [[Approval of Page Process]].&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/b&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
== Global Methane Genetics ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:GMG label.png|right|frameless|300x300px]]&lt;br /&gt;
The Global Methane Genetics (GMG) initiative is a global program to accelerate genetic progress in methane emission in ruminants in the Global North and South. This WUR-ABG coordinated initiative is funded by the [https://www.globalmethanehub.org/ Global Methane Hub] and the [https://www.bezosearthfund.org/ Bezos Earth Fund,] both based on philanthropic funds to support methane mitigation and prevent global warming. If you have questions about the [https://www.wur.nl/en/project/global-methane-genetics-initiative.htm GMG initiative] you can send an email to gmg@wur.nl, contact Roel Veerkamp: roel.veerkamp@wur.nl or Birgit Gredler-Grandl: birgit.gredler-grandl@wur.nl.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The initiative holds the following projects:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== &#039;&#039;&#039;Dairy Cattle&#039;&#039;&#039; ===&lt;br /&gt;
We can look to nature to reduce CH4 emissions and use genetic diversity to provide solutions. Genetic improvement, based on identifying animals with genetic predisposition for lower CH4 output and using them to breed for the next generations, is a reliable, cost-effective, and permanent method for transforming livestock&#039;s impact on the environment.  Breeding programs in dairy cattle are run within breeds and across countries. Therefore, the program will accelerate genetic progress by focusing on four major dairy breeds and organizations and countries involved in those breeds. Additionally, the program will acquire considerable leverage through investments in these countries. If you have questions about the dairy cattle section you can contact Birgit Gredler-Grandl: birgit.gredler-grandl@wur.nl.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== &#039;&#039;Holstein breed&#039;&#039; ====&lt;br /&gt;
The largest data collection has been for the Holstein breed, but there is a lack of standardization and protocols in terms of equipment and its utilization (farm level, data processing, data sharing agreements, genetic evaluations, and data collections). Governments and breeding organizations in Denmark and the Netherlands will collaborate and collect methane and genotypes on more than 20,000 Holstein cows for the GMG database. Also, Poland and Italy team up to collect data for the GMG database, and their aim is also to collect more than 20,000 Holstein animals and develop genetic evaluations across a wide range of systems.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===== Denmark-The Netherlands =====&lt;br /&gt;
This collaboration between Aarhus University and Wageningen Livestock Research has five main goals. The contact person for questions about this project is Trine Villumsen: tmv@qgg.au.dk.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Setting up Standard Operating Procedures (SOP) for measuring methane using sniffers&lt;br /&gt;
* Setting up international protocols to measure methane on commercial farms&lt;br /&gt;
* Develop software tools to automate the processing of data into a phenotype&lt;br /&gt;
* Combine historical data in both countries for genetic evaluations&lt;br /&gt;
* Measure enteric methane in 20.000 new cows.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===== Poland-Italy =====&lt;br /&gt;
This collaboration has the following main goals. The contact person for questions about this project is Raffaella Finocchiaro raffaellafinocchiaro@anafibj.it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Measure enteric methane in 20.000 new cows.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== &#039;&#039;Jersey breed&#039;&#039; ====&lt;br /&gt;
Currently, due to the limited data available, the Jersey dairy breed does not have breeding values for methane (CH4) mitigation. The goal of the program is to collect methane genotypes in Canada and Denmark and share this information with the GMG database. The aim is to develop breeding values that will be distributed through the World Jersey Cattle Bureau organization and national Jersey organizations in Australia, Canada, Switzerland, Denmark, France, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands, and New Zealand. If you have questions about the Jersey breed section you can contact Rasmus Bak Stephansen rasmus.stephansen@qgg.au.dk&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== &#039;&#039;Brown Swiss breed&#039;&#039; ====&lt;br /&gt;
The Brown Swiss (BS) breed faces significant challenges due to its small population size, an divers environments the animals are kept. A collaboration between Germany, Switzerland, and Austria to phenotype enough animals is a prerequisite for utilizing the genetic potential of reducing methane emission of the BS breed. In addition to a population of 250 cows recorded with Greenfeed, and 1250 with the sniffer, progress will be accelerated by recording an additional 3,360 cows with sniffers. If you have questions about the Brown Swiss breed section you can contact Elena Frenken: fe@fbf-forschung.de.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== &#039;&#039;Red breeds&#039;&#039; ====&lt;br /&gt;
The red breeds are important for crossbreeding in many countries around the world. The project aims to share and collect CH4 data from Red Dairy Cattle (RDC) breeds (in the Nordic countries, Canada, and the United Kingdom (UK)) and share it with the Global Methane Genetics (GMG) Hub. Together, they will set up a shared genetic evaluation for bulls used for crossbreeding in many more countries. If you have questions about the Red breed section you can contact Elisenda Rius-Vilarrasa: Elisenda.Rius-Vilarrasa@vxa.se.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== &#039;&#039;&#039;Beef Cattle&#039;&#039;&#039; ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== &#039;&#039;Bluegrass (global beef)&#039;&#039; ====&lt;br /&gt;
All industries world-wide have been challenged with reducing emissions and beef is no exception. Genetic selection and specifically genomic selection have been identified as key tools to help meet this challenge. Methane emissions are not a local problem, but a global one and several major beef producing countries who exchange genetic material have, are, and will be collecting methane phenotypes for the purpose of genomic prediction. Individually (including those in Australia), these datasets will be limited in their genomic prediction accuracy. The BLUEGRASS alliance will bring together the key players globally, who collectively have solicited key seed funding from the Global Methane Hub. By sharing data and resources, the development of necessary reference populations will be accelerated. Locally or globally, success in the beef genetics industry has been a model of ‘co-opetition’. Breeders, although competitors, pool resources to build tools that can be used by all to compete with one another. This BLUEGRASS alliance is no different. A global alliance will come together to address this challenge, with or without Australia. Having Australia lead and ignite the alliance with MDC co-funding will create opportunities to direct this global initiative and provide first mover advantages for Australian breeders.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The program is focused on building genomic reference datasets for the main beef breeds in the collaborating countries. The animals to be recorded will be intensively recorded for other production traits, and genotyped, outside this project itself. In each country, trial or research breeding values will be produced and delivered to industry during the life of the project – enabling genetic selection against methane to get underway, and the data will underpin the ability to genomically screen the entire populations of the breeds involved in the respective countries i.e. all seedstock and commercial animals. The data collected will likely assist development of genomic selection against methane in other countries. The accelerated genetic selection and the commercial animal screening will enable real impact to reduce methane from beef cattle. If you have questions about the bluegrass project specifically, you can contact Steve Miller, steve.miller@une.edu.au &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===== Number of phenotypes =====&lt;br /&gt;
This project will phenotype methane traits in beef cattle populations in the US, Australia, the UK, Ireland, and New Zealand. Around 18.500 phenotypes will be collected over all years and countries. It is estimated that around 7.000 phenotypes will be collected in Australia, around 1.600 in New Zealand, around 800 in the UK, around 2.000 in Ireland and around 7.00 in the USA.&lt;br /&gt;
===== Breeds and traits included =====&lt;br /&gt;
All countries included in the Bluegrass project have different breeds and different target traits included in their measurements, besides the methane phenotypes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Australia will focus on Angus and Hereford seedstock with a research population of Angus, Wagyu, Charolais, Shorthorn and Brahman being a target as well. For the seedstock they will focus on seedstock traits plus methane measurements using PAC measures. For the research populations on seedstock traits plus feed intake, carcass as well as methane measurements with PAC.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For New Zealand priority is the progeny test herds. These are mostly Angus, Hereford and their crosses, including a diallel cross design. Some Angus x Simmental. Complete requirements with seedstock herds of Angus and Hereford. Focus is on the following: progeny test, seedstock traits, conception date (via fetal aging) from natural mate at yearling (then re-breeding), carcass grading on steers, feed intake on heifers, rumen microbiome on steers and heifers, seedstock traits from seedstock herds&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For the UK focus lies on Angus and Hereford sired animals, both pedigree and crossbred (including from dairy dams) and they focus on liveweights.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For Ireland they include multi-breed/crossbreed. 30% Charolais and Limousin sired from Continental type suckler dams, 30% Holstein-Friesian and 40% beef (mostly Angus) cross dairy. They will focus on feed intake, liveweight and carcass data.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The USA will be measuring Angus focused on seedstock traits from seedstock herds.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== &#039;&#039;US beef&#039;&#039; ====&lt;br /&gt;
This project will accelerate genetic selection for reduced methane emissions from U.S. and Canadian beef cattle, through phenotyping and genotyping the 18 most influential beef breeds in North America.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The primary activities of this project will center on phenotyping and genetic evaluation of the Germplasm Evaluation (GPE) herd, a large, multibreed resource population at the U.S. Meat Animal Research Center (USMARC) in Nebraska, USA. This herd is structured to represent the genetic diversity of the 18 most influential beef breeds in the U.S.. These 18 breeds are: Angus, Red Angus, Hereford, South Devon, Shorthorn, Beefmaster, Brangus, Brahman, Santa Gertrudis, Braunvieh, ChiAngus, Charolais, Gelbvieh, Limousin, Maine-Anjou, Salers, Simmental, Tarentaise.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Recording of methane phenotypes will occur using multiple approaches to not only maximize the number of phenotypes collected, but to also offer a comparison between methodologies within a U.S. beef production system. Based on these findings and in coordination with other GMG project teams, standard operating procedures for methane phenotyping of beef cattle will be developed and integrated into the [https://beefimprovement.org/resource-center/bif-guidelines/ Guidelines for Uniform Beef Improvement Programs] supporting the evolution of these approaches into standard practice and routine evaluation in any beef breeding system. If you have questions about the US beef project specifically, you can contact Matthew Spangler, mspangler2@unl.edu.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===== Main goals =====&lt;br /&gt;
* Recording methane phenotypes from at least 5,500 multi-breed genotyped beef cattle and openly sharing to the GMG database and the public domain.&lt;br /&gt;
* Development and publication of uniform guidelines for both methane phenotyping in beef cattle systems and the integration of methane phenotypes into beef genetic evaluations, through the BIF Guidelines wiki.&lt;br /&gt;
* Dissemination and routine updating of genetic parameter and genomic marker effects critical for the development of genetic selection tools and deployment of methane-reducing breeding programs.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== &#039;&#039;&#039;Sheep&#039;&#039;&#039; ===&lt;br /&gt;
This project focusses on recording methane phenotypes on animals in various populations, e.g. Merino, Texel, Dohne, Corriedale, maternal and terminal. In each case, those animals will be recorded for a range of other production, health, product quality and welfare traits (the exact suite of traits varies between countries). This ensures that it will be possible to determine the genetic relationships between methane traits and the other traits included in current and future selection indexes and breeding programs – meaning that breeders will be able to make informed decisions on any trade-offs between methane and other traits. In total around 16.600 methane phenotypes will be collected over all years and countries. It is estimated that around 7.500 methane phenotypes will be collected in Australia, 3.000 in Uruguay, 4.000 in New Zealand, 1.200 in the UK and 1.000 in the UK. If you have questions about the sheep project specifically, you can contact Daniel Brown, dbrown2@une.edu.au &lt;br /&gt;
==== Main goals ====&lt;br /&gt;
* Phenotyping and reference populations. Fast tracked phenotyping and  genotyping up to 16,000 records of methane traits across the key countries to facilitate accurate international evaluation of animals (Table 2).&lt;br /&gt;
* Genetic evaluation and models. Breeding values based on international genomic evaluation models to share the benefits of the established reference populations.&lt;br /&gt;
* Proxies. Development and validation of new phenotyping methods to expedite genetic progress.&lt;br /&gt;
* Breeding Programs. Whole farm system models to incorporate methane into breeding objectives in a balanced way and indexes to facilitate selection of breeding candidates.&lt;br /&gt;
* Education and adoption. Stakeholder engagement campaign and international development to ensure world-wide impact.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== &#039;&#039;&#039;Africa&#039;&#039;&#039; ===&lt;br /&gt;
This project focused on three regions of Africa (Eastern, Western and Southern Africa). It will will leverage and  accelerate on-going early research on GHG in these regions, strongly build capacity and team up with researchers to record CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, other economic productive traits and use the records to implement breeding strategies to reduce CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; emission while simultaneously enhancing productivity, food security and employment opportunities in the dairy and beef cattle farming systems; The source of livelihood for many poorly resourced farmers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Tapping into the existing breeding program infrastructure for improved productivity for dairy cattle in the three regions of Africa, this project will result in overall program that will accelerate genetic progress through focus on phenotyping, genotyping and the use of information from the microbiome in the genetic selection of animals in the smallholder dairy system. The overall impact will be better mitigation of negative effects of climate change and more productive cows. Through selection programs based on the index developed with the phenotypic and genomic information from this project.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The major activities include the direct CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; measurements on about 1.655 tropical cattle using [[Greenfeed SOP|GreenFeed]] and the use of [[Laser Methane Detector|LMD]] in smallholder farmers. Genotypic information and phenotypes captured routinely on major important productive traits that influence profitability, income and livelihood of farmers on 1.619 animals. Data sets will be linked to a larger existing data on 9.000 cows with phenotypic and genotypic information from existing projects. If you have questions about the Africa project specifically, you can contact Raphael Mrode, raphael.mrode@sruc.ac.uk&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Main goals ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Methane measurements available on 1.655 tropical cows.&lt;br /&gt;
* Tissue samples and genotypes available on 1.619 tropical cows.&lt;br /&gt;
* Genetic relationship between dairy cows in Western and Eastern Africa estimated.&lt;br /&gt;
* Multi-trait genomic analysis of dairy data and methane in Eastern Africa.&lt;br /&gt;
* Incorporate existing data on over 9.000 cows from existing research projects to enhance genomic prediction.&lt;br /&gt;
* Computation and the roll out of final selection index or sub-indexes developed for improved efficiency - reduced CH4 emission, lower maintenance requirement and increased milk production.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== &#039;&#039;&#039;Latin America&#039;&#039;&#039; ===&lt;br /&gt;
The aim of this project is to accelerate the reduction of enteric methane emissions in beef cattle in Latin America through genetic selection in key breeds relevant to Argentina, Brazil, Uruguay, and Mexico. The focus will be on phenotyping methane emissions and genotyping animals linked to existing genetic improvement programs. Reference populations for genomic selection will be the basis to improve the estimation of genetic merit and select for lower emission. The link with ongoing genetic improvement programs provides data on other economically relevant production traits, thus making it possible to estimate genetic correlations and optimize methane emission reductions with a minimum impact on livestock productivity. This approach minimizes negative impacts on food production while preserving economic, social, and environmental sustainability of beef cattle farming. This collaborative project between national agricultural research institutes (NARI) is supported by breeders’ associations and other key stakeholders. Public-private partnerships and collaborative efforts will scale genetic evaluation for methane emissions as well as the use of lower methane emission genetics on commercial farms. Phenotypic and genomic data from approximately 7.000 animals will be made globally available. In synergy with other projects, it will be possible to increase the size of reference populations leading to an even greater impact on methane emissions mitigation. If you have questions about the Latin America project specifically, you can contact Elly Navajas, enavajas@inia.org.uy&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For developing methane emission phenotyping platforms and reference populations, it is essential to upgrade methane emission recording equipment as well as standardize and coordinate the measurement of animals. Standardized protocols will be developed in collaboration with ICAR, and the criteria for selecting animals to be measured and genotyped will be established by the research team, including technicians from breeder associations. A critical component of the project involves genetic analyses, such as estimating genetic parameters for methane emission-related traits, validating breeding values in additional populations, and evaluating the impact of selecting for reduced methane emissions. Scientific collaboration will be fostered with other beef cattle projects, focusing on areas such as expertise exchange. Communication strategies will be implemented to engage stakeholders, including breeders, artificial insemination centers, policymakers, and other private stakeholders. Dialogue with teams managing greenhouse gas (GHG) inventories and Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs) will also be enhanced. These activities require active collaboration among countries and stakeholders in Latin America to achieve successful outcomes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Main goals ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* A Latin American collaborative network for accelerating genetic improvement for methane emissions reduction is established by NARIs, universities, breeder societies, and private stakeholders engaged in genetic evaluation programs across South America and Mexico. &lt;br /&gt;
* Methane emission phenotyping platforms are implemented, enabling data collection across key beef cattle breeds, targeting 7.000 methane emission phenotypes and genotypes of animals linked to genetic evaluations. &lt;br /&gt;
* Genomic-enhanced estimated breeding values for methane emissions will be available to breeders: based on pure-breed and multi-breed reference populations enhanced through collaboration and data sharing across beef cattle projects within the GMG initiative. &lt;br /&gt;
* The economic and environmental impact of breeding strategies to reduce methane emissions is assessed, to identify the most promising breeding strategies to accelerate methane emission reduction. The development of breeding objectives combining methane emission reduction with production goals will support policy and incentives for breeders and farmers to overcome adoption barriers and integrate the results into national GHG inventories. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== &#039;&#039;&#039;Microbiome&#039;&#039;&#039; ===&lt;br /&gt;
The micro-HUB project will establish a reference population with metagenome and genotype data, and create a genomic evaluation system that can be used to select the parents of the next generation with microbiome profiles that produce less enteric methane while maintaining genetic progress in profit and health. The genomic evaluation system will be widely open, will target most relevant breeds and production systems. Furthermore, a large global microbiome network will be established to collect existing data and knowledge and ensure knowledge transfer. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This project will start with metagenome and genomic data on 5.430 individuals from the core project partners, we will explore the opportunity to extend and expand our reference population to other countries with suitable data. By combining national data sets with genotypes, microbiome and methane information, we aim to create the largest rumen microbiome reference population globally. We aim to enlarge the reference population by more than 20.000 microbiome sequenced dairy and beef cattle as well as sheep from the Global Methane Genetics (GMG) program. From this, we will facilitate the delivery of genomic breeding values that can be used in global breeding programs to select for a microbiome composition with lower emissions and reduce the abundance of methanogenic pathways in the rumen microbiome of future generations of cattle and sheep. The project partners cover beef, dairy and sheep populations and creates an opportunity to identify a core microbiome (or set of cores) that can be used as a reference for nation-based breeding programs. The project will closely connect to the other projects within the Global Methane Program, to facilitate microbiome sampling, sequencing and genomic analysis. If you have questions about the microbiome project specifically, you can contact Oscar Gonzalez-Recio, oscar.gonzalezrecio@ed.ac.uk&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Activities ====&lt;br /&gt;
To enlarge the national database partners will obtain additional samples from animals with methane and genotype data from different breeds and production systems within the GMG phenotyping program (dairy and beef cattle). The inclusion of samples from external partners will be encouraged. Partners (also external) will be provided with instruction to collect data and sample rumen microbiome. The micro-Hub will provide stewardship for GMG partners regarding sampling, storage and shipping, as well as bioinformatic analysis. Rumen metagenome sequencing will be centralized in as fewer labs as possible (ideally only one).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Reference populations from partners will be combined, covering a broad range of breeds and productions systems and different geographical regions. Format of the databases will be unified. The combined dataset will be used for the microbiome genomic evaluations. The reference database will be updated with additional data coming from external partners. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We will develop the capabilities to estimate the genomic breeding value for microbiome composition for any genotyped animal in similar productive conditions as those represented in our reference population. The goal is to propose recommendations based on own experience to include estimated genomic breeding values for rumen microbiome profile in breeding programs. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The project will contribute to the activities organized within Global Methane Genetics and the ICAR Feed&amp;amp;Gas working group in building a microbiome network to exchange knowledge, harmonize guidelines and develop protocols. All data generated within the project will be made available through the Global Methane Genetics database. The project will collaborate with the database development to develop microbiome sharing requirements and specifications. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Main goals ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Joint reference metagenome compiled.&lt;br /&gt;
* Microbiome genomic evaluations.&lt;br /&gt;
* Release of SNP coefficients for international genomic evaluations for microbiome compositions.&lt;br /&gt;
* Network building and establishment of platform for rumen metagenome data.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== &#039;&#039;&#039;Working Group meetings&#039;&#039;&#039; ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The six working groups as described above meet two times a year to discuss the progress of their projects and to share knowledge. There are also general webinars organized for the project participants throughout the years.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Dairy Cattle ====&lt;br /&gt;
On the 15th of May 2025 the Working Group Dairy cattle met for the first time and shared their current progress, you can find the presentation slides [[:File:250515 GMG meeting Dairy Working Group.pdf|here.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On the 27&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;th&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; of October 2025 the Working Group Cattle had their second meeting, the current progress was shared and other projects and bottlenecks were discussed. You can find the presentation slides [[:File:20251027 GMG Working group Dairy meeting.pdf|here.]] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Sheep ====&lt;br /&gt;
On the 20th of May 2025 the Working Sheep met for the first time and shared their current progress, you can find the presentation slides [[:File:20250520 Meeting GMG Working group sheep.pdf|here.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On the 11&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;th&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; of November 2025 the Working Group Sheep had their second meeting, the current progress was shared and other projects and bottlenecks were discussed. You can find the presentation slides [[:File:20251111 Sheep Working Group GMG presentation.pdf|here.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Microbiome ====&lt;br /&gt;
On the 23th of May 2025 the Working Group Microbiome met for the first time and shared their current progress, you can find the presentation slides [[:File:202505 Global Meeting Genetics Microbiome working group meeting.pdf|here.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On the 27&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;th&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; of November 2025 the Working Group Microbiome had their second meeting, the current progress was shared and other projects and bottlenecks were discussed. You can find the presentation slides [[:File:20251127 GMG Microbiome WG presentation.pdf|here.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On the 2&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;nd&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; of December 2025 the Working group microbiome organized a Q&amp;amp;A session about microbiome sampling. You can find the slides [[:File:20251202 GMG meeting MicroHub Q&amp;amp;A.pdf|here.]] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Latin America ====&lt;br /&gt;
On the 5th of June 2025 the Working Group Latin America met for the first time and shared their current progress, you can find the presentation slides [[:File:202506 Presentation GMG Working Group Latin America meeting.pdf|here.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On the 14&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;th&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; of November 2025 the Working Group Latin America had their second meeting, the current progress was shared and other projects and bottlenecks were discussed. You can find the presentation slides [[:File:20251114 Latin America GMG Work group meeting.pdf|here.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Africa ====&lt;br /&gt;
On the 23th of May 2025 the Working Group Africa met for the first time and shared their current progress, you can find the presentation slides [[:File:20250523 GMG Working group Africa meeting.pdf|here.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On the 7&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;th&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; of November 2025 the Working Group Africa had their second meeting, the current progress was shared and other projects and bottlenecks were discussed. You can find the presentation slides [[:File:20251107 Africa Workgroup GMG presentation.pdf|here.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Beef ====&lt;br /&gt;
On the 17th of June 2025 the Working Group Beef met for the first time and shared their current progress, you can find the presentation slides [[:File:202506 GMG Working group Beef meeting.pdf|here.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On the 11&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;th&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; of November 2025 the Working Group Beef had their second meeting, the current progress was shared and other projects and bottlenecks were discussed. You can find the presentation slides [[:File:20251106 GMG Working group Beef meeting.pdf|here.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Asia ====&lt;br /&gt;
On the 1th of July 2025 the Working Group Asia met for the first time and shared their current progress, you can find the presentation slides [[:File:20250701 AsiaGMG presentation.pdf|here.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On the 25&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;th&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; of November the Working Group Asia organized a webinar for parties interested in contributing to the Asia group. You can find slides on data to impact [[:File:GMG Asia From data to impact.pdf|here]], an introduction into the GMG [[:File:Asia 20251105.pdf|here]], slides on methane recording techniques [[:File:2511 GMG Asia MethaneMethods.pdf|here]] and a presentation about [[Laser Methane Detector|LMD]] and their experiences from ILRI [[:File:ILRI LMD Exp 2025.pdf|here]]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Webinars ====&lt;br /&gt;
On the 22th of May 2025 there was a webinar for all GMG project participants on effective records in the database, you can find the presentation slides [[:File:250515 GMG meeting Dairy Working Group.pdf|here.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== DAFNE ==&lt;br /&gt;
Department of Agriculture and Forest Sciences at the University of Tuscia. Their main purpose is to collect primary emissions data from sniffers and GF to have emissions factors related to the species, breed, physiological state and diet management. They are engaged with ANAFIBJ and sharing data related to Holstein cattle with them for genetic evaluations. Currently they are running trials with sheep and buffalo.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Sheep ===&lt;br /&gt;
