Section 22 – Sustainability recording traits: Difference between revisions
Line 415: | Line 415: | ||
| rowspan="2" |21 | | rowspan="2" |21 | ||
|Fresh Cow Infection Rate | |Fresh Cow Infection Rate | ||
| | |[[File:Image21.png|center|thumb|523x523px]] | ||
|- | |- | ||
|Health | |Health | ||
Line 425: | Line 425: | ||
|Selective Dry Cow Therapy Rate | |Selective Dry Cow Therapy Rate | ||
| | |[[File:Image22.png|center|thumb|607x607px]] | ||
|- | |- | ||
|Health | |Health | ||
Line 432: | Line 432: | ||
| rowspan="2" |23 | | rowspan="2" |23 | ||
|% Cows culled due to udder health | |% Cows culled due to udder health | ||
| | |[[File:Image23.png|center|thumb|601x601px]] | ||
|- | |- | ||
|Health | |Health | ||
Line 443: | Line 443: | ||
|% Cows culled due to lameness | |% Cows culled due to lameness | ||
| | |[[File:Image24.png|center|thumb|620x620px]] | ||
|- | |- | ||
|Health | |Health | ||
Line 452: | Line 452: | ||
| rowspan="2" |25 | | rowspan="2" |25 | ||
|% Cows culled due to other disorders/diseases | |% Cows culled due to other disorders/diseases | ||
| | |[[File:Image25.png|center|thumb|613x613px]] | ||
|- | |- | ||
|Health | |Health | ||
Line 461: | Line 461: | ||
| rowspan="2" |26 | | rowspan="2" |26 | ||
|% Cows with FPR < 1 at first test day | |% Cows with FPR < 1 at first test day | ||
| | |[[File:Image26.png|center|thumb|635x635px]] | ||
|- | |- | ||
|Health | |Health | ||
Line 468: | Line 468: | ||
| rowspan="2" |27 | | rowspan="2" |27 | ||
|% Cows with FPR >1.3/1.5 at first test day | |% Cows with FPR >1.3/1.5 at first test day | ||
| | |[[File:Image27.png|center|thumb|651x651px]] | ||
|- | |- | ||
|Health | |Health | ||
Line 476: | Line 476: | ||
|% Cows with lameness | |% Cows with lameness | ||
| | |[[File:Image28.png|center|thumb|644x644px]] | ||
|- | |- | ||
|Health | |Health | ||
Line 483: | Line 483: | ||
| rowspan="2" |29 | | rowspan="2" |29 | ||
|% Cows with mastitis | |% Cows with mastitis | ||
| | |[[File:Image29.png|center|thumb|637x637px]] | ||
|- | |- | ||
|Health | |Health | ||
Line 490: | Line 490: | ||
| rowspan="2" |30 | | rowspan="2" |30 | ||
|% Cows with subclinical metabolic issue | |% Cows with subclinical metabolic issue | ||
| | |[[File:Image30.png|center|thumb|643x643px]] | ||
|- | |- | ||
|Health | |Health | ||
Line 497: | Line 497: | ||
| rowspan="2" |31 | | rowspan="2" |31 | ||
|Age at culling (dairy cattle) | |Age at culling (dairy cattle) | ||
| | |[[File:Image31.png|center|thumb|654x654px]] | ||
|- | |- | ||
|Longevity | |Longevity | ||
Line 504: | Line 504: | ||
| rowspan="2" |32 | | rowspan="2" |32 | ||
|Average Daily Production of culled animals | |Average Daily Production of culled animals | ||
| | |[[File:Image32.png|center|thumb|636x636px]] | ||
|- | |- | ||
|Longevity | |Longevity | ||
Line 511: | Line 511: | ||
| rowspan="2" |33 | | rowspan="2" |33 | ||
|Average Lactation Number | |Average Lactation Number | ||
| | |[[File:Image33.png|center|thumb]] | ||
|- | |- | ||
|Longevity | |Longevity | ||
Line 518: | Line 518: | ||
| rowspan="2" |34 | | rowspan="2" |34 | ||
|Average Lifetime Production of culled animals | |Average Lifetime Production of culled animals | ||
| | |[[File:Image34.png|center|thumb|601x601px]] | ||
|- | |- | ||
|Longevity | |Longevity | ||
Line 525: | Line 525: | ||
| rowspan="2" |35 | | rowspan="2" |35 | ||
|% Cows died ≤ 60 days in milk | |% Cows died ≤ 60 days in milk | ||
| | |[[File:Image35.png|center|thumb|737x737px]] | ||
|- | |- | ||
|Longevity | |Longevity | ||
Line 532: | Line 532: | ||
| rowspan="2" |36 | | rowspan="2" |36 | ||
|Age at first calving | |Age at first calving | ||
| | |[[File:Image36.png|center|thumb|611x611px]] | ||