For this trial they are comparing 2 grazing methods using 2 groups of Sopravissana sheep, reared at the facility.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# Rotational, 18 sheep. Turns every 4 days on strip paddocks. 18 paddocks in total; 6 heads on 3 strip paddocks per turn of grazing. After 24 days the sheep are back to the first three strips.&lt;br /&gt;
# Continuous, 18 sheep. Continuous grazing on same paddock. 3 paddocks in total; 6 heads per paddock. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Subgroups for both group A and B (6 heads) are randomly arranged every day. The 18 strip paddocks are the same total size as the three continuous paddocks. They have the same number of heads grazing and the same live weight load.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Both groups are balanced for BW, receive the same hay in quantity and quality with ad libitum access and spend the same time at pasture. Daily sampling of the hay and residual per group is done, weekly sub samples of hay and residual are analyzed. In parallel fresh grass is sampled and analyzed to represent the 2 grazing methods. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The GreenFeed is located in the barn, at 9AM this barn is closed for group A and opens for group B and this switches every day. The GreenFeed is the only place they can get concentrates. Nutritional information for this concentrate can be found [[:File:Nutritional table sheep DAFHNE.docx|here]]. Amount of food and cup drops can be found here.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Trial started end of March 2025 and will last 1.5 months. They are using the GF adapted for small ruminants.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Buffalo ===&lt;br /&gt;
This is a continuous trial which will last 4 months per supplement tested. First they monitor the buffalo for 4 weeks without supplement as a control diet and then there will be an 8 week experimental period with the supplement diet. During the entire period the buffalo are confined to the barn. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The buffalo are separated in two groups, in adjacent pens. One group has access to a milking robot, with the MooLogger from [[Sniffer SOP|Tecnosens.]] The other pen has a conventional milking system and the GreenFeed is placed facing this pen.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
All buffaloes are fed the same concentrates. Nutritional information for this concentrate can be found [[:File:Nutritional table Buffalo DAFHNE.docx|here]]. Amount of food and cup drops can be found here. The buffalo’s in the GF group get the concentrates from the GF and about 1 kg of concentrates during milking operations. The buffalo’s in the sniffer group only get concentrates from the milking robot, which is about 2 kg/head/day.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To account for the emissions recorded individually at different times, they compare the emissions data aggregated on a daily basis. They are using the GF adapted for large ruminants with horns&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== MethaBreed ==&lt;br /&gt;
The MethaBreed project aims to improve the sustainability of dairy production by developing innovative breeding strategies for dairy cows that simultaneously reduce methane emissions, enhance feed efficiency, and support animal health. A large-scale longitudinal study is being conducted in commercial dairy herds. Using advanced technologies, individual cow traits are recorded across entire lactations and multiple lactation cycles. Data collection includes continuous monitoring of methane emissions using sniffers, feed intake (using CFIT: Cattle Feed Intake System), body weight (using CFIT and scales), and key health parameters. A particular focus lies on the role of the rumen microbiome in methane production. A central goal of MethaBreed is the development of a new breeding value for methane emissions, enabling the selection of animals with lower environmental impact. These data will be integrated with pedigree and genomic information to allow precise breeding decisions. At the same time, the existing breeding value for feed efficiency will be further refined. The outcomes of the project are expected to make a significant contribution towards more climate-friendly dairy production. In the long term, standardized breeding values will be provided, enabling breeding organizations and farmers to actively select for healthier, more efficient, and more sustainable dairy cows. For more information you can visit the following websites from the partners: [https://www.uni-giessen.de/de/fbz/fb09/institute/ith/ag-koenig/forschung/laufend/methabreed University Giessen], [https://www.fbf-forschung.de/aktuelles/methabreed-neues-forschungsprojekt-zur-reduzierung.html FBF], [https://livestock-functional-microbiology.uni-hohenheim.de/en/research-projects#jfmulticontent_c401477-2 University of Hohenheim.]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Presentation materials ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Seminar by Julius van der Werf: Breeding for a changing climate 13-05-2025 ===&lt;br /&gt;
On the 13th of May Julius van de Werf gave a presentation at Wageningen Livestock Research on selection indexes for selecting low methane livestock, focused on sheep. You can find the slides [[:File:20250513 Seminar J.v.d.Werf.pdf|here]]. You can find the recording of the presentation below.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;youtube&amp;gt;PxKmxKVvVEA?si=C6x0keKAvgU009Da&amp;lt;/youtube&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Seminar by Maria Frizzarin: Introduction to milk mid-infrared spectroscopy 10-07-2025 ===&lt;br /&gt;
On the 10th of July Maria Frizzarin gave a presentation at Wageningen Livestock Research on milk mid-infrared spectroscopy, equations development, and applications. You can find the slides [[:File:10072025 Seminar Maria MIR.pdf|here.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Seminar by Sarah-Joe Burn: Breed4Green 25-09-2025 ===&lt;br /&gt;
On the 25th of September Sarah-Joe Burn gave a presentation at Wageningen Livestock Research on measuring methane emissions in commercial farms and establishing a comprehensive dataset for genetic studies. A similar presentations was given at EAAP 2025, you can find the slides to that presentation [[:File:Eaap2025-breed4green-linke.pdf|here]] and the abstract [[:File:2025 Innsbruck EAAP Book Abstracts.pdf|here]], page 250.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Joint ICAR Feed&amp;amp;Gas and ASGGN workshop ===&lt;br /&gt;
On the 5th of October the joint workshop between the [https://www.icar.org/group/working-group-feed-and-gas/ ICAR Feed&amp;amp;Gas working group] and the [https://www.asggn.org/ ASGGN] took place before the GGAA conference in Nairobi. The presentations can be found below. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[:File:2025 ASGGN - GGAA - A Taste of the Future Buccal Swabbing for Rumen Microbial ProfilingTB.pdf|A Taste of the Future: Buccal Swabbing for Rumen Microbial Profiling]]​. Presented by Ben Perry ([https://www.bioeconomyscience.co.nz/ NZIBS])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[:File:2638 Booker ILRI GGAA ASGGN Oct 2025.pdf|Rate of Genetic Gain for Methane Emissions in a Maternal Production Flock]]. Presented by Fem Booker ([https://www.bioeconomyscience.co.nz/ NZIBS])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[:File:Boris ICAR2025 v01.pdf|Association between rumen and faecal microbiome and enteric methane emissions in dairy cattle]]. Presented by Boris Sepulveda ([https://agriculture.vic.gov.au/ AV])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[:File:CaeliRichardson GGAA Workshop 2025.pdf|Global Framework to Monitor, Measure, and Account for Methane Reductions from Genetic Selection]]. Presented by Caeli Richardson ([https://abacusbio.com/ Abacusbio])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[:File:GGAA Workshop ICAR and ASGGN Ida Storm.pdf|Danish Perspectives on implementation of GHG regulation]]. Presented by Ida Storm ([https://agricultureandfood.dk/ DAFG])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[:File:GGAA Workshop ICAR and ASGGN Rasmus Stephansen.pdf|Experience with CH4 sniffers, what have we learned so far?]] Presented by Rasmus Stephansen ([https://international.au.dk/ AU])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[:File:GGAA workshop MIR methane presentation.pdf|Overview of the methane equations developed from mid-infrared spectroscopy and their applications.]] Presented by Maria Frizzarin ([https://www.agroscope.admin.ch/agroscope/en/home.html Agroscope])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[:File:HanneHonerlagen ICARpresentation.pdf|Adding microbial data to enhance breeding for lower methane emissions]]. Presented by Hanne Honerlagen ([https://www.wur.nl/en/research-results/chair-groups/animal-sciences/animal-breeding-and-genomics-group.htm WUR-ABG])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[:File:McNaughton ASGGN Workshop final.pdf|GreenFeed for phenotyping – our experiences]]. Presented by Lorna McNaughton ([https://www.lic.co.nz/ LIC])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[:File:MIE ILRI GGAA ASGGN Oct 2025.pdf|Methane Index Explorer: Optimising a Breeding Value Format for Simultaneous Inclusion of Enteric Methane Emissions in Breeding Schemes and National Inventories]]. Presented by Pavithra Ariyarathne ([https://www.bioeconomyscience.co.nz/ NZIBS])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[:File:RiccardoGGAA Presentation RB.pdf|ZELP sense]]. Presented by Riccardo Bica ([https://www.zelp.co/ ZELP])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[:File:ICAR Working group Nairobi 5 Oct2025.pdf|Selection for lower methane livestock, selection index considerations]]. Presented by Julius van der Werf (UNE)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Measuring enteric methane in beef and dairy cattle using PAC. Presented by Timothy Bilton ([https://www.bioeconomyscience.co.nz/ NZIBS])&amp;lt;youtube&amp;gt;https://youtu.be/NjPuotrmkMQ&amp;lt;/youtube&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Estimating methane emissions with the GreenFeed System. Presented by Paul Smith ([https://teagasc.ie/ Teagasc]) &amp;lt;youtube&amp;gt;https://youtu.be/TnHefWoP29I&amp;lt;/youtube&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Cvangemert</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://wiki.icar.org/index.php?title=Section_20:_ICAR_validation_methane_recording_devices&amp;diff=4825</id>
		<title>Section 20: ICAR validation methane recording devices</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://wiki.icar.org/index.php?title=Section_20:_ICAR_validation_methane_recording_devices&amp;diff=4825"/>
		<updated>2026-01-07T07:06:54Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Cvangemert: added info on webinar new icar validation service for sniffers&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Introduction ==&lt;br /&gt;
[https://www.icar.org/icar-validated-sensor-systems/ ICAR validation] ensures that a device (e.g. methane recording devices) meets manufacturer performance claims through ICAR-approved test plans conducted by a qualified ICAR Test Center. Successful validation confirms that the system can reliably deliver quality data when used correctly, leading to the award of an &#039;&#039;&#039;ICAR Certificate of Validation&#039;&#039;&#039;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A webinar on the scope of this service was held 10 and 11 December 2025. You can find more information and the recording [https://www.icar.org/webinar/webinar-on-icar-new-service-validation-of-methane-sniffers-10-and-11-dec-2025/ here]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Procedure with application for ICAR validation of methane [[Sniffer SOP|sniffer]] and its claims ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Section 11 – Testing, Approval and Checking of Measuring, Recording and Sampling Devices#Part 11C – Testing of Sensor Systems for ICAR Validation|The procedure for validation]] (Figure 1) starts with a request or claim by an applicant, which can be a manufacturer, another stakeholder or a combination of these, to the ICAR Secretariat. The applicant should apply through the application form available [https://my.icar.org/applications-for-icar-validation/edit/ here] or through the ICAR Secretariat and ICAR website. A complete application includes: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* General features of the applicant (name, addresses, physical location, contact person), to be provided filling an ICAR application form; &lt;br /&gt;
* Information on outsourced processes used by the applicant that are relevant for the evaluation; &lt;br /&gt;
* Sniffer name and type, additional ‘brand and type’ names; &lt;br /&gt;
* Purpose and measurement parameters; &lt;br /&gt;
* Where and how to be applied (laboratory, on-farm at-line, on-farm in-line); &lt;br /&gt;
* Mounting position or use; &lt;br /&gt;
* Specie(s) - i.e. cow, buffalo, sheep, goat, other; &lt;br /&gt;
* Peer reviewed publications; &lt;br /&gt;
* Reports of validation studies; &lt;br /&gt;
* Claim(s) to be validated ; &lt;br /&gt;
* Test type required (new device, testing a modification); &lt;br /&gt;
* Technical characteristics, drawings and photographs of device; &lt;br /&gt;
* Technical manual outlining functional processes and principles as well as software/firmware documentation. &lt;br /&gt;
* Installation procedure; &lt;br /&gt;
* User manual, including instructions on proper maintenance; &lt;br /&gt;
* Routine test or periodic check procedures for operators and service technicians. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Following the payment of a first part of the application fee by the applicant, the following steps will be taken: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* ICAR Secretariat will check the application form and related documentation. &lt;br /&gt;
* ICAR will recruit and appoint experts to form an ICAR Expert Panel. This Expert Panel reviews the application with the request/claim. &lt;br /&gt;
* ICAR, on recommendation of the ICAR Expert Panel will appoint an ICAR Test Centre to conduct the tests. &lt;br /&gt;
* The ICAR Expert Panel will formulate a test plan in consultation with the applicant and the ICAR appointed Test Centre. &lt;br /&gt;
* ICAR issues an umbrella contract and sends it to the applicant together with the test plan and the invoice for the full test fees. &lt;br /&gt;
* The ICAR test will be scheduled and conducted after the contract is signed and the test fees are paid in full. The ICAR Secretariat coordinates financial transactions between the applicant, the ICAR appointed Test Centre, and ICAR. &lt;br /&gt;
* For the test to begin, the applicant must send all the necessary devices and accessories to the ICAR appointed Test Centre. In addition, all manuals, documents, and procedures should be provided to the ICAR appointed Test Centre. &lt;br /&gt;
* Then the ICAR appointed Test Centre will conduct the tests. The ICAR appointed Test Centre is obliged to act according to the procedures laid down in the test plan and accompanying protocols. All details associated with the testing phase, including the test results, are kept strictly confidential. The ICAR appointed Test Centre provides periodic reports on tests in progress to the concerned ICAR Expert Panel. &lt;br /&gt;
* Upon completion of the test, the ICAR appointed Test Centre provides a draft report on the test results to the concerned ICAR Expert Panel through the ICAR Secretariat. &lt;br /&gt;
* After a 21-day review and comment period by the ICAR Expert Panel, the ICAR appointed Test Centre addresses any possible comments, prepares a final report and resubmits it to the ICAR Expert Panel through the ICAR Secretariat within 21 days of the receipt of the comments. &lt;br /&gt;
* After another 21-day review period, the ICAR Expert Panel provides its recommendation on validation output to ICAR Certification with a notification to the applicant. &lt;br /&gt;
* In case of a successful test for validation, ICAR will grant an ICAR certificate of validation to the applicant. &lt;br /&gt;
* All ICAR-validated claims are published on the ICAR website, including pictures of the device, year of validation, species and information on the certified claim. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Flowchart for ICAR validation.png|980x980px|Figure 1. Flowchart for ICAR validation|alt=Figure 1. Flowchart for ICAR validation|center|thumb]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Testing procedure methane sniffers ==&lt;br /&gt;
The testing procedure consists of two stages: Firstly, the sniffer will be tested in the Air Quality Lab of [https://www.wur.nl/en.htm Wageningen University and Research] (Droevendaalsesteeg 3a, 6708 PB Wageningen, the Netherlands) and after the sniffer producing company and Wageningen University and Research agree on continuing the test procedure, the sniffer will be tested on farm at the innovation and research center [https://www.dairycampus.nl/nl/home.htm DairyCampus]; the official ICAR Test Centre (Boksumerdyk 11, 8912 CA Leeuwarden, the Netherlands). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Test in Air Quality Lab of Wageningen University and Research ===&lt;br /&gt;
At the Air Quality Lab known concentrations of CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and, if applicable, CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; will be offered to the sniffers to validate the output of the sniffers. The offered CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentrations are within a range of 100 ppm to 2,000 ppm and, if applicable, for CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; within a range of 1,000 ppm to 10,000 ppm. The test procedure stipulates to start with the lowest concentration going to the highest concentration and back to also capture the capability of the sniffer to record sinking gas concentrations. At the lab, moisture sensitivity will also be tested for the sniffers. Here a known CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; gas concentration is offered, and the level of relative humidity is increased in 5 steps from 0 ‘dry’ gas to 90-95%, which is the maximum amount. The recorded measures, the response time of the sniffer, the repeatability and the effect of moisture in the lab test will be documented and analyzed.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== On farm test on DairyCampus ===&lt;br /&gt;
Field testing of the sniffers will be conducted on the DairyCampus farm. The barn in which the test will be conducted has a milking robot (DeLaval) as well as a [[Greenfeed SOP|GreenFeed unit]] (c-Lock Inc.) measuring the gas fluxes of CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2.&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; The sniffer will be installed for 3 months continuously at the milking robot. The repeatability of repeated measurements on the same cow on the same day, as well as the correlation with GreenFeed measurements on the same cow on the same day will be calculated and missing measurements will be documented. The ranking of the animals from low to high emitters will be compared. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Further, once per month the [[:File:Determination of carbon dioxide concentrations in-wageningen university and research LUNG METHOD.pdf|lung method]] will be applied to validate the output from the sniffers in the field. This is done by placing two gas collection bins next to the milking robot and collecting air samples from the same tube as the sniffers. We will collect samples at three different time points during the day. Each sample collected will be from an approximately 2-hour time period, in duplo (duplicate of air sampling at the same time). This collected gas will then be sent to the air-quality lab to be analyzed with gas chromatography (GC) to determine the concentrations of CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; in each bag. The results from this GC analysis will be compared to the average gas measurements from the sniffers over the same time period.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Cvangemert</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://wiki.icar.org/index.php?title=Section_20:_Activities&amp;diff=4824</id>
		<title>Section 20: Activities</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://wiki.icar.org/index.php?title=Section_20:_Activities&amp;diff=4824"/>
		<updated>2026-01-07T06:57:44Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Cvangemert: Added Methabreed project&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;big&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;b&amp;gt;NOTE: This version of Section 20 has been approved by the working group&#039;s Chair.  Please be aware that further revisions may occur before final review and approval by the Board and ICAR members per the [[Approval of Page Process]].&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/b&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
== Global Methane Genetics ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:GMG label.png|right|frameless|300x300px]]&lt;br /&gt;
The Global Methane Genetics (GMG) initiative is a global program to accelerate genetic progress in methane emission in ruminants in the Global North and South. This WUR-ABG coordinated initiative is funded by the [https://www.globalmethanehub.org/ Global Methane Hub] and the [https://www.bezosearthfund.org/ Bezos Earth Fund,] both based on philanthropic funds to support methane mitigation and prevent global warming. If you have questions about the [https://www.wur.nl/en/project/global-methane-genetics-initiative.htm GMG initiative] you can send an email to gmg@wur.nl, contact Roel Veerkamp: roel.veerkamp@wur.nl or Birgit Gredler-Grandl: birgit.gredler-grandl@wur.nl.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The initiative holds the following projects:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== &#039;&#039;&#039;Dairy Cattle&#039;&#039;&#039; ===&lt;br /&gt;
We can look to nature to reduce CH4 emissions and use genetic diversity to provide solutions. Genetic improvement, based on identifying animals with genetic predisposition for lower CH4 output and using them to breed for the next generations, is a reliable, cost-effective, and permanent method for transforming livestock&#039;s impact on the environment.  Breeding programs in dairy cattle are run within breeds and across countries. Therefore, the program will accelerate genetic progress by focusing on four major dairy breeds and organizations and countries involved in those breeds. Additionally, the program will acquire considerable leverage through investments in these countries. If you have questions about the dairy cattle section you can contact Birgit Gredler-Grandl: birgit.gredler-grandl@wur.nl.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== &#039;&#039;Holstein breed&#039;&#039; ====&lt;br /&gt;
The largest data collection has been for the Holstein breed, but there is a lack of standardization and protocols in terms of equipment and its utilization (farm level, data processing, data sharing agreements, genetic evaluations, and data collections). Governments and breeding organizations in Denmark and the Netherlands will collaborate and collect methane and genotypes on more than 20,000 Holstein cows for the GMG database. Also, Poland and Italy team up to collect data for the GMG database, and their aim is also to collect more than 20,000 Holstein animals and develop genetic evaluations across a wide range of systems.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===== Denmark-The Netherlands =====&lt;br /&gt;
This collaboration between Aarhus University and Wageningen Livestock Research has five main goals. The contact person for questions about this project is Trine Villumsen: tmv@qgg.au.dk.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Setting up Standard Operating Procedures (SOP) for measuring methane using sniffers&lt;br /&gt;
* Setting up international protocols to measure methane on commercial farms&lt;br /&gt;
* Develop software tools to automate the processing of data into a phenotype&lt;br /&gt;
* Combine historical data in both countries for genetic evaluations&lt;br /&gt;
* Measure enteric methane in 20.000 new cows.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===== Poland-Italy =====&lt;br /&gt;
This collaboration has the following main goals. The contact person for questions about this project is Raffaella Finocchiaro raffaellafinocchiaro@anafibj.it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Measure enteric methane in 20.000 new cows.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== &#039;&#039;Jersey breed&#039;&#039; ====&lt;br /&gt;
Currently, due to the limited data available, the Jersey dairy breed does not have breeding values for methane (CH4) mitigation. The goal of the program is to collect methane genotypes in Canada and Denmark and share this information with the GMG database. The aim is to develop breeding values that will be distributed through the World Jersey Cattle Bureau organization and national Jersey organizations in Australia, Canada, Switzerland, Denmark, France, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands, and New Zealand. If you have questions about the Jersey breed section you can contact Rasmus Bak Stephansen rasmus.stephansen@qgg.au.dk&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== &#039;&#039;Brown Swiss breed&#039;&#039; ====&lt;br /&gt;
The Brown Swiss (BS) breed faces significant challenges due to its small population size, an divers environments the animals are kept. A collaboration between Germany, Switzerland, and Austria to phenotype enough animals is a prerequisite for utilizing the genetic potential of reducing methane emission of the BS breed. In addition to a population of 250 cows recorded with Greenfeed, and 1250 with the sniffer, progress will be accelerated by recording an additional 3,360 cows with sniffers. If you have questions about the Brown Swiss breed section you can contact Elena Frenken: fe@fbf-forschung.de.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== &#039;&#039;Red breeds&#039;&#039; ====&lt;br /&gt;
The red breeds are important for crossbreeding in many countries around the world. The project aims to share and collect CH4 data from Red Dairy Cattle (RDC) breeds (in the Nordic countries, Canada, and the United Kingdom (UK)) and share it with the Global Methane Genetics (GMG) Hub. Together, they will set up a shared genetic evaluation for bulls used for crossbreeding in many more countries. If you have questions about the Red breed section you can contact Elisenda Rius-Vilarrasa: Elisenda.Rius-Vilarrasa@vxa.se.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== &#039;&#039;&#039;Beef Cattle&#039;&#039;&#039; ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== &#039;&#039;Bluegrass (global beef)&#039;&#039; ====&lt;br /&gt;
All industries world-wide have been challenged with reducing emissions and beef is no exception. Genetic selection and specifically genomic selection have been identified as key tools to help meet this challenge. Methane emissions are not a local problem, but a global one and several major beef producing countries who exchange genetic material have, are, and will be collecting methane phenotypes for the purpose of genomic prediction. Individually (including those in Australia), these datasets will be limited in their genomic prediction accuracy. The BLUEGRASS alliance will bring together the key players globally, who collectively have solicited key seed funding from the Global Methane Hub. By sharing data and resources, the development of necessary reference populations will be accelerated. Locally or globally, success in the beef genetics industry has been a model of ‘co-opetition’. Breeders, although competitors, pool resources to build tools that can be used by all to compete with one another. This BLUEGRASS alliance is no different. A global alliance will come together to address this challenge, with or without Australia. Having Australia lead and ignite the alliance with MDC co-funding will create opportunities to direct this global initiative and provide first mover advantages for Australian breeders.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The program is focused on building genomic reference datasets for the main beef breeds in the collaborating countries. The animals to be recorded will be intensively recorded for other production traits, and genotyped, outside this project itself. In each country, trial or research breeding values will be produced and delivered to industry during the life of the project – enabling genetic selection against methane to get underway, and the data will underpin the ability to genomically screen the entire populations of the breeds involved in the respective countries i.e. all seedstock and commercial animals. The data collected will likely assist development of genomic selection against methane in other countries. The accelerated genetic selection and the commercial animal screening will enable real impact to reduce methane from beef cattle. If you have questions about the bluegrass project specifically, you can contact Steve Miller, steve.miller@une.edu.au &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===== Number of phenotypes =====&lt;br /&gt;
This project will phenotype methane traits in beef cattle populations in the US, Australia, the UK, Ireland, and New Zealand. Around 18.500 phenotypes will be collected over all years and countries. It is estimated that around 7.000 phenotypes will be collected in Australia, around 1.600 in New Zealand, around 800 in the UK, around 2.000 in Ireland and around 7.00 in the USA.&lt;br /&gt;
===== Breeds and traits included =====&lt;br /&gt;
All countries included in the Bluegrass project have different breeds and different target traits included in their measurements, besides the methane phenotypes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Australia will focus on Angus and Hereford seedstock with a research population of Angus, Wagyu, Charolais, Shorthorn and Brahman being a target as well. For the seedstock they will focus on seedstock traits plus methane measurements using PAC measures. For the research populations on seedstock traits plus feed intake, carcass as well as methane measurements with PAC.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For New Zealand priority is the progeny test herds. These are mostly Angus, Hereford and their crosses, including a diallel cross design. Some Angus x Simmental. Complete requirements with seedstock herds of Angus and Hereford. Focus is on the following: progeny test, seedstock traits, conception date (via fetal aging) from natural mate at yearling (then re-breeding), carcass grading on steers, feed intake on heifers, rumen microbiome on steers and heifers, seedstock traits from seedstock herds&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For the UK focus lies on Angus and Hereford sired animals, both pedigree and crossbred (including from dairy dams) and they focus on liveweights.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For Ireland they include multi-breed/crossbreed. 30% Charolais and Limousin sired from Continental type suckler dams, 30% Holstein-Friesian and 40% beef (mostly Angus) cross dairy. They will focus on feed intake, liveweight and carcass data.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The USA will be measuring Angus focused on seedstock traits from seedstock herds.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== &#039;&#039;US beef&#039;&#039; ====&lt;br /&gt;
This project will accelerate genetic selection for reduced methane emissions from U.S. and Canadian beef cattle, through phenotyping and genotyping the 18 most influential beef breeds in North America.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The primary activities of this project will center on phenotyping and genetic evaluation of the Germplasm Evaluation (GPE) herd, a large, multibreed resource population at the U.S. Meat Animal Research Center (USMARC) in Nebraska, USA. This herd is structured to represent the genetic diversity of the 18 most influential beef breeds in the U.S.. These 18 breeds are: Angus, Red Angus, Hereford, South Devon, Shorthorn, Beefmaster, Brangus, Brahman, Santa Gertrudis, Braunvieh, ChiAngus, Charolais, Gelbvieh, Limousin, Maine-Anjou, Salers, Simmental, Tarentaise.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Recording of methane phenotypes will occur using multiple approaches to not only maximize the number of phenotypes collected, but to also offer a comparison between methodologies within a U.S. beef production system. Based on these findings and in coordination with other GMG project teams, standard operating procedures for methane phenotyping of beef cattle will be developed and integrated into the [https://beefimprovement.org/resource-center/bif-guidelines/ Guidelines for Uniform Beef Improvement Programs] supporting the evolution of these approaches into standard practice and routine evaluation in any beef breeding system. If you have questions about the US beef project specifically, you can contact Matthew Spangler, mspangler2@unl.edu.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===== Main goals =====&lt;br /&gt;
* Recording methane phenotypes from at least 5,500 multi-breed genotyped beef cattle and openly sharing to the GMG database and the public domain.&lt;br /&gt;
* Development and publication of uniform guidelines for both methane phenotyping in beef cattle systems and the integration of methane phenotypes into beef genetic evaluations, through the BIF Guidelines wiki.&lt;br /&gt;
* Dissemination and routine updating of genetic parameter and genomic marker effects critical for the development of genetic selection tools and deployment of methane-reducing breeding programs.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== &#039;&#039;&#039;Sheep&#039;&#039;&#039; ===&lt;br /&gt;
This project focusses on recording methane phenotypes on animals in various populations, e.g. Merino, Texel, Dohne, Corriedale, maternal and terminal. In each case, those animals will be recorded for a range of other production, health, product quality and welfare traits (the exact suite of traits varies between countries). This ensures that it will be possible to determine the genetic relationships between methane traits and the other traits included in current and future selection indexes and breeding programs – meaning that breeders will be able to make informed decisions on any trade-offs between methane and other traits. In total around 16.600 methane phenotypes will be collected over all years and countries. It is estimated that around 7.500 methane phenotypes will be collected in Australia, 3.000 in Uruguay, 4.000 in New Zealand, 1.200 in the UK and 1.000 in the UK. If you have questions about the sheep project specifically, you can contact Daniel Brown, dbrown2@une.edu.au &lt;br /&gt;
==== Main goals ====&lt;br /&gt;
* Phenotyping and reference populations. Fast tracked phenotyping and  genotyping up to 16,000 records of methane traits across the key countries to facilitate accurate international evaluation of animals (Table 2).&lt;br /&gt;
* Genetic evaluation and models. Breeding values based on international genomic evaluation models to share the benefits of the established reference populations.&lt;br /&gt;
* Proxies. Development and validation of new phenotyping methods to expedite genetic progress.&lt;br /&gt;
* Breeding Programs. Whole farm system models to incorporate methane into breeding objectives in a balanced way and indexes to facilitate selection of breeding candidates.&lt;br /&gt;
* Education and adoption. Stakeholder engagement campaign and international development to ensure world-wide impact.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== &#039;&#039;&#039;Africa&#039;&#039;&#039; ===&lt;br /&gt;
This project focused on three regions of Africa (Eastern, Western and Southern Africa). It will will leverage and  accelerate on-going early research on GHG in these regions, strongly build capacity and team up with researchers to record CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, other economic productive traits and use the records to implement breeding strategies to reduce CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; emission while simultaneously enhancing productivity, food security and employment opportunities in the dairy and beef cattle farming systems; The source of livelihood for many poorly resourced farmers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Tapping into the existing breeding program infrastructure for improved productivity for dairy cattle in the three regions of Africa, this project will result in overall program that will accelerate genetic progress through focus on phenotyping, genotyping and the use of information from the microbiome in the genetic selection of animals in the smallholder dairy system. The overall impact will be better mitigation of negative effects of climate change and more productive cows. Through selection programs based on the index developed with the phenotypic and genomic information from this project.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The major activities include the direct CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; measurements on about 1.655 tropical cattle using [[Greenfeed SOP|GreenFeed]] and the use of [[Laser Methane Detector|LMD]] in smallholder farmers. Genotypic information and phenotypes captured routinely on major important productive traits that influence profitability, income and livelihood of farmers on 1.619 animals. Data sets will be linked to a larger existing data on 9.000 cows with phenotypic and genotypic information from existing projects. If you have questions about the Africa project specifically, you can contact Raphael Mrode, raphael.mrode@sruc.ac.uk&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Main goals ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Methane measurements available on 1.655 tropical cows.&lt;br /&gt;
* Tissue samples and genotypes available on 1.619 tropical cows.&lt;br /&gt;
* Genetic relationship between dairy cows in Western and Eastern Africa estimated.&lt;br /&gt;
* Multi-trait genomic analysis of dairy data and methane in Eastern Africa.&lt;br /&gt;
* Incorporate existing data on over 9.000 cows from existing research projects to enhance genomic prediction.&lt;br /&gt;
* Computation and the roll out of final selection index or sub-indexes developed for improved efficiency - reduced CH4 emission, lower maintenance requirement and increased milk production.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== &#039;&#039;&#039;Latin America&#039;&#039;&#039; ===&lt;br /&gt;
The aim of this project is to accelerate the reduction of enteric methane emissions in beef cattle in Latin America through genetic selection in key breeds relevant to Argentina, Brazil, Uruguay, and Mexico. The focus will be on phenotyping methane emissions and genotyping animals linked to existing genetic improvement programs. Reference populations for genomic selection will be the basis to improve the estimation of genetic merit and select for lower emission. The link with ongoing genetic improvement programs provides data on other economically relevant production traits, thus making it possible to estimate genetic correlations and optimize methane emission reductions with a minimum impact on livestock productivity. This approach minimizes negative impacts on food production while preserving economic, social, and environmental sustainability of beef cattle farming. This collaborative project between national agricultural research institutes (NARI) is supported by breeders’ associations and other key stakeholders. Public-private partnerships and collaborative efforts will scale genetic evaluation for methane emissions as well as the use of lower methane emission genetics on commercial farms. Phenotypic and genomic data from approximately 7.000 animals will be made globally available. In synergy with other projects, it will be possible to increase the size of reference populations leading to an even greater impact on methane emissions mitigation. If you have questions about the Latin America project specifically, you can contact Elly Navajas, enavajas@inia.org.uy&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For developing methane emission phenotyping platforms and reference populations, it is essential to upgrade methane emission recording equipment as well as standardize and coordinate the measurement of animals. Standardized protocols will be developed in collaboration with ICAR, and the criteria for selecting animals to be measured and genotyped will be established by the research team, including technicians from breeder associations. A critical component of the project involves genetic analyses, such as estimating genetic parameters for methane emission-related traits, validating breeding values in additional populations, and evaluating the impact of selecting for reduced methane emissions. Scientific collaboration will be fostered with other beef cattle projects, focusing on areas such as expertise exchange. Communication strategies will be implemented to engage stakeholders, including breeders, artificial insemination centers, policymakers, and other private stakeholders. Dialogue with teams managing greenhouse gas (GHG) inventories and Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs) will also be enhanced. These activities require active collaboration among countries and stakeholders in Latin America to achieve successful outcomes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Main goals ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* A Latin American collaborative network for accelerating genetic improvement for methane emissions reduction is established by NARIs, universities, breeder societies, and private stakeholders engaged in genetic evaluation programs across South America and Mexico. &lt;br /&gt;
* Methane emission phenotyping platforms are implemented, enabling data collection across key beef cattle breeds, targeting 7.000 methane emission phenotypes and genotypes of animals linked to genetic evaluations. &lt;br /&gt;
* Genomic-enhanced estimated breeding values for methane emissions will be available to breeders: based on pure-breed and multi-breed reference populations enhanced through collaboration and data sharing across beef cattle projects within the GMG initiative. &lt;br /&gt;
* The economic and environmental impact of breeding strategies to reduce methane emissions is assessed, to identify the most promising breeding strategies to accelerate methane emission reduction. The development of breeding objectives combining methane emission reduction with production goals will support policy and incentives for breeders and farmers to overcome adoption barriers and integrate the results into national GHG inventories. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== &#039;&#039;&#039;Microbiome&#039;&#039;&#039; ===&lt;br /&gt;
The micro-HUB project will establish a reference population with metagenome and genotype data, and create a genomic evaluation system that can be used to select the parents of the next generation with microbiome profiles that produce less enteric methane while maintaining genetic progress in profit and health. The genomic evaluation system will be widely open, will target most relevant breeds and production systems. Furthermore, a large global microbiome network will be established to collect existing data and knowledge and ensure knowledge transfer. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This project will start with metagenome and genomic data on 5.430 individuals from the core project partners, we will explore the opportunity to extend and expand our reference population to other countries with suitable data. By combining national data sets with genotypes, microbiome and methane information, we aim to create the largest rumen microbiome reference population globally. We aim to enlarge the reference population by more than 20.000 microbiome sequenced dairy and beef cattle as well as sheep from the Global Methane Genetics (GMG) program. From this, we will facilitate the delivery of genomic breeding values that can be used in global breeding programs to select for a microbiome composition with lower emissions and reduce the abundance of methanogenic pathways in the rumen microbiome of future generations of cattle and sheep. The project partners cover beef, dairy and sheep populations and creates an opportunity to identify a core microbiome (or set of cores) that can be used as a reference for nation-based breeding programs. The project will closely connect to the other projects within the Global Methane Program, to facilitate microbiome sampling, sequencing and genomic analysis. If you have questions about the microbiome project specifically, you can contact Oscar Gonzalez-Recio, oscar.gonzalezrecio@ed.ac.uk&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Activities ====&lt;br /&gt;
To enlarge the national database partners will obtain additional samples from animals with methane and genotype data from different breeds and production systems within the GMG phenotyping program (dairy and beef cattle). The inclusion of samples from external partners will be encouraged. Partners (also external) will be provided with instruction to collect data and sample rumen microbiome. The micro-Hub will provide stewardship for GMG partners regarding sampling, storage and shipping, as well as bioinformatic analysis. Rumen metagenome sequencing will be centralized in as fewer labs as possible (ideally only one).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Reference populations from partners will be combined, covering a broad range of breeds and productions systems and different geographical regions. Format of the databases will be unified. The combined dataset will be used for the microbiome genomic evaluations. The reference database will be updated with additional data coming from external partners. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We will develop the capabilities to estimate the genomic breeding value for microbiome composition for any genotyped animal in similar productive conditions as those represented in our reference population. The goal is to propose recommendations based on own experience to include estimated genomic breeding values for rumen microbiome profile in breeding programs. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The project will contribute to the activities organized within Global Methane Genetics and the ICAR Feed&amp;amp;Gas working group in building a microbiome network to exchange knowledge, harmonize guidelines and develop protocols. All data generated within the project will be made available through the Global Methane Genetics database. The project will collaborate with the database development to develop microbiome sharing requirements and specifications. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Main goals ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Joint reference metagenome compiled.&lt;br /&gt;
* Microbiome genomic evaluations.&lt;br /&gt;
* Release of SNP coefficients for international genomic evaluations for microbiome compositions.&lt;br /&gt;
* Network building and establishment of platform for rumen metagenome data.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== &#039;&#039;&#039;Working Group meetings&#039;&#039;&#039; ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The six working groups as described above meet two times a year to discuss the progress of their projects and to share knowledge. There are also general webinars organized for the project participants throughout the years.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Dairy Cattle ====&lt;br /&gt;
On the 15th of May 2025 the Working Group Dairy cattle met for the first time and shared their current progress, you can find the presentation slides [[:File:250515 GMG meeting Dairy Working Group.pdf|here.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On the 27&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;th&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; of October 2025 the Working Group Cattle had their second meeting, the current progress was shared and other projects and bottlenecks were discussed. You can find the presentation slides [[:File:20251027 GMG Working group Dairy meeting.pdf|here.]] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Sheep ====&lt;br /&gt;
On the 20th of May 2025 the Working Sheep met for the first time and shared their current progress, you can find the presentation slides [[:File:20250520 Meeting GMG Working group sheep.pdf|here.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On the 11&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;th&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; of November 2025 the Working Group Sheep had their second meeting, the current progress was shared and other projects and bottlenecks were discussed. You can find the presentation slides [[:File:20251111 Sheep Working Group GMG presentation.pdf|here.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Microbiome ====&lt;br /&gt;
On the 23th of May 2025 the Working Group Microbiome met for the first time and shared their current progress, you can find the presentation slides [[:File:202505 Global Meeting Genetics Microbiome working group meeting.pdf|here.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On the 27&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;th&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; of November 2025 the Working Group Microbiome had their second meeting, the current progress was shared and other projects and bottlenecks were discussed. You can find the presentation slides [[:File:20251127 GMG Microbiome WG presentation.pdf|here.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On the 2&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;nd&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; of December 2025 the Working group microbiome organized a Q&amp;amp;A session about microbiome sampling. You can find the slides [[:File:20251202 GMG meeting MicroHub Q&amp;amp;A.pdf|here.]] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Latin America ====&lt;br /&gt;
On the 5th of June 2025 the Working Group Latin America met for the first time and shared their current progress, you can find the presentation slides [[:File:202506 Presentation GMG Working Group Latin America meeting.pdf|here.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On the 14&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;th&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; of November 2025 the Working Group Latin America had their second meeting, the current progress was shared and other projects and bottlenecks were discussed. You can find the presentation slides [[:File:20251114 Latin America GMG Work group meeting.pdf|here.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Africa ====&lt;br /&gt;
On the 23th of May 2025 the Working Group Africa met for the first time and shared their current progress, you can find the presentation slides [[:File:20250523 GMG Working group Africa meeting.pdf|here.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On the 7&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;th&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; of November 2025 the Working Group Africa had their second meeting, the current progress was shared and other projects and bottlenecks were discussed. You can find the presentation slides [[:File:20251107 Africa Workgroup GMG presentation.pdf|here.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Beef ====&lt;br /&gt;
On the 17th of June 2025 the Working Group Beef met for the first time and shared their current progress, you can find the presentation slides [[:File:202506 GMG Working group Beef meeting.pdf|here.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On the 11&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;th&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; of November 2025 the Working Group Beef had their second meeting, the current progress was shared and other projects and bottlenecks were discussed. You can find the presentation slides [[:File:20251106 GMG Working group Beef meeting.pdf|here.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Asia ====&lt;br /&gt;
On the 1th of July 2025 the Working Group Asia met for the first time and shared their current progress, you can find the presentation slides [[:File:20250701 AsiaGMG presentation.pdf|here.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On the 25&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;th&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; of November the Working Group Asia organized a webinar for parties interested in contributing to the Asia group. You can find slides on data to impact [[:File:GMG Asia From data to impact.pdf|here]], an introduction into the GMG [[:File:Asia 20251105.pdf|here]], slides on methane recording techniques [[:File:2511 GMG Asia MethaneMethods.pdf|here]] and a presentation about [[Laser Methane Detector|LMD]] and their experiences from ILRI [[:File:ILRI LMD Exp 2025.pdf|here]]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Webinars ====&lt;br /&gt;
On the 22th of May 2025 there was a webinar for all GMG project participants on effective records in the database, you can find the presentation slides [[:File:250515 GMG meeting Dairy Working Group.pdf|here.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== DAFNE ==&lt;br /&gt;
Department of Agriculture and Forest Sciences at the University of Tuscia. Their main purpose is to collect primary emissions data from sniffers and GF to have emissions factors related to the species, breed, physiological state and diet management. They are engaged with ANAFIBJ and sharing data related to Holstein cattle with them for genetic evaluations. Currently they are running trials with sheep and buffalo.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Sheep ===&lt;br /&gt;
For this trial they are comparing 2 grazing methods using 2 groups of Sopravissana sheep, reared at the facility.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# Rotational, 18 sheep. Turns every 4 days on strip paddocks. 18 paddocks in total; 6 heads on 3 strip paddocks per turn of grazing. After 24 days the sheep are back to the first three strips.&lt;br /&gt;
# Continuous, 18 sheep. Continuous grazing on same paddock. 3 paddocks in total; 6 heads per paddock. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Subgroups for both group A and B (6 heads) are randomly arranged every day. The 18 strip paddocks are the same total size as the three continuous paddocks. They have the same number of heads grazing and the same live weight load.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Both groups are balanced for BW, receive the same hay in quantity and quality with ad libitum access and spend the same time at pasture. Daily sampling of the hay and residual per group is done, weekly sub samples of hay and residual are analyzed. In parallel fresh grass is sampled and analyzed to represent the 2 grazing methods. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The GreenFeed is located in the barn, at 9AM this barn is closed for group A and opens for group B and this switches every day. The GreenFeed is the only place they can get concentrates. Nutritional information for this concentrate can be found [[:File:Nutritional table sheep DAFHNE.docx|here]]. Amount of food and cup drops can be found here.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Trial started end of March 2025 and will last 1.5 months. They are using the GF adapted for small ruminants.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Buffalo ===&lt;br /&gt;
This is a continuous trial which will last 4 months per supplement tested. First they monitor the buffalo for 4 weeks without supplement as a control diet and then there will be an 8 week experimental period with the supplement diet. During the entire period the buffalo are confined to the barn. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The buffalo are separated in two groups, in adjacent pens. One group has access to a milking robot, with the MooLogger from [[Sniffer SOP|Tecnosens.]] The other pen has a conventional milking system and the GreenFeed is placed facing this pen.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
All buffaloes are fed the same concentrates. Nutritional information for this concentrate can be found [[:File:Nutritional table Buffalo DAFHNE.docx|here]]. Amount of food and cup drops can be found here. The buffalo’s in the GF group get the concentrates from the GF and about 1 kg of concentrates during milking operations. The buffalo’s in the sniffer group only get concentrates from the milking robot, which is about 2 kg/head/day.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To account for the emissions recorded individually at different times, they compare the emissions data aggregated on a daily basis. They are using the GF adapted for large ruminants with horns&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== MethaBreed ==&lt;br /&gt;
The [https://livestock-functional-microbiology.uni-hohenheim.de/en/research-projects#jfmulticontent_c401477-2 MethaBreed] project aims to improve the sustainability of dairy production by developing innovative breeding strategies for dairy cows that simultaneously reduce methane emissions, enhance feed efficiency, and support animal health. A large-scale longitudinal study is being conducted in commercial dairy herds. Using advanced technologies, individual cow traits are recorded across entire lactations and multiple lactation cycles. Data collection includes continuous monitoring of methane emissions using sniffers, feed intake (using CFIT: Cattle Feed Intake System), body weight (using CFIT and scales), and key health parameters. A particular focus lies on the role of the rumen microbiome in methane production. A central goal of MethaBreed is the development of a new breeding value for methane emissions, enabling the selection of animals with lower environmental impact. These data will be integrated with pedigree and genomic information to allow precise breeding decisions. At the same time, the existing breeding value for feed efficiency will be further refined. The outcomes of the project are expected to make a significant contribution towards more climate-friendly dairy production. In the long term, standardized breeding values will be provided, enabling breeding organizations and farmers to actively select for healthier, more efficient, and more sustainable dairy cows.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Presentation materials ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Seminar by Julius van der Werf: Breeding for a changing climate 13-05-2025 ===&lt;br /&gt;
On the 13th of May Julius van de Werf gave a presentation at Wageningen Livestock Research on selection indexes for selecting low methane livestock, focused on sheep. You can find the slides [[:File:20250513 Seminar J.v.d.Werf.pdf|here]]. You can find the recording of the presentation below.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;youtube&amp;gt;PxKmxKVvVEA?si=C6x0keKAvgU009Da&amp;lt;/youtube&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Seminar by Maria Frizzarin: Introduction to milk mid-infrared spectroscopy 10-07-2025 ===&lt;br /&gt;
On the 10th of July Maria Frizzarin gave a presentation at Wageningen Livestock Research on milk mid-infrared spectroscopy, equations development, and applications. You can find the slides [[:File:10072025 Seminar Maria MIR.pdf|here.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Seminar by Sarah-Joe Burn: Breed4Green 25-09-2025 ===&lt;br /&gt;
On the 25th of September Sarah-Joe Burn gave a presentation at Wageningen Livestock Research on measuring methane emissions in commercial farms and establishing a comprehensive dataset for genetic studies. A similar presentations was given at EAAP 2025, you can find the slides to that presentation [[:File:Eaap2025-breed4green-linke.pdf|here]] and the abstract [[:File:2025 Innsbruck EAAP Book Abstracts.pdf|here]], page 250.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Joint ICAR Feed&amp;amp;Gas and ASGGN workshop ===&lt;br /&gt;
On the 5th of October the joint workshop between the [https://www.icar.org/group/working-group-feed-and-gas/ ICAR Feed&amp;amp;Gas working group] and the [https://www.asggn.org/ ASGGN] took place before the GGAA conference in Nairobi. The presentations can be found below. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[:File:2025 ASGGN - GGAA - A Taste of the Future Buccal Swabbing for Rumen Microbial ProfilingTB.pdf|A Taste of the Future: Buccal Swabbing for Rumen Microbial Profiling]]​. Presented by Ben Perry ([https://www.bioeconomyscience.co.nz/ NZIBS])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[:File:2638 Booker ILRI GGAA ASGGN Oct 2025.pdf|Rate of Genetic Gain for Methane Emissions in a Maternal Production Flock]]. Presented by Fem Booker ([https://www.bioeconomyscience.co.nz/ NZIBS])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[:File:Boris ICAR2025 v01.pdf|Association between rumen and faecal microbiome and enteric methane emissions in dairy cattle]]. Presented by Boris Sepulveda ([https://agriculture.vic.gov.au/ AV])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[:File:CaeliRichardson GGAA Workshop 2025.pdf|Global Framework to Monitor, Measure, and Account for Methane Reductions from Genetic Selection]]. Presented by Caeli Richardson ([https://abacusbio.com/ Abacusbio])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[:File:GGAA Workshop ICAR and ASGGN Ida Storm.pdf|Danish Perspectives on implementation of GHG regulation]]. Presented by Ida Storm ([https://agricultureandfood.dk/ DAFG])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[:File:GGAA Workshop ICAR and ASGGN Rasmus Stephansen.pdf|Experience with CH4 sniffers, what have we learned so far?]] Presented by Rasmus Stephansen ([https://international.au.dk/ AU])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[:File:GGAA workshop MIR methane presentation.pdf|Overview of the methane equations developed from mid-infrared spectroscopy and their applications.]] Presented by Maria Frizzarin ([https://www.agroscope.admin.ch/agroscope/en/home.html Agroscope])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[:File:HanneHonerlagen ICARpresentation.pdf|Adding microbial data to enhance breeding for lower methane emissions]]. Presented by Hanne Honerlagen ([https://www.wur.nl/en/research-results/chair-groups/animal-sciences/animal-breeding-and-genomics-group.htm WUR-ABG])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[:File:McNaughton ASGGN Workshop final.pdf|GreenFeed for phenotyping – our experiences]]. Presented by Lorna McNaughton ([https://www.lic.co.nz/ LIC])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[:File:MIE ILRI GGAA ASGGN Oct 2025.pdf|Methane Index Explorer: Optimising a Breeding Value Format for Simultaneous Inclusion of Enteric Methane Emissions in Breeding Schemes and National Inventories]]. Presented by Pavithra Ariyarathne ([https://www.bioeconomyscience.co.nz/ NZIBS])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[:File:RiccardoGGAA Presentation RB.pdf|ZELP sense]]. Presented by Riccardo Bica ([https://www.zelp.co/ ZELP])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[:File:ICAR Working group Nairobi 5 Oct2025.pdf|Selection for lower methane livestock, selection index considerations]]. Presented by Julius van der Werf (UNE)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Measuring enteric methane in beef and dairy cattle using PAC. Presented by Timothy Bilton ([https://www.bioeconomyscience.co.nz/ NZIBS])&amp;lt;youtube&amp;gt;https://youtu.be/NjPuotrmkMQ&amp;lt;/youtube&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Estimating methane emissions with the GreenFeed System. Presented by Paul Smith ([https://teagasc.ie/ Teagasc]) &amp;lt;youtube&amp;gt;https://youtu.be/TnHefWoP29I&amp;lt;/youtube&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Cvangemert</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://wiki.icar.org/index.php?title=Section_20:_Methane_measuring_methods&amp;diff=4822</id>
		<title>Section 20: Methane measuring methods</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://wiki.icar.org/index.php?title=Section_20:_Methane_measuring_methods&amp;diff=4822"/>