|- | |- | ||
|Young stock | |Young stock | ||
Line 560: | Line 560: | ||
| rowspan="2" |39 | | rowspan="2" |39 | ||
|% Female young stock involuntary culled | |% Female young stock involuntary culled | ||
| | |[[File:Image39.png|center|thumb|697x697px]] | ||
|- | |- | ||
|Young stock | |Young stock | ||
Line 567: | Line 567: | ||
| rowspan="2" |40 | | rowspan="2" |40 | ||
|% Calves born dead | |% Calves born dead | ||
| | |[[File:Image40.png|center|thumb|475x475px]] | ||
|- | |- | ||
|Young stock | |Young stock | ||
Line 577: | Line 577: | ||
|% Female calves with diarrhea | |% Female calves with diarrhea | ||
| | |[[File:Image41.png|center|thumb|742x742px]] | ||
|- | |- | ||
|Young stock | |Young stock | ||
Line 584: | Line 584: | ||
| rowspan="2" |42 | | rowspan="2" |42 | ||
|% Female calves with respiratory diseases | |% Female calves with respiratory diseases | ||
| | |[[File:Image42.png|center|thumb|737x737px]] | ||
|- | |- | ||
|Young stock | |Young stock | ||
Line 591: | Line 591: | ||
| rowspan="2" |43 | | rowspan="2" |43 | ||
|% Mortality of female calves until 90 days | |% Mortality of female calves until 90 days | ||
| | |[[File:Imagelast.png|center|thumb|733x733px]] | ||
|- | |- | ||
|Young stock | |Young stock |
Revision as of 15:42, 14 August 2024
Sustainability recording traits
Introduction to ICAR sustainability traits
The purpose of ICAR sustainability traits is to provide a harmonized approach to assess the sustainability of dairy herds. By providing a common definition of these traits, we encourage organizations that are involved in milk recording, breeding or any other way of data recording in dairy herds to develop tools to support farmers to increase the sustainability of their dairy herd.
The traits have been selected and defined by a group of ICAR related experts. As definition of sustainability itself the group has used the definition provided by the SAI platform (https://saiplatform.org/):
“Sustainable agriculture is the efficient, long-term production of safe, high-quality agricultural product, in a way that protects and improves the natural environment, the social and economic conditions of the farmers, their employees and local communities, and safeguards the health and welfare of all farmed species.”
It is regarded not to be ICAR’s role to standardize the make-up of Sustainability Indices. The weight of the various traits is a matter for the members or countries themselves to decide. Therefore, ICAR does not provide a sustainability index, but lets the user make a choice which traits to include in their own sustainability index. A selection of traits can be used to create an index that fits the data available and the specific circumstances in your organization or your country.
With this list of traits ICAR aims to identify the key traits in recording that effect sustainability, to provide definitions of these key traits and to harmonize measurement methods of these key traits.
ICAR sustainability traits are selected in such a way that they cover the most important aspects of the performance of the herd regarding sustainability. The traits have been defined in a way that they generally reflect data collected over a 365-day period in one herd. Data collected during a one-year period is more stable to influences on animal performance due to geography, seasonal calving, environmental impact related to weather conditions, herd size fluctuations etc.
Definitions of traits might differ according to how the used data is measured. Some traits are based on 365-day counts of the number of cows present in the dairy herd. Other traits are based on snapshot data (for example test-day average days in milk).