		<updated>2025-12-22T12:27:49Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Cvangemert: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;big&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;b&amp;gt;NOTE: This version of Section 20 has been approved by the working group&#039;s Chair.  Please be aware that further revisions may occur before final review and approval by the Board and ICAR members per the [[Approval of Page Process]].&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/b&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Several factors influence the choice of measurement method such as cost, level of accuracy, precision, scope of application, and scale, which vary across disciplines (Cassandro et al., 2013&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Cassandro, M. 2013. Comparing local and cosmopolitan cattle breeds on added values for milk and cheese production and their predicted methane emissions. Animal Genetic Resources/Ressources génétiques animales/Recursos genéticos animales, available on CJO2013. doi:10.1017/S2078 63361200077X&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;; Hammond et al., 2016A&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Hammond, K.J., Crompton, L.A., Bannink, A., Dijkstra, J., Yáñez-Ruiz, D.R., O’Kiely, P., Kebreab, E., Eugenè, M.A., Yu, Z., Shingfield, K.J., Schwarm, A., Hristov, A.N., and Reynolds, C.K. 2016A. Review of current in vivo measurement techniques for quantifying enteric methane emission from ruminants. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 219:13–30. doi:10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2016.05.018.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;; Garnsworthy et al., 2019&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Garnsworthy, P.C. Difford, G.F. Bell, M.J. Bayat, A.R. Huhtanen, P. Kuhla, B. Lassen, J. Peiren, N. Pszczola, M; Sorg, D. Visker, M.H., and Yan, T. 2019 Comparison of Methods to Measure Methane for Use in Genetic Evaluation of Dairy Cattle. Animals 9:837, 12p.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;). For instance, genetic selection programs require CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; measurements on thousands of related individuals under the environmental conditions in which the animals are expected to perform (Falconer and Mackay, 1996&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Falconer, D., and Macka,y T. 1996. Introduction to quantitative genetics (4th edn). ISBN-13: 978-0582243026; ISBN-10: 0582243025&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;). This can be challenging because dairy cattle perform in a wide range of conditions (e.g. grazing vs indoor housing). There are a number of different measurement methods currently being employed, each with advantages and disadvantages in terms of the factors listed above. The currently accepted and widely used measurement methods are listed and described below. The main features of methods for measuring CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; output by individual animals are summarised in Table 4. Values for each feature are based on experience of experts in METHAGENE WG2 who have used the methods. All values are relative, and somewhat subjective, because absolute values will depend on installation and implementation of each method at different research centres. It should be noted that the measuring methods can be divided in two major sections: methods that measure the concentration and flux of CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (e.g. the respiration chamber), and methods that measure the flux of CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; through the device (e.g. GreenFeed). This affects the useability of the methods for answering research questions – please see also the recommendations at the end of these guidelines.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Respiration chamber]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Portable Accumulation Chamber|Portable Accumulation Chambers]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Wearables]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Breath sampling during milk and feeding]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Sniffer SOP]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Greenfeed SOP]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Laser Methane Detector]]&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! colspan=&amp;quot;7&amp;quot; | &#039;&#039;Table 1. Summary of the main features of methods for measuring CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; output by individual animals.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|+&lt;br /&gt;
!Method&lt;br /&gt;
!Purchase cost&lt;br /&gt;
!Running costs&lt;br /&gt;
!Labour&lt;br /&gt;
!Repeatability&lt;br /&gt;
!Behaviour alteration&lt;br /&gt;
!Throughput&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Respiration chamber&lt;br /&gt;
|High&lt;br /&gt;
|High&lt;br /&gt;
|High&lt;br /&gt;
|High&lt;br /&gt;
|High&lt;br /&gt;
|Low&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|SF6 technique&lt;br /&gt;
|Medium&lt;br /&gt;
|High&lt;br /&gt;
|High&lt;br /&gt;
|Medium&lt;br /&gt;
|Medium&lt;br /&gt;
|Medium&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Breath sampling during milking and feeding&lt;br /&gt;
|Low&lt;br /&gt;
|Low&lt;br /&gt;
|Low&lt;br /&gt;
|Medium&lt;br /&gt;
|None&lt;br /&gt;
|High&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|GreenFeed&lt;br /&gt;
|Medium&lt;br /&gt;
|Medium&lt;br /&gt;
|Medium&lt;br /&gt;
|Medium&lt;br /&gt;
|Medium&lt;br /&gt;
|Medium&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Laser methane detector&lt;br /&gt;
|Low&lt;br /&gt;
|Low&lt;br /&gt;
|High&lt;br /&gt;
|Low&lt;br /&gt;
|Low-Medium&lt;br /&gt;
|Medium&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|ZELP Sense&lt;br /&gt;
|Low&lt;br /&gt;
|Low&lt;br /&gt;
|Low-Medium&lt;br /&gt;
|Medium&lt;br /&gt;
|Low&lt;br /&gt;
|High&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Cvangemert</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://wiki.icar.org/index.php?title=Section_20:_Wearables&amp;diff=4821</id>
		<title>Section 20: Wearables</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://wiki.icar.org/index.php?title=Section_20:_Wearables&amp;diff=4821"/>
		<updated>2025-12-22T12:26:45Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Cvangemert: /* System description */ changed link to updated version&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;big&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;b&amp;gt;NOTE: This version of Section 20 has been approved by the working group&#039;s Chair.  Please be aware that further revisions may occur before final review and approval by the Board and ICAR members per the [[Approval of Page Process]].&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/b&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== SF6 ==&lt;br /&gt;
The SF6 technique samples breath over 24 hours, whereas other techniques use spot samples of breath over periods of minutes throughout the day, so diurnal variation has to be considered. The majority of CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (87-99%) is released by eructation (Blaxter and Joyce, 1963&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Blaxter, K.L., and Joyce, J.P. 1963. The accuracy and ease with which measurements of respiratory metabolism can be made with tracheostomized sheep. Br. J. Nutr. 17:523-537&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;; Murray et al., 1976&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Murray, R.M., Bryant, A.M., and Leng, R.A.. 1976. Rates of production of methane in the rumen and large intestine of sheep. Br. J. Nutr. 36:1-14.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;), which provides a clear signal for sample processing. Please note that the tracheostomy used in Murray et al. (1976)&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:0&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; may have resulted in a higher percentage, but in both publications, it is clear that the majority of the CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is released via eructation. The SF6 tracer gas technique was developed in an attempt to measure CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; emissions by animals without confinement in respiration chambers (Johnson et al., 1994&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Johnson, K., Huyler, M., Westberg, H., Lamb, B., and Zimmerman, P. 1994. Measurement of methane emissions from ruminant livestock using a sulfur hexafluoride tracer technique. Environ. Sci. Technol. 28:359-362.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;). Air is sampled near the animal’s nostrils through a tube attached to a halter and connected to an evacuated canister worn around the animal’s neck or on its back. A capillary tube or orifice plate is used to restrict airflow through the tube so that the canister is between 50 and 70% full in approximately 24 hours. A permeation tube containing SF6 is placed into the rumen of each animal. The pre-determined release rate of SF6 is multiplied by the ratio of CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; to SF6 concentrations in the canister to calculate CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; emission rate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Many research centres have used the SF6 technique with variations in design of sampling and collection equipment, permeation tubes, and gas analysis (Berndt et al., 2014&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Berndt, A., Boland, T.M., Deighton, M.H., Gere, J.I., Grainger, C., Hegarty, R.S., Iwaasa, A.D., Koolaard, J.P., Lassey, K.R., Luo D., Martin, R.J., Martin, C., Moate, P.J., Molano, G., Pinares-Patiño, C., Ribaux, B.E., Swainson, N.M., Waghorn, G.C., and Williams, S.R.O. 2014. Guidelines for use of sulphur hexafluoride (SF6) tracer technique to measure enteric methane emissions from ruminants. Pages 166. M. G. Lambert, ed. New Zealand Agricultural Greenhouse Gas Research Centre, New Zealand. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;). Reliable results depend on following standard protocols, with greatest variation coming from accuracy of determining SF6 release rate from permeation tubes and control of sampling rate. With capillary tubes, sampling rate decreases as pressure in the canister increases, whereas an orifice plate gives a steadier sampling rate over 24 hours (Deighton et al., 2014&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Deighton, M.H., Williams, S.R.O., Hannah, M.C., Eckard, R.J., Boland, T.M., Wales, W.J., and Moate, P.J. 2014. A modified sulphur hexafluoride tracer technique enables accurate determination of enteric methane emissions from ruminants. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 197:47-63.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;). A source of error that has not been evaluated is that animals might interact and share CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; emissions when the sampling tube of one animal is near the head of another animal. There is good agreement between CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; emissions measured by the SF6 technique and respiration chambers, although results from the SF6 technique are more variable (Grainger et al., 2007&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Grainger, C., Clarke, T., McGinn, S.M., Auldist, M.J., Beauchemin, K.A., Hannah, M.C., Waghorn, G.C., Clark, H., and Eckard, R J. 2007. Methane emissions from dairy cows measured using the sulfur hexafluoride (SF6) tracer and chamber techniques. J. Dairy Sci. 90:2755-2766.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;; Muñoz et al., 2012&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Muñoz, C., Yan, T., Wills, D.A., Murray, S., and Gordon, A.W. 2012. Comparison of the sulfur hexafluoride tracer and respiration chamber techniques for estimating methane emissions and correction for rectum methane output from dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 95:3139-3148.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== ZELP Sense ==&lt;br /&gt;
[https://www.zelp.co/ ZELP] is a company based in the UK, which has developed a wearable device for cows called [https://www.zelp.co/measurement/ ZELP Sense]. The device continuously measures methane (CH₄) and carbon dioxide (CO₂) emissions from individual cows, in real-world settings, together with estimated dry matter intake (DMI). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== System description ===&lt;br /&gt;
ZELP Sense consists of three key parts: a headpiece, nosepiece, and gas sensing unit. The headpiece, made from ventilated neoprene, correctly positions the nosepiece without restricting the cow&#039;s natural movements or behaviours. The gas sensing unit sits below the cow&#039;s neck. The full device is lightweight and quick and easy to fit to the animal. The headpiece and nosepiece come in multiple sizes to ensure an optimal fit for a wide range of cows.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The device samples ambient and eructed air from close to the cow&#039;s nostrils through the nosepiece. These samples are processed by the gas sensing unit, which contains sensors to track ventilation rate and measure gas concentrations. Data from the device is offloaded via a WiFi connection and processed by ZELP&#039;s Machine Learning models. The device has local data storage allowing it to be used in areas with intermittent connectivity.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Users receive daily CH₄ and CO₂ emission totals (g/day), hourly CH₄ and CO₂ emissions for every hour of data collected (g/hour), and estimated DMI (kg/day), via ZELP&#039;s mobile-optimized web-app. The data can be downloaded for further analysis.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Internal chamber trial (2024): ====&lt;br /&gt;
Three cows, each fitted with a ZELP Sense device, were tested in respiration chambers over a 3-week period, with two 3-day testing sessions, separated by a one-week break. The daily emission totals provided by ZELP Sense showed an average difference of less than 10% versus those provided by respiration chambers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For more details, you can download the latest version of ZELP’s White Paper [https://www.zelp.co/measurement/ here]. These results have been shared at the British Society for Animal Science Conference 2025, EAAP’s AI4AS Conference 2025, and at the ASGGN &amp;amp; ICAR Feed &amp;amp; Gas Workshop held at the 9th International Greenhouse Gas &amp;amp; Animal Agriculture Conference 2025. The poster presentation is available [[:File:ZELP Sense - Chamber Comparison Poster.pdf|here]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== External chamber trials (2025): ====&lt;br /&gt;
Multiple third-party trials of ZELP Sense have now been completed at different research institutions and universities. The trials focused on comparing the methane and carbon dioxide measurements provided by ZELP Sense with those from respiration chambers. Analysis is underway and results are expected to be published in early 2026. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Commercial availability ===&lt;br /&gt;
ZELP Sense is available for pre-order now, with ZELP’s team allocating devices from their upcoming commercial production run on a first-come, first-serve basis. Delivery is expected in the second half of 2026. For more information, and to request a quote, please contact: [Mailto:sense@zelp.co sense@zelp.co].&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Cvangemert</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://wiki.icar.org/index.php?title=Section_20:_Sniffer_SOP&amp;diff=4820</id>
		<title>Section 20: Sniffer SOP</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://wiki.icar.org/index.php?title=Section_20:_Sniffer_SOP&amp;diff=4820"/>
		<updated>2025-12-19T08:27:25Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Cvangemert: made emails hyperlinks&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;big&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;b&amp;gt;NOTE: This version of Section 20 has been approved by the working group&#039;s Chair.  Please be aware that further revisions may occur before final review and approval by the Board and ICAR members per the [[Approval of Page Process]].&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/b&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Introduction ==&lt;br /&gt;
This document is the report obtained from the presentations, talks, chats and discussions of the Zoom meetings on 23&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;rd&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; February 2023. In both meetings an introduction was made about the ICAR Feed&amp;amp;Gas Working Group, the objectives of the Working Group, including the revision of the guidelines (Section 20 - Recording Dairy Cattle Methane Emission for Genetic Evaluation) published two years ago. Moreover, the aim of the meeting was to share knowledge on Sniffer standard operating procedure including tips, tricks and trouble-shooting data recording using Sniffer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Accurate measurement of methane emissions in ruminants is crucial to develop robust national or international greenhouse gas emission inventories and to evaluate mitigation strategies for their reduction. Over years many instruments and techniques have been developed and used for research purposes. Between all instruments and techniques available, Sniffer method has assumed significance. Sniffer has been developed to measure and collect data about methane (CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) and carbon dioxide (CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) emissions in the breath of ruminants during milking and/or feeding. The feed bin might be in an automatic milking system (AMS) or in an automatic feeding system (AFS). Before considering all features, advantages and disadvantages of the system, it is important to remember that they have been originally designed to detect dangerous gas leaks. Breath-sampling methods are non-invasive because, once installed, animals are unaware of the equipment and animals are in their normal environment. Animals follow their normal routine, which includes milking and feeding, so no training of animals, handling or change in diet are required. Equipment is relatively cheap and running costs are negligible. In Sniffer method, gases are continuously sampled into a sampling tube installed in the feed bin or through. The other end of the sampling tube is connected to an infrared CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration analyser. Data are collected every 1-5 seconds by the Sniffer.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Equipment description ==&lt;br /&gt;
On the market several suppliers of this product are available, but all systems share the same basic structure consisting of: gas meter, pressure inlet, flow meter, pressure outlet and a tube to suction with filter. It is essential to have a filter at level of the suction tube to avoid clogging of the cylinder with dust, saliva or feed. In the tube between the cylinder and the gas meter, whose diameter is 2-4 mm, one or more filters can be inserted which ensure the removal of impurities and debris from the animal’s breath. For the correct functioning of the system and for the collection of good quality data, the aspiration pump must work with an aspiration volume of 0.5-1.5 L/s. In more complex systems and to deal with particular needs (e.g., high environmental humidity) a dryer tube can also be inserted. Generally, Sniffer systems are provided of at least two gas meters: one for the methane (CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) and one for carbon dioxide (CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;); further gas meters could be available, e.g., oxygen (O&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;), nitrous oxide (N&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;O) and water (H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;O). Gas cards used to estimate CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentrations have different ranges, depending on which sensor is used and how it is calibrated. Generally for CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; it is best to have a range between 0-25.000ppm, sensors with a range of 0-20.000ppm or 50.000ppm are also functional. For CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;  a range of 0-2.000ppm or 0-5.000 ppm is generally used. Internet connection is guaranteed through a 5G modem or through a Wi-Fi router. Internet connection allows data storage or download. Connections problems can occur; therefore, a hard disk can be provided to ensure data still collected when connection is lost. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is important to install the Sniffer sampling tube in a position that is not so visible to the animal to avoid frequent damages. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One unit, when installed in the automated milking system (AMS), can measure as many animals as the capacity of the AMS, generally up to 130 animals per day. Sniffers can also be installed in concentrate feeders. This is not often done as it does not give you simultaneous milking records and because concentrate feeders are generally more open than the AMS. Which means there is more influence on the measurements by for example the wind. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If there are power cuts, the system restarts automatically when power is restored. Some systems have a battery included to operate the system during a power cut.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Overview of commercially available sniffers ==&lt;br /&gt;
Currently there are different devices on the market that can be used as a sniffer. This section gives an overview of the different sniffers. &lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Agscent.png|thumb|157x157px|Agscent Air]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Agscent ===&lt;br /&gt;
Agscent is a company based in Australia, you can find their website [https://agscent.com/ here.] They have developed the Agscent Air, current model: GHG 2100. This device uses a TDL (Tunable Diode Laser) sensor for CH4 and a NDIR (Non-Dispersive InfraRed) sensor for CO2. With a measurement range of 0-20.000ppm for CO2 and 0-40.000ppm for CH4. The datasheet for this device can be downloaded [https://agscent.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Agscent-GHG-2100-tech-flyer.pdf here] and you can find the device on the website [https://agscent.com/products/agscent-air/#air-ghg here]. Currently this device is used in Australia and the USA. They have also developed the agscent x optiweigh, which combines the sniffer sensor with a weighting station for in the pasture. The datasheet for this device can be downloaded [https://agscent.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Agscent-Optiweigh-flyer.pdf here] and you can find the device on their website [https://agscent.com/products/agscent-air/#air-optiweigh here]. Currently these combined devices are being used in Australia. Validations for the combined and standalone devices were conducted by multiple institutions, you can find a summary [[:File:Agscent Air GHG Validation Case Study 2025.pdf|here.]] Preliminary results of one of these validation studies was presented at the State of the Science summit in 2025. You can find the poster [[:File:ADSA 2025 NS ed.pdf|here]] and the abstract [[:File:Abstracts BOOK 2025 20250624-1249.pdf|here]], number 1155. A preliminary paper on a follow-up study can be found [[:File:Reyes et al. - Enteric methane (paper).pdf|here.]] The report for one of the other validations can be found [[:File:Report Agscent 4-2024 external.pdf|here.]] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Agscent Air falls into the middle price range for a sniffer, for more information please contact Daniela Carnovale ([Mailto:daniela@agscent.com daniela@agscent.com])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
During the [[Section 20: Activities|Denmark-The Netherlands project]] the Axetris methane sensor will be tested, this is the same methane sensor that the Agscent Air uses. It has been installed in the original Carltech v1 casing. Testing in the Air Quality lab has been completed for these devices and these sensors functioned as well as the other sensors tested. On-farm testing is still in progress. &lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Arcoflex.jpg|thumb|151x151px|ASCH001]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Arcoflex ===&lt;br /&gt;
Arcoflex is a company based in Australia, you can find their website [https://www.arcoflex.com.au/ here.] They have developed a sniffer device different from the others currently on the market, as it is a passive device it does not require tubes to suck up the air. The sensor is directly placed in a feed bin above where the mouth from the cow will be. This sniffer is currently being used in Australia and New Zealand. Currently the version ASCH401 is available commercially, this device can only measure methane. Version ASCH402 will also include a CO2 sensor, this version is still under development. They have submitted a paper for review on device. You can download an earlier version of this paper [[Media:Enteric Methane Monitoring in Dairies.pdf|here]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The ASCH401 and ACH402 both fall into the lower price range for a sniffer, for more information please contact Geoff Schaller ([Mailto:geoff@arcoflex.com.au geoff@arcoflex.com.au])&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Carltech V2.jpg|thumb|181x181px|Carltech v2]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Carltech ===&lt;br /&gt;
Carltech is a company based in The Netherlands, you can find their website [https://carltech.nl/ here.]They have developed a a new version of the WD_WUR sniffer, which will be tested in the SOP sniffer project. This device can measure CO2 in the range 0-50.000ppm and CH4 in the range of 0-2.000ppm, optionally a O2 sensor can be included. Currently the older models are being used in The Netherlands. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The WD_WUR falls into the lower price range for a sniffer, for more information please contact Koen Böggemann ([Mailto:koen@carltech.nl koen@carltech.nl])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== C-lock ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Simplescan.jpg|thumb|163x163px|SimpleScan]]&lt;br /&gt;
C-lock is a company based in The USA, you can find their website [https://www.c-lockinc.com/ here.]Their development is mostly focused on the [[Greenfeed SOP|Greenfeed]], but they have also developed a sniffer, the SimpleScan. This sniffer uses the exact same sensors as their GreenFeed, TDL for CH4 with a range of 0-40.000ppm and NDIR for CO2 with a range of 0-20.000ppm. According to C-Lock their CH4 sensor is precise to about 1 ppm. This device can be outfitted with optional O&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; sensors. C-lock uses their own filtering algorithms and knowledge on finalized data for the final results. The datasheet for the SimpleScan can be downloaded [[Media:SimpleScan FactSheet.pdf|here.]]   &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The simple scan falls into the higher price range for a sniffer, for more information please contact Robert Whittington ([Mailto:rwhittington@c-lockinc.com rwhittington@c-lockinc.com])  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This product has been discontinued by the manufacturer.  &lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Gasera.png|thumb|181x181px|Gasera one pulse]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Gasera ===&lt;br /&gt;
Gasera is a company based in Finland, you can find their website [https://gasera.fi/ here.] They have developed multiple gas analysers, of which the Gasera one pulse can be used to measure CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. This device can be used for many different application as it can measure up to 9 gasses and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;O. Their sensor is based on combining the cantilever enhanced photoacoustic detection technology with a broad band IR source and narrow bandpass optical filters. It measures CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; in the range 0,3 – 30.000ppm and measures CH4 in the range 1-100.000ppm. Both ranges can be configured to achieve the detection performance required. The datasheet for this device can be found [[Media:Gasera brochure OnePulse.pdf|here]] and you can find the device on the website [https://gasera.fi/product/gasera-one-pulse/ here.]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
They have also developed the Gasera one GHG, this device can measure CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, NO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;O, but no CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;.&#039;&#039;&#039; This device is based on combining the cantilever enhanced photoacoustic detection technology with quantum cascade laser source operating at a Mid-IR fundamental spectral absorption line of CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and N&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;O. This combination provides very high sensitivity (ppb level) to reliably measure ambient background levels of greenhouse gases methane (CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) and nitrous oxide (N&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;O). It has a recommended recalibration period of 12 months. You can download the datasheet for this device [[Media:GASERA ONE GHG.pdf|here]] and find more information on the website [https://gasera.fi/product/gasera-one-ghg-greenhouse-gas-analyzer/ here].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Gasera one pulse falls into the higher price range for a sniffer, for more information please contact gasera [https://gasera.fi/company/distribution/ here].&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Gasmet.png|thumb|149x149px|GT5000]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Gasmet ===&lt;br /&gt;
Gasmet is a company based in Finland, you can find their website [https://www.gasmet.com/ here]. They have developed multiple gas analyzers for many different applications, the GT5000 can measure up to 50 gasses. It can measure both CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; up to 100.000ppm, the range can be adjusted to what is needed. This device uses a FTIR (Fourier Transformed InfraRed) sensor. The benefit of this sensor is that it can easily detect other or unknown gasses which you were not aware of and you can then add them to your detection. You can download the datasheet for this device [[Media:Gasmet GT5000 Terra Technical Data.pdf|here]] and find more information on the website [https://www.gasmet.com/products/category/portable-gas-analyzers/gt5000-terra/ here.]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The GT 5000 falls into the higher price range for a sniffer, for more information please contact Jockum Törnqvist ([Mailto:jockum.tornqvist@gasmet.fi jockum.tornqvist@gasmet.fi])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Edinburgh Sensors ===&lt;br /&gt;
Edinburgh Sensors is a company based in the UK, you can find their website [https://edinburghsensors.com/ here.] They develop sensors that can be used for measuring CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; in the breath of ruminants. They produce the boxed gascard and the guardian NG. These sensors can be used to build your own sniffer, by combining the sensors with, amongst others, a datalogger and waterproof casing. The measurement range is dependent on which type of gascard for CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; you include in the build. Currently the completely assembled Guardian sniffers are being used in Finland, Denmark and Spain. [[File:Guardian NEIKER.jpg|200px|thumb|Guardian build in Spain at [https://neiker.eus/en/ NEIKER]]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are companies that can build the complete sniffer from these sensors. One of these companies is DuoTec, you can find their website [https://duotec.dk/ here.] Contact person for inquiries for this company would be: Rasmus Bendsen ([Mailto:raw@duotec.dk raw@duotec.dk])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another company that can build a sniffer from these sensors is Bramtech, they build the sniffers that are currently used by Aarhus University. They currently have no plans to expand further into this business.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
During the [[Section 20: Activities|Denmark-The Netherlands project]] the Edinburgh methane sensor will be tested. It has been installed in the original Carltech v1 casing. Testing in the Air Quality lab has been completed for these devices and these sensors functioned as well as the other sensors tested. On-farm testing is still in progress. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Most often the Guardians are assembled in house by the research groups themselves.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In general this device, once completed falls in the lower price range for sniffers. You can contact Edinburgh Sensors [https://edinburghsensors.com/contact/ here.]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:MooLogger.jpg|thumb|175x175px|MooLogger]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Tecnosens  ===&lt;br /&gt;
Tecnosens is a company based in Italy, you can find their website [https://www.tecnosens.it/en here.] They have developed the MooLooger, currently there are two versions available, the MooLooger standard and the MooLogger advanced. The MooLogger has a measurement range of 0-5.000ppm for CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and 0-50.000ppm for CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and uses a NDIR sensor. Optionally this device can measure O&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; in the range of 0-25.000ppm. Currently the MooLogger is being used, on small or large scale, in Italy, Spain, Canada, USA, Switzerland and Uruguay. You can download the datasheet for this device [[Media:MooLogger Plus Oct 2024.pdf|here]] and find more information on the MooLogger on the website [https://www.tecnosens.it/en/Tecnosens-products/moologger here.] They have multiple instruction video&#039;s available on their [https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLR1KvTMU2thuf-xpkTuHM6fs_WRVtwoz6 youtube channel.] For this device a multiplexer is available to use one MooLogger and measure in multiple AMS.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The MooLooger falls in the lower price range for a sniffer, for more information please contact Greta Bonacina ([Mailto:gbonacina@tecnosens.it gbonacina@tecnosens.it]).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Nikira labs ===&lt;br /&gt;