The list contains several categories of traits:
- Feeding and production
- Fertility
- Health
- Longevity and culling
- Young stock
The list of sustainability traits can be found below in Table 1 as short list with just the name and category. Different colours are used to distinguish the different categories, these colours have no particular meaning. The list of sustainability traits can also be found in Appendix 1 as detailed list with the definitions of the traits. Appendix 2 of this Section contains prediction equations for feed intake, feed efficiency and methane for Dairy Cattle.
We recommend users of this list of traits to select one or more traits per category and to combine these traits into a sustainability index suitable to their national system. The weight per trait could be determined by each user. The sustainability index could be made available to members of your organization to support the sustainability of their herd or to proof sustainability or product quality to e.g. dairy processors.
Acknowledgements
This document is the work of the ICAR Sustainability Task Force. ICAR gratefully acknowledges their contribution. Members of the ICAR Sustainability Task Force were Tone Roalkvam (Chair, Tine, Norway), Martin Burke (ICAR, the Netherlands), Fabian Bernal (DeLaval, Sweden), Christa Egger-Danner (RinderZucht, Austria), Robert Fourdraine (Dairy Record Management Systems, USA), Birgit Grendl-Gredler (Wageningen University, the Netherlands), René van der Linde (ICAR, the Netherlands) and Débora Santschi (Lactanet, Canada).
List of ICAR sustainability recording traits
Table 1. List of ICAR sustainability recording traits. | ||
---|---|---|
Number | Trait | Category |
1 | Age at slaughter (beef cattle) | Feeding and Production |
2 | Average Days in Milk | Feeding and Production |
3 | Body weight | Feeding and Production |
4 | Daily gain | Feeding and Production |
5 | Dry Matter Intake | Feeding and Production |
6 | Energy Corrected Milk | Feeding and Production |
7 | Feed efficiency | Feeding and Production |
8 | Methane Emissions | Feeding and Production |
9 | MUN /Urea rates in milk | Feeding and Production |
10 | % Cows with functional BCS | Feeding and Production |
11 | Apparent Pregnancy Loss Rate | Fertility |
12 | Average Days Open | Fertility |
13 | Average Calving Interval | Fertility |
14a | Non-Return Rate 56 days | Fertility |
14b | 1st Service Conception Rate | Fertility |
15 | Pregnancy Rate | Fertility |
16 | % Cows culled due to reproductive problems | Fertility |
17 | % Cows with fertility disorders | Fertility |
18 | Average Somatic Cell Count | Health |
19 | Chronic infection rate | Health |
20 | Dry Cow Cure Rate | Health |
21 | Fresh Cow Infection Rate | Health |
22 | Selective Dry Cow Therapy Rate | Health |
23 | % Cows culled due to udder health | Health |
24 | % Cows culled due to lameness | Health |
25 | % Cows culled due to other disorders/diseases | Health |
26 | % Cows with FPR < 1 at first test day | Health |
27 | % Cows with FPR >1.3/1.5 at first test day | Health |
28 | % Cows with lameness | Health |
29 | % Cows with mastitis | Health |
30 | % Cows with subclinical metabolic issue | Health |
31 | Age at culling (dairy cattle) | Longevity |
32 | Average Daily Production of culled animals | Longevity |
33 | Average Lactation Number | Longevity |
34 | Average Lifetime Production of culled animals | Longevity |
35 | % Cows died ≤ 60 days in milk | Longevity |
36 | Age at first calving | Young stock |
37 | Young stock EBV ranking | Young stock |
38 | Young stock sire EBV ranking | Young stock |
39 | % Female young stock involuntary culled | Young stock |
40 | % Calves born dead | Young stock |
41 | % Female calves with diarrhea | Young stock |
42 | % Female calves with respiratory diseases | Young stock |
43 | % Mortality of female calves until 90 days | Young stock |
Appendix 1 : List of definitions of traits to assess sustainability at herd level
The list of sustainability traits can be found below in Table 2 as detailed list with the definitions of the traits. Different colors are used to distinguish the different categories, these colors have no particular meaning.