Nikira labs is a company bases in the USA, you can find their website [https://www.nikiralabs.com/ here]. They have developed the CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;/CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;/H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;O analyser. This device has a measurements range of 100-20.000ppm for CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and 1-20.000ppm for CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and can optionally detect H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;O in the range of 500-20.000 ppm. The datasheet for this device can be downloaded from their website [https://www.nikiralabs.com/ch4-co2-h2o-analyzer here.]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;/CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;/H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;O analyser falls into the higher price range for a sniffer, for more information please contact Nikira Labs [https://www.nikiralabs.com/contact-9 here.]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== La Trobe Uni ===&lt;br /&gt;
The research institute, as a part of La Trobe university based in Australia, has developed a sniffer inhouse, you can find their website [https://www.latrobe.edu.au/ here.] They are still working on commercializing their sniffer device.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When commercialized they aim to have the sniffer fall into the lower price range, for more information please contact Aniruddha (Ani) Desai ([Mailto:A.Desai@latrobe.edu.au A.Desai@latrobe.edu.au]).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Analox ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:PXL 20250722 143934376.jpg|thumb|343x343px|HerdLab system, for all gasses.]]&lt;br /&gt;
Analox is a company based in the UK, you can find their website [https://analoxgroup.com/ here.] They have developed the HerdLab system. This device can measure 6 different gasses. The measurement range for CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is dependent on which variant of the sensor you choose, generally it will be 0-2.000 ppm, they also offer 0-1.000 ppm and 0-5.000 ppm. For CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; the range is also dependent on the variant of sensor you choose, generally it will be 0-20.000 ppm, they also offer 0-2.000, 0-5.000 and 0-50.000. This device can also measure oxygen (O&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;), hydrogen (H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;), ammonia (NH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) and nitric oxide (NO), if needed. It uses a combination of NDIR, paramagnetic and electrochemical sensors to analyze the concentrations. The datasheet for this device can be found [[:File:Herd Lab Brochure - Final Version.pdf|here]]. A short introductory presentation [[:File:Measuring Methane Emissions Introduction.pdf|here]] with associated video to be found [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2O9cDKg94W0 here.] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This system is originally developed to measure up to 6 bays in a herringbone system, at the same time. Thereby, HerdLab can be applied to multiple AMS systems at the same time and multiple bays in a rotary system too. Due to this possibility price range is more dynamic than for other devices included in the list. When using one system for one AMS the HerdLab falls into the medium price range for a sniffer. Price will change when you want to measure more gasses or more animals, for measuring in multiple AMS systems (at the same farm) or multiple bays the increase in costs would be low, as you already have the system in place. For more information please contact Adrian Howe ([Mailto:adrian.howe@analoxgroup.com adrian.howe@analoxgroup.com]).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Comparison of technical details of commercially available sniffers ==&lt;br /&gt;
As part of the [[Section 20: Ongoing activities|DNK-NLD project]] Wageningen Livestock Research has collected technical information on all commercially available sniffers directly from the companies. An excel file showing these details for all the sniffers can be downloaded [[Media:Comparison technical details sniffers ICAR.xlsx|here]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Experimental protocols ==&lt;br /&gt;
No particular experimental protocols are applied. Once installed, the system runs continuously. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Change in diet are not required.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Training and adaptation period ==&lt;br /&gt;
Training, handling or adaptation period are not required.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Problems faced and upgrades ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Device waterproof ===&lt;br /&gt;
Sniffer devices are not always completely waterproof. Considering that there is electrical wiring inside and that in some cases the intervention of a technician is necessary, it is important to choose an IP65 box or to equip the Sniffer box with a waterproof coating.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Clogging problems ===&lt;br /&gt;
To avoid clogging of the pipes, ideally a venting hose is provided. This pipe is connected to the compressed air outlet pipe of the AMS. When the gate of the milking robot opens, allowing the animal to exit, compressed air is blown into the venting hose. This air flow in the direction of the cylinder helps to avoid clogging. Currently some sniffers have the option for a blow-back system.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Animals identification ===&lt;br /&gt;
Antenna for ID reader is not always successful. It is suggested to use AMS data identification and merge them later on.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Calibration procedure ===&lt;br /&gt;
In many cases problems of calibration drift can occur. It is necessary to standardize zero and span calibrating procedure.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Personell in charge of the trial ===&lt;br /&gt;
It is essential to have a good technician who monitors Sniffer&#039;s activities on daily basis and who also knows the AMS and AFS system. Among the activities that the technician must carry out: setting up, moving equipment, daily data monitoring and download, checking up on equipment at irregularities, fixing problems, downloading AMS data and ordering spare parts. If a good technician is not available, it is essential to have an alert system (sms, e-mail) of anomalies.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Filter replace ===&lt;br /&gt;
Filter obturations by dust or condensation can occur. It is possible to prevent these problems changing external filter every 15 days and change internal filter every 6 months. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Questions and answers ==&lt;br /&gt;
 &#039;&#039;&#039;Q1. What’s the cost of the system?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 A1. 10.000€ by Edimburgh Instruments + Duotec Sensors + Bramtech customization.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 A2. 4.500€ by Tecnosens (Italy).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 A3. 3.100€ by Carltech Sniffer (the Netherlands) (old generation). For new generation device we have not received a new pricing.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &#039;&#039;&#039;Q2. How many animals per Sniffer?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 A1. Not more than 130 cows per Sniffer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 A2. 1 Sniffer per AMS, so no more than 60/65 cows per AMS/Sniffer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &#039;&#039;&#039;Q3. How long does the experimental trial take?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 A1. We plan to continue for many years.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 A2. For genetic evaluation purposes we plan to collect data for many years.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &#039;&#039;&#039;Q4. How do you identify animals in Sniffer?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 A1. We use AMS identification, easier and more accurate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 A2. We use AMS identification. It is possible to use also external RFID tag reader but it need validation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &#039;&#039;&#039;Q5. It is necessary to have gas cards with wide detection limit (0-10.000 CH4 and 0-50.000 CO2)?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 A1. Not necessary considering animals’ emission, so probably are cheaper than other gas cards with different detection limit.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Cvangemert</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://wiki.icar.org/index.php?title=Section_20:_Wearables&amp;diff=4819</id>
		<title>Section 20: Wearables</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://wiki.icar.org/index.php?title=Section_20:_Wearables&amp;diff=4819"/>
		<updated>2025-12-19T07:35:15Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Cvangemert: Hyperlinked the email adres&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;big&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;b&amp;gt;NOTE: This version of Section 20 has been approved by the working group&#039;s Chair.  Please be aware that further revisions may occur before final review and approval by the Board and ICAR members per the [[Approval of Page Process]].&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/b&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== SF6 ==&lt;br /&gt;
The SF6 technique samples breath over 24 hours, whereas other techniques use spot samples of breath over periods of minutes throughout the day, so diurnal variation has to be considered. The majority of CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (87-99%) is released by eructation (Blaxter and Joyce, 1963&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Blaxter, K.L., and Joyce, J.P. 1963. The accuracy and ease with which measurements of respiratory metabolism can be made with tracheostomized sheep. Br. J. Nutr. 17:523-537&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;; Murray et al., 1976&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Murray, R.M., Bryant, A.M., and Leng, R.A.. 1976. Rates of production of methane in the rumen and large intestine of sheep. Br. J. Nutr. 36:1-14.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;), which provides a clear signal for sample processing. Please note that the tracheostomy used in Murray et al. (1976)&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:0&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; may have resulted in a higher percentage, but in both publications, it is clear that the majority of the CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is released via eructation. The SF6 tracer gas technique was developed in an attempt to measure CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; emissions by animals without confinement in respiration chambers (Johnson et al., 1994&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Johnson, K., Huyler, M., Westberg, H., Lamb, B., and Zimmerman, P. 1994. Measurement of methane emissions from ruminant livestock using a sulfur hexafluoride tracer technique. Environ. Sci. Technol. 28:359-362.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;). Air is sampled near the animal’s nostrils through a tube attached to a halter and connected to an evacuated canister worn around the animal’s neck or on its back. A capillary tube or orifice plate is used to restrict airflow through the tube so that the canister is between 50 and 70% full in approximately 24 hours. A permeation tube containing SF6 is placed into the rumen of each animal. The pre-determined release rate of SF6 is multiplied by the ratio of CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; to SF6 concentrations in the canister to calculate CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; emission rate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Many research centres have used the SF6 technique with variations in design of sampling and collection equipment, permeation tubes, and gas analysis (Berndt et al., 2014&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Berndt, A., Boland, T.M., Deighton, M.H., Gere, J.I., Grainger, C., Hegarty, R.S., Iwaasa, A.D., Koolaard, J.P., Lassey, K.R., Luo D., Martin, R.J., Martin, C., Moate, P.J., Molano, G., Pinares-Patiño, C., Ribaux, B.E., Swainson, N.M., Waghorn, G.C., and Williams, S.R.O. 2014. Guidelines for use of sulphur hexafluoride (SF6) tracer technique to measure enteric methane emissions from ruminants. Pages 166. M. G. Lambert, ed. New Zealand Agricultural Greenhouse Gas Research Centre, New Zealand. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;). Reliable results depend on following standard protocols, with greatest variation coming from accuracy of determining SF6 release rate from permeation tubes and control of sampling rate. With capillary tubes, sampling rate decreases as pressure in the canister increases, whereas an orifice plate gives a steadier sampling rate over 24 hours (Deighton et al., 2014&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Deighton, M.H., Williams, S.R.O., Hannah, M.C., Eckard, R.J., Boland, T.M., Wales, W.J., and Moate, P.J. 2014. A modified sulphur hexafluoride tracer technique enables accurate determination of enteric methane emissions from ruminants. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 197:47-63.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;). A source of error that has not been evaluated is that animals might interact and share CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; emissions when the sampling tube of one animal is near the head of another animal. There is good agreement between CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; emissions measured by the SF6 technique and respiration chambers, although results from the SF6 technique are more variable (Grainger et al., 2007&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Grainger, C., Clarke, T., McGinn, S.M., Auldist, M.J., Beauchemin, K.A., Hannah, M.C., Waghorn, G.C., Clark, H., and Eckard, R J. 2007. Methane emissions from dairy cows measured using the sulfur hexafluoride (SF6) tracer and chamber techniques. J. Dairy Sci. 90:2755-2766.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;; Muñoz et al., 2012&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Muñoz, C., Yan, T., Wills, D.A., Murray, S., and Gordon, A.W. 2012. Comparison of the sulfur hexafluoride tracer and respiration chamber techniques for estimating methane emissions and correction for rectum methane output from dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 95:3139-3148.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== ZELP Sense ==&lt;br /&gt;
[https://www.zelp.co/ ZELP] is a company based in the UK, which has developed a wearable device for cows called [https://www.zelp.co/measurement/ ZELP Sense]. The device continuously measures methane (CH₄) and carbon dioxide (CO₂) emissions from individual cows, in real-world settings, together with estimated dry matter intake (DMI). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== System description ===&lt;br /&gt;
ZELP Sense consists of three key parts: a headpiece, nosepiece, and gas sensing unit. The headpiece, made from ventilated neoprene, correctly positions the nosepiece without restricting the cow&#039;s natural movements or behaviours. The gas sensing unit sits below the cow&#039;s neck. The full device is lightweight and quick and easy to fit to the animal. The headpiece and nosepiece come in multiple sizes to ensure an optimal fit for a wide range of cows.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The device samples ambient and eructed air from close to the cow&#039;s nostrils through the nosepiece. These samples are processed by the gas sensing unit, which contains sensors to track ventilation rate and measure gas concentrations. Data from the device is offloaded via a WiFi connection and processed by ZELP&#039;s Machine Learning models. The device has local data storage allowing it to be used in areas with intermittent connectivity.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Users receive daily CH₄ and CO₂ emission totals (g/day), hourly CH₄ and CO₂ emissions for every hour of data collected (g/hour), and estimated DMI (kg/day), via ZELP&#039;s mobile-optimized web-app. The data can be downloaded for further analysis.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Internal chamber trial (2024): ====&lt;br /&gt;
Three cows, each fitted with a ZELP Sense device, were tested in respiration chambers over a 3-week period, with two 3-day testing sessions, separated by a one-week break. The daily emission totals provided by ZELP Sense showed an average difference of less than 10% versus those provided by respiration chambers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For more details, you can download the latest version of ZELP’s White Paper [[:File:Advancing-Livestock-Emissions-Measurement -ZELP-Sense-White-Paper.pdf|here]]. These results have been shared at the British Society for Animal Science Conference 2025, EAAP’s AI4AS Conference 2025, and at the ASGGN &amp;amp; ICAR Feed &amp;amp; Gas Workshop held at the 9th International Greenhouse Gas &amp;amp; Animal Agriculture Conference 2025. The poster presentation is available [[:File:ZELP Sense - Chamber Comparison Poster.pdf|here]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== External chamber trials (2025): ====&lt;br /&gt;
Multiple third-party trials of ZELP Sense have now been completed at different research institutions and universities. The trials focused on comparing the methane and carbon dioxide measurements provided by ZELP Sense with those from respiration chambers. Analysis is underway and results are expected to be published in early 2026. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Commercial availability ===&lt;br /&gt;
ZELP Sense is available for pre-order now, with ZELP’s team allocating devices from their upcoming commercial production run on a first-come, first-serve basis. Delivery is expected in the second half of 2026. For more information, and to request a quote, please contact: [Mailto:sense@zelp.co sense@zelp.co].&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Cvangemert</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://wiki.icar.org/index.php?title=Section_20:_Wearables&amp;diff=4818</id>
		<title>Section 20: Wearables</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://wiki.icar.org/index.php?title=Section_20:_Wearables&amp;diff=4818"/>
		<updated>2025-12-19T07:16:46Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Cvangemert: /* Internal chamber trial (2024): */ changes header to fit rest of wiki&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;big&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;b&amp;gt;NOTE: This version of Section 20 has been approved by the working group&#039;s Chair.  Please be aware that further revisions may occur before final review and approval by the Board and ICAR members per the [[Approval of Page Process]].&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/b&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== SF6 ==&lt;br /&gt;
The SF6 technique samples breath over 24 hours, whereas other techniques use spot samples of breath over periods of minutes throughout the day, so diurnal variation has to be considered. The majority of CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (87-99%) is released by eructation (Blaxter and Joyce, 1963&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Blaxter, K.L., and Joyce, J.P. 1963. The accuracy and ease with which measurements of respiratory metabolism can be made with tracheostomized sheep. Br. J. Nutr. 17:523-537&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;; Murray et al., 1976&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Murray, R.M., Bryant, A.M., and Leng, R.A.. 1976. Rates of production of methane in the rumen and large intestine of sheep. Br. J. Nutr. 36:1-14.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;), which provides a clear signal for sample processing. Please note that the tracheostomy used in Murray et al. (1976)&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:0&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; may have resulted in a higher percentage, but in both publications, it is clear that the majority of the CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is released via eructation. The SF6 tracer gas technique was developed in an attempt to measure CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; emissions by animals without confinement in respiration chambers (Johnson et al., 1994&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Johnson, K., Huyler, M., Westberg, H., Lamb, B., and Zimmerman, P. 1994. Measurement of methane emissions from ruminant livestock using a sulfur hexafluoride tracer technique. Environ. Sci. Technol. 28:359-362.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;). Air is sampled near the animal’s nostrils through a tube attached to a halter and connected to an evacuated canister worn around the animal’s neck or on its back. A capillary tube or orifice plate is used to restrict airflow through the tube so that the canister is between 50 and 70% full in approximately 24 hours. A permeation tube containing SF6 is placed into the rumen of each animal. The pre-determined release rate of SF6 is multiplied by the ratio of CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; to SF6 concentrations in the canister to calculate CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; emission rate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Many research centres have used the SF6 technique with variations in design of sampling and collection equipment, permeation tubes, and gas analysis (Berndt et al., 2014&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Berndt, A., Boland, T.M., Deighton, M.H., Gere, J.I., Grainger, C., Hegarty, R.S., Iwaasa, A.D., Koolaard, J.P., Lassey, K.R., Luo D., Martin, R.J., Martin, C., Moate, P.J., Molano, G., Pinares-Patiño, C., Ribaux, B.E., Swainson, N.M., Waghorn, G.C., and Williams, S.R.O. 2014. Guidelines for use of sulphur hexafluoride (SF6) tracer technique to measure enteric methane emissions from ruminants. Pages 166. M. G. Lambert, ed. New Zealand Agricultural Greenhouse Gas Research Centre, New Zealand. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;). Reliable results depend on following standard protocols, with greatest variation coming from accuracy of determining SF6 release rate from permeation tubes and control of sampling rate. With capillary tubes, sampling rate decreases as pressure in the canister increases, whereas an orifice plate gives a steadier sampling rate over 24 hours (Deighton et al., 2014&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Deighton, M.H., Williams, S.R.O., Hannah, M.C., Eckard, R.J., Boland, T.M., Wales, W.J., and Moate, P.J. 2014. A modified sulphur hexafluoride tracer technique enables accurate determination of enteric methane emissions from ruminants. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 197:47-63.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;). A source of error that has not been evaluated is that animals might interact and share CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; emissions when the sampling tube of one animal is near the head of another animal. There is good agreement between CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; emissions measured by the SF6 technique and respiration chambers, although results from the SF6 technique are more variable (Grainger et al., 2007&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Grainger, C., Clarke, T., McGinn, S.M., Auldist, M.J., Beauchemin, K.A., Hannah, M.C., Waghorn, G.C., Clark, H., and Eckard, R J. 2007. Methane emissions from dairy cows measured using the sulfur hexafluoride (SF6) tracer and chamber techniques. J. Dairy Sci. 90:2755-2766.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;; Muñoz et al., 2012&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Muñoz, C., Yan, T., Wills, D.A., Murray, S., and Gordon, A.W. 2012. Comparison of the sulfur hexafluoride tracer and respiration chamber techniques for estimating methane emissions and correction for rectum methane output from dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 95:3139-3148.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== ZELP Sense ==&lt;br /&gt;
[https://www.zelp.co/ ZELP] is a company based in the UK, which has developed a wearable device for cows called [https://www.zelp.co/measurement/ ZELP Sense]. The device continuously measures methane (CH₄) and carbon dioxide (CO₂) emissions from individual cows, in real-world settings, together with estimated dry matter intake (DMI). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== System description ===&lt;br /&gt;
ZELP Sense consists of three key parts: a headpiece, nosepiece, and gas sensing unit. The headpiece, made from ventilated neoprene, correctly positions the nosepiece without restricting the cow&#039;s natural movements or behaviours. The gas sensing unit sits below the cow&#039;s neck. The full device is lightweight and quick and easy to fit to the animal. The headpiece and nosepiece come in multiple sizes to ensure an optimal fit for a wide range of cows.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The device samples ambient and eructed air from close to the cow&#039;s nostrils through the nosepiece. These samples are processed by the gas sensing unit, which contains sensors to track ventilation rate and measure gas concentrations. Data from the device is offloaded via a WiFi connection and processed by ZELP&#039;s Machine Learning models. The device has local data storage allowing it to be used in areas with intermittent connectivity.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Users receive daily CH₄ and CO₂ emission totals (g/day), hourly CH₄ and CO₂ emissions for every hour of data collected (g/hour), and estimated DMI (kg/day), via ZELP&#039;s mobile-optimized web-app. The data can be downloaded for further analysis.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Internal chamber trial (2024): ====&lt;br /&gt;
Three cows, each fitted with a ZELP Sense device, were tested in respiration chambers over a 3-week period, with two 3-day testing sessions, separated by a one-week break. The daily emission totals provided by ZELP Sense showed an average difference of less than 10% versus those provided by respiration chambers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For more details, you can download the latest version of ZELP’s White Paper [[:File:Advancing-Livestock-Emissions-Measurement -ZELP-Sense-White-Paper.pdf|here]]. These results have been shared at the British Society for Animal Science Conference 2025, EAAP’s AI4AS Conference 2025, and at the ASGGN &amp;amp; ICAR Feed &amp;amp; Gas Workshop held at the 9th International Greenhouse Gas &amp;amp; Animal Agriculture Conference 2025. The poster presentation is available [[:File:ZELP Sense - Chamber Comparison Poster.pdf|here]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== External chamber trials (2025): ====&lt;br /&gt;
Multiple third-party trials of ZELP Sense have now been completed at different research institutions and universities. The trials focused on comparing the methane and carbon dioxide measurements provided by ZELP Sense with those from respiration chambers. Analysis is underway and results are expected to be published in early 2026. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Commercial availability ===&lt;br /&gt;
ZELP Sense is available for pre-order now, with ZELP’s team allocating devices from their upcoming commercial production run on a first-come, first-serve basis. Delivery is expected in the second half of 2026. For more information, and to request a quote, please contact: sense@zelp.co.  &lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Cvangemert</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://wiki.icar.org/index.php?title=Section_20:_Wearables&amp;diff=4817</id>
		<title>Section 20: Wearables</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://wiki.icar.org/index.php?title=Section_20:_Wearables&amp;diff=4817"/>
		<updated>2025-12-19T07:07:57Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Cvangemert: ZELP sense small adjustments&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;big&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;b&amp;gt;NOTE: This version of Section 20 has been approved by the working group&#039;s Chair.  Please be aware that further revisions may occur before final review and approval by the Board and ICAR members per the [[Approval of Page Process]].&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/b&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== SF6 ==&lt;br /&gt;
The SF6 technique samples breath over 24 hours, whereas other techniques use spot samples of breath over periods of minutes throughout the day, so diurnal variation has to be considered. The majority of CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (87-99%) is released by eructation (Blaxter and Joyce, 1963&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Blaxter, K.L., and Joyce, J.P. 1963. The accuracy and ease with which measurements of respiratory metabolism can be made with tracheostomized sheep. Br. J. Nutr. 17:523-537&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;; Murray et al., 1976&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Murray, R.M., Bryant, A.M., and Leng, R.A.. 1976. Rates of production of methane in the rumen and large intestine of sheep. Br. J. Nutr. 36:1-14.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;), which provides a clear signal for sample processing. Please note that the tracheostomy used in Murray et al. (1976)&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:0&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; may have resulted in a higher percentage, but in both publications, it is clear that the majority of the CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is released via eructation. The SF6 tracer gas technique was developed in an attempt to measure CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; emissions by animals without confinement in respiration chambers (Johnson et al., 1994&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Johnson, K., Huyler, M., Westberg, H., Lamb, B., and Zimmerman, P. 1994. Measurement of methane emissions from ruminant livestock using a sulfur hexafluoride tracer technique. Environ. Sci. Technol. 28:359-362.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;). Air is sampled near the animal’s nostrils through a tube attached to a halter and connected to an evacuated canister worn around the animal’s neck or on its back. A capillary tube or orifice plate is used to restrict airflow through the tube so that the canister is between 50 and 70% full in approximately 24 hours. A permeation tube containing SF6 is placed into the rumen of each animal. The pre-determined release rate of SF6 is multiplied by the ratio of CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; to SF6 concentrations in the canister to calculate CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; emission rate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Many research centres have used the SF6 technique with variations in design of sampling and collection equipment, permeation tubes, and gas analysis (Berndt et al., 2014&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Berndt, A., Boland, T.M., Deighton, M.H., Gere, J.I., Grainger, C., Hegarty, R.S., Iwaasa, A.D., Koolaard, J.P., Lassey, K.R., Luo D., Martin, R.J., Martin, C., Moate, P.J., Molano, G., Pinares-Patiño, C., Ribaux, B.E., Swainson, N.M., Waghorn, G.C., and Williams, S.R.O. 2014. Guidelines for use of sulphur hexafluoride (SF6) tracer technique to measure enteric methane emissions from ruminants. Pages 166. M. G. Lambert, ed. New Zealand Agricultural Greenhouse Gas Research Centre, New Zealand. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;). Reliable results depend on following standard protocols, with greatest variation coming from accuracy of determining SF6 release rate from permeation tubes and control of sampling rate. With capillary tubes, sampling rate decreases as pressure in the canister increases, whereas an orifice plate gives a steadier sampling rate over 24 hours (Deighton et al., 2014&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Deighton, M.H., Williams, S.R.O., Hannah, M.C., Eckard, R.J., Boland, T.M., Wales, W.J., and Moate, P.J. 2014. A modified sulphur hexafluoride tracer technique enables accurate determination of enteric methane emissions from ruminants. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 197:47-63.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;). A source of error that has not been evaluated is that animals might interact and share CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; emissions when the sampling tube of one animal is near the head of another animal. There is good agreement between CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; emissions measured by the SF6 technique and respiration chambers, although results from the SF6 technique are more variable (Grainger et al., 2007&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Grainger, C., Clarke, T., McGinn, S.M., Auldist, M.J., Beauchemin, K.A., Hannah, M.C., Waghorn, G.C., Clark, H., and Eckard, R J. 2007. Methane emissions from dairy cows measured using the sulfur hexafluoride (SF6) tracer and chamber techniques. J. Dairy Sci. 90:2755-2766.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;; Muñoz et al., 2012&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Muñoz, C., Yan, T., Wills, D.A., Murray, S., and Gordon, A.W. 2012. Comparison of the sulfur hexafluoride tracer and respiration chamber techniques for estimating methane emissions and correction for rectum methane output from dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 95:3139-3148.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== ZELP Sense ==&lt;br /&gt;
[https://www.zelp.co/ ZELP] is a company based in the UK, which has developed a wearable device for cows called [https://www.zelp.co/measurement/ ZELP Sense]. The device continuously measures methane (CH₄) and carbon dioxide (CO₂) emissions from individual cows, in real-world settings, together with estimated dry matter intake (DMI). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== System description ===&lt;br /&gt;
ZELP Sense consists of three key parts: a headpiece, nosepiece, and gas sensing unit. The headpiece, made from ventilated neoprene, correctly positions the nosepiece without restricting the cow&#039;s natural movements or behaviours. The gas sensing unit sits below the cow&#039;s neck. The full device is lightweight and quick and easy to fit to the animal. The headpiece and nosepiece come in multiple sizes to ensure an optimal fit for a wide range of cows.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The device samples ambient and eructed air from close to the cow&#039;s nostrils through the nosepiece. These samples are processed by the gas sensing unit, which contains sensors to track ventilation rate and measure gas concentrations. Data from the device is offloaded via a WiFi connection and processed by ZELP&#039;s Machine Learning models. The device has local data storage allowing it to be used in areas with intermittent connectivity.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Users receive daily CH₄ and CO₂ emission totals (g/day), hourly CH₄ and CO₂ emissions for every hour of data collected (g/hour), and estimated DMI (kg/day), via ZELP&#039;s mobile-optimized web-app. The data can be downloaded for further analysis.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Internal chamber trial (2024): ====&lt;br /&gt;
Three cows, each fitted with a ZELP Sense device, were tested in respiration chambers over a 3-week period, with two 3-day testing sessions, separated by a one-week break. The daily emission totals provided by ZELP Sense showed an average difference of less than 10% versus those provided by respiration chambers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For more details, ZELP’s White Paper is available to download [[:File:Advancing-Livestock-Emissions-Measurement -ZELP-Sense-White-Paper.pdf|here]]. These results have been shared at the British Society for Animal Science Conference 2025, EAAP’s AI4AS Conference 2025, and at the ASGGN &amp;amp; ICAR Feed &amp;amp; Gas Workshop held at the 9th International Greenhouse Gas &amp;amp; Animal Agriculture Conference 2025. The poster presentation is available [[:File:ZELP Sense - Chamber Comparison Poster.pdf|here]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== External chamber trials (2025): ====&lt;br /&gt;
Multiple third-party trials of ZELP Sense have now been completed at different research institutions and universities. The trials focused on comparing the methane and carbon dioxide measurements provided by ZELP Sense with those from respiration chambers. Analysis is underway and results are expected to be published in early 2026. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Commercial availability ===&lt;br /&gt;
ZELP Sense is available for pre-order now, with ZELP’s team allocating devices from their upcoming commercial production run on a first-come, first-serve basis. Delivery is expected in the second half of 2026. For more information, and to request a quote, please contact: sense@zelp.co.  &lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Cvangemert</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://wiki.icar.org/index.php?title=Section_20:_Wearables&amp;diff=4816</id>
		<title>Section 20: Wearables</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://wiki.icar.org/index.php?title=Section_20:_Wearables&amp;diff=4816"/>
		<updated>2025-12-19T07:06:09Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Cvangemert: ZELP sense small adjustments&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;big&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;b&amp;gt;NOTE: This version of Section 20 has been approved by the working group&#039;s Chair.  Please be aware that further revisions may occur before final review and approval by the Board and ICAR members per the [[Approval of Page Process]].&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/b&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== SF6 ==&lt;br /&gt;
The SF6 technique samples breath over 24 hours, whereas other techniques use spot samples of breath over periods of minutes throughout the day, so diurnal variation has to be considered. The majority of CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (87-99%) is released by eructation (Blaxter and Joyce, 1963&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Blaxter, K.L., and Joyce, J.P. 1963. The accuracy and ease with which measurements of respiratory metabolism can be made with tracheostomized sheep. Br. J. Nutr. 17:523-537&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;; Murray et al., 1976&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Murray, R.M., Bryant, A.M., and Leng, R.A.. 1976. Rates of production of methane in the rumen and large intestine of sheep. Br. J. Nutr. 36:1-14.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;), which provides a clear signal for sample processing. Please note that the tracheostomy used in Murray et al. (1976)&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:0&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; may have resulted in a higher percentage, but in both publications, it is clear that the majority of the CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is released via eructation. The SF6 tracer gas technique was developed in an attempt to measure CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; emissions by animals without confinement in respiration chambers (Johnson et al., 1994&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Johnson, K., Huyler, M., Westberg, H., Lamb, B., and Zimmerman, P. 1994. Measurement of methane emissions from ruminant livestock using a sulfur hexafluoride tracer technique. Environ. Sci. Technol. 28:359-362.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;). Air is sampled near the animal’s nostrils through a tube attached to a halter and connected to an evacuated canister worn around the animal’s neck or on its back. A capillary tube or orifice plate is used to restrict airflow through the tube so that the canister is between 50 and 70% full in approximately 24 hours. A permeation tube containing SF6 is placed into the rumen of each animal. The pre-determined release rate of SF6 is multiplied by the ratio of CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; to SF6 concentrations in the canister to calculate CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; emission rate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Many research centres have used the SF6 technique with variations in design of sampling and collection equipment, permeation tubes, and gas analysis (Berndt et al., 2014&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Berndt, A., Boland, T.M., Deighton, M.H., Gere, J.I., Grainger, C., Hegarty, R.S., Iwaasa, A.D., Koolaard, J.P., Lassey, K.R., Luo D., Martin, R.J., Martin, C., Moate, P.J., Molano, G., Pinares-Patiño, C., Ribaux, B.E., Swainson, N.M., Waghorn, G.C., and Williams, S.R.O. 2014. Guidelines for use of sulphur hexafluoride (SF6) tracer technique to measure enteric methane emissions from ruminants. Pages 166. M. G. Lambert, ed. New Zealand Agricultural Greenhouse Gas Research Centre, New Zealand. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;). Reliable results depend on following standard protocols, with greatest variation coming from accuracy of determining SF6 release rate from permeation tubes and control of sampling rate. With capillary tubes, sampling rate decreases as pressure in the canister increases, whereas an orifice plate gives a steadier sampling rate over 24 hours (Deighton et al., 2014&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Deighton, M.H., Williams, S.R.O., Hannah, M.C., Eckard, R.J., Boland, T.M., Wales, W.J., and Moate, P.J. 2014. A modified sulphur hexafluoride tracer technique enables accurate determination of enteric methane emissions from ruminants. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 197:47-63.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;). A source of error that has not been evaluated is that animals might interact and share CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; emissions when the sampling tube of one animal is near the head of another animal. There is good agreement between CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; emissions measured by the SF6 technique and respiration chambers, although results from the SF6 technique are more variable (Grainger et al., 2007&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Grainger, C., Clarke, T., McGinn, S.M., Auldist, M.J., Beauchemin, K.A., Hannah, M.C., Waghorn, G.C., Clark, H., and Eckard, R J. 2007. Methane emissions from dairy cows measured using the sulfur hexafluoride (SF6) tracer and chamber techniques. J. Dairy Sci. 90:2755-2766.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;; Muñoz et al., 2012&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Muñoz, C., Yan, T., Wills, D.A., Murray, S., and Gordon, A.W. 2012. Comparison of the sulfur hexafluoride tracer and respiration chamber techniques for estimating methane emissions and correction for rectum methane output from dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 95:3139-3148.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== ZELP Sense ==&lt;br /&gt;
[https://www.zelp.co/ ZELP] is a company based in the UK, which has developed a wearable device for cows called [https://www.zelp.co/measurement/ ZELP Sense]. The device continuously measures methane (CH₄) and carbon dioxide (CO₂) emissions from individual cows, in real-world settings, together with estimated dry matter intake (DMI). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== System description ===&lt;br /&gt;
ZELP Sense consists of three key parts: a headpiece, nosepiece, and gas sensing unit. The headpiece, made from ventilated neoprene, correctly positions the nosepiece without restricting the cow&#039;s natural movements or behaviours. The gas sensing unit sits below the cow&#039;s neck. The full device is lightweight and quick and easy to fit to the animal. The headpiece and nosepiece come in multiple sizes to ensure an optimal fit for a wide range of cows.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The device samples ambient and eructed air from close to the cow&#039;s nostrils through the nosepiece. These samples are processed by the gas sensing unit, which contains sensors to track ventilation rate and measure gas concentrations. Data from the device is offloaded via a WiFi connection and processed by ZELP&#039;s Machine Learning models. The device has local data storage allowing it to be used in areas with intermittent connectivity.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Users receive daily CH₄ and CO₂ emission totals (g/day), hourly CH₄ and CO₂ emissions for every hour of data collected (g/hour), and estimated DMI (kg/day), via ZELP&#039;s mobile-optimized web-app. The data can be downloaded for further analysis.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Internal Chamber Trial (2024): ====&lt;br /&gt;
Three cows, each fitted with a ZELP Sense device, were tested in respiration chambers over a 3-week period, with two 3-day testing sessions, separated by a one-week break. The daily emission totals provided by ZELP Sense showed an average difference of less than 10% versus those provided by respiration chambers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For more details, ZELP’s White Paper is available to download [[:File:Advancing-Livestock-Emissions-Measurement -ZELP-Sense-White-Paper.pdf|here]]. These results have been shared at the British Society for Animal Science Conference 2025, EAAP’s AI4AS Conference 2025, and at the ASGGN &amp;amp; ICAR Feed &amp;amp; Gas Workshop held at the 9th International Greenhouse Gas &amp;amp; Animal Agriculture Conference 2025. The poster presentation is available [[:File:ZELP Sense - Chamber Comparison Poster.pdf|here]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== External Chamber Trials (2025): ====&lt;br /&gt;
Multiple third-party trials of ZELP Sense have now been completed at different research institutions and universities. The trials focused on comparing the methane and carbon dioxide measurements provided by ZELP Sense with those from respiration chambers. Analysis is underway and results are expected to be published in early 2026. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Commercial Availability ===&lt;br /&gt;
ZELP Sense is available for pre-order now, with ZELP’s team allocating devices from their upcoming commercial production run on a first-come, first-serve basis. Delivery is expected in the second half of 2026. For more information, and to request a quote, please contact: sense@zelp.co.  &lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Cvangemert</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://wiki.icar.org/index.php?title=Section_20:_Methane_measuring_methods&amp;diff=4815</id>
		<title>Section 20: Methane measuring methods</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://wiki.icar.org/index.php?title=Section_20:_Methane_measuring_methods&amp;diff=4815"/>
		<updated>2025-12-19T06:58:19Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Cvangemert: Table title&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;big&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;b&amp;gt;NOTE: This version of Section 20 has been approved by the working group&#039;s Chair.  Please be aware that further revisions may occur before final review and approval by the Board and ICAR members per the [[Approval of Page Process]].&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/b&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Several factors influence the choice of measurement method such as cost, level of accuracy, precision, scope of application, and scale, which vary across disciplines (Cassandro et al., 2013&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Cassandro, M. 2013. Comparing local and cosmopolitan cattle breeds on added values for milk and cheese production and their predicted methane emissions. Animal Genetic Resources/Ressources génétiques animales/Recursos genéticos animales, available on CJO2013. doi:10.1017/S2078 63361200077X&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;; Hammond et al., 2016A&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Hammond, K.J., Crompton, L.A., Bannink, A., Dijkstra, J., Yáñez-Ruiz, D.R., O’Kiely, P., Kebreab, E., Eugenè, M.A., Yu, Z., Shingfield, K.J., Schwarm, A., Hristov, A.N., and Reynolds, C.K. 2016A. Review of current in vivo measurement techniques for quantifying enteric methane emission from ruminants. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 219:13–30. doi:10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2016.05.018.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;; Garnsworthy et al., 2019&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Garnsworthy, P.C. Difford, G.F. Bell, M.J. Bayat, A.R. Huhtanen, P. Kuhla, B. Lassen, J. Peiren, N. Pszczola, M; Sorg, D. Visker, M.H., and Yan, T. 2019 Comparison of Methods to Measure Methane for Use in Genetic Evaluation of Dairy Cattle. Animals 9:837, 12p.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;). For instance, genetic selection programs require CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; measurements on thousands of related individuals under the environmental conditions in which the animals are expected to perform (Falconer and Mackay, 1996&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Falconer, D., and Macka,y T. 1996. Introduction to quantitative genetics (4th edn). ISBN-13: 978-0582243026; ISBN-10: 0582243025&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;). This can be challenging because dairy cattle perform in a wide range of conditions (e.g. grazing vs indoor housing). There are a number of different measurement methods currently being employed, each with advantages and disadvantages in terms of the factors listed above. The currently accepted and widely used measurement methods are listed and described below. The main features of methods for measuring CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; output by individual animals are summarised in Table 4. Values for each feature are based on experience of experts in METHAGENE WG2 who have used the methods. All values are relative, and somewhat subjective, because absolute values will depend on installation and implementation of each method at different research centres. It should be noted that the measuring methods can be divided in two major sections: methods that measure the concentration and flux of CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (e.g. the respiration chamber), and methods that measure the flux of CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; through the device (e.g. GreenFeed). This affects the useability of the methods for answering research questions – please see also the recommendations at the end of these guidelines.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Respiration chamber]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Portable Accumulation Chamber|Portable Accumulation Chambers]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Wearables]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Breath sampling during milk and feeding]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Sniffer SOP]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Greenfeed SOP]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Laser Methane Detector]]&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! colspan=&amp;quot;7&amp;quot; | &#039;&#039;Table 1. Summary of the main features of methods for measuring CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; output by individual animals.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|+&lt;br /&gt;
!Method&lt;br /&gt;
!Purchase cost&lt;br /&gt;
!Running costs&lt;br /&gt;
!Labour&lt;br /&gt;
!Repeatability&lt;br /&gt;
!Behaviour alteration&lt;br /&gt;
!Throughput&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Respiration chamber&lt;br /&gt;
|High&lt;br /&gt;
|High&lt;br /&gt;
|High&lt;br /&gt;
|High&lt;br /&gt;
|High&lt;br /&gt;
|Low&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|SF6 technique&lt;br /&gt;
|Medium&lt;br /&gt;
|High&lt;br /&gt;
|High&lt;br /&gt;
|Medium&lt;br /&gt;
|Medium&lt;br /&gt;
|Medium&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Breath sampling during milking and feeding&lt;br /&gt;
|Low&lt;br /&gt;
|Low&lt;br /&gt;
|Low&lt;br /&gt;
|Medium&lt;br /&gt;
|None&lt;br /&gt;
|High&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|GreenFeed&lt;br /&gt;
|Medium&lt;br /&gt;
|Medium&lt;br /&gt;
|Medium&lt;br /&gt;
|Medium&lt;br /&gt;
|Medium&lt;br /&gt;
|Medium&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Laser methane detector&lt;br /&gt;
|Low&lt;br /&gt;
|Low&lt;br /&gt;
|High&lt;br /&gt;
|Low&lt;br /&gt;
|Low-Medium&lt;br /&gt;
|Medium&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|ZELP sense&lt;br /&gt;
|Low&lt;br /&gt;
|Low&lt;br /&gt;
|Low-Medium&lt;br /&gt;
|Medium&lt;br /&gt;
|Low&lt;br /&gt;
|High&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Cvangemert</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://wiki.icar.org/index.php?title=Section_20:_Methane_measuring_methods&amp;diff=4814</id>
		<title>Section 20: Methane measuring methods</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://wiki.icar.org/index.php?title=Section_20:_Methane_measuring_methods&amp;diff=4814"/>
		<updated>2025-12-19T06:57:07Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Cvangemert: Added ZELP sense&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;big&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;b&amp;gt;NOTE: This version of Section 20 has been approved by the working group&#039;s Chair.  Please be aware that further revisions may occur before final review and approval by the Board and ICAR members per the [[Approval of Page Process]].&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/b&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Several factors influence the choice of measurement method such as cost, level of accuracy, precision, scope of application, and scale, which vary across disciplines (Cassandro et al., 2013&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Cassandro, M. 2013. Comparing local and cosmopolitan cattle breeds on added values for milk and cheese production and their predicted methane emissions. Animal Genetic Resources/Ressources génétiques animales/Recursos genéticos animales, available on CJO2013. doi:10.1017/S2078 63361200077X&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;; Hammond et al., 2016A&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Hammond, K.J., Crompton, L.A., Bannink, A., Dijkstra, J., Yáñez-Ruiz, D.R., O’Kiely, P., Kebreab, E., Eugenè, M.A., Yu, Z., Shingfield, K.J., Schwarm, A., Hristov, A.N., and Reynolds, C.K. 2016A. Review of current in vivo measurement techniques for quantifying enteric methane emission from ruminants. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 219:13–30. doi:10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2016.05.018.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;; Garnsworthy et al., 2019&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Garnsworthy, P.C. Difford, G.F. Bell, M.J. Bayat, A.R. Huhtanen, P. Kuhla, B. Lassen, J. Peiren, N. Pszczola, M; Sorg, D. Visker, M.H., and Yan, T. 2019 Comparison of Methods to Measure Methane for Use in Genetic Evaluation of Dairy Cattle. Animals 9:837, 12p.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;). For instance, genetic selection programs require CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; measurements on thousands of related individuals under the environmental conditions in which the animals are expected to perform (Falconer and Mackay, 1996&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Falconer, D., and Macka,y T. 1996. Introduction to quantitative genetics (4th edn). ISBN-13: 978-0582243026; ISBN-10: 0582243025&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;). This can be challenging because dairy cattle perform in a wide range of conditions (e.g. grazing vs indoor housing). There are a number of different measurement methods currently being employed, each with advantages and disadvantages in terms of the factors listed above. The currently accepted and widely used measurement methods are listed and described below. The main features of methods for measuring CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; output by individual animals are summarised in Table 4. Values for each feature are based on experience of experts in METHAGENE WG2 who have used the methods. All values are relative, and somewhat subjective, because absolute values will depend on installation and implementation of each method at different research centres. It should be noted that the measuring methods can be divided in two major sections: methods that measure the concentration and flux of CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (e.g. the respiration chamber), and methods that measure the flux of CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; through the device (e.g. GreenFeed). This affects the useability of the methods for answering research questions – please see also the recommendations at the end of these guidelines.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Respiration chamber]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Portable Accumulation Chamber|Portable Accumulation Chambers]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Wearables]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Breath sampling during milk and feeding]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Sniffer SOP]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Greenfeed SOP]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Laser Methane Detector]]&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! colspan=&amp;quot;3&amp;quot; | &#039;&#039;Table 1.  Table one caption (in first row of the table).&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|- style=&amp;quot;background-color:#efefef;&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+&lt;br /&gt;
!Method&lt;br /&gt;
!Purchase cost&lt;br /&gt;
!Running costs&lt;br /&gt;
!Labour&lt;br /&gt;
!Repeatability&lt;br /&gt;
!Behaviour alteration&lt;br /&gt;
!Throughput&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Respiration chamber&lt;br /&gt;
|High&lt;br /&gt;
|High&lt;br /&gt;
|High&lt;br /&gt;
|High&lt;br /&gt;
|High&lt;br /&gt;
|Low&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|SF6 technique&lt;br /&gt;
|Medium&lt;br /&gt;
|High&lt;br /&gt;
|High&lt;br /&gt;
|Medium&lt;br /&gt;
|Medium&lt;br /&gt;
|Medium&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Breath sampling during milking and feeding&lt;br /&gt;
|Low&lt;br /&gt;
|Low&lt;br /&gt;
|Low&lt;br /&gt;
|Medium&lt;br /&gt;
|None&lt;br /&gt;
|High&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|GreenFeed&lt;br /&gt;
|Medium&lt;br /&gt;
|Medium&lt;br /&gt;
|Medium&lt;br /&gt;
|Medium&lt;br /&gt;
|Medium&lt;br /&gt;
|Medium&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Laser methane detector&lt;br /&gt;
|Low&lt;br /&gt;
|Low&lt;br /&gt;
|High&lt;br /&gt;
|Low&lt;br /&gt;
|Low-Medium&lt;br /&gt;
|Medium&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|ZELP sense&lt;br /&gt;
|Low&lt;br /&gt;
|Low&lt;br /&gt;
|Low-Medium&lt;br /&gt;
|Medium&lt;br /&gt;
|Low&lt;br /&gt;
|High&lt;br /&gt;
|}Table 4. Summary of the main features of methods for measuring CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; output by individual animals.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Cvangemert</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://wiki.icar.org/index.php?title=Section_20:_Activities&amp;diff=4813</id>
		<title>Section 20: Activities</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://wiki.icar.org/index.php?title=Section_20:_Activities&amp;diff=4813"/>
		<updated>2025-12-18T06:47:14Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Cvangemert: /* Working Group meetings */ Added Q&amp;amp;A microbiome&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;big&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;b&amp;gt;NOTE: This version of Section 20 has been approved by the working group&#039;s Chair.  Please be aware that further revisions may occur before final review and approval by the Board and ICAR members per the [[Approval of Page Process]].&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/b&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
== Global Methane Genetics ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:GMG label.png|right|frameless|300x300px]]&lt;br /&gt;
The Global Methane Genetics (GMG) initiative is a global program to accelerate genetic progress in methane emission in ruminants in the Global North and South. This WUR-ABG coordinated initiative is funded by the [https://www.globalmethanehub.org/ Global Methane Hub] and the [https://www.bezosearthfund.org/ Bezos Earth Fund,] both based on philanthropic funds to support methane mitigation and prevent global warming. If you have questions about the [https://www.wur.nl/en/project/global-methane-genetics-initiative.htm GMG initiative] you can send an email to gmg@wur.nl, contact Roel Veerkamp: roel.veerkamp@wur.nl or Birgit Gredler-Grandl: birgit.gredler-grandl@wur.nl.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The initiative holds the following projects:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== &#039;&#039;&#039;Dairy Cattle&#039;&#039;&#039; ===&lt;br /&gt;
We can look to nature to reduce CH4 emissions and use genetic diversity to provide solutions. Genetic improvement, based on identifying animals with genetic predisposition for lower CH4 output and using them to breed for the next generations, is a reliable, cost-effective, and permanent method for transforming livestock&#039;s impact on the environment.  Breeding programs in dairy cattle are run within breeds and across countries. Therefore, the program will accelerate genetic progress by focusing on four major dairy breeds and organizations and countries involved in those breeds. Additionally, the program will acquire considerable leverage through investments in these countries. If you have questions about the dairy cattle section you can contact Birgit Gredler-Grandl: birgit.gredler-grandl@wur.nl.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== &#039;&#039;Holstein breed&#039;&#039; ====&lt;br /&gt;
The largest data collection has been for the Holstein breed, but there is a lack of standardization and protocols in terms of equipment and its utilization (farm level, data processing, data sharing agreements, genetic evaluations, and data collections). Governments and breeding organizations in Denmark and the Netherlands will collaborate and collect methane and genotypes on more than 20,000 Holstein cows for the GMG database. Also, Poland and Italy team up to collect data for the GMG database, and their aim is also to collect more than 20,000 Holstein animals and develop genetic evaluations across a wide range of systems.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===== Denmark-The Netherlands =====&lt;br /&gt;
This collaboration between Aarhus University and Wageningen Livestock Research has five main goals. The contact person for questions about this project is Trine Villumsen: tmv@qgg.au.dk.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Setting up Standard Operating Procedures (SOP) for measuring methane using sniffers&lt;br /&gt;
* Setting up international protocols to measure methane on commercial farms&lt;br /&gt;
* Develop software tools to automate the processing of data into a phenotype&lt;br /&gt;
* Combine historical data in both countries for genetic evaluations&lt;br /&gt;
* Measure enteric methane in 20.000 new cows.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===== Poland-Italy =====&lt;br /&gt;
This collaboration has the following main goals. The contact person for questions about this project is Raffaella Finocchiaro raffaellafinocchiaro@anafibj.it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Measure enteric methane in 20.000 new cows.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== &#039;&#039;Jersey breed&#039;&#039; ====&lt;br /&gt;
Currently, due to the limited data available, the Jersey dairy breed does not have breeding values for methane (CH4) mitigation. The goal of the program is to collect methane genotypes in Canada and Denmark and share this information with the GMG database. The aim is to develop breeding values that will be distributed through the World Jersey Cattle Bureau organization and national Jersey organizations in Australia, Canada, Switzerland, Denmark, France, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands, and New Zealand. If you have questions about the Jersey breed section you can contact Rasmus Bak Stephansen rasmus.stephansen@qgg.au.dk&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== &#039;&#039;Brown Swiss breed&#039;&#039; ====&lt;br /&gt;
The Brown Swiss (BS) breed faces significant challenges due to its small population size, an divers environments the animals are kept. A collaboration between Germany, Switzerland, and Austria to phenotype enough animals is a prerequisite for utilizing the genetic potential of reducing methane emission of the BS breed. In addition to a population of 250 cows recorded with Greenfeed, and 1250 with the sniffer, progress will be accelerated by recording an additional 3,360 cows with sniffers. If you have questions about the Brown Swiss breed section you can contact Elena Frenken: fe@fbf-forschung.de.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== &#039;&#039;Red breeds&#039;&#039; ====&lt;br /&gt;
The red breeds are important for crossbreeding in many countries around the world. The project aims to share and collect CH4 data from Red Dairy Cattle (RDC) breeds (in the Nordic countries, Canada, and the United Kingdom (UK)) and share it with the Global Methane Genetics (GMG) Hub. Together, they will set up a shared genetic evaluation for bulls used for crossbreeding in many more countries. If you have questions about the Red breed section you can contact Elisenda Rius-Vilarrasa: Elisenda.Rius-Vilarrasa@vxa.se.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== &#039;&#039;&#039;Beef Cattle&#039;&#039;&#039; ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== &#039;&#039;Bluegrass (global beef)&#039;&#039; ====&lt;br /&gt;
All industries world-wide have been challenged with reducing emissions and beef is no exception. Genetic selection and specifically genomic selection have been identified as key tools to help meet this challenge. Methane emissions are not a local problem, but a global one and several major beef producing countries who exchange genetic material have, are, and will be collecting methane phenotypes for the purpose of genomic prediction. Individually (including those in Australia), these datasets will be limited in their genomic prediction accuracy. The BLUEGRASS alliance will bring together the key players globally, who collectively have solicited key seed funding from the Global Methane Hub. By sharing data and resources, the development of necessary reference populations will be accelerated. Locally or globally, success in the beef genetics industry has been a model of ‘co-opetition’. Breeders, although competitors, pool resources to build tools that can be used by all to compete with one another. This BLUEGRASS alliance is no different. A global alliance will come together to address this challenge, with or without Australia. Having Australia lead and ignite the alliance with MDC co-funding will create opportunities to direct this global initiative and provide first mover advantages for Australian breeders.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The program is focused on building genomic reference datasets for the main beef breeds in the collaborating countries. The animals to be recorded will be intensively recorded for other production traits, and genotyped, outside this project itself. In each country, trial or research breeding values will be produced and delivered to industry during the life of the project – enabling genetic selection against methane to get underway, and the data will underpin the ability to genomically screen the entire populations of the breeds involved in the respective countries i.e. all seedstock and commercial animals. The data collected will likely assist development of genomic selection against methane in other countries. The accelerated genetic selection and the commercial animal screening will enable real impact to reduce methane from beef cattle. If you have questions about the bluegrass project specifically, you can contact Steve Miller, steve.miller@une.edu.au &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===== Number of phenotypes =====&lt;br /&gt;
This project will phenotype methane traits in beef cattle populations in the US, Australia, the UK, Ireland, and New Zealand. Around 18.500 phenotypes will be collected over all years and countries. It is estimated that around 7.000 phenotypes will be collected in Australia, around 1.600 in New Zealand, around 800 in the UK, around 2.000 in Ireland and around 7.00 in the USA.&lt;br /&gt;
===== Breeds and traits included =====&lt;br /&gt;
All countries included in the Bluegrass project have different breeds and different target traits included in their measurements, besides the methane phenotypes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Australia will focus on Angus and Hereford seedstock with a research population of Angus, Wagyu, Charolais, Shorthorn and Brahman being a target as well. For the seedstock they will focus on seedstock traits plus methane measurements using PAC measures. For the research populations on seedstock traits plus feed intake, carcass as well as methane measurements with PAC.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For New Zealand priority is the progeny test herds. These are mostly Angus, Hereford and their crosses, including a diallel cross design. Some Angus x Simmental. Complete requirements with seedstock herds of Angus and Hereford. Focus is on the following: progeny test, seedstock traits, conception date (via fetal aging) from natural mate at yearling (then re-breeding), carcass grading on steers, feed intake on heifers, rumen microbiome on steers and heifers, seedstock traits from seedstock herds&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For the UK focus lies on Angus and Hereford sired animals, both pedigree and crossbred (including from dairy dams) and they focus on liveweights.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For Ireland they include multi-breed/crossbreed. 30% Charolais and Limousin sired from Continental type suckler dams, 30% Holstein-Friesian and 40% beef (mostly Angus) cross dairy. They will focus on feed intake, liveweight and carcass data.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The USA will be measuring Angus focused on seedstock traits from seedstock herds.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== &#039;&#039;US beef&#039;&#039; ====&lt;br /&gt;
This project will accelerate genetic selection for reduced methane emissions from U.S. and Canadian beef cattle, through phenotyping and genotyping the 18 most influential beef breeds in North America.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The primary activities of this project will center on phenotyping and genetic evaluation of the Germplasm Evaluation (GPE) herd, a large, multibreed resource population at the U.S. Meat Animal Research Center (USMARC) in Nebraska, USA. This herd is structured to represent the genetic diversity of the 18 most influential beef breeds in the U.S.. These 18 breeds are: Angus, Red Angus, Hereford, South Devon, Shorthorn, Beefmaster, Brangus, Brahman, Santa Gertrudis, Braunvieh, ChiAngus, Charolais, Gelbvieh, Limousin, Maine-Anjou, Salers, Simmental, Tarentaise.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Recording of methane phenotypes will occur using multiple approaches to not only maximize the number of phenotypes collected, but to also offer a comparison between methodologies within a U.S. beef production system. Based on these findings and in coordination with other GMG project teams, standard operating procedures for methane phenotyping of beef cattle will be developed and integrated into the [https://beefimprovement.org/resource-center/bif-guidelines/ Guidelines for Uniform Beef Improvement Programs] supporting the evolution of these approaches into standard practice and routine evaluation in any beef breeding system. If you have questions about the US beef project specifically, you can contact Matthew Spangler, mspangler2@unl.edu.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===== Main goals =====&lt;br /&gt;
* Recording methane phenotypes from at least 5,500 multi-breed genotyped beef cattle and openly sharing to the GMG database and the public domain.&lt;br /&gt;
* Development and publication of uniform guidelines for both methane phenotyping in beef cattle systems and the integration of methane phenotypes into beef genetic evaluations, through the BIF Guidelines wiki.&lt;br /&gt;
* Dissemination and routine updating of genetic parameter and genomic marker effects critical for the development of genetic selection tools and deployment of methane-reducing breeding programs.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== &#039;&#039;&#039;Sheep&#039;&#039;&#039; ===&lt;br /&gt;
This project focusses on recording methane phenotypes on animals in various populations, e.g. Merino, Texel, Dohne, Corriedale, maternal and terminal. In each case, those animals will be recorded for a range of other production, health, product quality and welfare traits (the exact suite of traits varies between countries). This ensures that it will be possible to determine the genetic relationships between methane traits and the other traits included in current and future selection indexes and breeding programs – meaning that breeders will be able to make informed decisions on any trade-offs between methane and other traits. In total around 16.600 methane phenotypes will be collected over all years and countries. It is estimated that around 7.500 methane phenotypes will be collected in Australia, 3.000 in Uruguay, 4.000 in New Zealand, 1.200 in the UK and 1.000 in the UK. If you have questions about the sheep project specifically, you can contact Daniel Brown, dbrown2@une.edu.au &lt;br /&gt;
==== Main goals ====&lt;br /&gt;
* Phenotyping and reference populations. Fast tracked phenotyping and  genotyping up to 16,000 records of methane traits across the key countries to facilitate accurate international evaluation of animals (Table 2).&lt;br /&gt;
* Genetic evaluation and models. Breeding values based on international genomic evaluation models to share the benefits of the established reference populations.&lt;br /&gt;
* Proxies. Development and validation of new phenotyping methods to expedite genetic progress.&lt;br /&gt;
* Breeding Programs. Whole farm system models to incorporate methane into breeding objectives in a balanced way and indexes to facilitate selection of breeding candidates.&lt;br /&gt;
* Education and adoption. Stakeholder engagement campaign and international development to ensure world-wide impact.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== &#039;&#039;&#039;Africa&#039;&#039;&#039; ===&lt;br /&gt;
This project focused on three regions of Africa (Eastern, Western and Southern Africa). It will will leverage and  accelerate on-going early research on GHG in these regions, strongly build capacity and team up with researchers to record CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, other economic productive traits and use the records to implement breeding strategies to reduce CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; emission while simultaneously enhancing productivity, food security and employment opportunities in the dairy and beef cattle farming systems; The source of livelihood for many poorly resourced farmers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Tapping into the existing breeding program infrastructure for improved productivity for dairy cattle in the three regions of Africa, this project will result in overall program that will accelerate genetic progress through focus on phenotyping, genotyping and the use of information from the microbiome in the genetic selection of animals in the smallholder dairy system. The overall impact will be better mitigation of negative effects of climate change and more productive cows. Through selection programs based on the index developed with the phenotypic and genomic information from this project.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The major activities include the direct CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; measurements on about 1.655 tropical cattle using [[Greenfeed SOP|GreenFeed]] and the use of [[Laser Methane Detector|LMD]] in smallholder farmers. Genotypic information and phenotypes captured routinely on major important productive traits that influence profitability, income and livelihood of farmers on 1.619 animals. Data sets will be linked to a larger existing data on 9.000 cows with phenotypic and genotypic information from existing projects. If you have questions about the Africa project specifically, you can contact Raphael Mrode, raphael.mrode@sruc.ac.uk&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Main goals ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Methane measurements available on 1.655 tropical cows.&lt;br /&gt;
* Tissue samples and genotypes available on 1.619 tropical cows.&lt;br /&gt;
* Genetic relationship between dairy cows in Western and Eastern Africa estimated.&lt;br /&gt;
* Multi-trait genomic analysis of dairy data and methane in Eastern Africa.&lt;br /&gt;
* Incorporate existing data on over 9.000 cows from existing research projects to enhance genomic prediction.&lt;br /&gt;
* Computation and the roll out of final selection index or sub-indexes developed for improved efficiency - reduced CH4 emission, lower maintenance requirement and increased milk production.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== &#039;&#039;&#039;Latin America&#039;&#039;&#039; ===&lt;br /&gt;
The aim of this project is to accelerate the reduction of enteric methane emissions in beef cattle in Latin America through genetic selection in key breeds relevant to Argentina, Brazil, Uruguay, and Mexico. The focus will be on phenotyping methane emissions and genotyping animals linked to existing genetic improvement programs. Reference populations for genomic selection will be the basis to improve the estimation of genetic merit and select for lower emission. The link with ongoing genetic improvement programs provides data on other economically relevant production traits, thus making it possible to estimate genetic correlations and optimize methane emission reductions with a minimum impact on livestock productivity. This approach minimizes negative impacts on food production while preserving economic, social, and environmental sustainability of beef cattle farming. This collaborative project between national agricultural research institutes (NARI) is supported by breeders’ associations and other key stakeholders. Public-private partnerships and collaborative efforts will scale genetic evaluation for methane emissions as well as the use of lower methane emission genetics on commercial farms. Phenotypic and genomic data from approximately 7.000 animals will be made globally available. In synergy with other projects, it will be possible to increase the size of reference populations leading to an even greater impact on methane emissions mitigation. If you have questions about the Latin America project specifically, you can contact Elly Navajas, enavajas@inia.org.uy&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For developing methane emission phenotyping platforms and reference populations, it is essential to upgrade methane emission recording equipment as well as standardize and coordinate the measurement of animals. Standardized protocols will be developed in collaboration with ICAR, and the criteria for selecting animals to be measured and genotyped will be established by the research team, including technicians from breeder associations. A critical component of the project involves genetic analyses, such as estimating genetic parameters for methane emission-related traits, validating breeding values in additional populations, and evaluating the impact of selecting for reduced methane emissions. Scientific collaboration will be fostered with other beef cattle projects, focusing on areas such as expertise exchange. Communication strategies will be implemented to engage stakeholders, including breeders, artificial insemination centers, policymakers, and other private stakeholders. Dialogue with teams managing greenhouse gas (GHG) inventories and Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs) will also be enhanced. These activities require active collaboration among countries and stakeholders in Latin America to achieve successful outcomes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Main goals ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* A Latin American collaborative network for accelerating genetic improvement for methane emissions reduction is established by NARIs, universities, breeder societies, and private stakeholders engaged in genetic evaluation programs across South America and Mexico. &lt;br /&gt;
* Methane emission phenotyping platforms are implemented, enabling data collection across key beef cattle breeds, targeting 7.000 methane emission phenotypes and genotypes of animals linked to genetic evaluations. &lt;br /&gt;
* Genomic-enhanced estimated breeding values for methane emissions will be available to breeders: based on pure-breed and multi-breed reference populations enhanced through collaboration and data sharing across beef cattle projects within the GMG initiative. &lt;br /&gt;
* The economic and environmental impact of breeding strategies to reduce methane emissions is assessed, to identify the most promising breeding strategies to accelerate methane emission reduction. The development of breeding objectives combining methane emission reduction with production goals will support policy and incentives for breeders and farmers to overcome adoption barriers and integrate the results into national GHG inventories. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== &#039;&#039;&#039;Microbiome&#039;&#039;&#039; ===&lt;br /&gt;
The micro-HUB project will establish a reference population with metagenome and genotype data, and create a genomic evaluation system that can be used to select the parents of the next generation with microbiome profiles that produce less enteric methane while maintaining genetic progress in profit and health. The genomic evaluation system will be widely open, will target most relevant breeds and production systems. Furthermore, a large global microbiome network will be established to collect existing data and knowledge and ensure knowledge transfer. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This project will start with metagenome and genomic data on 5.430 individuals from the core project partners, we will explore the opportunity to extend and expand our reference population to other countries with suitable data. By combining national data sets with genotypes, microbiome and methane information, we aim to create the largest rumen microbiome reference population globally. We aim to enlarge the reference population by more than 20.000 microbiome sequenced dairy and beef cattle as well as sheep from the Global Methane Genetics (GMG) program. From this, we will facilitate the delivery of genomic breeding values that can be used in global breeding programs to select for a microbiome composition with lower emissions and reduce the abundance of methanogenic pathways in the rumen microbiome of future generations of cattle and sheep. The project partners cover beef, dairy and sheep populations and creates an opportunity to identify a core microbiome (or set of cores) that can be used as a reference for nation-based breeding programs. The project will closely connect to the other projects within the Global Methane Program, to facilitate microbiome sampling, sequencing and genomic analysis. If you have questions about the microbiome project specifically, you can contact Oscar Gonzalez-Recio, oscar.gonzalezrecio@ed.ac.uk&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Activities ====&lt;br /&gt;
To enlarge the national database partners will obtain additional samples from animals with methane and genotype data from different breeds and production systems within the GMG phenotyping program (dairy and beef cattle). The inclusion of samples from external partners will be encouraged. Partners (also external) will be provided with instruction to collect data and sample rumen microbiome. The micro-Hub will provide stewardship for GMG partners regarding sampling, storage and shipping, as well as bioinformatic analysis. Rumen metagenome sequencing will be centralized in as fewer labs as possible (ideally only one).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Reference populations from partners will be combined, covering a broad range of breeds and productions systems and different geographical regions. Format of the databases will be unified. The combined dataset will be used for the microbiome genomic evaluations. The reference database will be updated with additional data coming from external partners. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We will develop the capabilities to estimate the genomic breeding value for microbiome composition for any genotyped animal in similar productive conditions as those represented in our reference population. The goal is to propose recommendations based on own experience to include estimated genomic breeding values for rumen microbiome profile in breeding programs. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The project will contribute to the activities organized within Global Methane Genetics and the ICAR Feed&amp;amp;Gas working group in building a microbiome network to exchange knowledge, harmonize guidelines and develop protocols. All data generated within the project will be made available through the Global Methane Genetics database. The project will collaborate with the database development to develop microbiome sharing requirements and specifications. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Main goals ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Joint reference metagenome compiled.&lt;br /&gt;
* Microbiome genomic evaluations.&lt;br /&gt;
* Release of SNP coefficients for international genomic evaluations for microbiome compositions.&lt;br /&gt;
* Network building and establishment of platform for rumen metagenome data.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== &#039;&#039;&#039;Working Group meetings&#039;&#039;&#039; ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The six working groups as described above meet two times a year to discuss the progress of their projects and to share knowledge. There are also general webinars organized for the project participants throughout the years.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Dairy Cattle ====&lt;br /&gt;
On the 15th of May 2025 the Working Group Dairy cattle met for the first time and shared their current progress, you can find the presentation slides [[:File:250515 GMG meeting Dairy Working Group.pdf|here.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On the 27&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;th&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; of October 2025 the Working Group Cattle had their second meeting, the current progress was shared and other projects and bottlenecks were discussed. You can find the presentation slides [[:File:20251027 GMG Working group Dairy meeting.pdf|here.]] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Sheep ====&lt;br /&gt;
On the 20th of May 2025 the Working Sheep met for the first time and shared their current progress, you can find the presentation slides [[:File:20250520 Meeting GMG Working group sheep.pdf|here.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On the 11&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;th&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; of November 2025 the Working Group Sheep had their second meeting, the current progress was shared and other projects and bottlenecks were discussed. You can find the presentation slides [[:File:20251111 Sheep Working Group GMG presentation.pdf|here.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Microbiome ====&lt;br /&gt;
On the 23th of May 2025 the Working Group Microbiome met for the first time and shared their current progress, you can find the presentation slides [[:File:202505 Global Meeting Genetics Microbiome working group meeting.pdf|here.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On the 27&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;th&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; of November 2025 the Working Group Microbiome had their second meeting, the current progress was shared and other projects and bottlenecks were discussed. You can find the presentation slides [[:File:20251127 GMG Microbiome WG presentation.pdf|here.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On the 2&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;nd&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; of December 2025 the Working group microbiome organized a Q&amp;amp;A session about microbiome sampling. You can find the slides [[:File:20251202 GMG meeting MicroHub Q&amp;amp;A.pdf|here.]] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Latin America ====&lt;br /&gt;
On the 5th of June 2025 the Working Group Latin America met for the first time and shared their current progress, you can find the presentation slides [[:File:202506 Presentation GMG Working Group Latin America meeting.pdf|here.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On the 14&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;th&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; of November 2025 the Working Group Latin America had their second meeting, the current progress was shared and other projects and bottlenecks were discussed. You can find the presentation slides [[:File:20251114 Latin America GMG Work group meeting.pdf|here.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Africa ====&lt;br /&gt;
On the 23th of May 2025 the Working Group Africa met for the first time and shared their current progress, you can find the presentation slides [[:File:20250523 GMG Working group Africa meeting.pdf|here.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On the 7&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;th&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; of November 2025 the Working Group Africa had their second meeting, the current progress was shared and other projects and bottlenecks were discussed. You can find the presentation slides [[:File:20251107 Africa Workgroup GMG presentation.pdf|here.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Beef ====&lt;br /&gt;
On the 17th of June 2025 the Working Group Beef met for the first time and shared their current progress, you can find the presentation slides [[:File:202506 GMG Working group Beef meeting.pdf|here.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On the 11&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;th&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; of November 2025 the Working Group Beef had their second meeting, the current progress was shared and other projects and bottlenecks were discussed. You can find the presentation slides [[:File:20251106 GMG Working group Beef meeting.pdf|here.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Asia ====&lt;br /&gt;
On the 1th of July 2025 the Working Group Asia met for the first time and shared their current progress, you can find the presentation slides [[:File:20250701 AsiaGMG presentation.pdf|here.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On the 25&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;th&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; of November the Working Group Asia organized a webinar for parties interested in contributing to the Asia group. You can find slides on data to impact [[:File:GMG Asia From data to impact.pdf|here]], an introduction into the GMG [[:File:Asia 20251105.pdf|here]], slides on methane recording techniques [[:File:2511 GMG Asia MethaneMethods.pdf|here]] and a presentation about [[Laser Methane Detector|LMD]] and their experiences from ILRI [[:File:ILRI LMD Exp 2025.pdf|here]]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Webinars ====&lt;br /&gt;
On the 22th of May 2025 there was a webinar for all GMG project participants on effective records in the database, you can find the presentation slides [[:File:250515 GMG meeting Dairy Working Group.pdf|here.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== DAFNE ==&lt;br /&gt;
Department of Agriculture and Forest Sciences at the University of Tuscia. Their main purpose is to collect primary emissions data from sniffers and GF to have emissions factors related to the species, breed, physiological state and diet management. They are engaged with ANAFIBJ and sharing data related to Holstein cattle with them for genetic evaluations. Currently they are running trials with sheep and buffalo.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Sheep ===&lt;br /&gt;
For this trial they are comparing 2 grazing methods using 2 groups of Sopravissana sheep, reared at the facility.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# Rotational, 18 sheep. Turns every 4 days on strip paddocks. 18 paddocks in total; 6 heads on 3 strip paddocks per turn of grazing. After 24 days the sheep are back to the first three strips.&lt;br /&gt;
# Continuous, 18 sheep. Continuous grazing on same paddock. 3 paddocks in total; 6 heads per paddock. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Subgroups for both group A and B (6 heads) are randomly arranged every day. The 18 strip paddocks are the same total size as the three continuous paddocks. They have the same number of heads grazing and the same live weight load.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Both groups are balanced for BW, receive the same hay in quantity and quality with ad libitum access and spend the same time at pasture. Daily sampling of the hay and residual per group is done, weekly sub samples of hay and residual are analyzed. In parallel fresh grass is sampled and analyzed to represent the 2 grazing methods. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The GreenFeed is located in the barn, at 9AM this barn is closed for group A and opens for group B and this switches every day. The GreenFeed is the only place they can get concentrates. Nutritional information for this concentrate can be found [[:File:Nutritional table sheep DAFHNE.docx|here]]. Amount of food and cup drops can be found here.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Trial started end of March 2025 and will last 1.5 months. They are using the GF adapted for small ruminants.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Buffalo ===&lt;br /&gt;
This is a continuous trial which will last 4 months per supplement tested. First they monitor the buffalo for 4 weeks without supplement as a control diet and then there will be an 8 week experimental period with the supplement diet. During the entire period the buffalo are confined to the barn. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The buffalo are separated in two groups, in adjacent pens. One group has access to a milking robot, with the MooLogger from [[Sniffer SOP|Tecnosens.]] The other pen has a conventional milking system and the GreenFeed is placed facing this pen.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
All buffaloes are fed the same concentrates. Nutritional information for this concentrate can be found [[:File:Nutritional table Buffalo DAFHNE.docx|here]]. Amount of food and cup drops can be found here. The buffalo’s in the GF group get the concentrates from the GF and about 1 kg of concentrates during milking operations. The buffalo’s in the sniffer group only get concentrates from the milking robot, which is about 2 kg/head/day.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To account for the emissions recorded individually at different times, they compare the emissions data aggregated on a daily basis. They are using the GF adapted for large ruminants with horns&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Presentation materials ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Seminar by Julius van der Werf: Breeding for a changing climate 13-05-2025 ===&lt;br /&gt;
On the 13th of May Julius van de Werf gave a presentation at Wageningen Livestock Research on selection indexes for selecting low methane livestock, focused on sheep. You can find the slides [[:File:20250513 Seminar J.v.d.Werf.pdf|here]]. You can find the recording of the presentation below.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;youtube&amp;gt;PxKmxKVvVEA?si=C6x0keKAvgU009Da&amp;lt;/youtube&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Seminar by Maria Frizzarin: Introduction to milk mid-infrared spectroscopy 10-07-2025 ===&lt;br /&gt;
On the 10th of July Maria Frizzarin gave a presentation at Wageningen Livestock Research on milk mid-infrared spectroscopy, equations development, and applications. You can find the slides [[:File:10072025 Seminar Maria MIR.pdf|here.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Seminar by Sarah-Joe Burn: Breed4Green 25-09-2025 ===&lt;br /&gt;
On the 25th of September Sarah-Joe Burn gave a presentation at Wageningen Livestock Research on measuring methane emissions in commercial farms and establishing a comprehensive dataset for genetic studies. A similar presentations was given at EAAP 2025, you can find the slides to that presentation [[:File:Eaap2025-breed4green-linke.pdf|here]] and the abstract [[:File:2025 Innsbruck EAAP Book Abstracts.pdf|here]], page 250.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Joint ICAR Feed&amp;amp;Gas and ASGGN workshop ===&lt;br /&gt;
On the 5th of October the joint workshop between the [https://www.icar.org/group/working-group-feed-and-gas/ ICAR Feed&amp;amp;Gas working group] and the [https://www.asggn.org/ ASGGN] took place before the GGAA conference in Nairobi. The presentations can be found below. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[:File:2025 ASGGN - GGAA - A Taste of the Future Buccal Swabbing for Rumen Microbial ProfilingTB.pdf|A Taste of the Future: Buccal Swabbing for Rumen Microbial Profiling]]​. Presented by Ben Perry ([https://www.bioeconomyscience.co.nz/ NZIBS])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[:File:2638 Booker ILRI GGAA ASGGN Oct 2025.pdf|Rate of Genetic Gain for Methane Emissions in a Maternal Production Flock]]. Presented by Fem Booker ([https://www.bioeconomyscience.co.nz/ NZIBS])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[:File:Boris ICAR2025 v01.pdf|Association between rumen and faecal microbiome and enteric methane emissions in dairy cattle]]. Presented by Boris Sepulveda ([https://agriculture.vic.gov.au/ AV])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[:File:CaeliRichardson GGAA Workshop 2025.pdf|Global Framework to Monitor, Measure, and Account for Methane Reductions from Genetic Selection]]. Presented by Caeli Richardson ([https://abacusbio.com/ Abacusbio])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[:File:GGAA Workshop ICAR and ASGGN Ida Storm.pdf|Danish Perspectives on implementation of GHG regulation]]. Presented by Ida Storm ([https://agricultureandfood.dk/ DAFG])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[:File:GGAA Workshop ICAR and ASGGN Rasmus Stephansen.pdf|Experience with CH4 sniffers, what have we learned so far?]] Presented by Rasmus Stephansen ([https://international.au.dk/ AU])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[:File:GGAA workshop MIR methane presentation.pdf|Overview of the methane equations developed from mid-infrared spectroscopy and their applications.]] Presented by Maria Frizzarin ([https://www.agroscope.admin.ch/agroscope/en/home.html Agroscope])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[:File:HanneHonerlagen ICARpresentation.pdf|Adding microbial data to enhance breeding for lower methane emissions]]. Presented by Hanne Honerlagen ([https://www.wur.nl/en/research-results/chair-groups/animal-sciences/animal-breeding-and-genomics-group.htm WUR-ABG])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[:File:McNaughton ASGGN Workshop final.pdf|GreenFeed for phenotyping – our experiences]]. Presented by Lorna McNaughton ([https://www.lic.co.nz/ LIC])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[:File:MIE ILRI GGAA ASGGN Oct 2025.pdf|Methane Index Explorer: Optimising a Breeding Value Format for Simultaneous Inclusion of Enteric Methane Emissions in Breeding Schemes and National Inventories]]. Presented by Pavithra Ariyarathne ([https://www.bioeconomyscience.co.nz/ NZIBS])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[:File:RiccardoGGAA Presentation RB.pdf|ZELP sense]]. Presented by Riccardo Bica ([https://www.zelp.co/ ZELP])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[:File:ICAR Working group Nairobi 5 Oct2025.pdf|Selection for lower methane livestock, selection index considerations]]. Presented by Julius van der Werf (UNE)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Measuring enteric methane in beef and dairy cattle using PAC. Presented by Timothy Bilton ([https://www.bioeconomyscience.co.nz/ NZIBS])&amp;lt;youtube&amp;gt;https://youtu.be/NjPuotrmkMQ&amp;lt;/youtube&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Estimating methane emissions with the GreenFeed System. Presented by Paul Smith ([https://teagasc.ie/ Teagasc]) &amp;lt;youtube&amp;gt;https://youtu.be/TnHefWoP29I&amp;lt;/youtube&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Cvangemert</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://wiki.icar.org/index.php?title=File:20251202_GMG_meeting_MicroHub_Q%26A.pdf&amp;diff=4812</id>
		<title>File:20251202 GMG meeting MicroHub Q&amp;A.pdf</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://wiki.icar.org/index.php?title=File:20251202_GMG_meeting_MicroHub_Q%26A.pdf&amp;diff=4812"/>
		<updated>2025-12-18T06:46:49Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Cvangemert: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Slides from the Q&amp;amp;A session organized by the microbiome Working group&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Cvangemert</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://wiki.icar.org/index.php?title=Section_20:_Sniffer_SOP&amp;diff=4811</id>
		<title>Section 20: Sniffer SOP</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://wiki.icar.org/index.php?title=Section_20:_Sniffer_SOP&amp;diff=4811"/>
		<updated>2025-12-17T10:01:27Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Cvangemert: /* Analox */ added picture&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;big&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;b&amp;gt;NOTE: This version of Section 20 has been approved by the working group&#039;s Chair.  Please be aware that further revisions may occur before final review and approval by the Board and ICAR members per the [[Approval of Page Process]].&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/b&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Introduction ==&lt;br /&gt;
This document is the report obtained from the presentations, talks, chats and discussions of the Zoom meetings on 23&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;rd&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; February 2023. In both meetings an introduction was made about the ICAR Feed&amp;amp;Gas Working Group, the objectives of the Working Group, including the revision of the guidelines (Section 20 - Recording Dairy Cattle Methane Emission for Genetic Evaluation) published two years ago. Moreover, the aim of the meeting was to share knowledge on Sniffer standard operating procedure including tips, tricks and trouble-shooting data recording using Sniffer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Accurate measurement of methane emissions in ruminants is crucial to develop robust national or international greenhouse gas emission inventories and to evaluate mitigation strategies for their reduction. Over years many instruments and techniques have been developed and used for research purposes. Between all instruments and techniques available, Sniffer method has assumed significance. Sniffer has been developed to measure and collect data about methane (CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) and carbon dioxide (CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) emissions in the breath of ruminants during milking and/or feeding. The feed bin might be in an automatic milking system (AMS) or in an automatic feeding system (AFS). Before considering all features, advantages and disadvantages of the system, it is important to remember that they have been originally designed to detect dangerous gas leaks. Breath-sampling methods are non-invasive because, once installed, animals are unaware of the equipment and animals are in their normal environment. Animals follow their normal routine, which includes milking and feeding, so no training of animals, handling or change in diet are required. Equipment is relatively cheap and running costs are negligible. In Sniffer method, gases are continuously sampled into a sampling tube installed in the feed bin or through. The other end of the sampling tube is connected to an infrared CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration analyser. Data are collected every 1-5 seconds by the Sniffer.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Equipment description ==&lt;br /&gt;
On the market several suppliers of this product are available, but all systems share the same basic structure consisting of: gas meter, pressure inlet, flow meter, pressure outlet and a tube to suction with filter. It is essential to have a filter at level of the suction tube to avoid clogging of the cylinder with dust, saliva or feed. In the tube between the cylinder and the gas meter, whose diameter is 2-4 mm, one or more filters can be inserted which ensure the removal of impurities and debris from the animal’s breath. For the correct functioning of the system and for the collection of good quality data, the aspiration pump must work with an aspiration volume of 0.5-1.5 L/s. In more complex systems and to deal with particular needs (e.g., high environmental humidity) a dryer tube can also be inserted. Generally, Sniffer systems are provided of at least two gas meters: one for the methane (CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) and one for carbon dioxide (CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;); further gas meters could be available, e.g., oxygen (O&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;), nitrous oxide (N&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;O) and water (H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;O). Gas cards used to estimate CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentrations have different ranges, depending on which sensor is used and how it is calibrated. Generally for CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; it is best to have a range between 0-25.000ppm, sensors with a range of 0-20.000ppm or 50.000ppm are also functional. For CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;  a range of 0-2.000ppm or 0-5.000 ppm is generally used. Internet connection is guaranteed through a 5G modem or through a Wi-Fi router. Internet connection allows data storage or download. Connections problems can occur; therefore, a hard disk can be provided to ensure data still collected when connection is lost. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is important to install the Sniffer sampling tube in a position that is not so visible to the animal to avoid frequent damages. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One unit, when installed in the automated milking system (AMS), can measure as many animals as the capacity of the AMS, generally up to 130 animals per day. Sniffers can also be installed in concentrate feeders. This is not often done as it does not give you simultaneous milking records and because concentrate feeders are generally more open than the AMS. Which means there is more influence on the measurements by for example the wind. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If there are power cuts, the system restarts automatically when power is restored. Some systems have a battery included to operate the system during a power cut.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Overview of commercially available sniffers ==&lt;br /&gt;
Currently there are different devices on the market that can be used as a sniffer. This section gives an overview of the different sniffers. &lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Agscent.png|thumb|157x157px|Agscent Air]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Agscent ===&lt;br /&gt;
Agscent is a company based in Australia, you can find their website [https://agscent.com/ here.] They have developed the Agscent Air, current model: GHG 2100. This device uses a TDL (Tunable Diode Laser) sensor for CH4 and a NDIR (Non-Dispersive InfraRed) sensor for CO2. With a measurement range of 0-20.000ppm for CO2 and 0-40.000ppm for CH4. The datasheet for this device can be downloaded [https://agscent.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Agscent-GHG-2100-tech-flyer.pdf here] and you can find the device on the website [https://agscent.com/products/agscent-air/#air-ghg here]. Currently this device is used in Australia and the USA. They have also developed the agscent x optiweigh, which combines the sniffer sensor with a weighting station for in the pasture. The datasheet for this device can be downloaded [https://agscent.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Agscent-Optiweigh-flyer.pdf here] and you can find the device on their website [https://agscent.com/products/agscent-air/#air-optiweigh here]. Currently these combined devices are being used in Australia. Validations for the combined and standalone devices were conducted by multiple institutions, you can find a summary [[:File:Agscent Air GHG Validation Case Study 2025.pdf|here.]] Preliminary results of one of these validation studies was presented at the State of the Science summit in 2025. You can find the poster [[:File:ADSA 2025 NS ed.pdf|here]] and the abstract [[:File:Abstracts BOOK 2025 20250624-1249.pdf|here]], number 1155. A preliminary paper on a follow-up study can be found [[:File:Reyes et al. - Enteric methane (paper).pdf|here.]] The report for one of the other validations can be found [[:File:Report Agscent 4-2024 external.pdf|here.]] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Agscent Air falls into the middle price range for a sniffer, for more information please contact Daniela Carnovale (daniela@agscent.com).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
During the [[Section 20: Activities|Denmark-The Netherlands project]] the Axetris methane sensor will be tested, this is the same methane sensor that the Agscent Air uses. It has been installed in the original Carltech v1 casing. Testing in the Air Quality lab has been completed for these devices and these sensors functioned as well as the other sensors tested. On-farm testing is still in progress. &lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Arcoflex.jpg|thumb|151x151px|ASCH001]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Arcoflex ===&lt;br /&gt;
Arcoflex is a company based in Australia, you can find their website [https://www.arcoflex.com.au/ here.] They have developed a sniffer device different from the others currently on the market, as it is a passive device it does not require tubes to suck up the air. The sensor is directly placed in a feed bin above where the mouth from the cow will be. This sniffer is currently being used in Australia and New Zealand. Currently the version ASCH401 is available commercially, this device can only measure methane. Version ASCH402 will also include a CO2 sensor, this version is still under development. They have submitted a paper for review on device. You can download an earlier version of this paper [[Media:Enteric Methane Monitoring in Dairies.pdf|here]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The ASCH401 and ACH402 both fall into the lower price range for a sniffer, for more information please contact Geoff Schaller (geoff@arcoflex.com.au)&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Carltech V2.jpg|thumb|181x181px|Carltech v2]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Carltech ===&lt;br /&gt;
Carltech is a company based in The Netherlands, you can find their website [https://carltech.nl/ here.]They have developed a a new version of the WD_WUR sniffer, which will be tested in the SOP sniffer project. This device can measure CO2 in the range 0-50.000ppm and CH4 in the range of 0-2.000ppm, optionally a O2 sensor can be included. Currently the older models are being used in The Netherlands. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The WD_WUR falls into the lower price range for a sniffer, for more information please contact Koen Böggemann (koen@carltech.nl)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== C-lock ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Simplescan.jpg|thumb|163x163px|SimpleScan]]&lt;br /&gt;
C-lock is a company based in The USA, you can find their website [https://www.c-lockinc.com/ here.]Their development is mostly focused on the [[Greenfeed SOP|Greenfeed]], but they have also developed a sniffer, the SimpleScan. This sniffer uses the exact same sensors as their GreenFeed, TDL for CH4 with a range of 0-40.000ppm and NDIR for CO2 with a range of 0-20.000ppm. According to C-Lock their CH4 sensor is precise to about 1 ppm. This device can be outfitted with optional O&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; sensors. C-lock uses their own filtering algorithms and knowledge on finalized data for the final results. The datasheet for the SimpleScan can be downloaded [[Media:SimpleScan FactSheet.pdf|here.]]   &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The simple scan falls into the higher price range for a sniffer, for more information please contact Robert Whittington (rwhittington@c-lockinc.com)  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This product has been discontinued by the manufacturer.  &lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Gasera.png|thumb|181x181px|Gasera one pulse]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Gasera ===&lt;br /&gt;
Gasera is a company based in Finland, you can find their website [https://gasera.fi/ here.] They have developed multiple gas analysers, of which the Gasera one pulse can be used to measure CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. This device can be used for many different application as it can measure up to 9 gasses and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;O. Their sensor is based on combining the cantilever enhanced photoacoustic detection technology with a broad band IR source and narrow bandpass optical filters. It measures CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; in the range 0,3 – 30.000ppm and measures CH4 in the range 1-100.000ppm. Both ranges can be configured to achieve the detection performance required. The datasheet for this device can be found [[Media:Gasera brochure OnePulse.pdf|here]] and you can find the device on the website [https://gasera.fi/product/gasera-one-pulse/ here.]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
They have also developed the Gasera one GHG, this device can measure CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, NO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;O, but no CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;.&#039;&#039;&#039; This device is based on combining the cantilever enhanced photoacoustic detection technology with quantum cascade laser source operating at a Mid-IR fundamental spectral absorption line of CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and N&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;O. This combination provides very high sensitivity (ppb level) to reliably measure ambient background levels of greenhouse gases methane (CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) and nitrous oxide (N&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;O). It has a recommended recalibration period of 12 months. You can download the datasheet for this device [[Media:GASERA ONE GHG.pdf|here]] and find more information on the website [https://gasera.fi/product/gasera-one-ghg-greenhouse-gas-analyzer/ here].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Gasera one pulse falls into the higher price range for a sniffer, for more information please contact gasera [https://gasera.fi/company/distribution/ here].&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Gasmet.png|thumb|149x149px|GT5000]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Gasmet ===&lt;br /&gt;
Gasmet is a company based in Finland, you can find their website [https://www.gasmet.com/ here]. They have developed multiple gas analyzers for many different applications, the GT5000 can measure up to 50 gasses. It can measure both CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; up to 100.000ppm, the range can be adjusted to what is needed. This device uses a FTIR (Fourier Transformed InfraRed) sensor. The benefit of this sensor is that it can easily detect other or unknown gasses which you were not aware of and you can then add them to your detection. You can download the datasheet for this device [[Media:Gasmet GT5000 Terra Technical Data.pdf|here]] and find more information on the website [https://www.gasmet.com/products/category/portable-gas-analyzers/gt5000-terra/ here.]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The GT 5000 falls into the higher price range for a sniffer, for more information please contact Jockum Törnqvist (jockum.tornqvist@gasmet.fi)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Edinburgh Sensors ===&lt;br /&gt;
Edinburgh Sensors is a company based in the UK, you can find their website [https://edinburghsensors.com/ here.] They develop sensors that can be used for measuring CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; in the breath of ruminants. They produce the boxed gascard and the guardian NG. These sensors can be used to build your own sniffer, by combining the sensors with, amongst others, a datalogger and waterproof casing. The measurement range is dependent on which type of gascard for CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; you include in the build. Currently the completely assembled Guardian sniffers are being used in Finland, Denmark and Spain. [[File:Guardian NEIKER.jpg|200px|thumb|Guardian build in Spain at [https://neiker.eus/en/ NEIKER]]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are companies that can build the complete sniffer from these sensors. One of these companies is DuoTec, you can find their website [https://duotec.dk/ here.] Contact person for inquiries for this company would be: Rasmus Bendsen (raw@duotec.dk)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another company that can build a sniffer from these sensors is Bramtech, they build the sniffers that are currently used by Aarhus University. They currently have no plans to expand further into this business.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
During the [[Section 20: Activities|Denmark-The Netherlands project]] the Edinburgh methane sensor will be tested. It has been installed in the original Carltech v1 casing. Testing in the Air Quality lab has been completed for these devices and these sensors functioned as well as the other sensors tested. On-farm testing is still in progress. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Most often the Guardians are assembled in house by the research groups themselves.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In general this device, once completed falls in the lower price range for sniffers. You can contact Edinburgh Sensors [https://edinburghsensors.com/contact/ here.]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:MooLogger.jpg|thumb|175x175px|MooLogger]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Tecnosens  ===&lt;br /&gt;
Tecnosens is a company based in Italy, you can find their website [https://www.tecnosens.it/en here.] They have developed the MooLooger, currently there are two versions available, the MooLooger standard and the MooLogger advanced. The MooLogger has a measurement range of 0-5.000ppm for CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and 0-50.000ppm for CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and uses a NDIR sensor. Optionally this device can measure O&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; in the range of 0-25.000ppm. Currently the MooLogger is being used, on small or large scale, in Italy, Spain, Canada, USA, Switzerland and Uruguay. You can download the datasheet for this device [[Media:MooLogger Plus Oct 2024.pdf|here]] and find more information on the MooLogger on the website [https://www.tecnosens.it/en/Tecnosens-products/moologger here.] They have multiple instruction video&#039;s available on their [https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLR1KvTMU2thuf-xpkTuHM6fs_WRVtwoz6 youtube channel.] For this device a multiplexer is available to use one MooLogger and measure in multiple AMS.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The MooLooger falls in the lower price range for a sniffer, for more information please contact Greta Bonacina (gbonacina@tecnosens.it).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Nikira labs ===&lt;br /&gt;
Nikira labs is a company bases in the USA, you can find their website [https://www.nikiralabs.com/ here]. They have developed the CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;/CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;/H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;O analyser. This device has a measurements range of 100-20.000ppm for CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and 1-20.000ppm for CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and can optionally detect H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;O in the range of 500-20.000 ppm. The datasheet for this device can be downloaded from their website [https://www.nikiralabs.com/ch4-co2-h2o-analyzer here.]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;/CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;/H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;O analyser falls into the higher price range for a sniffer, for more information please contact Nikira Labs [https://www.nikiralabs.com/contact-9 here.]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== La Trobe Uni ===&lt;br /&gt;
The research institute, as a part of La Trobe university based in Australia, has developed a sniffer inhouse, you can find their website [https://www.latrobe.edu.au/ here.] They are still working on commercializing their sniffer device.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When commercialized they aim to have the sniffer fall into the lower price range, for more information please contact Aniruddha (Ani) Desai (A.Desai@latrobe.edu.au).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Analox ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:PXL 20250722 143934376.jpg|thumb|343x343px|HerdLab system, for all gasses.]]&lt;br /&gt;
Analox is a company based in the UK, you can find their website [https://analoxgroup.com/ here.] They have developed the HerdLab system. This device can measure 6 different gasses. The measurement range for CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is dependent on which variant of the sensor you choose, generally it will be 0-2.000 ppm, they also offer 0-1.000 ppm and 0-5.000 ppm. For CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; the range is also dependent on the variant of sensor you choose, generally it will be 0-20.000 ppm, they also offer 0-2.000, 0-5.000 and 0-50.000. This device can also measure oxygen (O&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;), hydrogen (H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;), ammonia (NH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) and nitric oxide (NO), if needed. It uses a combination of NDIR, paramagnetic and electrochemical sensors to analyze the concentrations. The datasheet for this device can be found [[:File:Herd Lab Brochure - Final Version.pdf|here]]. A short introductory presentation [[:File:Measuring Methane Emissions Introduction.pdf|here]] with associated video to be found [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2O9cDKg94W0 here.] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This system is originally developed to measure up to 6 bays in a herringbone system, at the same time. Thereby, HerdLab can be applied to multiple AMS systems at the same time and multiple bays in a rotary system too. Due to this possibility price range is more dynamic than for other devices included in the list. When using one system for one AMS the HerdLab falls into the medium price range for a sniffer. Price will change when you want to measure more gasses or more animals, for measuring in multiple AMS systems (at the same farm) or multiple bays the increase in costs would be low, as you already have the system in place. For more information please contact Adrian Howe (adrian.howe@analoxgroup.com).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Comparison of technical details of commercially available sniffers ==&lt;br /&gt;
As part of the [[Section 20: Ongoing activities|DNK-NLD project]] Wageningen Livestock Research has collected technical information on all commercially available sniffers directly from the companies. An excel file showing these details for all the sniffers can be downloaded [[Media:Comparison technical details sniffers ICAR.xlsx|here]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Experimental protocols ==&lt;br /&gt;
No particular experimental protocols are applied. Once installed, the system runs continuously. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Change in diet are not required.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Training and adaptation period ==&lt;br /&gt;
Training, handling or adaptation period are not required.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Problems faced and upgrades ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Device waterproof ===&lt;br /&gt;
Sniffer devices are not always completely waterproof. Considering that there is electrical wiring inside and that in some cases the intervention of a technician is necessary, it is important to choose an IP65 box or to equip the Sniffer box with a waterproof coating.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Clogging problems ===&lt;br /&gt;
To avoid clogging of the pipes, ideally a venting hose is provided. This pipe is connected to the compressed air outlet pipe of the AMS. When the gate of the milking robot opens, allowing the animal to exit, compressed air is blown into the venting hose. This air flow in the direction of the cylinder helps to avoid clogging. Currently some sniffers have the option for a blow-back system.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Animals identification ===&lt;br /&gt;
Antenna for ID reader is not always successful. It is suggested to use AMS data identification and merge them later on.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Calibration procedure ===&lt;br /&gt;
In many cases problems of calibration drift can occur. It is necessary to standardize zero and span calibrating procedure.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Personell in charge of the trial ===&lt;br /&gt;
It is essential to have a good technician who monitors Sniffer&#039;s activities on daily basis and who also knows the AMS and AFS system. Among the activities that the technician must carry out: setting up, moving equipment, daily data monitoring and download, checking up on equipment at irregularities, fixing problems, downloading AMS data and ordering spare parts. If a good technician is not available, it is essential to have an alert system (sms, e-mail) of anomalies.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Filter replace ===&lt;br /&gt;
Filter obturations by dust or condensation can occur. It is possible to prevent these problems changing external filter every 15 days and change internal filter every 6 months. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Questions and answers ==&lt;br /&gt;
 &#039;&#039;&#039;Q1. What’s the cost of the system?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 A1. 10.000€ by Edimburgh Instruments + Duotec Sensors + Bramtech customization.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 A2. 4.500€ by Tecnosens (Italy).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 A3. 3.100€ by Carltech Sniffer (the Netherlands) (old generation). For new generation device we have not received a new pricing.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &#039;&#039;&#039;Q2. How many animals per Sniffer?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 A1. Not more than 130 cows per Sniffer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 A2. 1 Sniffer per AMS, so no more than 60/65 cows per AMS/Sniffer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &#039;&#039;&#039;Q3. How long does the experimental trial take?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 A1. We plan to continue for many years.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 A2. For genetic evaluation purposes we plan to collect data for many years.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &#039;&#039;&#039;Q4. How do you identify animals in Sniffer?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 A1. We use AMS identification, easier and more accurate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 A2. We use AMS identification. It is possible to use also external RFID tag reader but it need validation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &#039;&#039;&#039;Q5. It is necessary to have gas cards with wide detection limit (0-10.000 CH4 and 0-50.000 CO2)?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 A1. Not necessary considering animals’ emission, so probably are cheaper than other gas cards with different detection limit.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Cvangemert</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>